Star-Spangled Banner Back on Display
After a decade’s conservation, the flag that inspired the National Anthem returns to its place of honor on the National Mall
- By Robert M. Poole
- Smithsonian magazine, November 2008, Subscribe
Long before it flew to the moon, waved over the White House or was folded into tight triangles at Arlington National Cemetery; before it sparked fiery Congressional debates, reached the North Pole or the summit of Mount Everest; before it became a lapel fixture, testified to the Marines' possession of Iwo Jima, or fluttered over front porches, firetrucks and construction cranes; before it inspired a national anthem or recruiting posters for two world wars, the American ensign was just a flag.
"There was nothing special about it," says Scott S. Sheads, historian at Baltimore's Fort McHenry National Monument and Historic Shrine, speaking of a time when a new nation was struggling for survival and groping toward a collective identity. That all changed in 1813, when one enormous flag, pieced together on the floor of a Baltimore brewery, was first hoisted over the federal garrison at Fort McHenry. In time the banner would take on larger meaning, set on a path to glory by a young lawyer named Francis Scott Key, passing into one family's private possession and emerging as a public treasure.
Succeeding generations loved and honored the Stars and Stripes, but this flag in particular provided a unique connection to the national narrative. Once it was moved to the Smithsonian Institution in 1907, it remained on almost continuous display. After almost 200 years of service, the flag had slowly deteriorated almost to the point of no return. Removed from exhibit in 1998 for a conservation project that cost about $7 million, the Star-Spangled Banner, as it had become known, returns to center stage this month with the reopening of the renovated National Museum of American History on the National Mall in Washington, D.C.
Its long journey from obscurity began on a blazing July day in 1813, when Mary Pickersgill, a hardworking widow known as one of the best flag makers in Baltimore, received a rush order from Maj. George Armistead. Newly installed as commander of Fort McHenry, the 33-year-old officer wanted an enormous banner, 30 by 42 feet, to be flown over the federal garrison guarding the entrance to Baltimore's waterfront.
There was some urgency to Armistead's request. The United States had declared war in June 1812 to settle its disputed northern and western borders and stop the British from impressing American seamen; the British, annoyed by American privateering against their merchant ships, readily took up the challenge. As the summer of 1813 unfolded, the enemies were trading blows across the Canadian border. Then British war vessels appeared in the Chesapeake Bay, menacing shipping, destroying local batteries and burning buildings up and down the estuary. As Baltimore prepared for war, Armistead ordered his big new flag—one the British would be able to see from miles away. It would signal that the fort was occupied and prepared to defend the harbor.
Pickersgill got right to work. With her daughter Caroline and others, she wrestled more than 300 yards of English worsted wool bunting to the floor of Claggett's brewery, the only space in her East Baltimore neighborhood large enough to accommodate the project, and started measuring, snipping and fitting.
To make the flag's stripes, she overlapped and stitched eight strips of red wool and alternated them with seven strips of undyed white wool. While the bunting was manufactured in 18-inch widths, the stripes in her design were each two feet wide, so she had to splice in an extra six inches all the way across. She did it so smoothly that the completed product would look like a finished whole—and not like the massive patchwork it was. A rectangle of deep blue, about 16 by 21 feet, formed the flag's canton, or upper left quarter. Sitting on the brewery floor, she stitched a scattering of five-pointed stars into the canton. Each one, fashioned from white cotton, was almost two feet across. Then she turned the flag over and snipped out blue material from the backs of the stars, tightly binding the edges; this made the stars visible from either side.
"My mother worked many nights until 12 o'clock to complete it in the given time," Caroline Pickersgill Purdy recalled years later. By mid-August, the work was done—a supersize version of the Stars and Stripes. Unlike the 13-star ensign first authorized by Congress on June 14, 1777, this one had 15 stars to go with the 15 stripes, acknowledging the Union's latest additions, Vermont and Kentucky.
Mary Pickersgill delivered the finished flag on August 19, 1813, along with a junior version. The smaller flag, 17 by 25 feet, was to be flown in inclement weather, saving wear and tear on the more expensive one, not to mention the men who hoisted the unwieldy monster up the flagpole.
The government paid $405.90 for the big flag, $168.54 for the storm version (roughly $5,500 and $2,300, respectively, in today's currency). For a widow who had to make her own way, Pickersgill lived well, eventually buying a brick house on East Pratt Street, supporting her mother and daughter there and furnishing the place with luxuries such as floor coverings of painted sailcloth.
"Baltimore was a very good place to have a flag business," says Jean Ehmann, a guide who shows visitors around the Pickersgill house, now a National Historic Landmark known as the Star-Spangled Banner Flag House. "Ships were coming and going from around the world. All of them needed flags—company flags, signal flags, country flags."
There is no record of when Armistead's men first raised their new colors over Fort McHenry, but they likely did so as soon as Pickersgill delivered them: a sizable British flotilla had just appeared on Baltimore's doorstep, sailing into the mouth of the Patapsco River on August 8. The city braced itself, but after the enemies eyed each other for several days, the British weighed anchor and melted into the haze. They had surveyed the region's sketchy defenses and concluded that Washington, Baltimore and environs would be ripe for attack when springtime opened a new season of war in 1814.
That season looked like a disaster in the making for the Americans. When summer arrived in Canada, so did 14,000 British combatants ready to invade the United States across Lake Champlain. On the Chesapeake, 50 British warships under Vice Adm. Sir Alexander Cochrane headed for Washington, where, in August 1814, the invaders burned the presidential mansion, the Capitol and other public buildings. The British then headed for Baltimore, in part to punish the city's privateers, who had captured or burned 500 British ships since hostilities erupted two years before.
