A Monumental Struggle to Preserve Hagia Sophia
In Istanbul, secularists and fundamentalists clash over restoring the nearly 1,500 year-old structure
- By Fergus M. Bordewich
- Photographs by Lynsey Addario
- Smithsonian magazine, December 2008, Subscribe
(Page 3 of 3)
To more ideological Islamists, Hagia Sophia proclaims Islam's promise of ultimate triumph over Christianity. In November 2006, a visit by Pope Benedict XVI to Hagia Sophia prompted an outpouring of sectarian rage. The pope intended this as a gesture of goodwill, having previously antagonized Muslims by a speech in which he quoted a Byzantine emperor's characterization of Islam as a violent religion. But tens of thousands of protesters, who believed that he was arriving to stake a Christian claim to Hagia Sophia, jammed surrounding streets and squares in the days before his arrival, beating drums and chanting "Constantinople is forever Islamic" and "Let the chains break and Ayasofya open." Hundreds of women wearing head coverings brandished a petition that they claimed contained one million signatures demanding the reconversion of Hagia Sophia. Thirty-nine male protesters were arrested by police for staging a pray-in inside the museum. When the pope finally arrived at Hagia Sophia, traveling along streets lined with police and riding in an armored car rather than his open popemobile, he refrained from even making the sign of the cross. In the museum's guest book, he inscribed only the cautiously ecumenical phrase, "God should illuminate us and help us find the path of love and peace." (There still has been no real rapprochement between the Vatican and Turkish Islam.)
For secular Turks, also, Hagia Sophia retains power as a symbol of Turkish nationalism and Ataturk's embattled cultural legacy. Many are dismayed by the possibility of Islamic radicals taking over the building. "Taking Ayasofya back into a mosque is totally out of the question!" says Istar Gozaydin, a secularist scholar and expert on political Islam. "It is a symbol of our secular republic. It is not just a mosque, but part of the world's heritage."
As a symbol, its future would seem to be caught in an ideological no man's land, where any change in status quo threatens to upset the delicate balance of mistrust. "Hagia Sophia is a pawn in the game of intrigue between the secular and religious parties," says Ousterhout. "There's an alarmist response on both sides. They always assume the worst of each other. Secularists fear that religious groups are part of a conspiracy funded from Saudi Arabia, while religious people fear that the secularists want to take their mosques away from them." The situation is exacerbated by bitter battles over the larger role of Islam in political life and the right of women who wear Islamic head scarfs to attend schools and universities. "Neither side is willing to negotiate," says Ousterhout. "There's a visceral mistrust on both sides. Meanwhile, scholars fear offending either group, getting in trouble and losing their jobs. All this makes it harder and harder to work on Byzantine sites." Several attempts to finance large-scale restoration with funds from abroad have been stymied by suspicion of foreigners, a problem that has been made worse by the war in Iraq, fiercely opposed by a large majority of Turks.
Astonishingly—although many scholars have studied Hagia Sophia over the years—the building has never been completely documented. New discoveries may yet be made. In the 1990s, during emergency repairs on the dome, workers uncovered graffiti that had been scrawled by tenth-century repairmen, imploring God for protection as they worked from scaffolds 150 feet above the floor. "Kyrie, voithi to sou doulo, Gregorio," ran a typical one—"Lord, help your servant, Gregorius." Says Ousterhout, "You can imagine how scared they might have been up there."
Daunting work must be done for Hagia Sophia to survive for future centuries. "This is the premier monument of Byzantine civilization," says Ousterhout. "Old buildings like Hagia Sophia are ignored until there's an emergency. They're put back together and then forgotten about until the next emergency. Meanwhile, there is a continual deterioration."
Huge sections of ceiling are peeling and flaking, stained by water seepage and discolored by age and uneven exposure to light. Acres of stucco must be replaced. Windows must be repaired, new glass installed, warped frames replaced. Hundreds of marble panels, now grime-encrusted, must be cleaned. Irreplaceable mosaics must somehow be restored and protected.
"There is no long-term plan to conserve the mosaics that still survive," says art historian Teteriatnikov, who adds that a more coordinated effort is needed to protect the structure from earthquakes. "Hagia Sophia is uniquely vulnerable," says architectural engineer Stephen Kelley, "because, in an earthquake, unless a building acts as a single tightly connected unit, its parts will work against each other." The structure, he adds, comprises "additions and alterations with many natural breaks in the construction. We just don't know how stable [it] is."
