A Monumental Struggle to Preserve Hagia Sophia
In Istanbul, secularists and fundamentalists clash over restoring the nearly 1,500 year-old structure
- By Fergus M. Bordewich
- Photographs by Lynsey Addario
- Smithsonian magazine, December 2008, Subscribe
(Page 3 of 3)
To more ideological Islamists, Hagia Sophia proclaims Islam's promise of ultimate triumph over Christianity. In November 2006, a visit by Pope Benedict XVI to Hagia Sophia prompted an outpouring of sectarian rage. The pope intended this as a gesture of goodwill, having previously antagonized Muslims by a speech in which he quoted a Byzantine emperor's characterization of Islam as a violent religion. But tens of thousands of protesters, who believed that he was arriving to stake a Christian claim to Hagia Sophia, jammed surrounding streets and squares in the days before his arrival, beating drums and chanting "Constantinople is forever Islamic" and "Let the chains break and Ayasofya open." Hundreds of women wearing head coverings brandished a petition that they claimed contained one million signatures demanding the reconversion of Hagia Sophia. Thirty-nine male protesters were arrested by police for staging a pray-in inside the museum. When the pope finally arrived at Hagia Sophia, traveling along streets lined with police and riding in an armored car rather than his open popemobile, he refrained from even making the sign of the cross. In the museum's guest book, he inscribed only the cautiously ecumenical phrase, "God should illuminate us and help us find the path of love and peace." (There still has been no real rapprochement between the Vatican and Turkish Islam.)
For secular Turks, also, Hagia Sophia retains power as a symbol of Turkish nationalism and Ataturk's embattled cultural legacy. Many are dismayed by the possibility of Islamic radicals taking over the building. "Taking Ayasofya back into a mosque is totally out of the question!" says Istar Gozaydin, a secularist scholar and expert on political Islam. "It is a symbol of our secular republic. It is not just a mosque, but part of the world's heritage."
As a symbol, its future would seem to be caught in an ideological no man's land, where any change in status quo threatens to upset the delicate balance of mistrust. "Hagia Sophia is a pawn in the game of intrigue between the secular and religious parties," says Ousterhout. "There's an alarmist response on both sides. They always assume the worst of each other. Secularists fear that religious groups are part of a conspiracy funded from Saudi Arabia, while religious people fear that the secularists want to take their mosques away from them." The situation is exacerbated by bitter battles over the larger role of Islam in political life and the right of women who wear Islamic head scarfs to attend schools and universities. "Neither side is willing to negotiate," says Ousterhout. "There's a visceral mistrust on both sides. Meanwhile, scholars fear offending either group, getting in trouble and losing their jobs. All this makes it harder and harder to work on Byzantine sites." Several attempts to finance large-scale restoration with funds from abroad have been stymied by suspicion of foreigners, a problem that has been made worse by the war in Iraq, fiercely opposed by a large majority of Turks.
Astonishingly—although many scholars have studied Hagia Sophia over the years—the building has never been completely documented. New discoveries may yet be made. In the 1990s, during emergency repairs on the dome, workers uncovered graffiti that had been scrawled by tenth-century repairmen, imploring God for protection as they worked from scaffolds 150 feet above the floor. "Kyrie, voithi to sou doulo, Gregorio," ran a typical one—"Lord, help your servant, Gregorius." Says Ousterhout, "You can imagine how scared they might have been up there."
Daunting work must be done for Hagia Sophia to survive for future centuries. "This is the premier monument of Byzantine civilization," says Ousterhout. "Old buildings like Hagia Sophia are ignored until there's an emergency. They're put back together and then forgotten about until the next emergency. Meanwhile, there is a continual deterioration."
Huge sections of ceiling are peeling and flaking, stained by water seepage and discolored by age and uneven exposure to light. Acres of stucco must be replaced. Windows must be repaired, new glass installed, warped frames replaced. Hundreds of marble panels, now grime-encrusted, must be cleaned. Irreplaceable mosaics must somehow be restored and protected.
"There is no long-term plan to conserve the mosaics that still survive," says art historian Teteriatnikov, who adds that a more coordinated effort is needed to protect the structure from earthquakes. "Hagia Sophia is uniquely vulnerable," says architectural engineer Stephen Kelley, "because, in an earthquake, unless a building acts as a single tightly connected unit, its parts will work against each other." The structure, he adds, comprises "additions and alterations with many natural breaks in the construction. We just don't know how stable [it] is."
"At this point, we don't even know how much consolidation and restoration the building needs, much less how much it would cost," says Verkin Arioba, founder of the Historical Heritage Protection Foundation of Turkey, which has called for an international campaign to save the monument. "How do we approach it? How should the work be prioritized? First we need to assess how much damage has been done to the building. Then we'll at least know what must be done."
Meanwhile, Hagia Sophia continues its slow slide toward decay. "We have to rediscover Hagia Sophia," said Zeynep Ahunbay, as we left the gloom of the antechamber and re-entered the nave. I watched a trapped dove swoop down through ancient vaults and colonnades, then up again toward the canopy of shimmering gold mosaic, its wings beating urgently, like the lost soul of bygone Byzantines. "It is a huge and complicated building," she said. "It has to be studied the way you study old embroidery, stitch by stitch."
