(Page 4 of 5)
Freydis: Heroine or Murderer?
Viking scholars have long debated the veracity of the Icelandic sagas. Are they literature or history.or both? The two conflicting versions of Freydis Eriksdottir, who was Erik the Red.s daughter and the half sister of Leif Eriksson and who traveled to North America 1,000 years ago, are a case in point.
In Erik the Red.s saga, Freydis and her husband Thorvard accompany Thorfinn Karlsefni and Gudrid Thorbjarnardottir on their journey to the New World. When Natives attack their small colony, the Norse men run off. But a pregnant Freydis stands her ground, shouting: .Why do you flee from such pitiful wretches, brave men like you? . . . If I had weapons, I am sure I could fight better than any of you.. She snatches up a sword from a fallen Norseman and exposes a breast (presumably to indicate that she.s a woman), frightening off the attackers. When the danger had passed, Thorfinn .came over to her and praised her courage.
But in the Greenlanders. saga, Freydis is a murderer. Freydis and her husband do not travel with Thorfinn and Gudrid, but instead undertake an expedition with two Icelanders, known as Finnbogi and Helgi. When they arrive in Straumfjord (thought by some scholars to be the site in Newfoundland known as LAnse aux Meadows), they quarrel over who will live in the longhouses Leif Eriksson has left behind. Freydis wins, rousing the Icelanders. resentment. After a hard winter in which the two camps become more estranged, Freydis demands that the Icelanders hand over their larger ship for the journey home. She goads her husband and followers into murdering all the male Icelanders. When no one will kill the five women in the Icelanders . camp, she takes up an ax and dispatches them herself. Back in Greenland, word of the incident seeps out. .Afterwards no one thought anything but ill of her and her husband,. concludes the story of Freydis. expedition.
Was Freydis a heroine? Or a homicidal maniac? Archaeologist Birgitta Linderoth Wallace, who directed much of the excavation of L.Anse aux Meadows, doesn.t know for sure. .We try to sort out what.s fact and fiction,. she says. .We can.t presume the saga writers knew the difference. What we do know is the writers were often anonymous.and male. They were Christian priests. Freydis was a pagan, while Gudrid was Christian. Gudrid .s descendants were bishops and had an interest in making her appear as holy as possible and Freydis as bad as possible, for contrast.. Wallace says the murder of the Icelanders is hard to believe. .Something bad happened,. she says. .But can you imagine killing 35 Icelanders without all their relatives coming over to take revenge?
Why Didn’t They Stay?
The Viking presence in North America had dwindled to nothing long before Columbus began island hopping in the Caribbean. Why did the Norse fail where other Europeans succeeded? After all, Vikings were consummate seamen and peerless raiders who populated marginally inhabitable Greenland and who would push their way into the British Isles and France. And with their iron weapons and tools, they had a technological edge over America.s indigenous peoples.
Several explanations have been advanced for the Vikings. abandonment of North America. Perhaps there were too few of them to sustain a settlement. Or they may have been forced out by American Indians. While the European conquest was abetted by infectious diseases that spread from the invaders to the Natives, who succumbed in great numbers because they had no acquired immunity, early Icelanders may not have carried similar infections.



Comments
Im sorry to break up this fairy tale story but north america,central america,as well as south america and many more territory's are speaking spanish to this very day.And this is becuase the spanish are world renoune sea faring people,as well as conquerors,1000 of years fighting the muslims,and even before that remember who the romans were? take a western civ class the spanish were there best generals, as well as emperor ,Hadrian. I could go on but i will sum up that the norse were nothing more than savages, the vikings could never colonize a snow ball fight.History does not like to reconize that the spanish gave the indians in the new world horses and religion, but i know one thing that is certain what i comment is not fiction it is true,factual to 100% not opinion. SO those red heads up in new england sorry to say came off a boat and a journey that was made possible by the spanish 100 years before the bought there tickets.
Posted by Demetrius Rodriguez on March 2,2008 | 06:38 AM
Were to start Mrs. Rodriguez? You are not 100% right or factual. The Vikings , they are Northern Europeans or Norse, as you call them is not a name of a people but a adjective- to go a Vikining meant to go exploring, colonizing, trading, etc... Although the Spaniards were great people worthy of great praise at times, they were alsosavages brutal in south America and other places and were blood thirsty for gold.Also mostly all European and Also asian countries fought the Muslims, all the way from the Greeks fighting the Persian Empire, the Crusaders Knights Hospitaller/Tuetonic Knights /Knights Templar etc...,to the European nations during WW1 ( Ottoman Empire ring a bell) also Spain has a large Muslim population. The Norse people of Northern Europe founded Iceland, Greenland had some of the most earliest legal systems, The Thing or Allthing,Were some of the worlds finest craftsmen, explorers, traders, seafarers, merchants, mercanaries for the Byzantine empire, poets and had a religion although not X-tian, also they created aform of writing called the Runes. I would have to write a whole dissertation to show how absurd your statement was. Yours was not the truth I suggest do some research before claiming something as fact when posting on a prestigous Scientific magazine. I am very happy to see this article and many others written in this fine magazine.I suggest a article on early Celtic Christianity also
Posted by Albie A Gogel on June 26,2008 | 06:37 AM
I really think Demetrius needs to take another look at Spanish History, That of both the Iberian Peninsula as well as the Americas, That possibly his own surname from Rodrigo,is of Viking or Sueve origin,that held sway in Spain. Also, everyone knows the Spanish "religion" imposed on native populations, was a brutality that caused the extinction of Taino and other tribes in the Caribe, after the enslavement, and diseases introduced by the Spanish in Central and South America,for the sole purpose to extract gold for it's cathedrals and fill the coffers of their regents. And if the current state of "Hispanic Culture" in the New World is any barometer of civilisation- I would rather live in Scandinavia any day !!!
