Gobekli Tepe: The World’s First Temple?
Predating Stonehenge by 6,000 years, Turkey's stunning Gobekli Tepe upends the conventional view of the rise of civilization
- By Andrew Curry
- Photographs by Berthold Steinhilber
- Smithsonian magazine, November 2008, Subscribe
(Page 3 of 3)
"There's more time between Gobekli Tepe and the Sumerian clay tablets [etched in 3300 B.C.] than from Sumer to today," says Gary Rollefson, an archaeologist at Whitman College in Walla Walla, Washington, who is familiar with Schmidt's work. "Trying to pick out symbolism from prehistoric context is an exercise in futility."
Still, archaeologists have their theories—evidence, perhaps, of the irresistible human urge to explain the unexplainable. The surprising lack of evidence that people lived right there, researchers say, argues against its use as a settlement or even a place where, for instance, clan leaders gathered. Hodder is fascinated that Gobekli Tepe's pillar carvings are dominated not by edible prey like deer and cattle but by menacing creatures such as lions, spiders, snakes and scorpions. "It's a scary, fantastic world of nasty-looking beasts," he muses. While later cultures were more concerned with farming and fertility, he suggests, perhaps these hunters were trying to master their fears by building this complex, which is a good distance from where they lived.
Danielle Stordeur, an archaeologist at the National Center for Scientific Research in France, emphasizes the significance of the vulture carvings. Some cultures have long believed the high-flying carrion birds transported the flesh of the dead up to the heavens. Stordeur has found similar symbols at sites from the same era as Gobekli Tepe just 50 miles away in Syria. "You can really see it's the same culture," she says. "All the most important symbols are the same."
For his part, Schmidt is certain the secret is right beneath his feet. Over the years, his team has found fragments of human bone in the layers of dirt that filled the complex. Deep test pits have shown that the floors of the rings are made of hardened limestone. Schmidt is betting that beneath the floors he'll find the structures' true purpose: a final resting place for a society of hunters.
Perhaps, Schmidt says, the site was a burial ground or the center of a death cult, the dead laid out on the hillside among the stylized gods and spirits of the afterlife. If so, Gobekli Tepe's location was no accident. "From here the dead are looking out at the ideal view," Schmidt says as the sun casts long shadows over the half-buried pillars. "They're looking out over a hunter's dream."
Andrew Curry, who is based in Berlin, wrote the July cover story about Vikings.
Berthold Steinhilber's hauntingly lighted award-winning photograhs of American ghost towns appeared in Smithsonian in May 2001.
Subscribe now for more of Smithsonian's coverage on history, science and nature.
Related topics: Archaeology Rituals and Traditions Neolithic Turkey Places of Worship
Additional Sources
"Seeking the Roots of Ritual" by Andrew Curry, Science, January 18, 2008






Comments (548)
+ View All Comments
Soooooo cool
Posted by Johnnie on February 8,2013 | 07:28 AM
Super fine! Love to hear more as work continues
Posted by Christiana Powell on January 29,2013 | 08:36 PM
".. unlike in the case of crude and dissimilar massive ancient relics (e.g. huge statues, beams and columns etc.) carved out of stone long ago in other places by using clumsy, brittle and easily breakable, often blunt and difficult to handle stone tools, the nearly identically shaped and sculpted multiple massive stone pillars etc.(with right-angled sharp edges and uniformly flat surfaces) at GT (Figure 1) strongly point to the use of considerably stronger, harder, sharper and easy to handle metallic tools which became available only after the advent of metallic age about 6000 years ago or after 4000 BC." http://creative.sulekha.com//questions-and-comments-on-the-study-of-ancient-sites-and-cultures_597851_blog
Posted by Dr. Subhash C. Sharma on January 28,2013 | 09:32 AM
As is well known, women are important sources of inspiration in sculpture, architecture and other arts. Quite possibly, this is because these ideas arise from among images which are communicated to them by men during sexual intercourse.
Posted by Michael on January 28,2013 | 08:56 AM
not in entire worlu, before B.C cunstruct so maney temples in india
Posted by sundar on January 27,2013 | 01:55 PM
I would like to see how they came up with the 11000 years old figure. its obvious we didn't come from apes that is just ridiculous imaginative propaganda based on biased assumptions, anyone who dares to explore deeper can figure that one out. And atom dating is very inconsistent since it is based on assumption that evolution is true. So i think it would be a great trend for these kind of articles to start explaining in short how they got the dates that they claim so factually, after all most artifacts don't come with a "made in china at this date" type of inscription on it.