Writer Fergus M. Bordewich frequently covers history and culture.
Photographer Lynsey Addario is based in Istanbul.
Subscribe now for more of Smithsonian's coverage on history, science and nature.









Comments (34)
+ View All Comments
Mehmet II did not spare the Ágía Sofía from his pillage of the City, it was part of it. This Eastern Orthodox Basilica has been defiled and it is heart-rending to see what it has become at the hands of the occupying Turks. It is a blight on the world at large that Constantinople was not restored to its rightful sovereign owners, the Hellenes (it was founded by Greek colonists from Megara, in Attica, and settled by Greeks for over 2,500 years before its capture, and 3,000 years before their expulsion at the hands of the Turkish state). If the Turks had done to the Vatican and St Peter's Basilica what they have done to Constantinople and the Ágía Sofía the Pope would have raised the Ladder of Lucifer from Hell himself, and brought on the Apocalypse, to get it back. Especially because Catholicism has its roots in Eastern Orthodoxy (indeed, Christianity was spread from Jerusalem, through Anatolia and the Balkans, to Europe by the Greeks), it owes it to them (and indeed Pope Pius II attempted) to reclaim the Holy City of Constantinople, and the Ágía Sofía, for Christendom.
Posted by Pablo on March 13,2013 | 09:00 PM
I see my previous comments have not been published despite their factual accuracy in response to other comments to this article which have been published. 1. Yes, the Ágía Sofía should be rededicated to her original purpose, as the Temple of the Holy Wisdom of God, she is an Eastern Orthodox Basilica, the 'Mother Church' of all Orthodox Churches. Ágía Sofía is Orthodoxy's St Peter's Basilica and Constantinople is its Vatican; the minarets, minbar and mihrab do not belong on Ágía Sofía and her iconography and iconostasis ought to be restored as her original fixtures. If I did to Mecca what the Turks have done to Constantinople, Muslims would go ballistic! 2. To say the Greeks of Constantinople never considered themselves Greek but rather Roman is a obfuscation and betrays the fact that the Roman Empire was really two empires; the West Roman Empire and the East Roman (or Byzantine) Empire, Byzantine being from Byzas, the founding King on Constantinople (then Byzantium) it is a Greek word that refers to Baseiliou or 'Royalty'. Furthermore, the very name Istabul is a corruption of the Greek name for the City, from "stan" and "ople" and also from the expression "eis stin poli" (in the city). So the Turks can't have it both ways, paying tribute to the City's Greek heritage and then saying it was never, in fact, a Greek city. 3. In furtherance to my point above, the fact that the Greeks of Nycaea, Ionnia, Smyrne, Kappadocia and Trebizond were expelled by Turkey in 1923 to Greece and subsequently the Greeks of Constantinople fled in the wake of the 'Istanbul Pogrom' is at odds with Turkish revisionism about their ethnicity. Greeks settled and lived on what is now mainland Turkey for over 2,000 years, Constantinople is the eternal capital of Greece as inheritor of the Byzantine Empire and what's more it is of immeasurable significance to Eastern Orthodoxy. These are undeniable facts, relevantly responding to other comments to this article.
Posted by Pablo on March 13,2013 | 08:29 PM
The article in error. The Fall of the Roman Empire in 1453 was an empire that endured for 1500yrs. Claiming otherwise is Western European revisionist history. The so called "Byzantine" Empire never existed aside from being coined western scholars.
Posted by Daniel Homiak on November 18,2012 | 09:53 PM
Where does all the money go that is collected from entrance feesAt $15 for the millions of visitors each year it would seem that some major continual preservation project could be funded. The same could to asked regarding other nearby monuments?
Posted by Michael on June 12,2012 | 06:16 AM
It is interesting that your article has mentioned the capture of Istanbul by Turks with the use of a lot words putting attention to violence. But when it comes to invasion by the crusaders it only mentions "The realm was further weakened in 1204 when western European crusaders en route to the Holy Land, overtaken by greed, captured and looted Constantinople. The city never fully recovered."
It was well documented that the devastation caused by Catholic christians was no match to that of Turks. So It should have deserved a much bigger mention. Here I mentioned it. With 4th Crusade, Christians invaded Constantinople and have done unspeakable crime. They have murdered, raped, ruthlessly violated the city's churches and monasteries, destroying or stealing many of the ancient works. Venetians were good at stealing while French was into drinking wine, violating nuns, murdering Orthodox clerics and destroying the city. Hagia Sophia was not spared from these vandalizations.
I thought the article wouldn't be complete without it.
Posted by Deveci on November 26,2011 | 04:40 PM
How sad to read some of the commenter's attitude towards the Turkish nation. Hagia Sophia will and should remain as a museum not a place of worship, a great population of Turkish Republic are Muslims. We do not want arguments, all we need and want is a common ground, which is common sense. Wake up people! This is 21st century, and let us enjoy being in this magnificent structure! I love breathing equally in the Sultan Ahmed Mosque and in Saint Sophia, inhale the peace. Hagia Sophia needs tender loving care not conflicting ideas...
