We were flying what seemed only inches above a slope of the 20,300-foot-high Mount McKinley, now more often called by its Athabaskan name—Denali. Below our six-seat Cessna was a glacier extending 36 miles from the great peak. The doors of the little plane were open so that a photographer swathed in gloves and sweaters could lean out and capture the scene. I tried not to think about the statistic I'd spotted that morning on a bulletin board, a tally of the year's climbing figures at Denali: "Missing/Fatalities: 4."
It was a sparkling August morning—eight inches of snow had fallen four days before—and the snow line, after a chill and rainy summer, was already hundreds of feet lower than usual for this time of year. After barely six hours of sleep in semi-darkness, I had awoken at Camp Denali before dawn to see an unearthly pink glow light up the sharpened peaks. My cabin offered no electricity, no running water, no phone or Internet connection and no indoor plumbing. What it did offer was the rare luxury of silence, of stillness, of shockingly clear views of the snowcaps 20 miles away.
I'm not an outdoors person; the cabin's propane lamps defeated me daily and walking 50 feet through the cold near-dark to get icy water from a tiny tap was an amenity it took a while to appreciate. Northern exposure has never appealed to me as much as southern light.
But Alaska was celebrating its 50th anniversary—it became the 49th state on January 3, 1959—and the festivities were a reminder how, in its quirkiness, the state expanded and challenged our understanding of what our Union is all about. In almost 20,000 days on earth I had never set foot in our largest state, and as I stepped out of the Cessna and collected my heart again, wondering if forgoing travel insurance made me an honorary Alaskan, I was starting to see how Nature's creations could command one's senses as grippingly as any artist's perfections along Venice's Grand Canal. Wild open space holds a power that no museum or chandeliered restaurant can match.
Alaska plays havoc with your senses and turns everyday logic on its head. It's the westernmost state of the Union, as well, of course, as the northernmost, but I was surprised to learn, the day I arrived, that it is also (because the Aleutians cross the 180th meridian and extend to the east longitude side) the easternmost. Alaska is more than twice the size of Texas, I had read, yet has fewer miles of highway than Vermont.
When faced with such facts, one reaches for bearings, for ways to steady oneself. Hours after I touched down, from California, I set my watch back an hour, walked the few small blocks of downtown Anchorage (ending abruptly at a great expanse of water) and realized I was surrounded by Canada, Russia and the Arctic. The unpeopledness and scale of things made me feel as if I had fallen off the edge of the earth, into an entirely otherworldly place like nothing I had ever seen (with the possible exception of Iceland or parts of Australia), with people sitting on benches in the weird gray light of 9:30 p.m. and indigenous souls selling turquoise-colored teddy bears along a busy street. The shops in the scrappy center of town were offering "FREE ULU KNIFE with purchase of $50 or more" and "Raven Lunatic Art." One store's signs—advertising salmon-leather wallets, Sahale nuts and sealskin tumblers—were in both English and Japanese. Large stuffed bears stood outside other stores, and a stuffed moose stood guard outside a Starbucks.
Yet all around these desultory and somehow provisional signs of human settlement there was a silver sharpness to the air, a northern clarity. On clear days, you could see Denali, 140 miles away, from downtown Anchorage. At midnight, you could read a book on an unlit street. I remembered that naturalist John Muir had found in the local skies a radiance and sense of possibility that seemed to border on the divine. "The clearest of Alaskan air is always appreciably substantial," the Scottish-born visionary had written—he had set off without his bride to scout Alaska days after his wedding—"so much so that it would seem as if one might test its quality by rubbing it between the thumb and finger."
You don't come to Alaska for its cities, I started to understand, but for everything that puts them in their place. An Anchorage resident pointed out a reindeer sitting placidly in a cage in a small downtown garden maintained by an eccentric citizen.
"Your first piece of wildlife!" my new friend announced with pride.
"Actually, my second," I countered. "I saw a moose grazing by the road just outside the airport, coming in."
"Yeah," he answered, unimpressed. "I saw some whales while driving up here. A bear, too. One of them just mauled a woman who was going for a hike in my neighborhood park. Right next to my house."