Posted by Robert on January 24,2013 | 01:04 PM
This theory with our rather primitive ancestors that built megalithic structures seem by every discovery we make more and more hilarious. We will soon come to say that apes knew how to construct them:). Now it's only to the level of hunter-gatherers. I don't see other possibility than some aliens were on this planet. Others would give room to the theory of some ancient human advanced civilization that somehow perished. But I don't see how it would be possible. Because we discovered many megalithic structures but no sign of advanced technology. Would be reasonable to think that who had the technology took it with them. Again only ET. Otherwise would be found on Earth.
Posted by John Doe on January 10,2013 | 04:34 AM
Briefly compared to Stonehenge at the beginning of this article, it didn' mention whether researchers had persued Gobekli Tepe's astromical relevance. It seems each ancient "temple" site of this magnitude thus far discovered has been an astronomical clock of sorts, and I wonder what the astronomical significance of this site is? Perhaps the carvings relate to an ancient cosmology identified by these people and the celestial positions and/or periods are plotted on or with these stones. Stonehenge was a work in process for centuries, starting with wood structures gradually superceded by stoneworks. This site may perhaps be the same, with layers of stonework plotting a developing cosmology and/or religion. Computer programs could sort through the stones' placements and positions to corelate any relevance to the heavens. What amazes me is how, in my lifetime, much of human history has changed in light of what was then known compared with what is now known. Human civilization is multiple times older than our evidence of it, and achieved far more than we dare believe.
Posted by JCS on December 25,2012 | 01:41 PM
Maybe it's a sculpture of a family unit. The mother and father in the middle of a circle of children. Maybe the builders were expressing what was important to them at the time. That seems to be what architecture and art do: describe what's human and meaningful. Maybe the sculptures of the animals are meant to show the other "members" of their family - the animals that followed them around or always seemed to be where they wandered: scorpions, vultures and fox. The vultures would have wanted to eat the leftovers of the family meal as would a fox.Maybe the fox will become the ancestor of our dogs. Scorpions, well, they're just pests. They're always around. Maybe the place felt like a home and that's why people would go there. Or maybe the "temple" is a story that bound people together. I'm impressed with the way the hands of the standing stone hug or wrap around the tummy or waist of the standing stone. And the belt of the same figure looks almost like a chain. The pelt that hangs from it and covers the "private parts" might have been from the skin of a fox. The sculptor had a lot of imagination and ability. Clever.
Posted by Randy Purinton on December 16,2012 | 05:36 PM
I just absolutely love science and especially when something new is found that turns the world upside down and make people rethink what they thought was a fact.
Posted by ben on December 16,2012 | 11:30 AM
Clearly this is not the "first". This is like dating the Sphynx according to Egyptologists' ignorance. I have yet to see ANY credible evidence of this dating, much as the proposed dating of the Sphynx and Giza plateau. Accepted dating is simply preposterous. Compare the stone wall construction and surface tolerances of Gobelki Tepe to those of other megalithic structures. There is an absolute disconnect. With only 5% of the site excavated, I look forward to further excavation of the site and studies on the positioning relative to astronomy, similar to the work done by Bauval, West and Schoch. I personally believe Giza is not dated to 10,500 bc, as suggested by archaeoastrological studies, but one precessional cycle previous. This would also support the same positioning. Anyway, Since we know so little about the site, let's keep our minds open to a history of our race which we simply cannot explain at this point.
Posted by thetruthseeker711 on December 16,2012 | 11:21 AM
theres a bigger complex to be discovered at that site. trust me...
Posted by venancio duque on November 30,2012 | 09:23 PM
Why say this is the "first" religious site ever built. Say it's the oldest we've found, but calling it the first is just ignorant.
Posted by Jim on November 29,2012 | 12:01 AM
I find it easy to believe that humans were capable of building Gobekli Tepe without the help of aliens. Humans in their present form have been around for a hundred thousand years. In fact, the human brain has been shrinking since the advent of agriculture. Far more significant is that the dating of the structures coincide with a recent study that puts the beginning of the Indo-European languages at the same place and time. Anatolia was a cross roads between continents, and it wouldn't surprise me if our oldest and most enduring myths, memories of ancient events handed down from one generation to the next, technologies and ideas were disseminated from this area which created a more complex culture that involved larger numbers of people. It may have been the first time so many different kinds of people came together, which required a higher level of organization.
Posted by Dolora Zajick on November 15,2012 | 11:23 AM
+ View All Comments