Posted by T.G. on May 28,2011 | 07:29 PM
Ethan...
Your post about K.S area schools caught my attention... since the Turks won Istanbul just as righteously as any Christian military victory, it seems wrong to at all expect them to sponsor the Haga Sophia as a Christian church...especially in light of how mosques have been treated in the nearby countries where christian nations retook territory. Interesting that the Crusaders famously looted and disrespected the church, whereas the victorious Sultan personally forbid looting, desecration, or destruction of the marvelous scred site. That being said, a joint use idea, where both the main general faiths with a strong vested interest historically; Christian and Muslim... might help with maintenance of the building, as well as allow for sacred use.... which is what it was meant to host. The Kansas City Institute of Arts might be a school which could provide a base of studies, if you are strongly interested in the architectural and art aspects, of the Byzantine culture. It's a great little place, is the impression I have of the school... with a richness in how they connect with History. All The Best...
Posted by Peter on September 15,2010 | 06:36 PM
I support 100% any effort to restore the Hagia Sophia...but NOT as a tourist attraction. The Hagia Sophia is neither secular or Muslim...it is Christian. It rightfully belongs to the Orthodox church! The Muslims stole Hagia Sophia from Orthodox Christians back in the 15th Century, and then profaned and violated it! If Turkey wants to be taken seriously as a potential member of the EU, then they need to give back what was stolen from the Church, so that the Hagia Sophia may be proplerly and lovingly restured and then used for its original purpose...a spiritual center for Christianity! Turkey, if they are truly committed to human rights, and respecing all regardless of ethncity or religion, needs to right this horrible wrong that was committed long ago.
Posted by Sabrina on June 27,2010 | 12:58 AM
The Hagia Sophia is, undoubtedly, one of the world’s greatest cultural heritage of human beings nowadays.I have learned from this article that the Hagia Sophia was built in the year 537,which means it has such a long history of more than 1400 years. And I think it’s a miracle that the Hagia Sophia can suffer from various wars, revolutions and changes in the river of history.Maybe it’s no more splendid as what it was, but it’s still of great significance to not only the Turk but also the Christians all over the world. I think it’s really inadvisable for the debate between the secular Turks and the Christians around whether to bring the Hagia Sophia into a mosque. Actually, we should focus on the recovery of the Hagia rather than whether change it into a mosque. As the geographer mentioned in the article, Istanbul sits squarely atop a geologic fault line. "There most definitely are seismic threats to Hagia Sophia, and the potential ganger are great. As a result, what come first should we do is raise the people all around the world to do recovering work to protect this great cultural and historical heritage of humans-the Hagia Sophia.
Posted by YuanPan on December 13,2009 | 01:05 AM
Beautiful"Sophia"Cathedral, really besutiful! In fact, the church set religion, philosophy, aesthetics, literature, sculpture, painting, music, art forms, etc.as a whole. It is that people create and change the world of dynamic activities in the realization of reality, It is also the ctystallization of human wisdom and valuable cultural heritage. But the church was originally created as a vehicle for religion, so they were damaged bu the radical. However,according to historical materialist point of view, the emergence of religion is also a progressive history. The emergence of the church is the physical embodiment of religion.
The Church of Hagia Sophia was built in 537 years, a collection of Roman wisdom, which is a symbol of the Byzantine period, until the Muslim army conquered Istanbul. Then the church became a mosque, and it becomes the Ottoman Empire's most famous mosques.
Needless to say, it is one of the most beautiful buildings in the legacy of history. The great,spectacular, magnificent Sophia Cathedral is the world's only example of religious architecture,is a producct of convergence of Eastern and Western cultures. this great building is one of the survived legacu in the architectural history of mankind.We must protect the legacy of our ancestors.Let our future generations could see their achievements.
Posted by He yanwei on December 7,2009 | 07:31 PM
From the Internet, I know that Hagia Sophia is the starting point passing the torch of the Beijing 2008 Olympic Games in Istanbul. As one of the world's top ten desirable churches, the exterior seems less spectacular than Sultanahmet Camii - another famous structure in Istanbul, but the history of Hagia Sophia is more time-honored that Sultanahmet Camii could never compare with. Thank you for this article!
Posted by Lv Xin on December 5,2009 | 12:36 AM
very good
Posted by hh on December 3,2009 | 09:04 AM
Force of Arms”, in latin referred to as “Vi et Armis” or “Armorum VI”, in which ownership has always been established by force; originally by the "Force of Arms and latterly by the force of law. We are all descendants and have become the successors in title to the goods taken from our ancestors by "Force of Arms". As stated, the Hagia Sophia belongs rightfully to the Turkish Government and therefore they are under no moral obligations.
Posted by Williams on May 29,2009 | 11:46 PM
"Force of Arms" is a completely legitimate way of transferring ownership of territory,treasure and artifacts etc, even when good guys lose. Just ask the Americans they are experts on "Force of Arms". The Hagia Sophia belongs rightfully to the Turkish Government and therefore they are under no moral obligations.
Posted by Williams on May 28,2009 | 10:27 PM
+ View All Comments