Tattoos
The Ancient and Mysterious History
- By Cate Lineberry
- Smithsonian.com, January 01, 2007, Subscribe
(Page 4 of 6)
Can you describe the tattoos used in other ancient cultures and how they differ?
Among the numerous ancient cultures who appear to have used tattooing as a permanent form of body adornment, the Nubians to the south of Egypt are known to have used tattoos. The mummified remains of women of the indigenous C-group culture found in cemeteries near Kubban c. 2000-15000 B.C. were found to have blue tattoos, which in at least one case featured the same arrangement of dots across the abdomen noted on the aforementioned female mummies from Deir el-Bahari. The ancient Egyptians also represented the male leaders of the Libyan neighbors c. 1300-1100 B.C. with clear, rather geometrical tattoo marks on their arms and legs and portrayed them in Egyptian tomb, temple and palace scenes.
The Scythian Pazyryk of the Altai Mountain region were another ancient culture which employed tattoos. In 1948, the 2,400 year old body of a Scythian male was discovered preserved in ice in Siberia, his limbs and torso covered in ornate tattoos of mythical animals. Then, in 1993, a woman with tattoos, again of mythical creatures on her shoulders, wrists and thumb and of similar date, was found in a tomb in Altai. The practice is also confirmed by the Greek writer Herodotus c. 450 B.C., who stated that amongst the Scythians and Thracians "tattoos were a mark of nobility, and not to have them was testimony of low birth.”
Accounts of the ancient Britons likewise suggest they too were tattooed as a mark of high status, and with "divers shapes of beasts" tattooed on their bodies, the Romans named one northern tribe "Picti," literally "the painted people."
Yet amongst the Greeks and Romans, the use of tattoos or "stigmata" as they were then called, seems to have been largely used as a means to mark someone as "belonging" either to a religious sect or to an owner in the case of slaves or even as a punitive measure to mark them as criminals. It is therefore quite intriguing that during Ptolemaic times when a dynasty of Macedonian Greek monarchs ruled Egypt, the pharaoh himself, Ptolemy IV (221-205 B.C.), was said to have been tattooed with ivy leaves to symbolize his devotion to Dionysus, Greek god of wine and the patron deity of the royal house at that time. The fashion was also adopted by Roman soldiers and spread across the Roman Empire until the emergence of Christianity, when tattoos were felt to "disfigure that made in God's image" and so were banned by the Emperor Constantine (A.D. 306-373).
We have also examined tattoos on mummified remains of some of the ancient pre-Columbian cultures of Peru and Chile, which often replicate the same highly ornate images of stylized animals and a wide variety of symbols found in their textile and pottery designs. One stunning female figurine of the Naszca culture has what appears to be a huge tattoo right around her lower torso, stretching across her abdomen and extending down to her genitalia and, presumably, once again alluding to the regions associated with birth. Then on the mummified remains which have survived, the tattoos were noted on torsos, limbs, hands, the fingers and thumbs, and sometimes facial tattooing was practiced.
With extensive facial and body tattooing used among Native Americans, such as the Cree, the mummified bodies of a group of six Greenland Inuit women c. A.D. 1475 also revealed evidence for facial tattooing. Infrared examination revealed that five of the women had been tattooed in a line extending over the eyebrows, along the cheeks and in some cases with a series of lines on the chin. Another tattooed female mummy, dated 1,000 years earlier, was also found on St. Lawrence Island in the Bering Sea, her tattoos of dots, lines and hearts confined to the arms and hands.
Single Page « Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next »
Subscribe now for more of Smithsonian's coverage on history, science and nature.









Comments (131)
+ View All Comments
Interesting article, but not very scientifically written, as the person uses personal opinions rather than scientific findings, guess he is trying to be politically correct!!!!
Posted by on April 28,2013 | 05:50 PM
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/magazine-19628418 Re your paragraph ending "the practice was apparently continued as recently as the 1970s." It still continues to this day.
Posted by Emma on February 14,2013 | 09:53 PM
If there is no God then explain the giraffe and bombardier beetle. Don't know of what I "speak"? Find out why they could not have "evolved" to their present state. They had to be specially created.
Posted by The real earnesto on February 6,2013 | 01:02 AM
this article was very informative for me i was so shocked how you can still see the tattoos on the face thank you for writing this!!!!!
Posted by emily on October 25,2012 | 01:52 PM
i am a christian. and i have tattoos. and my god loves me just the way i am.
Posted by Cait on July 10,2012 | 11:48 AM
Whatever thats a scar or tattoo on our body, body is body, and body must go back to dusk. Body is like a carrier of a spirit being, to enable the spirit being to carry out physical works. The ost important we need to concentrate on is the MIND OR SOUL, OR SPIRIT, They re the same. I dont have tatoos but i know of tatoos draw with powerful powder, for many reasons basically on spiritual protections and spiritual guardian.
