The Vikings: A Memorable Visit to America
Exploring the New World a thousand years ago, a Viking woman gave birth to what is likely the first European-American baby. The discovery of the house the family built upon their return to Iceland has scholars rethinking the Norse sagas
- By Eugene Linden
- Smithsonian magazine, December 2004, Subscribe
(Page 4 of 5)
Freydis: Heroine or Murderer?
Viking scholars have long debated the veracity of the Icelandic sagas. Are they literature or history.or both? The two conflicting versions of Freydis Eriksdottir, who was Erik the Red.s daughter and the half sister of Leif Eriksson and who traveled to North America 1,000 years ago, are a case in point.
In Erik the Red.s saga, Freydis and her husband Thorvard accompany Thorfinn Karlsefni and Gudrid Thorbjarnardottir on their journey to the New World. When Natives attack their small colony, the Norse men run off. But a pregnant Freydis stands her ground, shouting: .Why do you flee from such pitiful wretches, brave men like you? . . . If I had weapons, I am sure I could fight better than any of you.. She snatches up a sword from a fallen Norseman and exposes a breast (presumably to indicate that she.s a woman), frightening off the attackers. When the danger had passed, Thorfinn .came over to her and praised her courage.
But in the Greenlanders. saga, Freydis is a murderer. Freydis and her husband do not travel with Thorfinn and Gudrid, but instead undertake an expedition with two Icelanders, known as Finnbogi and Helgi. When they arrive in Straumfjord (thought by some scholars to be the site in Newfoundland known as LAnse aux Meadows), they quarrel over who will live in the longhouses Leif Eriksson has left behind. Freydis wins, rousing the Icelanders. resentment. After a hard winter in which the two camps become more estranged, Freydis demands that the Icelanders hand over their larger ship for the journey home. She goads her husband and followers into murdering all the male Icelanders. When no one will kill the five women in the Icelanders . camp, she takes up an ax and dispatches them herself. Back in Greenland, word of the incident seeps out. .Afterwards no one thought anything but ill of her and her husband,. concludes the story of Freydis. expedition.
Was Freydis a heroine? Or a homicidal maniac? Archaeologist Birgitta Linderoth Wallace, who directed much of the excavation of L.Anse aux Meadows, doesn.t know for sure. .We try to sort out what.s fact and fiction,. she says. .We can.t presume the saga writers knew the difference. What we do know is the writers were often anonymous.and male. They were Christian priests. Freydis was a pagan, while Gudrid was Christian. Gudrid .s descendants were bishops and had an interest in making her appear as holy as possible and Freydis as bad as possible, for contrast.. Wallace says the murder of the Icelanders is hard to believe. .Something bad happened,. she says. .But can you imagine killing 35 Icelanders without all their relatives coming over to take revenge?
Why Didn’t They Stay?
The Viking presence in North America had dwindled to nothing long before Columbus began island hopping in the Caribbean. Why did the Norse fail where other Europeans succeeded? After all, Vikings were consummate seamen and peerless raiders who populated marginally inhabitable Greenland and who would push their way into the British Isles and France. And with their iron weapons and tools, they had a technological edge over America.s indigenous peoples.
Several explanations have been advanced for the Vikings. abandonment of North America. Perhaps there were too few of them to sustain a settlement. Or they may have been forced out by American Indians. While the European conquest was abetted by infectious diseases that spread from the invaders to the Natives, who succumbed in great numbers because they had no acquired immunity, early Icelanders may not have carried similar infections.
Single Page « Previous 1 2 3 4 5 Next »
Subscribe now for more of Smithsonian's coverage on history, science and nature.









Comments (21)
+ View All Comments
I think that the Norse probably took a few inuit women from Greenland back to iceland and Norway. Thats how some "East Asian" genes are showing up in iceland.
Posted by Tim on January 11,2013 | 09:03 AM
I'm gonna agree with everyone here and say Demetrius is terribly misinformed and should take a look into a history book next time he decides to make a post. And however I understand that he would like to defend his culture (if you can call it that) in the same way I am currently doing (Vikings are the s#@t) Now not only did the vikings who were apparently "savages" Spread their Culture from as far as Iceland to The Middle East whereas the Spanish got to the South America and had their hearts set that it was india,and to top it all off these "highly civilized" spaniards butchered Countless Native Americans and ruined Several Civilizations which thanks to the spaniards we'll never get to know enough about to piece together how their society worked so yeah Demetrius Spanish are just sooooooo great. >:-(
Posted by ErikYeahlikeaviking on December 3,2012 | 07:59 PM
The abandonment of the settlements on Greenland in the 14th century has intrigued me for some years. That pioneers of this kind should disappear without fighting back somehow seems to be unnatural. Assuming that they were still pioneers leaves us with a few alternatives.
They could go back east to Iceland and Scandinavia, where the Plague had made room for that. Other destinations in Europe not to be forgotten. But why not imagine that these pioneers went further west? They knew the riches they craved were there so I feel convinced that some of them went. Others have suggested the same but have not been able to come up with enough evidence to support their claims.
