Gobekli Tepe: The World’s First Temple?
Predating Stonehenge by 6,000 years, Turkey's stunning Gobekli Tepe upends the conventional view of the rise of civilization
- By Andrew Curry
- Photographs by Berthold Steinhilber
- Smithsonian magazine, November 2008, Subscribe
(Page 2 of 3)
Schmidt returned a year later with five colleagues and they uncovered the first megaliths, a few buried so close to the surface they were scarred by plows. As the archaeologists dug deeper, they unearthed pillars arranged in circles. Schmidt's team, however, found none of the telltale signs of a settlement: no cooking hearths, houses or trash pits, and none of the clay fertility figurines that litter nearby sites of about the same age. The archaeologists did find evidence of tool use, including stone hammers and blades. And because those artifacts closely resemble others from nearby sites previously carbon-dated to about 9000 B.C., Schmidt and co-workers estimate that Gobekli Tepe's stone structures are the same age. Limited carbon dating undertaken by Schmidt at the site confirms this assessment.
The way Schmidt sees it, Gobekli Tepe's sloping, rocky ground is a stonecutter's dream. Even without metal chisels or hammers, prehistoric masons wielding flint tools could have chipped away at softer limestone outcrops, shaping them into pillars on the spot before carrying them a few hundred yards to the summit and lifting them upright. Then, Schmidt says, once the stone rings were finished, the ancient builders covered them over with dirt. Eventually, they placed another ring nearby or on top of the old one. Over centuries, these layers created the hilltop.
Today, Schmidt oversees a team of more than a dozen German archaeologists, 50 local laborers and a steady stream of enthusiastic students. He typically excavates at the site for two months in the spring and two in the fall. (Summer temperatures reach 115 degrees, too hot to dig; in the winter the area is deluged by rain.) In 1995, he bought a traditional Ottoman house with a courtyard in Urfa, a city of nearly a half-million people, to use as a base of operations.
On the day I visit, a bespectacled Belgian man sits at one end of a long table in front of a pile of bones. Joris Peters, an archaeozoologist from the Ludwig Maximilian University in Munich, specializes in the analysis of animal remains. Since 1998, he has examined more than 100,000 bone fragments from Gobekli Tepe. Peters has often found cut marks and splintered edges on them—signs that the animals from which they came were butchered and cooked. The bones, stored in dozens of plastic crates stacked in a storeroom at the house, are the best clue to how people who created Gobekli Tepe lived. Peters has identified tens of thousands of gazelle bones, which make up more than 60 percent of the total, plus those of other wild game such as boar, sheep and red deer. He's also found bones of a dozen different bird species, including vultures, cranes, ducks and geese. "The first year, we went through 15,000 pieces of animal bone, all of them wild. It was pretty clear we were dealing with a hunter-gatherer site," Peters says. "It's been the same every year since." The abundant remnants of wild game indicate that the people who lived here had not yet domesticated animals or farmed.
But, Peters and Schmidt say, Gobekli Tepe's builders were on the verge of a major change in how they lived, thanks to an environment that held the raw materials for farming. "They had wild sheep, wild grains that could be domesticated—and the people with the potential to do it," Schmidt says. In fact, research at other sites in the region has shown that within 1,000 years of Gobekli Tepe's construction, settlers had corralled sheep, cattle and pigs. And, at a prehistoric village just 20 miles away, geneticists found evidence of the world's oldest domesticated strains of wheat; radiocarbon dating indicates agriculture developed there around 10,500 years ago, or just five centuries after Gobekli Tepe's construction.
To Schmidt and others, these new findings suggest a novel theory of civilization. Scholars have long believed that only after people learned to farm and live in settled communities did they have the time, organization and resources to construct temples and support complicated social structures. But Schmidt argues it was the other way around: the extensive, coordinated effort to build the monoliths literally laid the groundwork for the development of complex societies.
The immensity of the undertaking at Gobekli Tepe reinforces that view. Schmidt says the monuments could not have been built by ragged bands of hunter-gatherers. To carve, erect and bury rings of seven-ton stone pillars would have required hundreds of workers, all needing to be fed and housed. Hence the eventual emergence of settled communities in the area around 10,000 years ago. "This shows sociocultural changes come first, agriculture comes later," says Stanford University archaeologist Ian Hodder, who excavated Catalhoyuk, a prehistoric settlement 300 miles from Gobekli Tepe. "You can make a good case this area is the real origin of complex Neolithic societies."
What was so important to these early people that they gathered to build (and bury) the stone rings? The gulf that separates us from Gobekli Tepe's builders is almost unimaginable. Indeed, though I stood among the looming megaliths eager to take in their meaning, they didn't speak to me. They were utterly foreign, placed there by people who saw the world in a way I will never comprehend. There are no sources to explain what the symbols might mean. Schmidt agrees. "We're 6,000 years before the invention of writing here," he says.
Single Page « Previous 1 2 3 Next »
Subscribe now for more of Smithsonian's coverage on history, science and nature.
Related topics: Archaeology Rituals and Traditions Neolithic Turkey Places of Worship
Additional Sources
"Seeking the Roots of Ritual" by Andrew Curry, Science, January 18, 2008






Comments (548)
+ View All Comments
Soooooo cool
Posted by Johnnie on February 8,2013 | 07:28 AM
Super fine! Love to hear more as work continues
Posted by Christiana Powell on January 29,2013 | 08:36 PM
".. unlike in the case of crude and dissimilar massive ancient relics (e.g. huge statues, beams and columns etc.) carved out of stone long ago in other places by using clumsy, brittle and easily breakable, often blunt and difficult to handle stone tools, the nearly identically shaped and sculpted multiple massive stone pillars etc.(with right-angled sharp edges and uniformly flat surfaces) at GT (Figure 1) strongly point to the use of considerably stronger, harder, sharper and easy to handle metallic tools which became available only after the advent of metallic age about 6000 years ago or after 4000 BC." http://creative.sulekha.com//questions-and-comments-on-the-study-of-ancient-sites-and-cultures_597851_blog
Posted by Dr. Subhash C. Sharma on January 28,2013 | 09:32 AM
As is well known, women are important sources of inspiration in sculpture, architecture and other arts. Quite possibly, this is because these ideas arise from among images which are communicated to them by men during sexual intercourse.
