The Romneys’ Mexican History
Mitt Romney’s father was born in a small Mormon enclave where family members still live, surrounded by rugged beauty and violent drug cartels
- By Héctor Tobar
- Photographs by Eros Hoagland
- Smithsonian magazine, May 2012, Subscribe
My journey to the Mormon heartland of Mexico began in a gloomy bar in Ciudad Juárez, just a short walk from the bridge over the Rio Grande and the U.S. border.
I ordered a margarita, a decidedly un-Mormon thing to do. But otherwise I was faithfully following in the footsteps of the pioneers of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, many of whom once passed through Ciudad Juárez on their way to build settlements in the remote mountains and foothills of northern Chihuahua.
Back in the late 19th century, the pioneers traveled by wagon or train. Neither conveyance is used much in northern Mexico these days. I arrived in El Paso from Los Angeles via airplane, and would travel by car from the border on a mission to see the Mormon colonies where Mitt Romney’s father, George, was born.
Mitt Romney, who is vying to be the next president of the United States, has family roots in Mexico. And not in just any part of Mexico, but in a place famous for producing true hombres, a rural frontier where thousands of Mormons still live, and where settling differences at the point of a gun has been a tragically resilient tradition.
These days northern Chihuahua is being ravaged by the so-called cartel drug wars, making Ciudad Juárez the most notoriously dangerous city in the Western Hemisphere. “Murder City,” the writer Charles Bowden called it in his most recent book.
I entered Ciudad Juárez just as a gorgeous canopy of lemon and tangerine twilight was settling over the border.
It isn’t advisable to travel through northern Chihuahua after dark, so I was going to have to spend a night in Ciudad Juárez before heading to the Mormon settlements, 170 miles to the south. Thus my visit to the Kentucky Club, where Frank Sinatra, Marilyn Monroe and assorted other stars downed cocktails.
“They say this is where the margarita was invented,” I told the bartender in Spanish.
“Así es,” he answered. I consider myself something of a margarita connoisseur, and this one was unremarkable. So was the bar’s wood décor. Honestly, there are two dozen Mexican-themed bars in Greater Los Angeles with better atmosphere.
Still, one has to give the watering hole credit just for staying open given the general sense of abandonment that has overtaken the old tourist haunts of Ciudad Juárez. Devout Mormons have always avoided the debauchery on offer there. Now everyone else does too.
On a Sunday night, the once vibrant commercial strips by the international bridges presented a forlorn sight. I saw sidewalks empty of pedestrian traffic leading to shuttered nightclubs and crumbling adobe buildings, all patrolled by the occasional squad of body-armored soldiers in pickup trucks toting charcoal-colored automatic weapons.
Subscribe now for more of Smithsonian's coverage on history, science and nature.









Comments (17)
This article is not accurate. It would have the readers believe that polygamy ceased among mormons in 1904. This is certainly not so. The "FLDS" still practices polygamy today and flew to Mexico to avoid US persecution. That is to say that mormon men did nt want to answer for this form of slavery and oppression of women and children
Posted by C. Aguirre on December 12,2012 | 06:14 PM
This article seems to be a travel guide than an historical essay. When reading it I get an odd romantic inference, yet no understanding-if it wasn't the desire to practice polygamy that lead Romneys family to flee, why would people do such a thing as to dramatically fling their family from their country. It was polygamy, is the answer.
Posted by Jan on August 24,2012 | 07:51 AM
Who are the "they" who say that the Margarita was invented/created at the Kentucky Club? a google of the question doesn't give any clear answer. For a tabloid or light reading article, this could be tolerated, but isn't The Smithsonian supposed to represent the media equivalent of the scholarship embodied in the institution itself?
Posted by oldleftie on May 24,2012 | 05:13 PM
I don't share the author's view that the Kentucky Club can be equaled by two dozen Mexican themed bars in LA. I've been to the Kentucky Club, when Juarez was peaceful and 3 years ago during the height of the drug wars. Many fine times and vibrant experiences. "Mexican themed bars in LA?" Please.
Posted by Rufus Laux on May 14,2012 | 11:58 PM
Nice article. I appreciate the tone of it, the lack of gotcha hostility and/or condescension.
Posted by Daniel Peterson on May 9,2012 | 11:57 PM
As to the comment made by Rose Priven April 24th 2012 I lived in Colonia Juarez from 1976 to 1996 and know the people well in both Colonia Dublan and Colonia Juarez. The LDS memebers there were NOT practicing polygamy nor do they now. Your information is inaccurate.
Posted by Pam Held on April 29,2012 | 09:04 PM
I would like to respond to Rose Priven and her comments about polygamy. Several decades ago, there were some families in Chihuahua that wanted to start practicing polygamy again. They were promptly excommunicated, which means that they are no longer members of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints. Most of these families separated themselves from the Dublan and Juarez to start their own town called Colonia LeBaron. My guess is that your brother actually visited LeBaron and not Dublan because there are no polygamists that live in Dublan.