"At this point, we don't even know how much consolidation and restoration the building needs, much less how much it would cost," says Verkin Arioba, founder of the Historical Heritage Protection Foundation of Turkey, which has called for an international campaign to save the monument. "How do we approach it? How should the work be prioritized? First we need to assess how much damage has been done to the building. Then we'll at least know what must be done."
Meanwhile, Hagia Sophia continues its slow slide toward decay. "We have to rediscover Hagia Sophia," said Zeynep Ahunbay, as we left the gloom of the antechamber and re-entered the nave. I watched a trapped dove swoop down through ancient vaults and colonnades, then up again toward the canopy of shimmering gold mosaic, its wings beating urgently, like the lost soul of bygone Byzantines. "It is a huge and complicated building," she said. "It has to be studied the way you study old embroidery, stitch by stitch."
Writer Fergus M. Bordewich frequently covers history and culture.
Photographer Lynsey Addario is based in Istanbul.
Subscribe now for more of Smithsonian's coverage on history, science and nature.









Comments (34)
Mehmet II did not spare the Ágía Sofía from his pillage of the City, it was part of it. This Eastern Orthodox Basilica has been defiled and it is heart-rending to see what it has become at the hands of the occupying Turks. It is a blight on the world at large that Constantinople was not restored to its rightful sovereign owners, the Hellenes (it was founded by Greek colonists from Megara, in Attica, and settled by Greeks for over 2,500 years before its capture, and 3,000 years before their expulsion at the hands of the Turkish state). If the Turks had done to the Vatican and St Peter's Basilica what they have done to Constantinople and the Ágía Sofía the Pope would have raised the Ladder of Lucifer from Hell himself, and brought on the Apocalypse, to get it back. Especially because Catholicism has its roots in Eastern Orthodoxy (indeed, Christianity was spread from Jerusalem, through Anatolia and the Balkans, to Europe by the Greeks), it owes it to them (and indeed Pope Pius II attempted) to reclaim the Holy City of Constantinople, and the Ágía Sofía, for Christendom.
Posted by Pablo on March 13,2013 | 09:00 PM
I see my previous comments have not been published despite their factual accuracy in response to other comments to this article which have been published. 1. Yes, the Ágía Sofía should be rededicated to her original purpose, as the Temple of the Holy Wisdom of God, she is an Eastern Orthodox Basilica, the 'Mother Church' of all Orthodox Churches. Ágía Sofía is Orthodoxy's St Peter's Basilica and Constantinople is its Vatican; the minarets, minbar and mihrab do not belong on Ágía Sofía and her iconography and iconostasis ought to be restored as her original fixtures. If I did to Mecca what the Turks have done to Constantinople, Muslims would go ballistic! 2. To say the Greeks of Constantinople never considered themselves Greek but rather Roman is a obfuscation and betrays the fact that the Roman Empire was really two empires; the West Roman Empire and the East Roman (or Byzantine) Empire, Byzantine being from Byzas, the founding King on Constantinople (then Byzantium) it is a Greek word that refers to Baseiliou or 'Royalty'. Furthermore, the very name Istabul is a corruption of the Greek name for the City, from "stan" and "ople" and also from the expression "eis stin poli" (in the city). So the Turks can't have it both ways, paying tribute to the City's Greek heritage and then saying it was never, in fact, a Greek city. 3. In furtherance to my point above, the fact that the Greeks of Nycaea, Ionnia, Smyrne, Kappadocia and Trebizond were expelled by Turkey in 1923 to Greece and subsequently the Greeks of Constantinople fled in the wake of the 'Istanbul Pogrom' is at odds with Turkish revisionism about their ethnicity. Greeks settled and lived on what is now mainland Turkey for over 2,000 years, Constantinople is the eternal capital of Greece as inheritor of the Byzantine Empire and what's more it is of immeasurable significance to Eastern Orthodoxy. These are undeniable facts, relevantly responding to other comments to this article.
Posted by Pablo on March 13,2013 | 08:29 PM
The article in error. The Fall of the Roman Empire in 1453 was an empire that endured for 1500yrs. Claiming otherwise is Western European revisionist history. The so called "Byzantine" Empire never existed aside from being coined western scholars.
Posted by Daniel Homiak on November 18,2012 | 09:53 PM
Where does all the money go that is collected from entrance feesAt $15 for the millions of visitors each year it would seem that some major continual preservation project could be funded. The same could to asked regarding other nearby monuments?
