Paul Theroux’s Quest to Define Hawaii
For this renowned travel writer, no place has proved harder to decipher than his home for the past 22 years
- By Paul Theroux
- Smithsonian magazine, May 2012, Subscribe
Hawaii seems a robust archipelago, a paradise pinned like a bouquet to the middle of the Pacific, fragrant, sniffable and easy of access. But in 50 years of traveling the world, I have found the inner life of these islands to be difficult to penetrate, partly because this is not one place but many, but most of all because of the fragile and floral way in which it is structured. Yet it is my home, and home is always the impossible subject, multilayered and maddening.
Two thousand miles from any great landmass, Hawaii was once utterly unpeopled. Its insularity was its salvation; and then, in installments, the world washed ashore and its Edenic uniqueness was lost in a process of disenchantment. There was first the discovery of Hawaii by Polynesian voyagers, who brought with them their dogs, their plants, their fables, their cosmology, their hierarchies, their rivalries and their predilection for plucking the feathers of birds; the much later barging in of Europeans and their rats and diseases and junk food; the introduction of the mosquito, which brought avian flu and devastated the native birds; the paving over of Honolulu; the bombing of Pearl Harbor; and many hurricanes and tsunamis. Anything but robust, Hawaii is a stark illustration of Proust’s melancholy observation: “The true paradises are the paradises we have lost.”
I think of a simple native plant, the alula, or cabbage plant, which is found only in Hawaii. In maturity, as an eight-foot specimen, you might mistake it for a tall, pale, skinny creature with a cabbage for a head (“cabbage on a stick” is its common description, Brighamia insignis its proper name). In the 1990s an outcrop of it was found growing on a high cliff on the Na Pali Coast in Kauai by some intrepid botanists. A long-tongued moth, a species of hawk moth, its natural pollinator, had gone extinct, and because of this the plant itself was facing extinction. But some rapelling botanists, dangling from ropes, pollinated it with their dabbling fingers; in time, they collected the seeds and germinated them.
Like most of Hawaii’s plants, an early form of the alula was probably carried to the volcanic rock in the ocean in the Paleozoic era as a seed in the feathers of a migratory bird. But the eons altered it, made it milder, more precious, dependent on a single pollinator. That’s the way with flora on remote islands. Plants, so to speak, lose their sense of danger, their survival skills—their thorns and poisons. Isolated, without competition and natural enemies, they become sportive and odder and special—and far more vulnerable to anything new or introduced. Now there are many alula plants—though each one is the result of having been propagated by hand.
This is the precarious fate of much of Hawaii’s flora, and its birds—its native mammals are just two, the Hawaiian hoary bat (Lasiurus cinereus semotus), Hawaii’s only native land mammal, and the Hawaiian monk seal (Monachus schauinslandi), both severely endangered and needlessly so. I have seen the slumber of a monk seal on a Hawaii beach interrupted by a dithering dog walker with an unleashed pet, and by onlookers in bathing suits hooting gleefully. There are fewer than 1,100 monk seals in the islands and the numbers are decreasing. The poor creature is undoubtedly doomed.
Hawaii offers peculiar challenges to anyone wishing to write about the place or its people. Of course, many writers do, arriving for a week or so and gushing about the marvelous beaches, the excellent food, the heavenly weather, filling travel pages with holiday hyperbole. Hawaii has a well-deserved reputation as a special set of islands, a place apart, fragrant with blossoms, caressed by trade winds, vibrant with the plucking of ukuleles, effulgent with sunshine spanking the water—see how easy it is? None of this is wrong; but there is more, and it is difficult to find or describe.
I have spent my life on the road waking in a pleasant, or not so pleasant hotel, and setting off every morning after breakfast hoping to discover something new and repeatable, something worth writing about. I think other serious travelers do the same, looking for a story, facing the world, tramping out a book with their feet—a far cry from sitting at a desk and staring mutely at a glowing screen or a blank page. The traveler physically enacts the narrative, chases the story, often becomes part of the story. This is the way most travel narratives happen.
