Wolves and the Balance of Nature in the Rockies
Wolves are flourishing again in the northern Rockies. Yet even as they're helping restore the balance of nature, they're also killing livestock—and reigniting a fierce controversy
- By Frank Clifford
- Smithsonian magazine, February 2009, Subscribe
(Page 3 of 4)
Of all the people who supported easing the restrictions on wolf hunting, perhaps the most surprising was Douglas W. Smith, a biologist who heads the Yellowstone Wolf Recovery Project and is the co-author of the 2005 book Decade of the Wolf. He helped carry the first wolves into the park in crates 14 years ago and has functioned as their head nanny ever since. But he also has sympathy for his ranching neighbors. "We covet what we've lost, and when you go out and see wolves free in nature, it's real," he said. "Most people are so many levels removed from wild nature that seeing wolves establishes a very powerful link. But ranchers already have a strong connection. They don't need wolves for that."
Smith agrees that Yellowstone's wolves need to mix with animals outside the park to strengthen their genetic stock. It's just that he doesn't think hunting or stricter predator control laws will prevent that. "I have faith in the wolves," he said during an interview in his office at Yellowstone National Park headquarters. "They will find each other."
If they are allowed to, that is. Even if the wolves continue to roam relatively more freely, their future survival would not be guaranteed in a part of the country where human development is quickly expanding into wildlife habitat.
For now, the reintroduced wolves appear to be doing the job they were recruited to do—put more teeth in the natural order that had been out of whack since the wolves disappeared in the early 20th century. By 2005, they were killing around 3,000 elk every year in Yellowstone, where outsized herds had been denuding the park's vegetation. Much of the elk predation took place in the Lamar Valley in the northeast quarter of the park, a stretch of open space that has been compared to East Africa's Serengeti Plain. For all its magnificence, it has been something of an unbalanced ecosystem, the absence of trees due in no small part to an overabundance of browsing elk.
With wolves back on the prowl, the elk became more restive. And as the elk spent less time foraging along stream banks, scientists have reported that willows and other plants that had been eaten to the nubs began to flourish again. So did some of the animals that depend on the trees, like beavers, which use willow branches to build lodges. Since the wolves were reintroduced, beaver colonies have increased eightfold. So there are more beaver ponds—habitat for insects, fish, amphibians, reptiles, birds and mammals, even moose, Smith says. Especially in winter, wolf kills have provided food for other park dwellers, including ravens, magpies and bald and golden eagles.
For human visitors to the park, one of the highlights of wildlife viewing in recent years has been watching the combat between wolves and grizzly bears, alternately fierce and comical, for control of elk carcasses. Wolf watching generates more than $35 million a year for motels, restaurants and other businesses in the three states surrounding the park, according to park surveys.
Hard-core wolf watchers arrive at first light, their cars filling roadside turnouts in the Lamar Valley. They erect a picket line of spotting scopes and point their lenses at den sites in the hillsides that frame the valley. Some of the regulars act as volunteer aides to the wolf recovery project, documenting the appearance of new pups, changes in den sites and interactions with other animals.
"Getting to know a wolf pack is like getting to know a family," said Laurie Lyman. Three years ago, she and her husband retired from teaching jobs in San Diego and moved to Silver Gate, Montana, just outside the park's northeast entrance and a 30-minute drive from the Lamar Valley. "Each wolf has its own individual temperament—the ones that nurture the pups, the males that feed the females. Everybody means something in the pack. Each wolf contributes. One of my goals is to get more people to look into the lives of wolves so they better understand the effect they have when they kill wolves."
A wolf pack has a familial makeup, typically consisting of parents and one or more generations of offspring. Slow to mature sexually, wolf pups stay with their parents up to four years, longer than many other mammals. In the process, the pups learn about hunting, foraging and working with other members of the pack.
The number of wolves in a pack varies with the size of their prey. Wolves that dine regularly on big animals—bison, elk or caribou—tend to operate in large packs of up to 15 members. In summer, packs are likely to split up, with individuals traveling 20 or more miles a day in pursuit of small prey such as squirrels and beaver. In winter, when snow slows down bigger animals, a wolf pack tends to work together, bringing down an elk every other day or so.
The constant combat takes a toll. In Yellowstone National Park, where only 2 percent of mortality is caused by humans—mostly by car accidents— the average life span of a wolf is still only four to five years. (Wolves in captivity sometimes live into their teens.) When he examines wolves that have died in the park, Smith routinely finds smashed bones, teeth ground to useless stubs and scars from fights with rival packs, moose and bison. Disease has also exacted a heavy price. Two-thirds of the pups born in 2005 died from distemper, a viral infection that strikes the respiratory and central nervous systems.