After maneuvering their ships into position and testing the range of their guns, the British opened the main assault on Baltimore on September 13. Five bomb ships led the way, lobbing 190-pound shells into Fort McHenry and unleashing rockets with exploding warheads. The fort answered—but with little effect. "We immediately opened Our Batteries and Kept up a brisk fire from Our Guns and Mortars," Major Armistead reported, "but unfortunately our Shot and Shells all fell considerably Short." The British kept up a thunderous barrage throughout the 13th and into the predawn hours of the 14th.
During the 25-hour battle, says historian Sheads, the British unleashed about 133 tons of shells, raining bombs and rockets on the fort at the rate of one projectile per minute. The thunder they produced shook Baltimore to its foundations and was heard as far away as Philadelphia. Hugging walls and taking the hits wore on the defenders. "We were like pigeons tied by the legs to be shot at," recalled Judge Joseph H. Nicholson, an artillery commander within the fort. Capt. Frederick Evans looked up to see a shell the size of a flour barrel screaming toward him. It failed to explode. Evans noticed handwritten on its side: "A present from the King of England."
Despite the din and the occasional hits, the Americans sustained few casualties—four out of a thousand were killed, 24 wounded—as the fort's aggressive gunnery kept the British at arm's length.
After a furious thunderstorm broke over Baltimore about 2 p.m. on September 13, the storm flag was likely hoisted in place of its larger sibling, although official descriptions of the battle mention neither. After all, says Sheads, it was "just an ordinary garrison flag."
Subscribe now for more of Smithsonian's coverage on history, science and nature.









Comments (24)
+ View All Comments
Wow that is really cool because I want to learn more. About it,,,,,
Posted by Runderhill on May 10,2012 | 11:12 AM
wow it is so so so so old
Posted by on April 25,2012 | 06:50 PM
the topic was good and inpresing i enjoyed it so much thank u for the view
Posted by sheila dithate on February 24,2012 | 04:01 AM
I brought my boys to DC from Phoenix, I was thrilled to see the flag back on display today (flag day) Thank you for this great article.
Posted by Kerrykenney on June 14,2011 | 11:43 PM
I visited the museum 7 years ago and will be going back again in two weeks. I was mesmerized at what I saw, that beautiful flag looking so fragile and to know what it has gone through and what it symbolized. I'm proud to be an American.
Posted by Gloria Zielinski on July 26,2010 | 08:39 PM
it should totally have a timeline in here so we dont have to look at it
Posted by Anissa Henry on February 23,2010 | 01:09 PM
I found what appears to be very very old copy of the Star Spangled Banner. It was behind a picture frame that I bought from a very old estate in Winter Haven Florida...
It is crumbling and very fragile....Very dark....May be a lithograph copy...Many of them were printed ....but how old is it and why was it hidden behind a picture frame that owned by a Navy Admiral that was a friend of Francis Scott Key's....
HELP!!!!!
phillip.millner@earthlink.net
Posted by Phil Millner on July 24,2009 | 06:42 PM
In the late 1990's i aquired, I blieve a lithograph 1907, and a certificate from the Francis Scott Key Association.
I have alway tried to find info on them. Today, I found a one of the certificates on-line for sale, $199.95
Both, art and certificate (1908) I gave to my son when he returned from Iraq (2006). He is currently in Germany and the items are in storage; therefore I may no tbe able to get more info until he returns home July. They have the same persons name of membership on both pieces. do you have any info on the portrait.
Thank you
Posted by Sharon Staub-Minor on June 21,2009 | 09:57 AM
who took the missing piece from the flag
Posted by sarah on May 5,2009 | 04:09 PM
Does anyone know the history of or why there are eight flags behind the President when he makes speeches?
Posted by Vincent Knight on February 19,2009 | 10:26 AM
this is cool. i like the history about this pce!
Posted by tiffany on January 26,2009 | 12:23 PM
The 2 flags for Ft. McHenry were ordered in 1813. Why did the flag maker use the 15 stars and stripes version? TN had come into the Union in 1796. OH was admitted in 1803 and LA in 1812. If Congress had authorized the 15 stars and stripes flag, surely it did so prior to 1796. Did Congress not act again on the flag until after the War of 1812? So why does the Star Spangled Banner have 15 stars and stripes?
Posted by Donald White on January 11,2009 | 04:30 PM
It is truly a honor and a priviledge to stand in the presence of this piece of American History. People that don't understand what this Flag (or any other American Flag) represents need only to stand in its presence and ponder its history. Our Flag is a very expensive piece of cloth. Those that have served in the United States Military understand what I mean. "Freedom Isn't Free".
Posted by Tom Moore on November 26,2008 | 03:08 PM
I am thrilled as an American to know that this original symbol of our great country has been been preserved for all time. I do wish to say that the preservation was only able to take place because of the magnanimous donation of 13 million dollars by Ralph Loren. It was by a drive spear-headed by Senator Hillary Clinton. I think this should have noted in this article, otherwise, there would have been no article to write. More importantly, without Mr. Loren's generous help, we would have lost one of our greatest treasures. Kind Regards, M Beth O'Malia
Posted by Mary E O'Malia on November 21,2008 | 05:05 PM
+ View All Comments