To Recreate a 17th-Century Masterwork, an Entomologist at the National Museum of Natural History Got Creative with Butterflies, Bees and a Bit of Rosemary

The display will be featured in a new exhibition at the National Gallery of Art as part of a historic collaboration along the National Mall

5625-216.jpg
Collection manager Floyd Shockley used specimens from the museum’s entomology collection to recreate the 1653 composition “Insects and a Sprig of Rosemary.” Floyd Shockley, NMNH

In the 1600s, European cities like Antwerp were at the nexus of both art and science. Vast trade networks and expanding colonial empires brought animals and plants from around the world to northern Europe. This influx of new species not only transformed how scientists thought about the natural world but also inspired generations of masterful artists, who began incorporating beasts both small and large into their compositions.

This exciting era is explored in the new exhibition “Little Beasts: Art, Wonder, and the Natural World.” The show is a first-of-its-kind collaboration between the National Gallery of Art and the National Museum of Natural History. It will open on May 18 and run through November 2.
None
Flemish printmaker Adriaen Collaert was skilled at creating detailed depictions of all manner of birds. This engraving from 1600 features a soaring Eurasian hoopoe (left) alongside a perched owl (right). Gift of The Circle of the National Gallery of Art
Situated right down the National Mall from NMNH in the Gallery’s west building, “Little Beasts” will feature nearly 75 prints, drawings and paintings from celebrated Flemish artists like Jan van Kessel, Joris Hoefnagel and his son Jacob. Many of these masterworks were from the National Gallery’s collection, including a rarely displayed copy of Joris Hoefnagel’s “Four Elements,” a collection of nearly 300 watercolor paintings depicting a menagerie of different species that correspond with land, water, air and fire.
None
“Little Beasts” features specimens from across the museum’s collection, including this groundhog from the Division of Mammals. The mounted specimen will help contextualize Jacopo Ligozzi’s 1605 painting, “A Groundhog or Marmot with a Branch of Plums.” James Di Loreto and Phillip R. Lee, Smithsonian Institution (left image); Wolfgang Ratjen Collection, Purchased as the Gift of Helen Porter and James T. Dyke (right image)

To add context to the critters within the frames, “Little Beasts” will also display dozens of specimens from the NMNH collection, ranging from seashells and shrimp to a parrot, porcupine and even a monkey.

None
Not all of the NMNH specimens featured in “Little Beasts” were small. Specialists from the gallery carefully packed the larger mounts, like this Indian peafowl, for transport to the National Gallery. The smaller birds were easier to move. Once packed, Christopher Milensky, the collection manager of the museum’s bird collection, delivered these specimens by hand to the Gallery. Christopher Milensky

Roughly two-thirds of the scientific specimens in the exhibition are insects. This is because many 16th- and 17th-century Flemish artists were fascinated by what they called beestjes, which translates to “little beasts.” For example, Jacob Hoefnagel often made species like elephant beetles and hummingbird hawk-moths the stars of his engravings.

“I consider that a testament to the importance of insects as inspiration for artists of the period, with their diversity in shape, form and colors,” said Floyd Shockley, the collection manager of the museum’s Department of Entomology.

None
An elephant beetle from the museum’s collection (left) is a ringer for the centerpiece of this 1592 engraving by Jacob Hoefnagel. James Di Loreto and Phillip R. Lee, Smithsonian Institution (left image); Gift of Mrs. Lessing J. Rosenwald (right image)

According to Shockley, the artists featured in “Little Beasts” were carefully illustrating insects more than a century before Carl Linnaeus, in 1758, created binomial nomenclature, the two-word system researchers still use today to name animals based on their genus and species. “These artists were documenting insect diversity in all its complexity much earlier than science even had names for them,” Shockley said.

Few were better at depicting insects than van Kessel, who produced postcard-sized paintings that were often packed with butterflies, caterpillars, flies and wasps. One of the centerpieces of the new exhibition is van Kessel’s 1653 painting “Insects and a Sprig of Rosemary,” which depicts a dozen different insects milling about a flowering branch of rosemary.
None
Van Kessel’s “Insects and a Sprig of Rosemary,” an oil painting on a copper plate that features a variety of insects including butterflies and beetles. The Richard C. Von Hess Foundation, Nell and Robert Weidenhammer Fund, Barry D. Friedman, and Friends of Dutch Art

To contextualize van Kessel’s work, curators at the gallery asked Shockley to identify the various insects featured in the painting. Van Kessel’s incredible eye for detail made things easy. “It was very clear that van Kessel had spent a lot of time carefully studying his entomological subjects,” Shockley said.

As he tracked down the various insect specimens displayed in the painting, Shockley decided to recreate the entire ensemble. He positioned each insect and pinned the specimens in place. To tie the tableau together, he cut a piece off of an artificial rosemary plant he ordered online. (Real rosemary was not an option because it wilts quickly and could introduce pests.) He was pleasantly surprised by how the plastic rosemary snippet matched the piece of shrub that anchors van Kessel’s original.

The tableau caught the attention of curators at the gallery, who insisted it be displayed right next to van Kessel’s original in “Little Beasts.”

None
Shockley’s tableau on display in “Little Beasts.” Jack Tamisiea, NMNH

The placement of the rendering is surreal for Shockley. Although he does his own line illustrations for research publications, Shockley does not consider himself an artist. “To have specimens I worked on featured at the National Gallery of Art next to the masterworks of artists like van Kessel is certainly humbling,” Shockley said.

The inclusion of Shockley’s tableau in the new exhibition underlies how art and science remained intertwined today. Centuries after van Kessel and the Hoefnagels were carefully depicting beestjes, researchers still rely on scientific illustrations to describe mysterious beasts that are new to science.

Get the latest stories in your inbox every weekday.

Email Powered by Salesforce Marketing Cloud (Privacy Notice / Terms & Conditions)

Categories
Archive