Share
Digg
StumbleUpon
RedditNow that nearly everyone has been nearly everywhere, it might be thought that travel writers have lost their purpose. In a way they have. Only the most spectacularly perilous journey is nowadays worth writing a book about, and a public almost surfeited with TV travelogues rarely needs to be told what foreign parts look like.
Ah, but what they feel like is something else, and in a profounder sense the best travel writers are not really writing about travel at all. They are recording the effects of places or movements upon their own particular temperaments—recording the experience rather than the event, as they might make literary use of a love affair, an enigma or a tragedy.
So it is with the six practitioners represented in this special issue—whose destinations were chosen by their answer to a single question: Where in the world would you like to go? Talk about dream assignments.
When in 1922 the novelist E.M. Forster set out to write a guidebook to the Egyptian city of Alexandria, his most memorable advice was "to wander aimlessly about." In that one famous phrase, he was admitting that the subjective means more than the objective.
I do not doubt that wandering aimlessly was part of the technique of all six of the writers in this issue; most of them are even recalling a very first travel experience. Paul Theroux, who has famously quartered the world in his time, here makes his inaugural drive from coast to coast in his American homeland. Geoff Ward grew up in India but had never traveled to Punjab, and he describes for us his sensations with the wisdom of an old hand and the excitement of a newcomer. When we hear the name of Frances Mayes we instantly think of Tuscany, but here she makes a journey across the very different landscapes of Poland. Susan Orlean looks at Morocco through the unlikely prism of a donkey's personality. Caroline Alexander, though she had been to Jamaica, chooses to write about marvelous gardens there that are new to her, and Francine Prose explores rural Japan as the most delighted and appreciative of tourists.
I would guess they approached their tasks, like Forster in Alexandria, open to all suggestions, all antennas out: but it is their technique that is aimless, not their purpose. They know exactly what they are doing, and the result is something far more complex and profound than mere wandering.
First impressions are not always best—certainly not always the most accurate. Responses are often mellower, less gushing, less bigoted, more balanced, upon a return visit. Some of the most potent evocations of places are written by people who have known them for years, so that observer and observed, so to speak, become more intricately enmeshed. But there is no denying extra freshness, extra sparkle, to a seasoned observer's first impressions. Like us, they have doubtless sniffed by proxy the cherry blossoms of Japan. But until now they have not known what those places feel like, have not matched their realities with their own imaginations.
This is not to say that these writers are exploring the treacherous creative quagmire called fiction. It is not invention that you will find in these pages, but something subtler: the alliance of knowledge and sensation, nature and intellect, sight and interpretation, instinct and logic. It is more real than fiction, but more genuine than mere fact, too. Susan Orlean is not just thinking about donkeyness, she is exploring the relationship between animal and human in North Africa. In Japan, Francine Prose is wondering why some travelers find themselves so fully at home in other people's homelands. And Geoff Ward ends his article on Punjab with the Sikh thought that all Punjabis—"and, by extension, all mankind"—are one.
Our writers are certainly not telling us what we shall see or feel ourselves, if ever we go to the parts they write about, and it is no good complaining that our own responses were different, if we happen to have been there already. For they are other minds that we are traveling with here, other sensibilities, and as any philosopher knows, the truth about anything is nobody's monopoly—not least, the truth about a place.
Jan Morris has written some 40 books on history and travel.
Comments
Wonderful observation and insight. I've been a fan of Smithsonian for many years and thoroughly appreciate the contribution of it's writers.
Posted by Judith Grabowski on August 27,2009 | 09:41AM
Dear Jan Morris,
Thank you for this very interesting article which provided a taking-off point for ours. This little box might not like HTML, but if you check out The Blog of Kevin Dolgin, Sept. 3, you'll see what I mean. It's always a pleasure to turn our readers on to great writers.
Best of all possible regards,
Pat Hartman
News Editor, The Blog of Kevin Dolgin
Posted by Pat Hartman on September 8,2009 | 08:12AM
Dear Jan,
When I circumnavigated on my 33 ft. sailboat years ago, I wrote stories about the people I met along the way. A conversation with an Aborigine about his two wives, a visit with villagers in the Trobriand Islands, and the Polynesian woman who wanted to know if it was true that on my "island" we had unwanted children.. yes, and unwanted old people, too. Those stories found their way into my book, VOICES ON THE WIND. I wish that I could open travelers' eyes to the mind-changing experience travel offers when you open your heart to the people you meet. Cultural differences diasppear. Language barriers melt, and you end up sitting cross-legged on a pandanus mat next to a bare breasted New Guinea woman talking about raising children.
Smithsonian and its writers have single-handedly broken down barriers between people, cultures and nations. My book would be a good fit for your readership. How can I submit it for review?
Posted by Bonnie McGee on September 17,2009 | 03:40PM