Single Page « Previous 1 2 3 4 Next »
Subscribe now for more of Smithsonian's coverage on history, science and nature.









Comments (39)
+ View All Comments
I hate that they are killing wolves for no reason it is seriously pathetic to do such a thing....just wrong to do it I don't understand why Obama to do such a thing I think he does it because so many wolves but that does not make it okay to kill an entire population of wolves because if it goes on for any longer and if it does ther won't be any more wolves And just to think of it is just terrible
Posted by rebecca on April 25,2013 | 04:20 PM
I've quit eating beef over this . The extreme cruelty of these states who are allowing these wolves to be killed is heart wrenching. Cattle are invasive species that destroy the environment. I have no patience with the ranching community anymore. I have also lost respect for these states.
Posted by Karl Schueman on January 2,2013 | 01:32 PM
I really enjoyed reading the intresting coments written concerning the so called evident wolfe problem in the yellowstone ecosytem. The comments i have is that weather you or i like it the wolves belong there and up here in canada aswell. The athorities do need to learn a little more on just how to manage problem areas with high concentration of these intresting creatures. Up here we call them preditor pits. I am cree which means i am first nations. These creature have a very important roll in any ecosystem without wolves the ungulates such as moose/elk/deer and so on need them to insure a healthy population exists. I really get a bad taste in my mouth when the predominant complaint is ranchers and money to you very obviosly narrow minded people my advise to you is open you eyes your mind and grow up and be a part of the solution rather than a constant part of the problem. Educate yourselves boys. the land is theres always has always will be. After were all done poluting ourselve off this planet guesse who will still be around? yup and were sapose to be the smart mammals.
Posted by melisa on December 5,2012 | 01:00 PM
I really enjoyed reading the intresting coments written concerning the so called evident wolfe problem in the yellowstone ecosytem. The comments i have is that weather you or i like it the wolves belong there and up here in canada aswell. The athorities do need to learn a little more on just how to manage problem areas with high concentration of these intresting creatures. Up here we call them preditor pits. I am cree which means i am first nations. These creature have a very important roll in any ecosystem without wolves the ungulates such as moose/elk/deer and so on need them to insure a healthy population exists. I really get a bad taste in my mouth when the predominant complaint is ranchers and money to you very obviosly narrow minded people my advise to you is open you eyes your mind and grow up and be a part of the solution rather than a constant part of the problem. Educate yourselves boys. the land is theres always has always will be. After were all done poluting ourselve off this planet guesse who will still be around? yup and were sapose to be the smart mammals.
Posted by darryl on June 12,2012 | 10:50 PM
The ranchers can also buy a cd that has another packs wolf howls...you broadcast it at night and that keeps other packs of dogs away from you area..It really does work!
Posted by mmm on May 11,2012 | 11:44 PM
Are wolf's Marathon or short distance runers?
Posted by Elizabeth on April 6,2012 | 03:34 PM
I think the introduction of wolves was a big disgrace to elk herds canadians were probably laughing all the way to the bank becase of wolf lovers that don't fare if they kill all the elk Android deer id rather see one elk than a dozen wolves
Posted by rod walchly on January 23,2012 | 11:45 AM
The balance of nature is a widely discredited ecologic theory and hasn't been taught in university ecology courses for years.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Balance_of_nature
So far I've just read the title of this essay and found it lacking, I might comment further after reading.
Posted by Som Sai on December 26,2011 | 11:00 AM
I believe that everyone has to know every bit of the spectrum. I live literally and hour from Yellowstone National Park, I live this issue every day. Wolves are not a bad animal, at all. But their numbers do need to drop down. Wolves are pack animals which means when more wolves mate and create new packs they are pushed out of Yellowstone and on to our property. What people need to understand is they do eat livestock and attack peoples pets. They need to eat and they are extremely protective over their territory. It is not slaughter to protect your lively hood. Cattle around here is the way of life and when wolves come in and kill your livestock its hurting the way a rancher lives. I am all for reintroduction to wolves in Yellowstone. But people need to understand that is where they need to stay and belong. Some people might say, "wolves dont know the boundary." but really, they do. When they realized pack members are being shot when they cross out of Yellowstone they wont go there anymore. Just like if your dog had a shock collar on. If he was to get shocked a certain amount of times he will soon learn not to go near the place that he gets shocked. Wolves are not dumb animals. I love wolves and I study them when I get the chance. So for those people who think they know what is going on with the wolves I live with everyday, you really have no idea.
Posted by Kasey Cape on November 28,2011 | 10:59 AM
Are you smarter than a 7th grader?
