A Monumental Struggle to Preserve Hagia Sophia
In Istanbul, secularists and fundamentalists clash over restoring the nearly 1,500 year-old structure
- By Fergus M. Bordewich
- Photographs by Lynsey Addario
- Smithsonian magazine, December 2008, Subscribe
(Page 2 of 3)
That same afternoon, Constantinople's new overlord, Sultan Mehmet II, rode triumphantly to the shattered doors of Hagia Sophia. Mehmet was one of the great figures of his age. As ruthless as he was cultivated, the 21-year-old conqueror spoke at least four languages, including Greek, Turkish, Persian and Arabic, as well as some Latin. He was an admirer of European culture and patronized Italian artists, such as the Venetian master Gentile Bellini, who painted him as a bearded, introspective figure swathed in an enormous robe, his small eyes gazing reflectively over an aristocratically arched nose. "He was ambitious, superstitious, very cruel, very intelligent, paranoid and obsessed with world domination," says Crowley. "His role models were Alexander the Great and Julius Caesar. He saw himself as coming not to destroy the empire, but to become the new Roman emperor." Later, he would cast medallions that proclaimed him, in Latin, "Imperator Mundi"—"Emperor of the World."
Before entering the church, Mehmet bent down to scoop up a fistful of earth, pouring it over his head to symbolize his abasement before God. Hagia Sophia was the physical embodiment of imperial power: now it was his. He declared that it was to be protected and was immediately to become a mosque. Calling for an imam to recite the call to prayer, he strode through the handful of terrified Greeks who had not already been carted off to slavery, offering mercy to some. Mehmet then climbed onto the altar and bowed down to pray.
Among Christians elsewhere, reports that Byzantium had fallen sparked widespread anxiety that Europe would be overrun by a wave of militant Islam. "It was a 9/11 moment," says Crowley. "People wept in the streets of Rome. There was mass panic. People long afterward remembered exactly where they were when they heard the news." The "terrible Turk," a slur popularized in diatribes disseminated across Europe by the newly invented printing press, soon became a synonym for savagery.
In fact, the Turks treated Hagia Sophia with honor. In contrast to other churches that had been seized and converted into mosques, the conquerors refrained from changing its name, merely adapting it to the Turkish spelling. ("Ayasofya" is the way it is written in Turkey today.) Mehmet, says Ilber Ortayli, director of the Topkapi Palace Museum, the former residence of the Ottoman emperors, "was a man of the Renaissance, an intellectual. He was not a fanatic. He recognized Hagia Sophia's greatness and he saved it."
Remarkably, the sultan allowed several of the finest Christian mosaics to remain, including the Virgin Mary and images of the seraphs, which he considered to be guardian spirits of the city. Under subsequent regimes, however, more orthodox sultans would be less tolerant. Eventually, all of the figurative mosaics were plastered over. Where Christ's visage had once gazed out from the dome, Koranic verses in Arabic proclaimed: "In the name of God the merciful and pitiful, God is the light of heaven and earth."
Until 1934, Muslim calls to prayer resounded from Hagia Sophia's four minarets—added after Mehmet's conquest. In that year, Turkey's first president, Kemal Ataturk, secularized Hagia Sophia as part of his revolutionary campaign to westernize Turkey. An agnostic, Ataturk ordered Islamic madrassas (religious schools) closed; banned the veil; and gave women the vote—making Turkey the first Muslim country to do so. He cracked down harshly on once-powerful religious orders. "Fellow countrymen," he warned, "you must realize that the Turkish Republic cannot be the country of sheikhs or dervishes. If we want to be men, we must carry out the dictates of civilization. We draw our strength from civilization, scholarship and science and are guided by them. We do not accept anything else." Of Hagia Sophia he declared: "This should be a monument for all civilization." It thus became the world's first mosque to be turned into a museum. Says Ortayli, "At the time, this was an act of radical humanism."
Although ethnic Greeks constituted a sizable proportion of Istanbul's population well into the 20th century, the heritage of Byzantium was virtually expunged from history, first by Mehmet's Ottoman successors, then by a secular Turkey trying to foster Turkish nationalism. Nobel Prize- winning author Orhan Pamuk says that by the 1960s, Hagia Sophia had become a remnant of an unimaginably distant age. "As for the Byzantines," he writes in his memoir, Istanbul, "they had vanished into thin air soon after the conquest, or so I'd been led to believe. No one had told me that it was their grandchildren's grandchildren's grandchildren who now ran the shoe stores, patisseries, and haberdasheries of Beyoglu," a center-city neigborhood.
