Jellyfish: The Next King of the Sea
As the world's oceans are degraded, will they be dominated by jellyfish?
- By Abigail Tucker
- Photographs by John Lee
- Smithsonian magazine, July-August 2010, Subscribe
On the night of December 10, 1999, the Philippine island of Luzon, home to the capital, Manila, and some 40 million people, abruptly lost power, sparking fears that a long-rumored military coup d’état was underway. Malls full of Christmas shoppers plunged into darkness. Holiday parties ground to a halt. President Joseph Estrada, meeting with senators at the time, endured a tense ten minutes before a generator restored the lights, while the public remained in the dark until the cause of the crisis was announced, and dealt with, the next day. Disgruntled generals had not engineered the blackout. It was wrought by jellyfish. Some 50 dump trucks’ worth had been sucked into the cooling pipes of a coal-fired power plant, causing a cascading power failure. “Here we are at the dawn of a new millennium, in the age of cyberspace,” fumed an editorial in the Philippine Star, “and we are at the mercy of jellyfish.”
A decade later, the predicament seems only to have worsened. All around the world, jellyfish are behaving badly—reproducing in astonishing numbers and congregating where they’ve supposedly never been seen before. Jellyfish have halted seafloor diamond mining off the coast of Namibia by gumming up sediment-removal systems. Jellies scarf so much food in the Caspian Sea they’re contributing to the commercial extinction of beluga sturgeon—the source of fine caviar. In 2007, mauve stinger jellyfish stung and asphyxiated more than 100,000 farmed salmon off the coast of Ireland as aquaculturists on a boat watched in horror. The jelly swarm reportedly was 35 feet deep and covered ten square miles.
Nightmarish accounts of “Jellyfish Gone Wild,” as a 2008 National Science Foundation report called the phenomenon, stretch from the fjords of Norway to the resorts of Thailand. By clogging cooling equipment, jellies have shut down nuclear power plants in several countries; they partially disabled the aircraft carrier USS Ronald Reagan four years ago. In 2005, jellies struck the Philippines again, this time incapacitating 127 police officers who had waded chest-deep in seawater during a counterterrorism exercise, apparently oblivious to the more imminent threat. (Dozens were hospitalized.) This past fall, a ten-ton fishing trawler off the coast of Japan capsized and sank while hauling in a netful of 450-pound Nomura’s jellies.
The sensation of getting stung ranges from a twinge to tingling to savage agony. Victims include Hudson River triathletes, Ironmen in Australia and kite surfers in Costa Rica. In summertime so many jellies mob the waters of the Mediterranean Sea that it can appear to be blistering, and many bathers’ bodies don’t look much different: in 2006, the Spanish Red Cross treated 19,000 stung swimmers along the Costa Brava. Contact with the deadliest type, a box jellyfish native to northern Australian waters, can stop a person’s heart in three minutes. Jellyfish kill between 20 and 40 people a year in the Philippines alone.
The news media have tried out various names for this new plague: “the jellyfish typhoon,” “the rise of slime,” “the spineless menace.” Nobody knows exactly what’s behind it, but there’s a queasy sense among scientists that jellyfish just might be avengers from the deep, repaying all the insults we’ve heaped on the world’s oceans.
“Jellyfish” is a decidedly unscientific term—the creatures are not fish and are more rubbery than jamlike—but scientists use it all the same (though one I spoke with prefers his own coinage, “gelata”). The word “jellyfish” lumps together two groups of creatures that look similar but are unrelated. The largest group includes the bell-shaped beings that most people envision when they think of jellyfish: the so-called “true jellies” and their kin. The other group consists of comb jellies—ovoid, ghostly creatures that swim by beating their hairlike cilia and attack their prey with gluey appendages instead of stinging tentacles. (Many other gelatinous animals are often referred to as jellyfish, including the Portuguese man-of-war, a colony of stinging animals known as a siphonophore.) All told, there are some 1,500 jellyfish species: blue blubbers, bushy bottoms, fire jellies, jimbles. Cannonballs, sea walnuts. Pink meanies, a.k.a. stinging cauliflowers. Hair jellies, a.k.a. snotties. Purple people eaters.
The bell-shaped jellies—distantly related to corals and anemones—launched their lifestyle long, long ago. Exquisite jellyfish fossils found recently in Utah display reproductive organs, muscle structure and intact tentacles; the jelly fossils, the oldest discovered, date back more than 500 million years, when Utah was a shallow sea. By contrast, fish evolved only about 370 million years ago.
The descendants of those ancient jellies haven’t changed much. They are boneless and bloodless. In their domelike bells, guts are squished beside gonads. The mouth doubles as an anus. (Jellies are also brainless, “so they don’t have to contemplate that,” one jelly specialist says.) Jellies drift at the mercy of the currents, though many also propel themselves by contracting their bells, pushing water out, while others—such as the upside-down jellyfish and the flower hat, with its psychedelic lures—can recline on the seafloor. They absorb oxygen and store it in their jelly. They can sense light and certain chemicals. They can grow quickly when there’s food around and shrink when there isn’t. Their tentacles, which reach up to 100 feet long in some species, are covered with cells called nematocysts that fire tiny poison harpoons, enabling the animals to immobilize krill, larval fish and other prey without risking their mushy bodies in a struggle. Yet if a sea turtle bites off a hunk, the flesh regenerates.