Posted by Michael on June 12,2012 | 06:16 AM
It is interesting that your article has mentioned the capture of Istanbul by Turks with the use of a lot words putting attention to violence. But when it comes to invasion by the crusaders it only mentions "The realm was further weakened in 1204 when western European crusaders en route to the Holy Land, overtaken by greed, captured and looted Constantinople. The city never fully recovered."
It was well documented that the devastation caused by Catholic christians was no match to that of Turks. So It should have deserved a much bigger mention. Here I mentioned it. With 4th Crusade, Christians invaded Constantinople and have done unspeakable crime. They have murdered, raped, ruthlessly violated the city's churches and monasteries, destroying or stealing many of the ancient works. Venetians were good at stealing while French was into drinking wine, violating nuns, murdering Orthodox clerics and destroying the city. Hagia Sophia was not spared from these vandalizations.
I thought the article wouldn't be complete without it.
Posted by Deveci on November 26,2011 | 04:40 PM
How sad to read some of the commenter's attitude towards the Turkish nation. Hagia Sophia will and should remain as a museum not a place of worship, a great population of Turkish Republic are Muslims. We do not want arguments, all we need and want is a common ground, which is common sense. Wake up people! This is 21st century, and let us enjoy being in this magnificent structure! I love breathing equally in the Sultan Ahmed Mosque and in Saint Sophia, inhale the peace. Hagia Sophia needs tender loving care not conflicting ideas...
Posted by T.G. on May 28,2011 | 07:29 PM
Ethan...
Your post about K.S area schools caught my attention... since the Turks won Istanbul just as righteously as any Christian military victory, it seems wrong to at all expect them to sponsor the Haga Sophia as a Christian church...especially in light of how mosques have been treated in the nearby countries where christian nations retook territory. Interesting that the Crusaders famously looted and disrespected the church, whereas the victorious Sultan personally forbid looting, desecration, or destruction of the marvelous scred site. That being said, a joint use idea, where both the main general faiths with a strong vested interest historically; Christian and Muslim... might help with maintenance of the building, as well as allow for sacred use.... which is what it was meant to host. The Kansas City Institute of Arts might be a school which could provide a base of studies, if you are strongly interested in the architectural and art aspects, of the Byzantine culture. It's a great little place, is the impression I have of the school... with a richness in how they connect with History. All The Best...
Posted by Peter on September 15,2010 | 06:36 PM
I support 100% any effort to restore the Hagia Sophia...but NOT as a tourist attraction. The Hagia Sophia is neither secular or Muslim...it is Christian. It rightfully belongs to the Orthodox church! The Muslims stole Hagia Sophia from Orthodox Christians back in the 15th Century, and then profaned and violated it! If Turkey wants to be taken seriously as a potential member of the EU, then they need to give back what was stolen from the Church, so that the Hagia Sophia may be proplerly and lovingly restured and then used for its original purpose...a spiritual center for Christianity! Turkey, if they are truly committed to human rights, and respecing all regardless of ethncity or religion, needs to right this horrible wrong that was committed long ago.
Posted by Sabrina on June 27,2010 | 12:58 AM
The Hagia Sophia is, undoubtedly, one of the world’s greatest cultural heritage of human beings nowadays.I have learned from this article that the Hagia Sophia was built in the year 537,which means it has such a long history of more than 1400 years. And I think it’s a miracle that the Hagia Sophia can suffer from various wars, revolutions and changes in the river of history.Maybe it’s no more splendid as what it was, but it’s still of great significance to not only the Turk but also the Christians all over the world. I think it’s really inadvisable for the debate between the secular Turks and the Christians around whether to bring the Hagia Sophia into a mosque. Actually, we should focus on the recovery of the Hagia rather than whether change it into a mosque. As the geographer mentioned in the article, Istanbul sits squarely atop a geologic fault line. "There most definitely are seismic threats to Hagia Sophia, and the potential ganger are great. As a result, what come first should we do is raise the people all around the world to do recovering work to protect this great cultural and historical heritage of humans-the Hagia Sophia.
Posted by YuanPan on December 13,2009 | 01:05 AM
Beautiful"Sophia"Cathedral, really besutiful! In fact, the church set religion, philosophy, aesthetics, literature, sculpture, painting, music, art forms, etc.as a whole. It is that people create and change the world of dynamic activities in the realization of reality, It is also the ctystallization of human wisdom and valuable cultural heritage. But the church was originally created as a vehicle for religion, so they were damaged bu the radical. However,according to historical materialist point of view, the emergence of religion is also a progressive history. The emergence of the church is the physical embodiment of religion.