Turkish authorities have made little effort to excavate and protect the vestiges of Byzantium (apart from Hagia Sophia and a handful of other sites) that lie buried beneath modern Istanbul. The city's growth from a population of 1 million in the 1950s to 12 million today has created development pressures that preservationists are ill equipped to resist. Robert Ousterhout, an architectural historian at the University of Pennsylvania, has worked on Byzantine sites in Turkey since the 1980s; he was once awakened in the middle of the night by work crews surreptitiously demolishing a sixth-century Byzantine wall behind his house to make room for a new parking lot. "This is happening all over old Istanbul," says Ousterhout. "There are laws, but there's no enforcement. Byzantine Istanbul is literally disappearing day by day and month by month."
Hagia Sophia, of course, is in no danger of being knocked down in the middle of the night. It is almost universally regarded as the nation's "Taj Mahal," as one conservator put it. But the monument's fate remains hostage to the roiling political and religious currents of present-day Turkey. "The building has always been treated in a symbolic way—by Christians, Muslims, and by Ataturk and his secular followers," says Ousterhout. "Each group looks at Hagia Sophia and sees a totally different building." Under Turkish laws dating from the 1930s, public prayer is prohibited in the museum. Nevertheless, religious extremists are bent on reclaiming it for their respective faiths, while other Turks remain equally determined to retain it as a national symbol of a proud—and secular—civilization.
Hagia Sophia has also become a potent symbol for Greeks and Greek-Americans. In June 2007, Chris Spirou, president of the Free Agia Sophia Council of America, a U.S.-based advocacy group whose Web site features photographs depicting the building with its minarets erased, testified in Washington, D. C. at hearings sponsored by the Congressional Human Rights Caucus that the one-time cathedral had been "taken prisoner" by the Turks; he called for it to be restored as the "Holy House of Prayer for all Christians of the world and the Basilica of Orthodoxy that it was before the conquest of Constantinople by the Ottoman Turks." Spirou then asserted, in terms usually reserved for the world's outlaw regimes, that "Hagia Sophia stands as the greatest testimony to the ruthlessness, the insensitivity and the barbaric behavior of rulers and conquerors towards human beings and their rights." Such rhetoric fuels anxiety among some Turkish Muslims that Western concern for Hagia Sophia reflects a hidden plan to restore it to Christianity.
At the same time, Turkish Islamists demand the reconsecration of Hagia Sophia as a mosque, a position once espoused by Turkey's current prime minister, 54-year-old Recep Tayyip Erdogan, who, as a rising politician in the 1990s, asserted that "Ayasofya should be opened to Muslim prayers." (Erdogan frightened secularists even more at the time by declaring his support for introduction of Islamic law, announcing that "For us, democracy is a means to an end.") Erdogan went on to become mayor of Istanbul and to win election as prime minister in 2003. The effect of increased religiosity is evident in the streets of Istanbul, where women wearing head scarfs and ankle-length dresses are far more common than they were only a few years ago.
As prime minister, Erdogan, re-elected with a large majority in July 2007, shed his earlier rhetoric and has pursued a moderate and conciliatory course, rejecting political Islam, reaffirming Turkey's desire to join the European Union and maintaining—however tenuously—a military alliance with the United States. "Erdogan-type Islamists are resolved not to challenge through word or deed the basic premises of the secular democratic state that Turkey wants to institutionalize," says Metin Heper, a political scientist at Bilkent University in Ankara. Although Erdogan has not publicly repudiated his stance on reopening Hagia Sophia to Muslim prayer, he has scrupulously enforced existing law against it.
Single Page « Previous 1 2 3 Next »
Subscribe now for more of Smithsonian's coverage on history, science and nature.









Comments (34)
+ View All Comments
Mehmet II did not spare the Ágía Sofía from his pillage of the City, it was part of it. This Eastern Orthodox Basilica has been defiled and it is heart-rending to see what it has become at the hands of the occupying Turks. It is a blight on the world at large that Constantinople was not restored to its rightful sovereign owners, the Hellenes (it was founded by Greek colonists from Megara, in Attica, and settled by Greeks for over 2,500 years before its capture, and 3,000 years before their expulsion at the hands of the Turkish state). If the Turks had done to the Vatican and St Peter's Basilica what they have done to Constantinople and the Ágía Sofía the Pope would have raised the Ladder of Lucifer from Hell himself, and brought on the Apocalypse, to get it back. Especially because Catholicism has its roots in Eastern Orthodoxy (indeed, Christianity was spread from Jerusalem, through Anatolia and the Balkans, to Europe by the Greeks), it owes it to them (and indeed Pope Pius II attempted) to reclaim the Holy City of Constantinople, and the Ágía Sofía, for Christendom.