Because of my capacity for listening to strangers’ tales, or the details of their lives, my patience with their food and their crotchets, my curiosity that borders on nosiness, I am told that anyone traveling with me experiences an unbelievable tedium, and this is why I choose to travel alone. Where I have found a place, or its people, to be unyielding I have moved on. But this is a rare happenstance. The wider world in my experience is anything but unyielding. I seldom meet uncooperative people. In traditional societies, especially, I’ve found folks to be hospitable, helpful, talkative, grateful for my interest, and curious about me, too—who I am, where I’m from, and by the way where’s my wife? I have sometimes encountered hostility, but in each case I have found that conflict dramatic enough to write about—a rifle muzzle in my face in Malawi, a predatory shifta bandit in the northern Kenya desert, a pickpocket in Florence, a drunken policeman at a roadblock in rural Angola, a mob in India, teenaged boys jabbing spears at me in a shallow lagoon where I was paddling in Papua New Guinea. Such confrontations go with the territory.
My love for traveling to islands amounts to a pathological condition known as nesomania, an obsession with islands. This craze seems reasonable to me, because islands are small self-contained worlds that can help us understand larger ones. For example, in Easter Island, Earth Island, the authors Paul Bahn and John Flenley convincingly argue that the fate of the world has been prefigured by the eco-disaster of Easter Island, the history of this small rock standing as a parable of the earth. Literature is full of island parables too, from The Tempest through Robinson Crusoe to Lord of the Flies, and notably in each case the drama arises from people who have arrived on the island from the outside world.
One of the traits that I’ve found in many island cultures is a deep suspicion of the outsiders, palangi, as such people are called in Samoa, suggesting they’ve dropped from the sky; a haole in Hawaii, meaning “of another breath”; the “wash-ashore” as non-islanders are dismissively termed in Martha’s Vineyard and other islands. Of course it’s understandable that an islander would regard a visitor with a degree of suspicion. An island is a fixed and finite piece of geography, and usually the whole place has been carved up and claimed. It is inconceivable that a newcomer, invariably superfluous, could bring a benefit to such a place; suspicion seems justified. The very presence of the visitor, the new arrival, the settler, suggests self-interest and scheming.
Subscribe now for more of Smithsonian's coverage on history, science and nature.









Comments (61)
+ View All Comments
It's simple: some of the local people in Hawaii could have sometimes nastiness, meanness, badness towards travelers, white people, etc. Why ? Something is wrong with them. It's not enough to say "Aloha" and "Mahalo", you need to have these concepts in your heart. Just to be nice and kind to other people from other places. It's simple ! They, local people, make their life complicated and they are not happy because of that ! It's a fake smile and life !
Posted by "Goodness Concept " on October 27,2012 | 08:32 PM
having lived on the island of Molokai for 45yrs of the 69yrs that I have been alive and being 60% native hawaiian....early childhood in kalia waikiki...tourist had to be wealthy to travel by boat to oahu where only the royal hawaiian hotel and moana hotel was WAIKIKI back then...relatives on all island......no haole...translation ole..no more the haaa breath...can write about place and people that have been here for generations and understand the kanaka maoli...to call hawaii your home for a mere 22 years you are speaking the truthwhen you say you feel unable to simulate and penetrate the wisdom of these island we know and feel sorry for you,hope you made a killing on your article.....aloha
Posted by Kimo Kalaniopuu Mcpherson on September 26,2012 | 03:33 PM
I too lived in Hawaii for many years. The Hawaiian people have HUGE HEARTS. Your author is about as welcome as an archaeologist in Indian Country collecting information of special even spiritual significance to publish for self importance and money. Face it man, they just don't like you.
Posted by Mary Ann Dow on August 29,2012 | 12:19 PM
I've been on the big island for 20 years and could write my own book on the complicated social study that is life in Hawaii. I greatly appreciate Mr Theroux's writing and world-view. (Dark Star Safari was the best travel book I've ever read.) Here, he is being criticized by americans who don't always appreciate his sometimes less than cheery attitude. There was a European influence in Mr Theroux's formative years and I suspect this different view is a source of misunderstanding. I've experienced this all my life.
Posted by Robert on July 23,2012 | 07:47 PM
Collectively, the comments are pretty fascinating. Many of the angry reactions have the whiff of a tribal blame-the-messenger attitude. Emphasis on tribal. There's a casual crankiness in Theroux's writing that often comes through when he uses individual interaction, singular events, to support his grander theories. He is consistent – he always does this – fairly or unfairly.