The Church of Hagia Sophia was built in 537 years, a collection of Roman wisdom, which is a symbol of the Byzantine period, until the Muslim army conquered Istanbul. Then the church became a mosque, and it becomes the Ottoman Empire's most famous mosques.
Needless to say, it is one of the most beautiful buildings in the legacy of history. The great,spectacular, magnificent Sophia Cathedral is the world's only example of religious architecture,is a producct of convergence of Eastern and Western cultures. this great building is one of the survived legacu in the architectural history of mankind.We must protect the legacy of our ancestors.Let our future generations could see their achievements.
Posted by He yanwei on December 7,2009 | 07:31 PM
From the Internet, I know that Hagia Sophia is the starting point passing the torch of the Beijing 2008 Olympic Games in Istanbul. As one of the world's top ten desirable churches, the exterior seems less spectacular than Sultanahmet Camii - another famous structure in Istanbul, but the history of Hagia Sophia is more time-honored that Sultanahmet Camii could never compare with. Thank you for this article!
Posted by Lv Xin on December 5,2009 | 12:36 AM
very good
Posted by hh on December 3,2009 | 09:04 AM
Force of Arms”, in latin referred to as “Vi et Armis” or “Armorum VI”, in which ownership has always been established by force; originally by the "Force of Arms and latterly by the force of law. We are all descendants and have become the successors in title to the goods taken from our ancestors by "Force of Arms". As stated, the Hagia Sophia belongs rightfully to the Turkish Government and therefore they are under no moral obligations.
Posted by Williams on May 29,2009 | 11:46 PM
"Force of Arms" is a completely legitimate way of transferring ownership of territory,treasure and artifacts etc, even when good guys lose. Just ask the Americans they are experts on "Force of Arms". The Hagia Sophia belongs rightfully to the Turkish Government and therefore they are under no moral obligations.
Posted by Williams on May 28,2009 | 10:27 PM
The Agia Sophia is a place of worship. I traveled to Istanbul and I saw the present state of the building and this is sad. Why should a building of this magnitude and history be falling apart. Shame on you Turkey for neglecting this site and leaving the hundreds of other Byzantine sites to simply fall apart. The European Union should take action and the world alike to bring and end to Byzantine history which is being threatened because of neglect and stupidity. LETS DO SOMETHING ABOUT IT!
Posted by John Dedes on May 18,2009 | 02:11 PM
To the Byzantinist: Please remember that Byzantine Empire is a term invented by the French Historian Montesqueu in 18th Century. The Ionian Megeran Byzas established the first settlement and the polis in 6th century BCE and Montesqueu adapted the name from that. The city was named Constantinopolis after the Roman Emperor Constantine made it the Roma Capital in 313CE and built the first Saint Sophia Church. The Emperors and the population of Constantinopolis identified themselves as Romans. There is no written or archeological record of them ever calling themselves as the Byzantine Empire, Byzantines, Hellen, or Greek. Quite the contary, being a multi deity culture, many Hellens strongly reacted to the Roman State imposed Christianity and there were several returns to Hellinic Gods (Such as the Emperor Julian the Apostate period when the Christian religion olmost perished).
Posted by Demir Karsan on January 8,2009 | 07:18 PM
To the young Byzantinist: I don't know specifically whether there are any good places for Byzantine studies near you, but as an art historian, I can recommend some resources. The College Art Association has just published a guide to art history programs in the United States and will list the specialties of faculty members. You can probably get it through your local library. If there is the work of a scholar you particularly admire, you could contact him or her - email addresses are often findable on the web - to ask for advice. Best wishes.
Posted by Natasha S. on January 4,2009 | 09:26 AM
The restoration of the Hagia Sophia would serve us all. Would it be possible to organize and engage in a truly GRASSROOTS effort with volunteers from all over the civilized world contributing the labor? Such an effort would not only restore the building, but raise the awareness among all of us of our kinship. Perhaps it could be done through the colleges and universities, with all of the disciplines involved.