Posted by Pablo on March 13,2013 | 09:00 PM
I see my previous comments have not been published despite their factual accuracy in response to other comments to this article which have been published. 1. Yes, the Ágía Sofía should be rededicated to her original purpose, as the Temple of the Holy Wisdom of God, she is an Eastern Orthodox Basilica, the 'Mother Church' of all Orthodox Churches. Ágía Sofía is Orthodoxy's St Peter's Basilica and Constantinople is its Vatican; the minarets, minbar and mihrab do not belong on Ágía Sofía and her iconography and iconostasis ought to be restored as her original fixtures. If I did to Mecca what the Turks have done to Constantinople, Muslims would go ballistic! 2. To say the Greeks of Constantinople never considered themselves Greek but rather Roman is a obfuscation and betrays the fact that the Roman Empire was really two empires; the West Roman Empire and the East Roman (or Byzantine) Empire, Byzantine being from Byzas, the founding King on Constantinople (then Byzantium) it is a Greek word that refers to Baseiliou or 'Royalty'. Furthermore, the very name Istabul is a corruption of the Greek name for the City, from "stan" and "ople" and also from the expression "eis stin poli" (in the city). So the Turks can't have it both ways, paying tribute to the City's Greek heritage and then saying it was never, in fact, a Greek city. 3. In furtherance to my point above, the fact that the Greeks of Nycaea, Ionnia, Smyrne, Kappadocia and Trebizond were expelled by Turkey in 1923 to Greece and subsequently the Greeks of Constantinople fled in the wake of the 'Istanbul Pogrom' is at odds with Turkish revisionism about their ethnicity. Greeks settled and lived on what is now mainland Turkey for over 2,000 years, Constantinople is the eternal capital of Greece as inheritor of the Byzantine Empire and what's more it is of immeasurable significance to Eastern Orthodoxy. These are undeniable facts, relevantly responding to other comments to this article.
Posted by Pablo on March 13,2013 | 08:29 PM
The article in error. The Fall of the Roman Empire in 1453 was an empire that endured for 1500yrs. Claiming otherwise is Western European revisionist history. The so called "Byzantine" Empire never existed aside from being coined western scholars.
Posted by Daniel Homiak on November 18,2012 | 09:53 PM
Where does all the money go that is collected from entrance feesAt $15 for the millions of visitors each year it would seem that some major continual preservation project could be funded. The same could to asked regarding other nearby monuments?
Posted by Michael on June 12,2012 | 06:16 AM
It is interesting that your article has mentioned the capture of Istanbul by Turks with the use of a lot words putting attention to violence. But when it comes to invasion by the crusaders it only mentions "The realm was further weakened in 1204 when western European crusaders en route to the Holy Land, overtaken by greed, captured and looted Constantinople. The city never fully recovered."
It was well documented that the devastation caused by Catholic christians was no match to that of Turks. So It should have deserved a much bigger mention. Here I mentioned it. With 4th Crusade, Christians invaded Constantinople and have done unspeakable crime. They have murdered, raped, ruthlessly violated the city's churches and monasteries, destroying or stealing many of the ancient works. Venetians were good at stealing while French was into drinking wine, violating nuns, murdering Orthodox clerics and destroying the city. Hagia Sophia was not spared from these vandalizations.
I thought the article wouldn't be complete without it.
Posted by Deveci on November 26,2011 | 04:40 PM
How sad to read some of the commenter's attitude towards the Turkish nation. Hagia Sophia will and should remain as a museum not a place of worship, a great population of Turkish Republic are Muslims. We do not want arguments, all we need and want is a common ground, which is common sense. Wake up people! This is 21st century, and let us enjoy being in this magnificent structure! I love breathing equally in the Sultan Ahmed Mosque and in Saint Sophia, inhale the peace. Hagia Sophia needs tender loving care not conflicting ideas...
Posted by T.G. on May 28,2011 | 07:29 PM
Ethan...
Your post about K.S area schools caught my attention... since the Turks won Istanbul just as righteously as any Christian military victory, it seems wrong to at all expect them to sponsor the Haga Sophia as a Christian church...especially in light of how mosques have been treated in the nearby countries where christian nations retook territory. Interesting that the Crusaders famously looted and disrespected the church, whereas the victorious Sultan personally forbid looting, desecration, or destruction of the marvelous scred site. That being said, a joint use idea, where both the main general faiths with a strong vested interest historically; Christian and Muslim... might help with maintenance of the building, as well as allow for sacred use.... which is what it was meant to host. The Kansas City Institute of Arts might be a school which could provide a base of studies, if you are strongly interested in the architectural and art aspects, of the Byzantine culture. It's a great little place, is the impression I have of the school... with a richness in how they connect with History. All The Best...
