Alaska's Great Wide Open
A land of silvery light and astonishing peaks, the country's largest state perpetuates the belief that anything is possible
- By Pico Iyer
- Smithsonian magazine, November 2009, Subscribe
(Page 2 of 4)
"No. Pretty close to where we're standing right now."
The next day, the same matter-of-fact strangeness, the same sense of smallness amid the elements, the same polished wryness—and the way these played off scenes so majestic and overpowering they humbled me—resumed at dawn. A young newcomer from Virginia was driving our bus the five-and-a-half hours to the railway depot just outside Denali National Park. "You can look for some of the local sights as we pull out," he said as we started up. "One thing I like watching for is the gas prices rising as we go out of the city." A little later, taking on what I was coming to think of as a distinctive Alaskan love of drollness, he announced, "If you feel a strange fluttering in your heart, an inexplicable sense of excitement, that may be because we're coming up on the Duct Tape Capital of the World"—Sarah Palin's own Wasilla.
Yet as he dropped us at the park entrance, where a worn, dusty blue and white bus was waiting to take us into the wilderness itself, all ironies fell away. Almost no private cars are allowed in Denali—an expanse of six million acres, larger than all of New Hampshire—and the number of full-service lodges where you can spend the night can be counted on the fingers of one hand. Most people enter by bus, driving about 60 miles along a single narrow road to see what they can of "The Mountain," then hurry out again. We, however, were treated to a drive of 75 miles over unpaved roads to our little cabins in Camp Denali, where moose and bears walked around and towering snowcaps reflected in the pond.
When at last we drew up to our destination in the chill twilight, a troupe of caribou was silhouetted on a ridge nearby, and a golden eagle was diving down from its nest. By first light next morning, I felt so washed clean by the silence and the calm that I could hardly remember the person who, a week before, had run an apprehensive finger across a map from Icy Cape to Deadhorse to the first place I'd seen on arrival, Turnagain Bay—names suggesting that life was not easy here.
A quiet place, I was coming to see, teaches you attention; stillness makes you keen-eared as a bear, as alert to sounds in the brush as I had been, a few days before, in Venice, to key changes in Vivaldi. That first Denali morning one of the cheerful young naturalists at the privately owned camp took a group of us out into the tundra. "Six million acres with almost no trails," she exulted. She showed us how to "read" the skull of a caribou—its lost antler suggested it died before the spring—and handed me her binoculars, turned the wrong way round, so that I could see, as through a microscope, the difference between rushes and grass. She pointed out the sandhill cranes whose presence heralded the coming autumn, and she even identified the berries in bear scat, which she was ready to eat, she threatened, should our attention begin to flag.
The springy tundra ("like walking on a trampoline," a fellow visitor remarked) was turning scarlet and yellow, another augury of autumn. "You really don't need to calculate how many people there are per square mile," said a pathologist from Chattanooga squishing through the tussocks behind me. "You need to find out how many miles there are per square people." (He's right: the population density is roughly 1.1 person per square mile.)
What this sense of unending expanse—of loneliness and space and possibility—does to the soul is the story of America, which has always been a place for people lighting out for new territory and seeking new horizons. Every bus driver I met in Alaska seemed to double as tour guide and kept up a steady bombardment of statistics, as if unable to contain his fresh astonishment. Eleven percent of the world's earthquakes crack the ground here. There is a fault in Alaska almost twice as large as California's San Andreas. Anchorage is within 9.5 hours by plane of 90 percent of the civilized world (and roughly five minutes by foot from the wild).
"You need around 2,000 feet of water to land a floatplane," one of these sharers of wonders told me my first day in the state. "You know how many bodies of water with at least that much space there are in Alaska?"
"A thousand."
"No."
"Ten thousand?"
"No. Three million." And with that he went back to driving his bus.
Single Page « Previous 1 2 3 4 Next »
Subscribe now for more of Smithsonian's coverage on history, science and nature.