Posted by Michael on January 28,2013 | 08:56 AM
not in entire worlu, before B.C cunstruct so maney temples in india
Posted by sundar on January 27,2013 | 01:55 PM
I would like to see how they came up with the 11000 years old figure. its obvious we didn't come from apes that is just ridiculous imaginative propaganda based on biased assumptions, anyone who dares to explore deeper can figure that one out. And atom dating is very inconsistent since it is based on assumption that evolution is true. So i think it would be a great trend for these kind of articles to start explaining in short how they got the dates that they claim so factually, after all most artifacts don't come with a "made in china at this date" type of inscription on it.
Posted by Robert on January 24,2013 | 01:04 PM
This theory with our rather primitive ancestors that built megalithic structures seem by every discovery we make more and more hilarious. We will soon come to say that apes knew how to construct them:). Now it's only to the level of hunter-gatherers. I don't see other possibility than some aliens were on this planet. Others would give room to the theory of some ancient human advanced civilization that somehow perished. But I don't see how it would be possible. Because we discovered many megalithic structures but no sign of advanced technology. Would be reasonable to think that who had the technology took it with them. Again only ET. Otherwise would be found on Earth.
Posted by John Doe on January 10,2013 | 04:34 AM
Briefly compared to Stonehenge at the beginning of this article, it didn' mention whether researchers had persued Gobekli Tepe's astromical relevance. It seems each ancient "temple" site of this magnitude thus far discovered has been an astronomical clock of sorts, and I wonder what the astronomical significance of this site is? Perhaps the carvings relate to an ancient cosmology identified by these people and the celestial positions and/or periods are plotted on or with these stones. Stonehenge was a work in process for centuries, starting with wood structures gradually superceded by stoneworks. This site may perhaps be the same, with layers of stonework plotting a developing cosmology and/or religion. Computer programs could sort through the stones' placements and positions to corelate any relevance to the heavens. What amazes me is how, in my lifetime, much of human history has changed in light of what was then known compared with what is now known. Human civilization is multiple times older than our evidence of it, and achieved far more than we dare believe.
Posted by JCS on December 25,2012 | 01:41 PM
Maybe it's a sculpture of a family unit. The mother and father in the middle of a circle of children. Maybe the builders were expressing what was important to them at the time. That seems to be what architecture and art do: describe what's human and meaningful. Maybe the sculptures of the animals are meant to show the other "members" of their family - the animals that followed them around or always seemed to be where they wandered: scorpions, vultures and fox. The vultures would have wanted to eat the leftovers of the family meal as would a fox.Maybe the fox will become the ancestor of our dogs. Scorpions, well, they're just pests. They're always around. Maybe the place felt like a home and that's why people would go there. Or maybe the "temple" is a story that bound people together. I'm impressed with the way the hands of the standing stone hug or wrap around the tummy or waist of the standing stone. And the belt of the same figure looks almost like a chain. The pelt that hangs from it and covers the "private parts" might have been from the skin of a fox. The sculptor had a lot of imagination and ability. Clever.
Posted by Randy Purinton on December 16,2012 | 05:36 PM
I just absolutely love science and especially when something new is found that turns the world upside down and make people rethink what they thought was a fact.
Posted by ben on December 16,2012 | 11:30 AM
Clearly this is not the "first". This is like dating the Sphynx according to Egyptologists' ignorance. I have yet to see ANY credible evidence of this dating, much as the proposed dating of the Sphynx and Giza plateau. Accepted dating is simply preposterous. Compare the stone wall construction and surface tolerances of Gobelki Tepe to those of other megalithic structures. There is an absolute disconnect. With only 5% of the site excavated, I look forward to further excavation of the site and studies on the positioning relative to astronomy, similar to the work done by Bauval, West and Schoch. I personally believe Giza is not dated to 10,500 bc, as suggested by archaeoastrological studies, but one precessional cycle previous. This would also support the same positioning. Anyway, Since we know so little about the site, let's keep our minds open to a history of our race which we simply cannot explain at this point.
Posted by thetruthseeker711 on December 16,2012 | 11:21 AM
theres a bigger complex to be discovered at that site. trust me...
Posted by venancio duque on November 30,2012 | 09:23 PM
Why say this is the "first" religious site ever built. Say it's the oldest we've found, but calling it the first is just ignorant.
Posted by Jim on November 29,2012 | 12:01 AM
I find it easy to believe that humans were capable of building Gobekli Tepe without the help of aliens. Humans in their present form have been around for a hundred thousand years. In fact, the human brain has been shrinking since the advent of agriculture. Far more significant is that the dating of the structures coincide with a recent study that puts the beginning of the Indo-European languages at the same place and time. Anatolia was a cross roads between continents, and it wouldn't surprise me if our oldest and most enduring myths, memories of ancient events handed down from one generation to the next, technologies and ideas were disseminated from this area which created a more complex culture that involved larger numbers of people. It may have been the first time so many different kinds of people came together, which required a higher level of organization.
Posted by Dolora Zajick on November 15,2012 | 11:23 AM
+ View All Comments