Posted by Peter on September 15,2010 | 06:36 PM
I support 100% any effort to restore the Hagia Sophia...but NOT as a tourist attraction. The Hagia Sophia is neither secular or Muslim...it is Christian. It rightfully belongs to the Orthodox church! The Muslims stole Hagia Sophia from Orthodox Christians back in the 15th Century, and then profaned and violated it! If Turkey wants to be taken seriously as a potential member of the EU, then they need to give back what was stolen from the Church, so that the Hagia Sophia may be proplerly and lovingly restured and then used for its original purpose...a spiritual center for Christianity! Turkey, if they are truly committed to human rights, and respecing all regardless of ethncity or religion, needs to right this horrible wrong that was committed long ago.
Posted by Sabrina on June 27,2010 | 12:58 AM
The Hagia Sophia is, undoubtedly, one of the world’s greatest cultural heritage of human beings nowadays.I have learned from this article that the Hagia Sophia was built in the year 537,which means it has such a long history of more than 1400 years. And I think it’s a miracle that the Hagia Sophia can suffer from various wars, revolutions and changes in the river of history.Maybe it’s no more splendid as what it was, but it’s still of great significance to not only the Turk but also the Christians all over the world. I think it’s really inadvisable for the debate between the secular Turks and the Christians around whether to bring the Hagia Sophia into a mosque. Actually, we should focus on the recovery of the Hagia rather than whether change it into a mosque. As the geographer mentioned in the article, Istanbul sits squarely atop a geologic fault line. "There most definitely are seismic threats to Hagia Sophia, and the potential ganger are great. As a result, what come first should we do is raise the people all around the world to do recovering work to protect this great cultural and historical heritage of humans-the Hagia Sophia.
Posted by YuanPan on December 13,2009 | 01:05 AM
Beautiful"Sophia"Cathedral, really besutiful! In fact, the church set religion, philosophy, aesthetics, literature, sculpture, painting, music, art forms, etc.as a whole. It is that people create and change the world of dynamic activities in the realization of reality, It is also the ctystallization of human wisdom and valuable cultural heritage. But the church was originally created as a vehicle for religion, so they were damaged bu the radical. However,according to historical materialist point of view, the emergence of religion is also a progressive history. The emergence of the church is the physical embodiment of religion.
The Church of Hagia Sophia was built in 537 years, a collection of Roman wisdom, which is a symbol of the Byzantine period, until the Muslim army conquered Istanbul. Then the church became a mosque, and it becomes the Ottoman Empire's most famous mosques.
Needless to say, it is one of the most beautiful buildings in the legacy of history. The great,spectacular, magnificent Sophia Cathedral is the world's only example of religious architecture,is a producct of convergence of Eastern and Western cultures. this great building is one of the survived legacu in the architectural history of mankind.We must protect the legacy of our ancestors.Let our future generations could see their achievements.
Posted by He yanwei on December 7,2009 | 07:31 PM
From the Internet, I know that Hagia Sophia is the starting point passing the torch of the Beijing 2008 Olympic Games in Istanbul. As one of the world's top ten desirable churches, the exterior seems less spectacular than Sultanahmet Camii - another famous structure in Istanbul, but the history of Hagia Sophia is more time-honored that Sultanahmet Camii could never compare with. Thank you for this article!
Posted by Lv Xin on December 5,2009 | 12:36 AM
very good
Posted by hh on December 3,2009 | 09:04 AM
Force of Arms”, in latin referred to as “Vi et Armis” or “Armorum VI”, in which ownership has always been established by force; originally by the "Force of Arms and latterly by the force of law. We are all descendants and have become the successors in title to the goods taken from our ancestors by "Force of Arms". As stated, the Hagia Sophia belongs rightfully to the Turkish Government and therefore they are under no moral obligations.
Posted by Williams on May 29,2009 | 11:46 PM
"Force of Arms" is a completely legitimate way of transferring ownership of territory,treasure and artifacts etc, even when good guys lose. Just ask the Americans they are experts on "Force of Arms". The Hagia Sophia belongs rightfully to the Turkish Government and therefore they are under no moral obligations.
Posted by Williams on May 28,2009 | 10:27 PM
+ View All Comments