Comments (10)
This was an article that brought back a lot of memories for me. The writer in my opinion did a very good job describing a huge and diverse area in a small space. 50 years ago most of the non-native residents other than military personal were in Alaska because they wanted to be. They were individuals, and it sounds as if they still are.
In 1958 I drove to Alaska and found a job with the Army Corps of Engineers in Anchorage. Two years later I had to leave for a four-year hitch in the Navy, which did include one year on Kodiak. Alas, my plans to return after my military service were frustrated by other obligations but those few years were among the happiest and most interesting of my life. To even begin to appreciate the state and the differences between it and the south 48, one must spend at least a year there. In those latitudes sunrise and sunset times can change dramatically not only by time of year but in a relatively few miles north or south. And in Spring and Summer those times can be almost meaningless thanks to the long twilight periods.
A few more photos I would have liked to have seen. The seaplane base at Lake Hood – Lake Spenard near Anchorage back in the early 60’s was home to some 20% of US registered floatplanes. That figure is probably larger now. Then there is Merrill Field at Anchorage, what does it look like today.
Is there no up to date photograph of the exterior of the Salty Dawg Saloon? In 1959 along with a few friends from the Corps of Engineers I visited Homer and met Chuck Abbot. That was 5 years before the Good Friday earthquake and I have never heard how much damage was sustained by that old building. Given its location I had assumed that it was probably destroyed.
Posted by Walt Kramer on December 14,2009 | 02:25 AM
It was a typical afternoon; cool, overcast with an intermittent light rain,in the month of August 1966, when I stepped off the blue catamaran supply ship that had docked in front of the only General Store in the Tlinget Indian village of Kake in Southeastern Alaska. I quickly surveyed the physical setting of this new, different and exciting settlement in which I was to live and work as a Business Studies teacher for the next two years.
The first row of houses were built on the tidal flats. Then there was a dirt road followed by another row of houses. The second dirt road was followed by the last row of houses. There was a very noticeable lack of TV antennas. The single wooden water line from a mountainside spring supplied the buildings with water. During the winter the water line would freeze; thereby, making the use of a potty chair a daily necessity. The resourceful and innovative people who lived on the tidal flats had indoor outhouses. When they had the urge to relieve themselves they would sit on the one holer and allow it to drop into the tide water below. Hopefully when the tide went out it would take the human waste out with it. Needless to say if one were to gather octopus, clams or seaweed for the evening meal it was prudent to go to a beach that was at least a quarter mile away.
I asked a little girl where the school Superintendent lived. She spoke in a flat monotone style of English that the house was in the third row up. I later learned that the young people only spoke English, the middle aged folks were bi-lingual and the older aged individuals just spoke Tlingit. The Tlingit language has a guttural sound to it.
The school year ended in May of 1968. I spoke in the Tlingit language. "Goona-cheech:" Thank you. "Suey-yeah-qua-sit-teen:" See you later.
Posted by Charlie Kenyon on December 14,2009 | 04:21 PM
I HAVE MADE TWO ATTEMPTS TO TELL THE STORY OF MY TWO YEARS OF LIVING IN A PRIMITIVE TLINGIT INDIAN VILLAGE IN SOUTHEAST ALASKA COMMENCING IN AUGUST 1966. EACH TIME I GET THROWN INTO CYBER SPACE AND MY NARRATIVE IS FOREVER LOST. IS THERE A METHOD TO SAVE WHAT I HAVE WRITTEN SO WHEN I GET BACK TO THE WEB ADDRESS I CAN CONTINUE WITH MY STORY LINE?
