Abandoned Ship: the Mary Celeste
What really happened aboard the Mary Celeste? More than a century after her crew went missing, a scenario is emerging
- By Jess Blumberg
- Smithsonian magazine, November 2007, Subscribe
The British brig Dei Gratia was about 400 miles east of the Azores on December 5, 1872, when crew members spotted a ship adrift in the choppy seas. Capt. David Morehouse was taken aback to discover that the unguided vessel was the Mary Celeste, which had left New York City eight days before him and should have already arrived in Genoa, Italy. He changed course to offer help.
Morehouse sent a boarding party to the ship. Belowdecks, the ship's charts had been tossed about, and the crewmen's belongings were still in their quarters. The ship's only lifeboat was missing, and one of its two pumps had been disassembled. Three and a half feet of water was sloshing in the ship's bottom, though the cargo of 1,701 barrels of industrial alcohol was largely intact. There was a six-month supply of food and water—but not a soul to consume it.
Thus was born one of the most durable mysteries in nautical history: What happened to the ten people who had sailed aboard the Mary Celeste? Through the decades, a lack of hard facts has only spurred speculation as to what might have taken place. Theories have ranged from mutiny to pirates to sea monsters to killer waterspouts. Arthur Conan Doyle's 1884 short story based on the case posited a capture by a vengeful ex-slave, a 1935 movie featured Bela Lugosi as a homicidal sailor. Now, a new investigation, drawing on modern maritime technology and newly discovered documents, has pieced together the most likely scenario.
"I love the idea of mysteries, but you should always revisit these things using knowledge that has since come to light," says Anne MacGregor, the documentarian who launched the investigation and wrote, directed and produced The True Story of the 'Mary Celeste,' partly with funding from Smithsonian Networks.
The ship began its fateful voyage on November 7, 1872, sailing with seven crewmen and Capt. Benjamin Spooner Briggs, his wife, Sarah, and the couple's 2-year-old daughter, Sophia. The 282-ton brigantine battled heavy weather for two weeks to reach the Azores, where the ship log's last entry was recorded at 5 a.m. on November 25.
After spotting the Mary Celeste ten days later, the Dei Gratia crewmen sailed the ship some 800 miles to Gibraltar, where a British vice admiralty court convened a salvage hearing, which was usually limited to determining whether the salvagers—in this case, the Dei Gratia crewmen—were entitled to payment from the ship's insurers. But the attorney general in charge of the inquiry, Frederick Solly-Flood, suspected mischief and investigated accordingly. After more than three months, the court found no evidence of foul play. Eventually, the salvagers received a payment, but only one-sixth of the $46,000 for which the ship and its cargo had been insured, suggesting that the authorities were not entirely convinced of the Dei Gratia crew's innocence.
The story of the Mary Celeste might have drifted into history if Conan Doyle hadn't published "J. Habakuk Jephson's Statement" in 1884; his sensationalistic account, printed in Cornhill Magazine, set off waves of theorizing about the ship's fate. Even Attorney General Solly-Flood revisited the case, writing summaries of his interviews and notes. But the mystery remained unsolved. MacGregor picked up the trail in 2002. "There's so much nonsense written about this legend," she said. "I felt compelled to find the truth."
MacGregor's four previous investigative documentaries, including The Hindenburg Disaster: Probable Cause (2001), applied modern forensic techniques to historical questions. "There are obvious limitations for historic cases," she says. "But using the latest technology, you can come to a different conclusion."
For her Mary Celeste film, MacGregor began by asking what didn't happen. Speculation concerning sea monsters was easy to dismiss. The ship's condition—intact and with full cargo—seemed to rule out pirates. One theory bandied about in the 19th century held that crew members drank the alcohol onboard and mutinied; after interviewing crewmen's descendants, MacGregor deemed that scenario unlikely. Another theory assumed that alcohol vapors expanded in the Azores heat and blew off the main hatch, prompting those aboard to fear an imminent explosion. But MacGregor notes that the boarding party found the main hatch secured and did not report smelling any fumes. True, she says, nine of the 1,701 barrels in the hold were empty, but the empty nine had been recorded as being made of red oak, not white oak like the others. Red oak is known to be a more porous wood and therefore more likely to leak.
