Saving Punjab
A Sikh architect is helping to preserve cultural sites in the north Indian state still haunted by 1947’s heart-wrenching Partition
- By Geoffrey C. Ward
- Photographs by Raghu Rai
- Smithsonian magazine, September 2009, Subscribe
(Page 3 of 5)
As we negotiated Amritsar traffic, Gurmeet's iPhone rarely stopped ringing. She now heads the Cultural Resource Conservation Initiative (CRCI), a multidisciplinary conservation consultancy with projects all over the country, but it is preserving the relics of Sikh history that means the most to her. We rounded a traffic circle marked by a battered Patton tank captured from Pakistan by a Sikh regiment and pulled up at a little guard post. Two watchmen peered curiously into the car window, recognized Gurmeet and waved us through. We were about to enter Gobindgarh, a 43-acre, 18th-century Sikh fortress with four mountainous bastions and a broad moat choked with trees. Ranjit Singh stored some of his vast treasure within its walls. The British Army occupied it. So did the army of free India, which in 2006 turned it over to the state of Punjab. It is not yet open to the general public, but in the middle of the old parade ground craftsmen are mixing traditional lime mortar in a circular pit. Under the CRCI's direction they are shoring up the mammoth brick tower in which Ranjit Singh lived when visiting the holy city. Gurmeet has stopped by to make sure the color of the lime is right. But she has bigger plans, as well. There are rumors that an American-based hotelier plans to turn the fort into a luxury hotel for overseas Punjabis interested in revisiting the shrines of their faith without more than minimal contact with the real India. If he succeeds, she fears ordinary citizens will be kept out of this precious relic of their history.
'"Freezing buildings in time may not work here the way it does in the West," Gurmeet says. "There are too many pressures for change. But turning everything into tourist hotels won't work either. Our historic buildings need to mean something to the people who live around them. We need to involve them in our work, to make them understand its importance." To achieve those ends she hopes to undertake an overall management plan that would both provide for world-class preservation and supply visitors with the interpretive materials they need to understand monuments like this. (Since our visit, Gurmeet has been given the go-ahead by the Punjab government.)
That understanding has largely been missing in Punjab. In recent years, for example, Sikh congregations have been "improving" historic structures by bulldozing them and then constructing ever-more-lavish substitutes on the sites. "Somewhere along the line the original, unpretentious Sikh architecture has begun to be perceived as something to be ashamed of," Gurmeet says. "Our gurus were simple, down-to-earth men of the soil, and their buildings reflect the simplicity and harmony Sikhism is all about."
Wagah marks the western end of the Indian portion of the Grand Trunk Road. It is the sole crossing point between the two Punjabs; Lahore, the capital of Ranjit Singh's Sikh kingdom and of pre-Partition united Punjab, is just 18 miles up the road. The formal flag-lowering ceremony that takes place at Wagah at dusk every evening of the year must be one of the oddest regularly scheduled events on earth. On the evening we visited, hundreds of eager onlookers streamed into specially built grandstands in the coppery light. On the Indian side, a big amiable crowd jostled one another for the best seats, men, women and children sitting together. In the roadbed, several busloads of teenage girls in brightly colored salwar kameez danced to recorded bhangra music. On the Pakistani side, a giant portrait of Mohammed Ali Jinnah, the founding father whom Pakistanis call their Quaid-i-Azam, or "Great Leader," looked down upon stadium seats in which men and women sat carefully segregated: men and boys on the left side of the road; girls and women (a handful in full-length burqas) on the right. Instead of dancing schoolgirls, three gray-bearded mullahs in green and white raced back and forth, waving huge Pakistani flags to whip up enthusiasm.