Posted by Ken on August 17,2011 | 01:05 PM
I believe wolves have their place in the circle of life and am pleased that they have a haven in Yellowstone. What I deplore is the hunting of the wolves from airplanes and helicopters in Alaska, where the wolves are chased and harrassed until they can no longer run and have no place to hide, and then are shot. That is not sportsmanship; it is slaughter.
Posted by Maida Christner on February 9,2009 | 10:16 AM
Non-native Canadian wolves chase and harrass their prey until they can no longer run and have no place to hide, and kill eating animals while they are still alive.
They even do all this withtout eating animals they kill just for fun! (That Is Not Sportsmanship; It Is Slaughter!)
You see this is not the same wolf that is native to the United States! Non-native Canadian wolves are the worst crime ever committed on our native wildlife ever in this country!
Posted by Ken on August 17,2011 | 01:02 PM
Every man/woman has a right to choose where they want to make a living. Some choose the great cities of society, some choose the Arctic, some choose the swamp lands of Louisiana, or Florida, or the Deserts of the Mojave Desert, and my relatives, choose Nebraska, Iowa and Kansas to raise their Cattle and livestock. All come with consequences of nature, good and bad. In the great Cities, man/woman must be aware of the Human Preditor. In the Arctic, Man/Woman must be aware of the eliments, not to mention Polar Bears.
The Swamps have Alligators and Venomous Snakes. The Desert has oppressive heat, and very little moisture. The midwest deals with Tornado's and twisters. Whatever the challenge that Man/Woman is confronted with, how we make the choices to deal with our environment is as important as the end result we seek. Nature has no known natural boundaries. Humans do! When we choose a path that crosses nature's path, depending on the situation and area we choose to inhabit, nature will win most of the encounters. The equalizer between Humans and Nature is Technology. Wolves or Preditors do not have guns, or traps, or helicopters to be hunted. They do not know they are encroaching upon Mans/Woman's domain. Business, Government, and Science must find a way that all of us can live with each other. Sacrifices on all sides will need to be made. But this is America, we don't manufacture anything to speak of here anymore, but we do manufacture something the rest of the world is lacking, "innovation" We can come up with the right solutions, we must come up with the right solutions, who will come up with the right solutions? Will it be you?
Posted by James B. Albert on June 14,2011 | 10:21 PM
First of all i would like to say that yes, the ranchers are justified in shooting the wolves for eating thier property. However, there wouldnt even be an issue if the wolves land wasnt taken up. they wouldnt need to go on to ranchers land if theirs wasnt taken first. wolves are being driven out of their home and hunting grounds. How would any of you like it if some came up to you and kicked you out of your home and job and took it over. You would have to fend for yourselvesand your family. You would do anything you had to to make sure you and your family would survive. This is how it is with wolves. When they are kicked out of their home thay will do anything to feed their young and make sure that their family lived out the winter. So next time think about that before you go kill another wolf. One calf will only feed two adult wolves, if that that . It's the least you could do.
Posted by Viviane Pendragon on January 22,2010 | 05:27 PM
THERE IS NO BALANCE OF WOLVES WHEN DEFENDERS OF WILDLIFE CANT EVEN PLAY BY THERE OWN GIUDLINES DONT MATTER WHAT STATE THEY HAVE DONE THE SAMETHING.HERE IN MN. THE GOAL WAS 1,600 WOLVES THEN COULD BE DELISTED WHY STILL PROTECTED WHEN POPULATION IS ALMOST 4,OOO AND THEY STILL WANT MORE INSANE.LOOK AT THE DEFENDERS OF ANIMALS TV SHOWS ANIMAL PLANET BACK TO BACK EPISODES OFOVER POPULATED,STARVEING DOGS AND CATS IN THE BIG CITIES THESE ARE THE SAME PEOPLE THAT WANT WOLVES TO BE AT NUMBERS OF A HUNDRED YEARS AGO,HOW IN THE WORLD CAN THEY TAKE CARE OF WILD DOGS WHEN THEY CANT TAKE CARE OF DOMESTIC ANIMALS IN THERE OWN BACK YARD.DO I HAVE SOME REVENGE AND HATRED TO WOLVES YOU BET WHEN THEY KILLED 32 CALVES AND I GET PAID FOR THREE AND YES THIS IS PRIVATE LAND AND MANY THOUSAND DOLLARS THEY ATE.THERE WAS 17 WOLVES IN THIS PACK VERIFIED BY OUR WONDERFUL DNR .
Posted by MN.RANCHER on December 6,2009 | 05:11 PM
+ View All Comments