Posted by E.J. Quinn on June 26,2008 | 11:11 AM
Demetrius, I'm sorry you feel attacked, but this article did not say anything derogatory about Spanish explorers or Spanish speakers. It shared some insights about the exploits of some Vikings who arrived in America (and eventually left--due, most likely to climate change) almost 500 years before an Italian explorer persuaded the monarchs of Spain (descendants of Visigoths--read Viking cousins) to back his expedition to the "Indies". Y te digo estas cosas no para decirte nada mala, sino para mostrarte que no hay porque sentirte enojado cuando estas leyendo de la historia ajena.
Posted by George Johnson on June 26,2008 | 07:02 PM
I love it when people with so little knowledge froth at the mouth. The only reason the Spanish ever amounted to ANYthing was because of the Moors and Jews, whom the kicked out in 1492. After that, Spain has only been a nation of bloody-handed seagoing plunderers and genocidal murderers who were not smart enough to keep from squandering all they stole on squabbling with the English (hey, Demitrius, can you say "Spanish Armada?" twice?). What they didn't spend on wars they gave to Rome. Not exactly a culture of geniuses. There has never been anything called "Spanish" culture. Anything that has ever been labeled "Spanish" that is cultural is because of the Moorish & Jewish influences. For all they stole, they have remained the most culturally and economically backward country in Europe! Anyone with enough intelligence to question the repressiveness of the Spanish system ended up in the clutches of Torquemada! And how about Columbus? He wasn't even a Spaniard, he was an Italian! So...the culmination of Spanish ...uh...culture...in the 20th century was the fascist regime of Franco? Compare what the Scandinavian nations are today to what Spain is today. Sure, a lot of people speak Spanish because they were seafarers, that is undeniable. But Viking culture has spread to and been in absorbed into virtually ALL of Europe (even Spain throught the visigoths as has been pointed out), through the Mediterranean, into italy, Russia (the "Russ" whom Russia was named after were Vikings) and so on. In the words of Bugs Bunny, "what a maroon."
Posted by Ellis D. Tripp on July 2,2008 | 03:33 PM
The Norsemen were quite late in the game of Europeans finding, using the resources found it North & Central America. Why not read the evidence in both of Professor Barry Fell's books, "America, B.C." and "Saga, America". Then increase your knowledge a bit more by reading of the findings of Gloria Farley in her book, "In Plain Sight". The musems where the findings of artifacts from the American B.C. period of history, unearthed, preserved & presented for inquisitive eyes are listed in all three books.By all means make an effort to read these outstanding non fiction books.
Posted by Will D. Sinclair on July 26,2008 | 11:46 AM
To Will Sinclair: I have been studying and documenting sites in Colorado, US, since meeting Bill McGlone, Gloria Farley and companies in the field in 1988. There is incredible evidence, (i.e. glyphs marking equinox, cross-quarter days, etc., most with some form of significant Celtic Ogham) of incursions of Western Europeans into the Americas before the Vikings. Farley translated the Heavner Runestone in Oklahoma as Viking: http://www2.privatei.com/~bartjean/mainpage.htm I have located star charts and ship petroglyphs, filmed equinox shadow plays in caves, even Mithriams http://onter.net/story.html As Farley explains, the evidence is "In Plain Sight". Scott Monahan currently offers the best documentation: http://onter.net/story.html There is now DNA evidence of Europeans in theAmerica's N.E. dating beyond 13,000 years. I will be back in the field this fall continuing my own amatuer documentation with the goal of local presentations in Colorado. The sites are under threat of military training ground expansion and I will do my part to record what I can ... for posterity ... Truth? The evidence is on the rocks. I'm surprised there are no articles in the Smithsonian on the subject, and taken back by the resistance of the archaeological community to such theory. Archaeology should be a science, not a dogma. Douglas Young
Posted by Douglas Young on July 28,2008 | 11:02 AM
This is viking history that is proven: The vikings of norway who invented the viking boat ( today known as the most solid boat built and as fast as modern sailboats today). These vikings went over to Iceland from norway. From Iceland to greenland (some of them). As they were exploring they came to north america 400-500 years before columbus discovered central america. Thats right: columbus discovered central america and leif Eriksson discovered north america. This is not a theory - it's a fact that is accepted in Europa and north america. I read about spanish ppl in here and north america hehe, sorry but nomatter how many spanish speaking ppl that exists in north america , it doesn't change proven history. the fact of the first born white child born in north america was from Norway/Iceland , and that the first viking walked this land 500 years before columbus is part of our viking history in scandinavia. One spanish guy in here is talking about vikings as savages. That is right they were. But vikings were good craftsmen and tacticians during war and occupation. You can't just be a pure "monkey savage" to have as great success as the vikings had. I actually think spanish talking ppl should see the film by Mel gibson about spanish occupation of central and south americas. No, not savage at all ;)
Posted by kristianviking on January 17,2009 | 07:01 AM
Hatred of mankind is an obominous thing. We all need to be more tolerant of each other so that our own cultures do not disappear. Vikings, like native Americans were not savages; they were human beings just like you and I. In fact the Vikings are our ancestors, though their culture has been destroyed their blood still runs through our veins.
Posted by M Binkley on September 20,2009 | 10:55 AM