The ceremony itself proved both impressive and ludicrous. As the spectators cheered and chanted "Long Live India" or "Long Live Pakistan," squads of uniformed Punjabis from both sides of the border, picked for their height and fierce good looks and wearing turbans with starched coxcombs that made them look still taller, quick-marched toward one another till they stood only a foot or two apart. Then, they stamped and whirled, puffed out their chests and flared their nostrils in perfect military unison, each apparently seeking to out-testosterone his opposite number before hauling down their flags. I asked the major in charge of the Indian contingent how seriously his men took their nightly confrontation with their neighbors. He laughed. "We've been doing this for more than 20 years," he said. "We know each other's names. It's all for the audience."
It was the muted reaction of that audience that fascinated me. The region around Wagah had witnessed some of the worst Partition bloodletting. Since then, India and Pakistan have gone to war three times. A few weeks before my visit, fanatics trained in Pakistan had butchered more than 160 people in Mumbai. The people who had turned out to watch the ceremony this evening had grown hoarse shouting patriotic slogans. And yet when the flags were finally folded away and the big gates clanged shut, spectators on both sides drifted as close to the dividing line as the respective armies would allow, peering silently across the no man's land into the faces of counterparts who looked so much like themselves.
Most of the monuments we'd seen testified to Punjab's bloody past: battlefield markers; crumbling village walls built to bar marauders; gurdwaras that honor Sikhs martyred in battle against the Moguls; and Jallianwalla Bagh, the Amritsar park now filled with flowers and shouting schoolchildren, where, in 1919, a British commander ordered his men to fire upon unarmed civilians—killing at least 379 and galvanizing the independence movement.
But there are also sites that still evoke the mutual respect that characterized life for many Punjabis before the tragedy of Partition. Gurmeet led us to one of the most unlikely of them, the Guru ki Maseet, or "Guru's Mosque," in the old walled town of Sri Hargobindpur, west of Amritsar. Here, on a bluff overlooking the Beas River, a member of the Nihang Sikh order, justly celebrated for the ferocity with which it defended the faith against its enemies in the old days, stands lonely guard over a Muslim house of worship. His name is Baba Balwant Singh and he has been on duty here for more than a quarter of a century. The shrine he protects is a modest three-domed brick structure, barely 20 feet deep, with arched entryways so low that anyone much over five feet tall must duck to enter. But it has a truly extraordinary history.
Single Page « Previous 1 2 3 4 5 Next »
Subscribe now for more of Smithsonian's coverage on history, science and nature.









Comments (12)
The beautiful cultural and religious site of Golden Temple is the most sacred place for Sikhs. It is enthralling and great experience to visit Punjab and golden temple just for once. if you want some more information then you may visit this website for more info http://www.mytravelindiaguide.com/north-india/travel-punjab-a-travel-tour-to-granary-land-of-india/ This website also has some useful info but if you want to have some more information about India then you can bookmark it on http://www.mytravelindiaguide.com/feed/
Posted by travelindiaguide on June 21,2010 | 11:24 PM
Great opening par. Enthralling angle, and beguiling vision of the real India.
Posted by gordon david durich on February 4,2010 | 11:00 PM
I admire Geoff Ward's work - from providing the intellectual scaffolding on which Ken Burns builds his documentaries about America to writing about FDR to writing about India ... he covers a lot of ground with a clear-eyed affection for his subjects unlike, say, Theroux whom you also feature in this issue, and whose writing is pitiably ethnocentric unless his subject is Britain or the United States.
Still, Ward succumbs to the all-too American habit of seeing a "real" India outside Gobindgarh, disorderly and dusty, against his implicitly "unreal" India if Gobindgarh does become a sealed off and antiseptic, American-style spiritual Williamsburg.
Why a disorderly and dusty India should be the "real" India and why a planned area which offers creature comforts with spiritual solace should be the "unreal" India, escapes me.
They are all part of the Indian reality -- as they are of the reality in the U.S. or anywhere else. Or, should we begin to think of American strip malls as the "real" America and the beautifully-laid avenues of Washington D.C. as the "unreal" America?
Punjabis interested in revisiting the shrines of their faith without more than minimal contact with the real India.