"In the outskirts of the city?"



Comments
Carey Winfrey states in the opening editorial remarks. "Our title is our greatest asset...Smithsonian confers authority, integrity, responsibility, and trust." As an avid supporter of the Smithsonian these words ring true and are the reasons for my support of the work done by the Institution. However, I am writing out of concern for the publications integrity. I must tell you how disappointed I was to see Smithsonian use a 20 to 30 year old stock photo for the cover showing Portage lake and Portage Glacier in the background. For those readers who are not from the area this photo would seem appropriate for a story about Alaska, the truth is, due to climate change Portage Glacier seen in the background (viewers right) has receded from view and is no longer calving such large pieces of ice. As a resident of Anchorage I can certainly appreciate Pico's enthusiasm for our state. I made that discovery years ago. That said, I cannot understand why the magazine chose to cherry pick from cheap out dated royalty free stock photos to show case a state as beautiful and dynamic as Alaska. I implore the publication to reevaluate when and what stock photos to utilize in their stories and return to maintaining imagery that speaks to the organizations creed of authority, integrity, responsibility, and trust.
Sincerely,
Tim Remick
Posted by Tim Remick on November 3,2009 | 03:55PM
Despite Iyers beautiful use of imagery and a vivid account of his times in Alaska, one has to question is there is a sense of guilt for divulging a secret twice the size of Texas. Those who search out new fronteirs do it not for others, but for their own satisfaction. In the case of Alaska this satisfaction is most definately a sense of being in an unexplored territory that you are uniquely experiencing. By writing about Alaska and its wonders, the untainted tundra becomes less mysterious every word. Each word attracts more tourists who undoubtedly do not preserve the natural wonders of Alaska. Writing about such a wonderful place is a benefit and detriment at the same time. You are educating readers while at the same time encouraging them to explore the land you so dearly want to protect.
Posted by Alden Harris on November 11,2009 | 07:42AM
This article is well written and persuaded me to go to Alaska to camp with a couple of my buddies. I love how the author describes Alaska, culture, people, and wildlife. Its a breath of fresh air.
Posted by Derek Parker on November 11,2009 | 08:48AM
I love the way Iyer described his journey through Alaska with such detail. I felt like I was there experiencing the stillness of life and the calmness of nature. I am from Chicago and absolutely love the city, and I love going to other cities. I think I'd love to visit Alaska for his reason,"You don't come to Alaska for its cities...but for everything that puts them in their place."
Posted by Tyler Michel on November 11,2009 | 03:46PM
Iyer provides an ideal image of the territory by sharing some of the smallest details that contribute to the uniqueness of the Alaska experience. I found myself captivated by the extensive use of imagery. I would expect that Iyer writing about his experience brought about much-needed recognition to a beautiful land often overlooked.
Posted by Katherine Richardson on November 12,2009 | 07:12PM
This story about Alaska is interesting but unfortunately incomplete and somewhat misleading, particularly from the perspective of wildlife. A case in point – totally omitted from the article - is Alaska’s cruel practice of allowing the hunting of wolves from airplanes for a bounty. These animals are spotted from the air, chased to the point of exhaustion, and then killed by gunshot, their bodies slung under the airplane’s wings as proof of their demise. It’s one reason why efforts are being redoubled to pass the Protect America’s Wildlife (PAW) Act in Washington, DC - to bring an end to Alaska’s abominable aerial hunting program and what apparently passes for ‘sportsmanship’ in our northernmost state.
Also, the photo of the young woman grinning beneath A ‘lynx hat” - all that remains of an exquisite animal who was killed for its pelt - makes me wonder if she knew how her headgear was produced. The lynx is threatened or endangered in many places, including the lower 48 states and here in Maine; this unlucky creature was probably caught in a trap, executed at point blank range, and then skinned. These repulsive details say a great deal about the society that sanctions them.
Both of these animals deserve better from the self-styled superior species we humans claim to be. In my view, Alaska has some vital improvements to make in this regard.
Posted by Don Loprieno on November 13,2009 | 10:52AM