• Smithsonian
    Institution
  • Travel
    With Us
  • Smithsonian
    Store
  • Smithsonian
    Channel
  • goSmithsonian
    Visitors Guide
  • Air & Space
    magazine

Smithsonian.com

  • Subscribe
  • History & Archaeology
  • Science
  • Ideas & Innovations
  • Arts & Culture
  • Travel & Food
  • At the Smithsonian
  • Photos
  • Videos
  • Games
  • Shop
  • Food
  • U.S. & Canada
  • Europe
  • Central & South America
  • Asia Pacific
  • Africa & the Middle East
  • Best of Lists
  • Evotourism
  • Photos
  • Travel with Smithsonian
  • Travel

With Clive in India

He Conquered Bengal, drove the French from India and built a civil service. But was he a savior or plunderer?

| | | Reddit | Digg | Stumble | Email |
  • By Michael Olmert
  • Smithsonian magazine, February 2001, Subscribe
 

"By god, Mr. Chairman, at this moment I stand astonished at my own moderation." The year is 1773. The place, the House of Commons, London. The speaker is Robert, Lord Clive of India (1725-1774). At the peak of his military fame, in 1757, Clive had been the stunning—though vastly outmanned—victor at the Battle of Plassey, which drove the French out of Bengal and placed the jewel of India atop the British crown. At the end of his career, he left British India with a firmly British-style civil service administration that would endure until India achieved independence in 1947.

This son of a minor Shropshire squire had it all—estates, land, houses, jewels, gold, art, shares, and cash, buckets of it. The wonder was that he had not come home from India with more. But jealousy created powerful enemies who sought to bring him down through accusations that he had benefited illegally during his time in India. In the end, Parliament resolved that "Robert, Lord Clive did, at the same time, render great and meritorious services to his country." He was vindicated, though the stress of it all had broken his heart. Eighteen months later, in 1774, Clive was dead.

In the intervening 226 years, few have questioned Clive's bravery, power or pluck. But the question remains: Was Clive British India's savior or plunderer, its founder or a mere profiteer?

In the end, what saved Clive's reputation was that he created in Bengal a Pax Britannica. Moreover, Plassey was the beginning of the end of French influence on the subcontinent. Without any doubt, Clive in India laid the foundation for the vast British empire that was to follow.


"By god, Mr. Chairman, at this moment I stand astonished at my own moderation." The year is 1773. The place, the House of Commons, London. The speaker is Robert, Lord Clive of India (1725-1774). At the peak of his military fame, in 1757, Clive had been the stunning—though vastly outmanned—victor at the Battle of Plassey, which drove the French out of Bengal and placed the jewel of India atop the British crown. At the end of his career, he left British India with a firmly British-style civil service administration that would endure until India achieved independence in 1947.

This son of a minor Shropshire squire had it all—estates, land, houses, jewels, gold, art, shares, and cash, buckets of it. The wonder was that he had not come home from India with more. But jealousy created powerful enemies who sought to bring him down through accusations that he had benefited illegally during his time in India. In the end, Parliament resolved that "Robert, Lord Clive did, at the same time, render great and meritorious services to his country." He was vindicated, though the stress of it all had broken his heart. Eighteen months later, in 1774, Clive was dead.

In the intervening 226 years, few have questioned Clive's bravery, power or pluck. But the question remains: Was Clive British India's savior or plunderer, its founder or a mere profiteer?

In the end, what saved Clive's reputation was that he created in Bengal a Pax Britannica. Moreover, Plassey was the beginning of the end of French influence on the subcontinent. Without any doubt, Clive in India laid the foundation for the vast British empire that was to follow.

    Subscribe now for more of Smithsonian's coverage on history, science and nature.


| | | Reddit | Digg | Stumble | Email |
 

Add New Comment


Name: (required)

Email: (required)

Comment:

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until Smithsonian.com has approved them. Smithsonian reserves the right not to post any comments that are unlawful, threatening, offensive, defamatory, invasive of a person's privacy, inappropriate, confidential or proprietary, political messages, product endorsements, or other content that might otherwise violate any laws or policies.

Comments (1)

I am terribly grateful to Michael Olmert that he did not imply that Indians had to be grateful to Clive. I am not terribly worried about who the British are grateful to or give credit for the British Raj. As long as it is clear, that the Raj was a unmitigated blight on Indian landscape.

Posted by Anuraag Sanghi on July 23,2012 | 09:54 AM






View full archiveRecent Issues


  • Jun 2013


  • May 2013


  • Apr 2013

Newsletter

Sign up for regular email updates from Smithsonian magazine, including free newsletters, special offers and current news updates.

Subscribe Now

About Us

Smithsonian.com expands on Smithsonian magazine's in-depth coverage of history, science, nature, the arts, travel, world culture and technology. Join us regularly as we take a dynamic and interactive approach to exploring modern and historic perspectives on the arts, sciences, nature, world culture and travel, including videos, blogs and a reader forum.

Explore our Brands

  • goSmithsonian.com
  • Smithsonian Air & Space Museum
  • Smithsonian Student Travel
  • Smithsonian Catalogue
  • Smithsonian Journeys
  • Smithsonian Channel
  • About Smithsonian
  • Contact Us
  • Advertising
  • Subscribe
  • RSS
  • Topics
  • Member Services
  • Copyright
  • Site Map
  • Privacy Policy
  • Ad Choices

Smithsonian Institution