Posted by Siddhartha Banerjee on November 6,2009 | 03:52 PM
i am really touched by the writer's emotional empathy .
yes , ido agree that our punjab has been on the forefront since[ the invader mohammed of ghazni ] long and the pepole are always the sufferer .
we have lost in all the ways . what really sadens me the approach of the central goverment towards the punjab policies .
pakistan is sending in so much of drugs and they cannot legally stop the bus service .
well leaders donot think about masses they just think about their SWISS accounts
indu
Posted by indu bajwa on November 6,2009 | 04:03 AM
It is so nice to read an article about India - and especially Punjab - written by someone who actually knows the area and does good research. This is sadly too rare in US publications and I hope to see more well-informed articles like this!
Posted by Jchemist on November 3,2009 | 09:42 AM
why did the writer did not mention the weapons found in the "golden temple" during the raid that occured when Indira Gandhi was ruler?
Posted by michael on October 2,2009 | 04:54 PM
God, or Allah, or Brahman, or whatever name the Supreme Being is known by, is supposed to be the universal unifying force in our lives, It's ironic that men would rend nations asunder, divide families, fight over relics and temples, and kill and maim one another in the name of this unifying Being, the one all mankind is born of. To echo the plaint of one Rodney King, purported victim of excessive police force and street philosopher by default, "Can't we all just get along?"
Posted by Armando Chavez on September 22,2009 | 01:24 PM
picture shown of Darbar sahib is incorrectly labeled as Mecca of the sikhs, Mecca of the sikhs is Gurudwara Sahib at Nankana beacause Guru Nank was born in Nankana not at Amritsar.
Mecca of muslims is Mecca for them beacause Mohammad sahib was born in Mecca not any city outside mecca
Posted by charanjit singh on September 20,2009 | 09:24 PM
What is remarkable about the work on architectural conservation being carried out by Rai's team is it's absolute professionalism. In an environment where political and economic environments eschew "short term fixes " in favour of pragmatic and long lasting solutions their work enjoys a reputation for thoroughness which others would do well to envy.
Posted by Harbinder Singh on August 31,2009 | 03:59 PM
To the editor:
- A minor correction
Photo # 16 in 'Photo Gallery' titled "Preservationist Gurmeet Rai at Golden Temple" is incorrectly labeled. That picture is taken at 'Durgiana Temple' in Amritsar
This temple is occasionally also referred as Golden temple but then author needs to make distinction between both the Sikh and Hindu Golden temples - Sikh golden temple which is AKA 'Harimandir Sahib' and the Hindu Golden temple which is AKA as 'Durgiana Temple'.
Posted by Mr Singh on August 28,2009 | 07:23 PM
Very well written article. Thank you The writer through his experience and research communicates Guru Nanak's view of God as well as a brief history of the sikhs. Thank you. However, I have one correction or comment. The writer on page 2 states "Sikh men are identifiable by the turbans and beards their faith requires the orthodox to wear, ........." This is not true. All Sikh (particularly men) are supposed to wear turbans. After Guru Gobind Singh baptised Khalsa, and since then some woman wear turban, too. In my view point, there are no orthodox or unorthodox sikhs. They are all sikhs. Of course, as Guru Nanak said there are no Hindus and no Muslims, any one can read and gain wisdom of the Guru Granth Sahibs.
Manjeet
Posted by Manjeet Kaur Tangri on August 27,2009 | 01:41 AM
very well written article
impressed by the work done by Gurmeet and her colleagues at the local level.
I have just come back from Dera Baba Nanak. I was driving my bus from Amritsar to the place. As our bus crossed through some village road close to army centre few km from Dera Baba Nanaki saw ancient temple domes. Coulnot see a clear view as there were cow dung piles around it and stack of grass. Someone could take a look. I have taken pictures from bus and could post to you, if there was an email id.
regards
madhvi
chandigarh
Posted by madhvi on August 27,2009 | 01:55 PM