Just how far did they penetrate into the continent? Modern DNA-testing may be able to help. My idea is not scientific, basically. I am a wooden shipwright and have for some time been wondering if the shape of the indian canoe, which in some areas resemble the norse ships,could help us decide approximately how far they got, assuming that the native boatbuilder would have thought it worthwhile to copy the foreign vessels. How far into the woods am I?
Posted by ole klemme on April 13,2012 | 04:39 AM
Does anyone ever stop to think why northeastern tribes such as the Iraquois Algonquin mohecan and probably most all of the tribes of that region look more european and not mongoloid as western tribes do?
They seem to have prominent straight noses of scandinavians.
HUM JUST THINKING.
Posted by Greg on February 9,2012 | 02:18 PM
Why does it seem that scandinavians are not given credit for being the first modern europeans. The fact they discovered america is one of the most important things to have ever been done by peoples of there time! What would modern history have been with out the viking's explorations trading and interbreeding with most of the world. Just wondering
Posted by on February 9,2012 | 02:01 PM
They didn't find "beach nuts" at LAM. They were butternuts ( also called white walnuts). And BTW they are Beech Trees, not Beach Trees!
Posted by Dick Jorgensen on January 3,2012 | 05:49 PM
"Tom McGovern, an archaeologist at HunterCollege in New York City, has spent more than 20 years reconstructing the demise of a Norse settlement on Greenland. In the middle of the 14th century, the colony suffered eight harsh winters in a row, culminating, in 1355, in what may have been the worst in a century. McGovern says the Norse ate their livestock and dogs before turning to whatever else they could find in their final winter there. The settlers might have survived if they had mimicked the Inuit, who hunted ringed seal in the winter and prospered during the Little Ice Age"
Looks like twenty years of modelling were wasted. Midden heaps from fifteenth century Greenland show the Norse diet was 80% fish in the final years in the final years of their settlement there.
The climate affected the Inuit just as much as the Norse. The Dorset Eskimo were forced into the northernmost reaches of Greenland and Ellesmere Island during the medieval warm period. The Thule migrated there as well and drove the Dorset to extinction with the dog, bow, and toggling harpoon. The Thule themselves were forced out of the northernmost latitudes and below the Arctic circle once the Little Ice Age hit, placing them in competition with the Norse. Perhaps the Norse were doomed from the start, we can't be certain. What is known is that the settlements in Greenland were obsolete once Europe obtained easy access to elephant ivory, endangering the market for walrus ivory, Greenland's only valuable export.
Posted by Ken on October 2,2011 | 06:59 PM
Great helped me on my project
Posted by pizza on January 13,2011 | 05:39 AM
Leaving later (and irrelevant) Europeans aside...
Linden seems to have cloaked the core of this article, the uncovering of a large Viking Age building in Iceland, with a fairly free ranging overview of the problem of matching the three Vinlander's Sagas to possible historic events.
There has long been (massive) debate about just how the tales of the Sagas might match any actual facts. Any modern reader of what are in truth long repeated *stories* needs to be aware that although there may be accurate elements, much is also intended as mere entertainment. On the other hand there is the proven archaeology uncovered in Canada, primarily at L'Anse aux Meadows, but also through the Arctic. That the house remains and small collection of artifacts at L'Anse aux Meadows Newfoundland are Norse in origin is certain.
One obvious flaw in Linden's thesis is that he seems to conclude the building complex at LAM needs to belong to only one of either of Leif or Thorfin. He appears to discard the more obvious interpretation - that the Saga tales actually describe entirely different locations.
That the Norse at LAM did in fact travel down at least to modern day New Brunswick is proven by artifacts. Both beach nuts and beach wood was found at LAM, trees which never grew further north than New Brunswick. People tend to always want to settle in desirable locations - so perhaps Thorfin's houses are sitting, unknown, under the buildings of some modern Canadian town.
Readers should remember that to Leif and the other Norse, *Vinland* was a vast territory, not merely a small exploration camp set on it's doorstep.
Frankly, given the extensive work we all undertook on the fine details on the exhibit 'Vikings - North Atlantic Saga' ( http://www.mnh.si.edu/vikings/start.html ), I do find this offering by Eugene Linden 'a bit shallow'.
Posted by Darrell Markewitz on October 5,2010 | 08:15 AM
i totally agree
Posted by rythm drummer on September 30,2010 | 10:59 AM
Red Feather has it.
Posted by Skáld on September 9,2010 | 11:32 PM
Haha, very good point, Red Feather!
Posted by Aratan "Fire Spirit" on March 26,2010 | 01:49 PM
well..i`m afraid america was already populated thousands of years before both Leiv Eriksson and colombus "discovered" it..so I belive someone dicovered it before any of them really. and they colonized it too :-)
Posted by Red Feather on February 10,2010 | 05:04 PM
Hatred of mankind is an obominous thing. We all need to be more tolerant of each other so that our own cultures do not disappear. Vikings, like native Americans were not savages; they were human beings just like you and I. In fact the Vikings are our ancestors, though their culture has been destroyed their blood still runs through our veins.
Posted by M Binkley on September 20,2009 | 10:55 AM
+ View All Comments