Posted by Charlie Kenyon on December 12,2009 | 10:22 PM
your site is very nice and useful for me, I bookmarked your blog
Posted by canada private bus service on December 5,2009 | 06:10 AM
This story about Alaska is interesting but unfortunately incomplete and somewhat misleading, particularly from the perspective of wildlife. A case in point – totally omitted from the article - is Alaska’s cruel practice of allowing the hunting of wolves from airplanes for a bounty. These animals are spotted from the air, chased to the point of exhaustion, and then killed by gunshot, their bodies slung under the airplane’s wings as proof of their demise. It’s one reason why efforts are being redoubled to pass the Protect America’s Wildlife (PAW) Act in Washington, DC - to bring an end to Alaska’s abominable aerial hunting program and what apparently passes for ‘sportsmanship’ in our northernmost state.
Also, the photo of the young woman grinning beneath A ‘lynx hat” - all that remains of an exquisite animal who was killed for its pelt - makes me wonder if she knew how her headgear was produced. The lynx is threatened or endangered in many places, including the lower 48 states and here in Maine; this unlucky creature was probably caught in a trap, executed at point blank range, and then skinned. These repulsive details say a great deal about the society that sanctions them.
Both of these animals deserve better from the self-styled superior species we humans claim to be. In my view, Alaska has some vital improvements to make in this regard.
Posted by Don Loprieno on November 13,2009 | 01:52 PM
Iyer provides an ideal image of the territory by sharing some of the smallest details that contribute to the uniqueness of the Alaska experience. I found myself captivated by the extensive use of imagery. I would expect that Iyer writing about his experience brought about much-needed recognition to a beautiful land often overlooked.
Posted by Katherine Richardson on November 12,2009 | 10:12 PM
I love the way Iyer described his journey through Alaska with such detail. I felt like I was there experiencing the stillness of life and the calmness of nature. I am from Chicago and absolutely love the city, and I love going to other cities. I think I'd love to visit Alaska for his reason,"You don't come to Alaska for its cities...but for everything that puts them in their place."
Posted by Tyler Michel on November 11,2009 | 06:46 PM
This article is well written and persuaded me to go to Alaska to camp with a couple of my buddies. I love how the author describes Alaska, culture, people, and wildlife. Its a breath of fresh air.
Posted by Derek Parker on November 11,2009 | 11:48 AM
Despite Iyers beautiful use of imagery and a vivid account of his times in Alaska, one has to question is there is a sense of guilt for divulging a secret twice the size of Texas. Those who search out new fronteirs do it not for others, but for their own satisfaction. In the case of Alaska this satisfaction is most definately a sense of being in an unexplored territory that you are uniquely experiencing. By writing about Alaska and its wonders, the untainted tundra becomes less mysterious every word. Each word attracts more tourists who undoubtedly do not preserve the natural wonders of Alaska. Writing about such a wonderful place is a benefit and detriment at the same time. You are educating readers while at the same time encouraging them to explore the land you so dearly want to protect.
Posted by Alden Harris on November 11,2009 | 10:42 AM
Carey Winfrey states in the opening editorial remarks. "Our title is our greatest asset...Smithsonian confers authority, integrity, responsibility, and trust." As an avid supporter of the Smithsonian these words ring true and are the reasons for my support of the work done by the Institution. However, I am writing out of concern for the publications integrity. I must tell you how disappointed I was to see Smithsonian use a 20 to 30 year old stock photo for the cover showing Portage lake and Portage Glacier in the background. For those readers who are not from the area this photo would seem appropriate for a story about Alaska, the truth is, due to climate change Portage Glacier seen in the background (viewers right) has receded from view and is no longer calving such large pieces of ice. As a resident of Anchorage I can certainly appreciate Pico's enthusiasm for our state. I made that discovery years ago. That said, I cannot understand why the magazine chose to cherry pick from cheap out dated royalty free stock photos to show case a state as beautiful and dynamic as Alaska. I implore the publication to reevaluate when and what stock photos to utilize in their stories and return to maintaining imagery that speaks to the organizations creed of authority, integrity, responsibility, and trust.
Sincerely,
Tim Remick
Posted by Tim Remick on November 3,2009 | 06:55 PM