Posted by Bostonia on July 10,2012 | 08:56 AM
It is indeed sobering to see Paul, and i am sure there are more individuals of the same conviction and experience, has the candid, courage and deep self reflection to get himself to write such a iconoclastic article about his home and his land. Yes, there is wrong among us and hiding and trying to hid it wont make it go away. As anticlimactic and myth busting as it might sounds to some of us, as some of us have actually lived on Island for many years and invariably get to see and feel what Paul wrote about, this article is perhaps merely the tip of a giant iceberg. Islands are a multiverse within another with people who say and do things not always out of the spirit of Aloha. Aloha has been usurped as a term and as an identifier by some to define others and sun categorize them to their liking. The "blood drop" is the right that sets about making many wrongs look right. Hawaiian homeland as oppose to Haoles taking over the land, as presumed and sold within sub groups and resurfaced in state debate, only to exacerbate the already unhappy relationship among the settlers.
The pervasiveness of mistrust and entitlement seem to have imbued some settlers, as i wish to call them settlers rather than citizens since some of us peoples coming earlier rather than later to this land should not inherently bestow the right to call the land more mine than yours, nor the blood line can do the favor for that matter, has caused the rifts and walls of cultural separation. In my experience the pervasiveness of the mistrust and non aloha has find its way in to written laws and institutions so much as on the surface and depth of our cultural subconsciousness.
Posted by I'o on June 28,2012 | 03:46 PM
I think it is interesting that Mr. Theroux pays $60 a year for a University Library card. I wonder is he is aware that you can get a Public Library Card for a one time price of $5 and you can borrow books from any Library in the state. You can even order them online and pick them up at your local library. It would be interesting to know if Mr. Theroux has spent any time on the Island of Lanai. His views do not seem to match our experience.
Posted by Nancy on June 7,2012 | 10:46 PM
I got a kick out of the comment here from the white 30-year resident of Hawaii who "actually welcomed" being discriminated against, because it so perfectly sums up white political correctness as a competitive altruistic status-symbol strategy and as the disease that is destroying Western civilization. Obviously Hawaii is a breathtakingly beautiful state with many fine people. I have friends and relatives there. However Paul Theroux and the Smithsonian are to be commended for trying to get to the core truth of things--and isn't that a big part of what the Smithsonian is all about?--and cast aside the myth that many have propagandized, that Hawaii represents our future warm and welcoming, merrily ever more multicultural and vibrant future. On the other hand, despite how different areas of the world might welcome wealthy Westerners, such as visiting travel writers, Hawaii is obviously much more the norm than the exception, as far as most humans preferring to be comfortably tucked within their their own economic, cultural, ethnic and racial enclaves, as readily can be demonstrated by housing patterns in mainland USA, even when it comes to those most vehemently screaming "Diversity is our greatest strength!" As we saw in the case of the Soviet Union, no system can function for all that many decades when it is based on a top-down utopian fantasy.
Posted by Thomas Michael Andres on May 26,2012 | 12:14 AM
I concur with Lena on this. In true colonial form, Theroux has completely de-historicized Hawaii's modern condition. Entitlement oozes from between his words, dressed up in feigned understanding and sympathy. Nowhere does he address the socioeconomic conditions created out of the US' illegal annexation of the islands and its accompanying capitalism that has made Hawaii an impossible place to live for people of Hawaiian heritage, whose home Hawaii truly is. It is people like Theroux himself who calls Hawaii "home" who make it so that Hawaiians comprise the largest homeless population in the islands, and many more who must leave to find a more affordable life. It doesn't take a brain surgeon to figure out that those conditions might cause resentment in the indigenous population. Theroux himself is part of the problem, certainly not part of the solution just because he thinks of himself as "culturally sensitive." This is to say nothing of his anecdotal use of the term "one-drop rule" which is actually quite incorrect in the Hawaiian context. To the contrary; the US government does not engage the one-drop rule as a way to recognize Hawaiian identity (which would mean much more land would have to have been given back under the Hawaiian Homes Act). But that's another story with not enough room here.
Posted by Dina GW on May 24,2012 | 11:24 AM
Maybe the author cannot find acceptance because he presents himself as aloof and a little better than the average cat. He appears to be trying to learn because it's of his benefit, not because of innate desire to become part of a community. I lived in Hawaii and found the local folks to be friendly and accepting. And I loved the music, history, culture, and traditions. At a one year old birthday party with 300 locals, I was the only haole, but never felt in the minority, just part of a fun-loving group of folks. Theroux might set people off with his snobishness; he did the same thing in "The Happy Peoples of Oceana" and in Australia. Maybe he should stop working at understanding too many social complexities, and just start living.