Posted by Megan McClard on December 31,2008 | 08:31 AM
Thank for the issue that highlighted the significance of Hagia Sophia, not only as a structure and architectural masterpiece but also, and more importantly, as a symbol of preserving cultural heritage in all over the world. I wish the same understanding could prevail much earlier in the Balkans, for example. Please allow me to point out that, there are thousands of such pieces inherited in Turkey from many historic civilizations, including Seljuk and Ottoman eras, which deserve and wait for upgrading, restoration and rehabilitation. Please keep in mind that if the Turks had not saved, upgraded, and preserved the structure, today you would not see a piece of Hagia Sophia. It is regretful and disappointing that the author keeps implying clash of "fundamentalists" and "secularists" in Turkey on a monumental architectural museum. (You might have noticed some Christian fundamentalist readers above desiring conversion of the museum back to a church!)It is merely a matter of budget and time to rehabilitate defects in the roof insulation and interior plaster and painting. I would be pleased if you could consider Hagia Sophia as the monument of the tolerance and peace dominated by the Turkish Ottoman civilization in our region for centuries. Thank you, and kind regards.
Posted by Vecihi Acun on December 31,2008 | 04:21 AM
This is Ethan again, the young byzantinist, I was wondering if anyone knows of a good college that has Byzantine Studies around Kansas City, Missouri. If somebody could post it here I would be very appreciative, My search has been fruitless and I would rather not travel all the way to Dumbarton Oaks for college just yet.
Posted by Ethan Williamson on December 18,2008 | 04:42 PM
I visited Hagia Sophia in 1999. I amazed for beatiful building. Turks were very friendly. I recommend everybody.
Posted by Kagan Keskin on December 17,2008 | 02:06 AM
Since many people still seem to want to worship at the Hagia Sophia, why not allow limited religious services to any interested denomination? Keep the interior as it is now, non-denominational, allow a Christian service on Sunday and maybe one Moslem service per day on the other days. This way the building would be fulfilling its originally intended function, in a way that serves the needs of Istanbul's current population. And a resolution of the religious issues, in a way that is seen as fair and impartial, would be a big step towards preservation.
Posted by Mark Brissenden on December 15,2008 | 02:00 PM
As a former student of the late Fr. John Meyendorff, Dean of St. Vladimir's Seminary and world-renowned expert on Byzantium, this article is a good introduction. I would recommend books by John Meyendorff to understand the Byzantine History and Theology of the Orthodox Church. The major unrepairable occurrence between the Roman Catholic Church and the Orthodox Church took place with the Fourth Crusade when the Italian West invaded Constantinople destroying and looting the city. Dumbarton Oaks outside Washington, D.C. has devoted itself to the history and understanding of Byzantium.
Posted by Nick Kobbs on December 15,2008 | 10:04 AM
As usual nothing about the music in the H.S. - Neil Moran - see the article in Plainsong and Medieval Music (2002), 11:2:99-112 Cambridge University Press: http://journals.cambridge.org/action/displayIssue?jid=PMM&volumeId=11&issueId=02&iid=137178# Byzantine castrati by Neil Moran Abstract The employment of castrati in the Byzantine Church can be traced back to the choirmaster Brison in the fourth century. Brison was called upon by John Chrysostom to organize the antiphonal hymn-singing in the patriarchal church. Since eunuchs were generally considered to be remnants of a pagan past, castrati are seldom mentioned in early Byzantine sources, but beginning in the tenth century references to eunuchs or castrati became more and more frequent. By the twelfth century all the professional singers in the Hagia Sophia were castrati. The repertory of the castrati is discussed and the question is raised whether the introduction of castrati to the Sistine Chapel was influenced by the employment of castrati in Italo-Greek cloisters.
Posted by Neil Moran on December 8,2008 | 12:05 PM
The article on 'Ayasofya' leaves me befuddled. Is it an article exposing the needs of this museum, or is it directed at listing the history of the wars between Byzantium and the Ottomans? If it was the former, it was covered, with great mediocrity, in 4-6 paragraphs. If the latter, then it did succeed, flowered with push button words and a definite anti-Ottoman (should I say anti-Islamic) slant. Very disappointed. E. Esat Atikkan, Ph.D.
Posted by E. Esat Atikkan on December 7,2008 | 05:23 PM
Thanks for such a great article. Very objective coverage. I have visited Aghia Sophia on 3 diffeent trips to Turkey. Each time I entered the building, I had to stop for about 20 minutes to fully absorb the meaning of what I had just walked into. It's awesome. Worldwide, there are certainly enough people that would give support to a rehabilitation of the structure. Too bad there is so much difficulty getting started.
Posted by Charles Antonacos on December 4,2008 | 09:01 PM
Thanks for the exceptionally well done article and the wonderful and stunning 360 degree tour! One can only hope that reason and a respect for world heritage will prevail over human fanaticism of all stripes.
Posted by Gordon N. Fleming on December 4,2008 | 12:24 PM
Has Smithsonian organized any tour groups to visit Hagia Sophia?