Posted by Jeremy on April 29,2012 | 02:30 PM
In response to Fred J. Abrahams post "Doesn't anyone realize George's run for Presidentail nonmination was unconstitutional...disqualified by viture of being born in Mexion. BTW where's Mitt's birth certificate??" The constituion reads "No person except a natural born Citizen or a Citizen of the US, at time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President;" It says nothing about be born in the US it says you have to be a citizen of the US at birth. George Romney's parents were US citizens living in Mexico. Just like John McCain's parents were US citizens living in Pamama. I am sure your reference to "where is the birth certificate" is because some question Obama being born to US citizens living outside the US and if he was a citizen at birth.
Posted by William Call on April 27,2012 | 02:13 PM
Good point,Mark. The map locates Colonia Juarez where Chihuahua city is supposed to be. I hope the travel issue doesn't result in some very lost travelers.
Posted by Richard Shieldhouse on April 26,2012 | 01:23 PM
I feel sure that most people will realize that FRED J ABRAHAMS doesn't know what he is talking about. One does NOT have to be born within the borders of the United State in order to be a natural born citizen. The alternate requirment to birth within the borders is to have an American citizen parent. As with all those natural born citizens born to military or diplomatic, or missionary, or many other category US citizen partents living out side the borders for various reasons. Were that not so, John McCain's run in the last election would also have been unconstitutional. Afterall, he was born in Panama where his father was stationed. All you birthers, get a clue.
Posted by Bill Riddle on April 25,2012 | 08:32 PM
Mitt Romney was NOT born in Mexico!! If you would read the article it will tell you his Father was, as was my Grandfather, and my Father. So unlike our current President, Mitt can provide a Birth Certificate, and any other documents that are required to prove HIS citizenship in our great country! I lived in Colonia Juarez as a youth, and still have family who live there. We were going to have a family reunion this year in Colonia Juarez, but my relatives who live there told of the drug wars, the many killings, and kidnappings, and requested to have our reunion elsewhere!
Posted by Jesse E Farnsworth on April 25,2012 | 06:15 PM
Paul Theroux's interesting article on the difficulty of learning more about Hawaii's social culture(s) is at once a testimony to the islanders' intelligence and to Theroux's capacity for scalpel-like criticism. I love Theroux's books, have read them all--some two or three times. That said, if any culture has the slightest flaw or foilble, Theoux will sniff it out and reveal it. He is equally adroit at praising people and their cultural heritage.
It may well be that Hawaiians are more experienced readers of Theroux's travel books than he might imagine and that they realize he is merciless about some peoples and their culture. Perhaps the Hawaiians realize they would have too much to lose if they cut Theroux loose?
Thank you very much for enabling Paul to present his thoughts and feelings about the island he loves.
Posted by charles Michael Shepard on April 25,2012 | 05:07 PM
My brother went on a hunting trip and stayed in Colonia Dublan. He was there for several days about twelve years ago. At that time, the LDS members were practicing polygamy. Each man had three wives and many children. I seriously doubt that they have discontinued the practice in the intervening years. With Mitt Romney running for president, I suspect that they (and he) would want to keep their polygamy under wraps.
Posted by Rose Priven on April 24,2012 | 01:14 AM
As a second cousin of Mitt Romney and a descendant of Miles Park Romney of Colonia Juarez as well as other families who settled in Colonia Dublan I appreciated this article and the author's experience in visiting the Mormon Colonies. I would point out, however, that the map of the area attached to the article is not accurate. Both Colonia Dublan and Colonia Juarez are placed incorrectly.
Posted by Mark Romney on April 24,2012 | 10:25 PM
This was a lovely article, and the initial comment was a worthy supplement to the information.
Posted by Ryan Grace on April 24,2012 | 04:49 PM
Doesn't anyone realize that George's run for the Presidential nomination was unconstitutional...disqualified by virtue of being born in Mexico. BTW where's Mitt's birth certificate??
Posted by FRED J ABRAHAMS on April 24,2012 | 11:04 AM
The article fails to mention that the "ruins of the pre-Columbian mud city of Paquime" is one of 936 places of outstanding universal value populating UNESCO's World Heritage List. While the remaining Mormon colonies are interesting, the real star in this part of Mexico is Paquime. To call it a "mud city," is more than an understatement. Archaeologists note that Paquime, along with Chaco,600 km north along longitude 108W, are the two largest pre-Columbian cities in the arid expanse that once belonged to Mexico, but now spans the southwestern US states and Chihuahua and Sonora in Mexico. According to the 2008 work "Earth Architecture," by William N. Morgan, Paquime had its origins in a "modest hamlet of mud-domed houses built in pits during the ninth century." What the visitor sees today are the remains of an ancient city that included "ceremonial burial mounds, a large marketplace lined with merchants' booths, a ring of urban parks, sophisticated apartment buildings up to seven stores high, and a grand plaza dividing the city into halves." Morgan, both and architect and archaeologist, notes that the ruins one visits today are made of a material called caliche. I recently visited Casas Grandes, Colonia Dublan, Colonia Juarez, and Mata Ortiz and never once felt unsafe. The people I met there, Mexican, Mormon, and Mennonite, were all marvelous. (See http://www.shieldhouse.org for my experiences on the trip.)
Posted by Richard Shieldhouse on April 21,2012 | 02:17 PM