Las Vegas: An American Paradox
Pulitzer Prize-winning journalist J.R. Moehringer rolls the dice on life in Sin City
- By J.R. Moehringer
- Photographs by Jared McMillen
- Smithsonian magazine, October 2010, Subscribe
(Page 4 of 6)
As she counted out the money, I looked down at sweet, smiling Ben Franklin. I recalled that he had a weakness for fallen women. I recalled that he said, “A fool and his money are soon parted.” I recalled that he discovered electricity—so Vegas could one day look like a phosphorescent candy cane. Clearly, I thought, the C-note is the proper currency for Vegas.
Hours later I lost every one of those C-notes at a roulette table. I lost them faster than you can say Ben Franklin.
Vegas is America. No matter what you read about Vegas, no matter where you read it, this assertion invariably pops up, as sure as a face card in the hole when the dealer’s showing an ace. Vegas is unlike any other American city, and yet Vegas is America? Paradoxical, yes, but true. And it’s never been more true than during these past few years. Vegas typified the American boom—best suite at the Palms: $40,000 a night—and Vegas now epitomizes the bust. If the boom was largely caused by the housing bubble, Vegas was bubble-icious. It should be no surprise, therefore, that the Vegas area leads the United States in foreclosures—five times the national rate—and ranks among the worst cities for unemployment. More than 14 percent of Las Vegans are without work, compared with the national rate of 9.5 percent.
The proof that Vegas and America are two sides of the same chip is the simple fact that America’s economy functions like a casino. Who could dispute that a Vegas mind-set drives Wall Streeters? That AIG, Lehman and others put the nation’s rent money on red and let the wheel spin? Credit default swaps? Derivatives? The backroom boys in Vegas must be kicking themselves that they didn’t think of those things first.
The house always wins. Especially if you never leave the house. Vegas has been home to some of the most notorious hermits in American history. Howard Hughes, Michael Jackson—something about Vegas attracts the agoraphobic personality. Or creates it.
As my time in Vegas wound down, I often found myself bolting the door and pulling down the window shades. My self-imposed seclusion was motivated partly by Caligula, partly by my book. Facing a tight deadline, I had no time for Vegas. Consequently I went weeks in which my only window on Vegas was the TV. Years from now my clearest memories of Sin City might be the ceaseless stream of commercials for payday loans, personal injury lawyers, bail bondsmen, chat lines and strip clubs. (My favorite was for a club called the Badda Bing, with a female announcer intoning: “I’ll take care of that thing. At the Badda Bing.”) From TV, I concluded that a third of Vegas is in debt, a third in jail and a third in the market for anonymous hookups.
Many of those personal injury lawyers were jumping for joy in 2008, when a local gastroenterology clinic stood accused of gross malpractice. To save money, the clinic allegedly used unsafe injection practices and inadequately cleaned equipment. Thousands of patients who went there for colonoscopies and other invasive procedures were urged to get tested immediately for hepatitis and HIV. A wave of lawsuits is pending.
With growing horror, I watched this medical scandal unfold. To my mind it symbolized the Kafkaesque quality of 21st-century Vegas, the negligence and corruption, the widespread bad luck.
Some nights on the local news a segment about the clinic would be followed by a piece about O.J. Simpson’s brazen armed robbery at a local casino hotel, then one on Gov. Jim Gibbons’ denial of a sexual assault allegation, or a story about Nevada’s junior senator, John Ensign, cheating on his wife, though he had once declared on the floor of the United States Senate that marriage is “the cornerstone on which our society was founded.” Shutting off the TV, I’d walk to the window, listen to a nude game of Marco Polo raging around Caligula’s pool, and think: I have a front-row seat at the apocalypse.
I shave, get dressed, drive down to the Strip. My friends, a man and a woman, a longtime couple, love Las Vegas. They can’t imagine living anywhere else. Over tuna sashimi, Caprese salad, ravioli stuffed with crabmeat, they ask what I’ll miss most about the town.