Posted by Jen Martin on December 4,2008 | 09:25 AM
Thank you for a this article which introduces this masterpiece to your readers. I read your article carefully and I must say I sensed some Christian bias against the Turkey and Turks in it. As you know, Anatolia is a cradale of the civization whose history goes back for over ten thousand years. Turkey has so much to restore that, unless the entire World's restoration efforts are devoted to it, the Turkish Government's resources are not adquate. As for converting Saint Sophia to a Church. The morality in 1453, when Ottoman's took it, was very different than today's. Many Mosques taken by Christians, including the Mosques in Kordoba, Sevilla, and Granada were converted to and are still being used as churches. I have also traveled all around the Greek islands and cities, including the island of Crete and observed that all churches there were destroyed and not a single mention of the Ottomans is made in any of their museums. A similar situation exists in other old Ottoman lands such as the Bulgaria, Serbia, and Armenia. Turks did not destroy a single Church. They either converted it to a mosque or allowed these to be used as churches by their Christian population. Turks did the most humane thing to Saint Sophia by converting it to a museum. For 500 years it was used as a Mosque and converting it to a Church will hurt the sensibilities of many Turks who are 98% Moslem.
Posted by Demir Karsan on December 3,2008 | 05:27 PM
I have visited Hagia Sophia many times and it is one of my favorite places in Europe. The 360 tour is wonderful - fantastic views. Made me miss my visits all the more. I hope all parties decide to preserve this wonderful landmark and historical icon so many, many generations can enjoy it's beauty. I love Istanbul and it's rich history. I can not imagine it without Hagia Sophia.
Posted by Felecia Davenport on December 3,2008 | 03:49 PM
My recent visit to the Hagia Sophia was the fulfillment of a lifetime dream! It breaks my heart to think of how glorious it was in its heyday and how much damage has been done by time, weather and the history of empires. I will never forget the awesome beauty of that ancient and Holy place. May G-d preserve it for all generations to come, and grant us all a measure of His Holy Wisdom...
Posted by Ann-Marie on December 2,2008 | 02:38 PM
I am only 17 but I hve been a committed Byzantinist for several years now. I think the Byzantine Empire is the most fascinating and significant empire to western civilization and I am glad you actually di a story bringing them and their greatness back into the light again. The western world needs to gain an appreciation of this great culture that preserved civilization during the dark ages. I think it goes without saying that I think that the Hagia Sophia should be restored to a church once more.
Posted by Ethan Williamson on December 1,2008 | 06:09 PM
I have visited the Agia Sophia. It is an architectural and cultural landmark of the highest order. I hope and pray that all of the responsible parties will come together to preserve it for future generations.
Posted by Rabbi Gilbert Kollin on November 30,2008 | 10:49 PM
WOW!!! My wife and I just returned from a 5 weeks vacation in Turkey with the last 18 days in Istanbul. We spent an entire day wondering around the Hagia Sophia....the 360 degree tour blows my mind away!!!!! Dale
Posted by dalerudd on November 29,2008 | 09:23 PM
I enjoyed the article on HAGIA SOPHIA, but there is no mention of the BLUE MOSQUE with its six minarets (the only one with six in the world) and a change by Attaturk from religion to secular and its being restored. Am I missing something? It impressed me greatly when I visited. GP
Posted by George Pittman - COL.USAF, RET'D on November 29,2008 | 01:32 PM
This is a magnificent essay on the current state of this outstanding church. It is sad that this structure is referred to as a "basilica" since its construction is a domed building with four pendantives and does not have a hip roof and an apse at one end. That structure was characteristic of the emperor's building where he held court and many Christrian churches are constructed in that pattern and architecturally are designated as basilicas. However the popes had seen fit to apply that name to certain domed churches as an honorific one. The popes never had control of this church except when the warriors of the fourth crusade, through the wiles of the Venetians, overcame Constantinople and held it for 60 years. This has never been termed a basilica by the citizens of that city. It wss always referred to as "the Great Church of the Holy Wisdom of God." By the same token they and their empire were never identified as "Byzantines" or the "Byzantine Empire." These titles were introduced by a western scholar of the sixteenth century and were unknown in the 1000 year existence of that empire.
Posted by John P. Nasou, M.D. on November 28,2008 | 03:32 PM
This is a matter that should interest all who care about the human heritage. Is there one organization that one could support in an effort to help? UNESCO, perhaps?
Posted by Joan Campion on November 28,2008 | 12:44 PM