Posted by Andy Voikos on May 23,2012 | 06:09 PM
I came to Maui thirty years ago, a 52 year old haole female. I originally felt "discriminated against"(more from Japanese than Hawaiians), which I actually welcomed since I had never before experienced it, and felt it helped me understand friends on the mainland who had experienced discrimination. I also felt, like "Annie", a strong spiritual connection to the land -- for the first time, this is "home". I do live on "an island within an island", (a good phrase), but agree with other commenters that Theroux comes across as arrogant and "entitled", not wanting to share and connect to individuals, but to exploit them for commercial reasons. Theroux does not comment on the American complicity in the totally illegal overthrow of the monarchy, or the many many years of "quiet title" actions by which the Big Five picked up so many small holdings belonging to Hawaiian families. Thirty years ago there were legal notices in the papers every week for multiple "quiet title" actions. I see the hostility evident on Molokai etc as part of the Hawaiians becoming aware of how much they have been robbed by haoles. Shortly after I arrived on Maui, the splintered Hawaiian factions came together to protest the unearthing of over 1000 burials in the digging of the Ritz Carlton foundations in a sand dune. The reversal of that action, moving the Ritz Carlton to a different site, was the first time I know of that Hawaiians found an effective voice. Next the protests, over many years, of the bombing runs on Kaho'olawe, were successful and the island was returned to Hawaiian control. Every time I drive to Hana I am overwhelmingly aware that this island and its flora and fauna developed for over a million years without any human presence. I and my ancestors come from lands that were covered in glaciers hundreds of feet deep, only 18,000 years ago. To me, the Native Hawaiians are newcomers, like me, and we share a spiritual connection to this island.
Posted by Sally Raisbeck on May 21,2012 | 11:53 PM
When I first visited these islands I was overwhelmed by a spiritual connection that has endured to this day. I was standing in a pasture on Parker Ranch on the Big Island, cows all around and I knew I was home. Now that I am home, maybe like others who have come before I feel very protective of this place. I dread all the poorly planned development that trashes the islands. The misuse and abuse of the ocean and the burning cane fields irk me. When the Superferry began service between Oahu and Maui I donated funds for the court battle and wrote letters to the editor. Hated the intrusion of "others" stripping our reefs and stealing our moss rocks. Our friends here are from all over the world but not Hawiian. The discrimination is a sad useless behavior mostly grown out of ignorance. If it divides the population it sets up a wedge for bad policy decisions by our civil servants. We all get screwed. I have enjoyed Paul's writing because he rarely sugar-coats his experiences. Like many places,Hawaii has a dark side too. Remember the wars between the islands when the Iao Valley River ran red with warriors blood? This place is unique and we should continue to celebrate it, warts and all.
Posted by Annie on May 18,2012 | 02:23 AM
Regarding "Hawaiian Mormons" - We are interested in your reference for the "Land of Joshua (now California)" Hagoth and the Land of Joshua are both mentioned in the Book of Mormon. What is the reference for the land of Joshua being connected with California (or the "land northward" mentioned in Alma 63:5-8 which you cited)?
Posted by JH Todd on May 18,2012 | 05:07 PM
We lived on Oahu for three years in the early 70s. It was so beautiful in places. Waikiki and Honolulu were tourist traps, shiny and dingy all at the same time. Our Kailua house was within walking distance of what we considered the loveliest beach on the island. Emerging from the tunnel coming over the Pali each evening on my way home from work as a civilian federal employee at Pearl Harbor, I was always moved nearly to tears by the majestic panorama spread before me. Sadly, underneath this surface veneer lurked the reality of this "melting pot:" a sea of restlessness, suspicion, seething resentment and studied aloofness that bordered at times on seeming paranoia. There was no love between natives and Haoles to put it mildly, nor for that matter, between Portuguese and Samoans or the Chinese and other Asians. Presumably, this innate hostility was mostly held in check by the knowledge that the economy rose and fell with tourism so the Aloha welcomes were trundled out along with the tours, while the locals laughed behind their hands at the tourists lapping it up and spending freely. Our daughters were middle school and high school age. Our youngest, blonde and petite, didn't stand a chance in the environment of hate and physical confrontation. We placed her in a private religious school until departing for home. The oldest made cheerleader at the local high school, an almost unprecedented achievement for a haole but it did not protect her from being struck in the head by a rock throwing, intensely jealous local. There was constant tension and innumerable incidents. Paul Theroux's piece is the first I have read in all these years that actually tells it like it is. Living there without children and clustered with your own ethnic or cultural kind, it could be tolerated and would no doubt be accommodating to an easy, beach-bound existence. Hawaii is a truly beautiful place. A paradise - it is not.
Posted by Bernard Elliker on May 18,2012 | 03:42 PM
+ View All Comments