Single Page « Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next »
Subscribe now for more of Smithsonian's coverage on history, science and nature.










Comments (67)
+ View All Comments
For Vegas, if you seek the seedy, taudry, and nasty you will certainly find it. I believe you can find that in just about any city. For Vegas you can find anything you want and what is hardly ever talked about is the great hiking and biking trails. How about the great museums and fishing and boating. Heck, the Smithsonian is affiliated with the "Atomic Testing Museum". Come on, not every article about Vegas has to show it's darker side. Vegas is a great city.
Posted by Will on January 9,2013 | 08:22 AM
"Goodbye, Las Vegas" http://tim-shey.blogspot.com/2010/12/unreal-city-or-goodbye-las-vegas.html
Posted by Tim Shey on March 18,2012 | 03:16 PM
After reading my October issue of the Smithsonian and Mr Moehringer article, I rushed to my computer to send a scathing email to the Smithsonian.
I am so angry at the narrow minded, nothing new article about my hometown. I was born and raised in Las Vegas (a rarity for someone my age) and feel the need to defend my city against article. Although I live in Washington DC now, I love Las Vegas very much. I miss the people, the desert, the land, the lights, mountains, the family, the friends, the hot pink sky, parks, neighborhoods, bbq's and sagebrush. there isn't a Safeway in Las Vegas, hasn't been for decades. At least pretend to be interested in what your writing about. People came to Las Vegas because of natural springs, Hoover Dam and Nellis AFB. Do your homework and stop asking the strippers the history of Las Vegas. There are books out there.
The author is nothing but an elistist looking to spew his tourist experience with the world. Well guess what, I think there are better stories out there than yours. If this is all you have from living in Las Vegas for two year, I feel sorry for you. You missed out.
Mr. Moehringer took the easy route describing his life in Las Vegas. Low hanging fruit from a guy who should have the experience and intelligence to dig deeper. Las Vegas has been hit hard enough, the article adds salt in the wound. Have you no heart for the millions of people making a living in Las Vegas. Do you know what this article says to them and to me? You value only the superficial.
Do us all a favor Mr. Moehringer, never go back to Las Vegas. We'd appreciate it if you'd never write about your time in Las Vegas again. Maybe you should go to Vermont and stare leaves for two years and right about the obvious.
Posted by Native Las Vegan on November 4,2010 | 09:01 PM
http://www.lasvegasweekly.com/news/2010/nov/03/vegas-literate/ This link pretty much sums up the intersection of perception and reality on at least one of your points.
Posted by Dayvid Figler on November 3,2010 | 01:15 AM
Your article by J.R. Moehringer called Las Vegas: An American Paradox" was several notches below the high quality reporting usually seen in your magazine.
Mr. Moehringer's schizophrenic ramblings makes me think he needs a shrink. The contemptuous tone is despicable. It is a tragedy that Andre Agassi, who is considered a class act and obviously loves Las Vegas, is associated with this man's perverted view of his home town.
Margot Guenther
Posted by Margot Guenther on October 16,2010 | 01:03 PM
It takes a colossal amount of conceit for a person to spend two years in a city and feel that he has become an expert on it. I have lived in Las Vegas my entire life (31 years) and still don't feel that I understand this city well enough to write such a self-assured commentary. In 31 years, I have never seen nor heard of the majority of the places, TV ads, and neighborhood activities which Mr. Moehringer has dramatized in his desperate attempt to portray himself as some sort of modern-day philosopher. What I have learned, however, is that the "sinfulness" of Las Vegas only exists to draw in and cater to people who do not live in Las Vegas. If Las Vegas was the "City of Sin", in the way that this "author" and countless others have portrayed it, and so different from the rest of this country, then Las Vegas would not survive. I guess it's lucky for us that the rest of the world provides the sinners.