As for that homicidal sailor played by Lugosi in The Mystery of the Mary Celeste, he may have been drawn from two German crewmen, brothers Volkert and Boye Lorenzen, who fell under suspicion because none of their personal possessions were found on the abandoned ship. But a Lorenzen descendant told MacGregor that the pair had lost their gear in a shipwreck earlier in 1872. "They had no motive," MacGregor says.
After ruling out what didn't happen, MacGregor confronted the question of what might have.
Abandoning a ship in the open sea is the last thing a captain would order and a sailor would do. But is that what Captain Briggs ordered? If so, why?
Subscribe now for more of Smithsonian's coverage on history, science and nature.









Comments (36)
+ View All Comments
I have a theroy that captin briggs was a little parinoid because his 2yr old was with them and he saw water on the bottom of the ship he thought they were sinking so he ordered abandonment
Posted by samantha on April 24,2013 | 08:54 AM
I am looking for this information for English homework, I find this information very useful, but is there anyway you could add any more new information to the page? And if you could any pictures of the Ship itself and hyperlinks. The captain needs to be investigated thoroughly. Just saying he was well respected doesn't mean he was infallible or un-naive. A book could delve into captains' training and skills of the time and also, their knowledge of cargo and business, not just sailing and navigating. I think the captain was at fault and caused the deaths of 10 people through bad judgement, panic and ill-preparedness. In his last letter to his mother, he sounds like he wants nothing more than to enjoy quality time with his family. And also like he doesn't cotton to business too much. His father was also a bad businessman. So, maybe he didn't study up on his cargo and the dangers involved. What did this dude transport in previous voyages? But I think the fume theory of the alcohol almost poisoning the crew is preposterous. Before devising more theories research the world of shipping in the 1870's out of New York harbor. What did other captains do with similar cargoes, routes, etc. One commenter claims alot of ships went down that November but was that unusual? These books and articles on the Mary Celeste don't provide a vivid and detailed enough picture of the times. Instead, they overdo the research on nonsense like debunked theories and the inquiry with all its characters. Who cares? It's time someone looked at the person in charge of the ship.
Posted by Jack m on April 22,2013 | 04:21 PM
Does anyone know what eventually happened?
Posted by Sparkle on February 26,2013 | 02:28 PM
lots of info
Posted by chris on February 12,2013 | 01:07 PM
i thought it gave a lot of info
Posted by trevor on February 5,2013 | 01:30 PM
today in class we learned about the mary celeste.just by hearing the story it seemed HAUNTED!!!!! but maybe not to you.
Posted by Ryli on January 16,2013 | 09:38 PM
Hello hello what's all this mischief about a SHIP ooooh look at me and my ship er i've made a film too don't see me making films about it lol
Posted by Bilbo Baggins on December 16,2012 | 02:03 PM
hey i am reasearching about this it is awesome
Posted by on December 11,2012 | 04:53 PM
wow! were leaning about the mary celeste in school.I just wanted to do some reserch to laen more.
Posted by on December 5,2012 | 04:59 PM
I think this read is very educational and has kids to think with their imagination. I honestly think its amazing!
Posted by Coledyn on November 30,2012 | 09:52 AM
this is awesome
Posted by anisa on November 30,2012 | 09:50 AM
The captain needs to be investigated thoroughly. Just saying he was well respected doesn't mean he was infallible or un-naive. A book could delve into captains' training and skills of the time and also, their knowledge of cargo and business, not just sailing and navigating. I think the captain was at fault and caused the deaths of 10 people through bad judgement, panic and ill-preparedness. In his last letter to his mother, he sounds like he wants nothing more than to enjoy quality time with his family. And also like he doesn't cotton to business too much. His father was also a bad businessman. So, maybe he didn't study up on his cargo and the dangers involved. What did this dude transport in previous voyages? But I think the fume theory of the alcohol almost poisoning the crew is preposterous. Before devising more theories research the world of shipping in the 1870's out of New York harbor. What did other captains do with similar cargoes, routes, etc. One commenter claims alot of ships went down that November but was that unusual? These books and articles on the Mary Celeste don't provide a vivid and detailed enough picture of the times. Instead, they overdo the research on nonsense like debunked theories and the inquiry with all its characters. Who cares? It's time someone looked at the person in charge of the ship.
Posted by S on October 20,2012 | 01:46 PM
this is anb excellent report on the mary celeste
Posted by joey jckson on October 1,2012 | 12:06 PM
i think that this is interesting
Posted by brittany on September 19,2012 | 03:21 PM
+ View All Comments