Posted by on May 4,2012 | 07:25 AM
I have a question to those Bible goers out there. So I've been doing some research to see if there is any truth to what you say about teh bible verus saying yoiu shall not tattoo yourself. Could someone explain to me how the word "Tattoo" could be a part of the bible if it didn't come into play until 1769? Because I've looked an the only bibles that says tattoo is that of those after that date. Funny huh? Further more, I looked at the older versions too, I read an read just to realise that Constanie the king of Romans had a debate on what would actually be apart of the bible. Oh my right? The Bible is supposed to be pure right? How can it be pure when it was made by man? I'm Christian well Prodostant the oldest of old. I'm just cursious how to take the Bible seriously if it's man made.
Posted by Shae on March 8,2012 | 07:00 PM
IM WRITING AN ESSAY ON THIS MATTER.....I FIND IT STUPID THAT PEOPLE THAT HAVE TATTOS GET FIRED OR CANT GET JOBS FOR IT!!!!IT JUST ART,,A WAY TO NONVIOLENT WAY TO EXPRESS YOUR SELF.I AM A CHIRSTIAN(PENTECOSTAL)AND THEY DONT APPROVE OF IT...BUT IM COOL..I WANT TO TAT MYSELF ONE DAY.....WITH MY FAVORITE BIBBLE VERSE,,,,SO PEOPLE..JUST SHUT UP AND GO ON WITH YOUR LIFE INSTEAD OF DISCRIMINATING OTHARS FOR THE WAY THEY LOOK!>,<
Posted by ALEX on March 3,2012 | 04:03 PM
Just curious about the woman who's hand was tattooed Do they have the entire body in the museum or just the hand
Posted by Kathy on February 15,2012 | 01:21 PM
I am a christian myself I have read the bible and I have tattoos. Most of which point out parts of my faith. Showing my faith has made me strong helped me survive the things that would have killed any person. Yes Ive had other so called christians put me down for getting them and judge me. But as I have said before and I will keep saying in refence to the body being the temple of God. They paint churches dont they?
Posted by Richard Soulliere on February 8,2012 | 08:57 PM
I am not only saddened by put almost sickened by some of the ridiculous and quite asinine comments about tattoos. From a religious stand point I think the arguing against tattooing has no foundation. The idea behind Leviticus 19:28 had nothing to do with the act and everything to do with purpose. In that time the commandments were written for the Israelites, who had spent hundreds of years in Egypt.
Egypt was a polytheistic nation. They worship different gods and performed ceremonies and rituals to these gods. The idea is to not mimic religious practices or worship Egyptian gods. This is more indicative that the practice of tattooing was very spiritualistic to the Egyptians and has little to do with art.ç In that time the commandments were written for a large populous of uneducated and easily influence people. It is speculated that the Isrealites spent their time in Egypt so that no one who went to live their under Joseph would leave. This means that the ones who left were all slaves born in Egypt, and knew nothing of the outside world. Or very little at the least.ç Tattoos are simply art. There is little actual religious purpose or meaning to them now. The idea that they go against God is so ignorant, it proves that religion is simply a means of control. How pray tell does a picture of my dog on my shoulder or butterfly on the ankle affect ones soul? It doesn't religion; Christianity especially needs to get out of the mid evil ages. There are no lords ruling small provinces and solitary rule is considered primitive. We live in a time of elected leaders and governing of the people by representatives not bloodlines and tyrants. (for the most part) The symbolism and wording were to relate information in a way the people of that time could understand.
Posted by Angry Steve on January 21,2012 | 06:36 PM
god or no god. people can do what they want. free-will. and if there is a god he should be able to forgive us for putting art on our body.end of story. and people have been tattooing themselves for thousands of years. years before the bible was ever created mind you........and @someone whos opinion counts......wow. just wow. u need to keep your fingertips off the keyboard. TATTOOS ARE THE PAST PRESENT AND FUTURE. WHETHER YOU LIKE IT OR NOT. why dont you complain about something that really matters people and quit discriminating!!!! GEEZ this is why us humans will never grow, because you wanna spread this kind of thinking around like a disease and infect it in childrens minds thinking that its wrong or trash. I grew up around it, observing it, and i didnt turn into a murderer or anything of the sort. IT IS ART! GROW UP!
Posted by breanna on January 7,2012 | 05:47 PM
i'm sorry to post this but for all those who say tattoos are wrong, you need to fully understand the passage in leviticus...but if you honestly want to it to be taken as literal as you post it then im sorry but did you have any scars? any accidents from you childhood. did you ever get a paper cut? all those are marks placed on your skin, and would classify as "Place No Engraved Image Upon Thyself." well then if you believe that we took the apple and can now think for ourselve then we have to know that even a tiny wound is now classified as against God... so now where do we stand, all we can do is beg for forgiveness, and for all those who say its a comandment it may be but its not Part of the 10 unforgivable commandments.... so im sorry to say but God will forgive you for a tattoo.... AT least if you have a common understanding and some theological mindset you will be able to figure that out
Posted by arin on December 8,2011 | 06:50 PM
You could likewise argue that same biblical passage--quoted by Terry Castle below--prohibits ear piercings and circumcision. How about Leviticus 21:5? Do you cut your hair? There are other prohibitions throughout the Bible. Do you eat pork?
Posted by Bob on November 16,2011 | 01:55 PM
+ View All Comments