If I were you, Mr. Moehringer, I would think twice before sharing with the world that all you saw in your two Las Vegas years were casinos and strip clubs. I think that fact reveals a lot more about you than it does about Las Vegas. Shame on the Smithsonian magazine for supporting yet another installment of elitist Vegas-bashing from yet another individual who checks out a few tourist joints and feels he is now qualified to bore us with his pompous views on a city he knows nothing about.
Posted by SE on October 15,2010 | 02:57 AM
Well said J.R.! We lived in Henderson for one year - and your comments captured our experience perfectly. Bravo, and I look forward to your next article.
Posted by Heidi on October 14,2010 | 10:40 PM
While attending a convention in Las Vegas some years back I was overlooking a vast expanse of gambling tables and machines, wondering who those folks were that found this experience so enticing. Up strolled a Swiss gentleman attending the same event, who stood by me a moment then asked rhetorically "These are not America's decision makers, are they?" Penetrating insight, I thought.
A couple years later I had the chance to spend some time with a VP in the Trump organization and he described the mechanics and marketing behind generating the inflow of dollars that sustain his massive operations. From "grinder excursions" that bus in folks of modest means, to support of nearly any vice, these casino folks are at your service to help you lose your money.
I happened to be in Las Vegas again a couple of years ago and told myself I'd have an open mind, and would focus on food. From Bobby Flay to Thomas Keller to Mario Batali, I tried their various restaurants. The food was great, of course, but removed from their real world locations they seemed somehow plastic. As if their compelling native characteristics had been replaced by ersatz versions.
I'm sure there is a real town behind the scenes, with over half a million folks they can't all be Caligulas. In fact, it is no doubt quite a large one, with people offering all the usual services - plumbers, doctors, bankers and more. Any city needs those people, and they don't have to feed the casino monster to support it. But without the Caligulas, this town would not exist, and that's what the author gets so right.
Can anyone imagine any other city that would advertise itself to potential tourists with "What happens in XXX stays in XXX? It's got Caligula written all over it.
Posted by Don H on October 13,2010 | 01:36 PM
Suck it up, Vegas.
Yes, the article is kitchy. And quirky. And it plays on stereotypes. It is also brilliantly written: dense with wry descriptions of choice observations . . . and it paints a picture of your neon desert that anyone who's been to Vegas can smile at.
So get over your bad selves. Lighten up. Go to a show. Breathe in the neon. Chill.
I've got a secret to tell you: No one goes there for the libraries. ;)
Posted by earthgirl on October 13,2010 | 11:27 AM
Viva Las Vegas.....I love Las Vegas....(native over 40+ years)
Posted by ted leatherwallet on October 11,2010 | 03:35 PM
Great article. Laughed all the way through it. I would have already left Vegas, but the gravity eminating from the black hole that is my mortgage debt has trapped me.
Posted by Angry Buddhist on October 8,2010 | 03:00 PM
I always thought to be a great writer you had to be a keen observer of the human condition and able to reveal from those observations new observations that change perspectives.
After reading this tired, cliched piece filled with anecdotes that can only be described as Jayson Blairesque, I need to revisit that assumption.
Posted by rob on October 8,2010 | 01:21 PM
There sure are a lot of super-sensitive people here. Did you actually read the article, all the way to the end, or did you skim the first half sentence and then make up your mind what the whole thing was about? It's not an attack on Las Vegas, it's his account of what he saw and felt and thought -- and how that changed over time. Did you see the part where he says he grew to love vegas?
Anyway, since when is having a different opinion about something automatically an attack? If you're that insecure, how did you get past the title without bursting into tears?
Posted by Jeff on October 7,2010 | 08:23 PM
http://www.facebook.com/#!/note.php?note_id=454556934000&id=713894787
Here is an accurate and beautiful portrayal of what Living in Vegas is really all about.
Posted by Dave H on October 7,2010 | 01:20 PM
+ View All Comments