Single Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next »
Subscribe now for more of Smithsonian's coverage on history, science and nature.










Comments (12)
Does anyone know what the niche of a sea nettle is? They don't seem to have any "role" in the environment.
Posted by SamIAm on February 5,2013 | 06:28 PM
no story about jellyfish is compleate with out saying a nylon or licra panty hose suit and pantyhose is helpful in protecting yourself from many jelly fish stings .
Posted by davida on November 10,2012 | 10:44 AM
In the Atlantic, the growth of jellyfish numbers happened in tandem with the overfishing of cod. If we stopped overfishing and let the fish eat the jellyfish, the problem would be solved - and we could have a reliable source of fish, with its abundant harvest properly regulated.
Posted by on November 8,2012 | 02:51 AM
Sir, solar energy is not a reliable source in some places and nuclear energy exceeds in reliability and efficiency and just as dave said "Nuclear energy is clean too." Understand your topic before commenting and making a fool out of yourself. I may be young but even I know that.
Posted by A 6th grader on November 18,2010 | 09:34 PM
I literally laughed when I read about the damage jellyfish are inadvertently inflicting in their role as "mother nature's avengers" against mankind's general unwillingness to try to live in harmony with nature due to greed. It seemed like such poetic justice.
I was (and continually am) disappointed by the continued insistence of the Smithsonian and other media on fingering carbon dioxide as the main culprit in global warming when there are other factors much more powerful, such as the Milankovitch cycle (an entirely natural cycle responsible for the global temperature cycle, among other things, that anthropogenic factors only modify to a degree), water vapor (aka steam) and methane, along with a laundry list of stupid actions performed by humans.
The article was very educational and I learned some new things about jellyfish. The photography was stunning and I loved the "Marine Advisory" sidebar - I just hope people read it! The estimates were slightly conservative for the Arctic and coral reefs, but that's the norm - better to be cautious than embarrassed.
Posted by Glenn McGrew on November 1,2010 | 01:44 AM
I'd like to read more about these creatures.
Posted by Lilly on July 14,2010 | 08:11 PM
After reading about the rise of jellyfish throughout the world's seas and oceans (July/August 2010 40th anniversary issue), I'll be looking forward to buying my jellyfish t-shirt at the Smithsonian gift shop. On the back it will read: Do you not have what it takes? On the front it will read: No Bones, No Blood, No Brain. It will be black with bold images of Stomolophus meleagris and other members of the jellyfish family.
Posted by Joe Shocket on July 14,2010 | 04:19 PM
What extraordinary creatures. They evolved 500 million years ago, and they may be here 500 million years after humankind is gone. Jellyfish should be celebrated as one of our planet’s ultimate survivalists. This article helps illustrate the wonderful complexity of all life on Earth and shows how quickly one group of creatures can step in to fill a void in any ecological niche or niches.
Posted by John Sorrells on July 13,2010 | 07:07 PM
I learned of this article after showing my aunt photos of an unusual sea jelly my daughter and I found washed up on the sands of Hermosa bch, Ca., one morning in mid April of this year. No one I know has ever seen one before. Very fascinating article.
Posted by melissa safady on July 6,2010 | 09:09 PM
"They are still using COAL..."
That's funny, Jim. Oh, you were serious? Did you know that coal is still the primary fuel source almost everywhere - including the US? It still accounts for over 50% of the power production here and 25% world-wide, behind only China at 35%. Wind, solar, and geo-thermal are not worldwide, viable solutions at this point. The only real alternative to coal is nuclear power but I'm assuming you disagree with that too even though it is a clean fuel source ,eh?
Posted by dave on July 6,2010 | 03:58 PM
They wrote: It was wrought by JELLY FISH, Some 50 dump trucks worth has been sucked in the cooling pipes of a COAL FIRED power plant. Here we are at the dawn of a new Millenium,in the age of cyberspace, and we are at the mercy of jellyfish =end quote
What an ironic statement. They are still using COAL to heat precious water to make electricity. This makes tons of pollution ,causes global warmiong and is less than 30% efficient.
In the 21th Centruy I use clean renewable Solar PV power. It uses no water, makes zero pollution and makes the most during the day when we use and need it and shuts off at night. The Phillipines should step up to the New Millenium with Wind, Solar and Geo-Thermal power and leave the Jelly fish and nature alone.
Posted by jim stACk on July 4,2010 | 10:23 AM
http://news.travel.aol.com/2010/06/11/bp-oil-spill-disturbing-images-of-a-disaster/?ncid=AOLCOMMtravsharartl0001&sms_ss=facebook
Posted by Stephen Cecrle on July 3,2010 | 12:17 PM