(Page 2 of 3)
That same afternoon, Constantinople's new overlord, Sultan Mehmet II, rode triumphantly to the shattered doors of Hagia Sophia. Mehmet was one of the great figures of his age. As ruthless as he was cultivated, the 21-year-old conqueror spoke at least four languages, including Greek, Turkish, Persian and Arabic, as well as some Latin. He was an admirer of European culture and patronized Italian artists, such as the Venetian master Gentile Bellini, who painted him as a bearded, introspective figure swathed in an enormous robe, his small eyes gazing reflectively over an aristocratically arched nose. "He was ambitious, superstitious, very cruel, very intelligent, paranoid and obsessed with world domination," says Crowley. "His role models were Alexander the Great and Julius Caesar. He saw himself as coming not to destroy the empire, but to become the new Roman emperor." Later, he would cast medallions that proclaimed him, in Latin, "Imperator Mundi"—"Emperor of the World."
Before entering the church, Mehmet bent down to scoop up a fistful of earth, pouring it over his head to symbolize his abasement before God. Hagia Sophia was the physical embodiment of imperial power: now it was his. He declared that it was to be protected and was immediately to become a mosque. Calling for an imam to recite the call to prayer, he strode through the handful of terrified Greeks who had not already been carted off to slavery, offering mercy to some. Mehmet then climbed onto the altar and bowed down to pray.
Among Christians elsewhere, reports that Byzantium had fallen sparked widespread anxiety that Europe would be overrun by a wave of militant Islam. "It was a 9/11 moment," says Crowley. "People wept in the streets of Rome. There was mass panic. People long afterward remembered exactly where they were when they heard the news." The "terrible Turk," a slur popularized in diatribes disseminated across Europe by the newly invented printing press, soon became a synonym for savagery.
In fact, the Turks treated Hagia Sophia with honor. In contrast to other churches that had been seized and converted into mosques, the conquerors refrained from changing its name, merely adapting it to the Turkish spelling. ("Ayasofya" is the way it is written in Turkey today.) Mehmet, says Ilber Ortayli, director of the Topkapi Palace Museum, the former residence of the Ottoman emperors, "was a man of the Renaissance, an intellectual. He was not a fanatic. He recognized Hagia Sophia's greatness and he saved it."
Remarkably, the sultan allowed several of the finest Christian mosaics to remain, including the Virgin Mary and images of the seraphs, which he considered to be guardian spirits of the city. Under subsequent regimes, however, more orthodox sultans would be less tolerant. Eventually, all of the figurative mosaics were plastered over. Where Christ's visage had once gazed out from the dome, Koranic verses in Arabic proclaimed: "In the name of God the merciful and pitiful, God is the light of heaven and earth."
Until 1934, Muslim calls to prayer resounded from Hagia Sophia's four minarets—added after Mehmet's conquest. In that year, Turkey's first president, Kemal Ataturk, secularized Hagia Sophia as part of his revolutionary campaign to westernize Turkey. An agnostic, Ataturk ordered Islamic madrassas (religious schools) closed; banned the veil; and gave women the vote—making Turkey the first Muslim country to do so. He cracked down harshly on once-powerful religious orders. "Fellow countrymen," he warned, "you must realize that the Turkish Republic cannot be the country of sheikhs or dervishes. If we want to be men, we must carry out the dictates of civilization. We draw our strength from civilization, scholarship and science and are guided by them. We do not accept anything else." Of Hagia Sophia he declared: "This should be a monument for all civilization." It thus became the world's first mosque to be turned into a museum. Says Ortayli, "At the time, this was an act of radical humanism."
Although ethnic Greeks constituted a sizable proportion of Istanbul's population well into the 20th century, the heritage of Byzantium was virtually expunged from history, first by Mehmet's Ottoman successors, then by a secular Turkey trying to foster Turkish nationalism. Nobel Prize- winning author Orhan Pamuk says that by the 1960s, Hagia Sophia had become a remnant of an unimaginably distant age. "As for the Byzantines," he writes in his memoir, Istanbul, "they had vanished into thin air soon after the conquest, or so I'd been led to believe. No one had told me that it was their grandchildren's grandchildren's grandchildren who now ran the shoe stores, patisseries, and haberdasheries of Beyoglu," a center-city neigborhood.
Turkish authorities have made little effort to excavate and protect the vestiges of Byzantium (apart from Hagia Sophia and a handful of other sites) that lie buried beneath modern Istanbul. The city's growth from a population of 1 million in the 1950s to 12 million today has created development pressures that preservationists are ill equipped to resist. Robert Ousterhout, an architectural historian at the University of Pennsylvania, has worked on Byzantine sites in Turkey since the 1980s; he was once awakened in the middle of the night by work crews surreptitiously demolishing a sixth-century Byzantine wall behind his house to make room for a new parking lot. "This is happening all over old Istanbul," says Ousterhout. "There are laws, but there's no enforcement. Byzantine Istanbul is literally disappearing day by day and month by month."
Hagia Sophia, of course, is in no danger of being knocked down in the middle of the night. It is almost universally regarded as the nation's "Taj Mahal," as one conservator put it. But the monument's fate remains hostage to the roiling political and religious currents of present-day Turkey. "The building has always been treated in a symbolic way—by Christians, Muslims, and by Ataturk and his secular followers," says Ousterhout. "Each group looks at Hagia Sophia and sees a totally different building." Under Turkish laws dating from the 1930s, public prayer is prohibited in the museum. Nevertheless, religious extremists are bent on reclaiming it for their respective faiths, while other Turks remain equally determined to retain it as a national symbol of a proud—and secular—civilization.
Hagia Sophia has also become a potent symbol for Greeks and Greek-Americans. In June 2007, Chris Spirou, president of the Free Agia Sophia Council of America, a U.S.-based advocacy group whose Web site features photographs depicting the building with its minarets erased, testified in Washington, D. C. at hearings sponsored by the Congressional Human Rights Caucus that the one-time cathedral had been "taken prisoner" by the Turks; he called for it to be restored as the "Holy House of Prayer for all Christians of the world and the Basilica of Orthodoxy that it was before the conquest of Constantinople by the Ottoman Turks." Spirou then asserted, in terms usually reserved for the world's outlaw regimes, that "Hagia Sophia stands as the greatest testimony to the ruthlessness, the insensitivity and the barbaric behavior of rulers and conquerors towards human beings and their rights." Such rhetoric fuels anxiety among some Turkish Muslims that Western concern for Hagia Sophia reflects a hidden plan to restore it to Christianity.
At the same time, Turkish Islamists demand the reconsecration of Hagia Sophia as a mosque, a position once espoused by Turkey's current prime minister, 54-year-old Recep Tayyip Erdogan, who, as a rising politician in the 1990s, asserted that "Ayasofya should be opened to Muslim prayers." (Erdogan frightened secularists even more at the time by declaring his support for introduction of Islamic law, announcing that "For us, democracy is a means to an end.") Erdogan went on to become mayor of Istanbul and to win election as prime minister in 2003. The effect of increased religiosity is evident in the streets of Istanbul, where women wearing head scarfs and ankle-length dresses are far more common than they were only a few years ago.
As prime minister, Erdogan, re-elected with a large majority in July 2007, shed his earlier rhetoric and has pursued a moderate and conciliatory course, rejecting political Islam, reaffirming Turkey's desire to join the European Union and maintaining—however tenuously—a military alliance with the United States. "Erdogan-type Islamists are resolved not to challenge through word or deed the basic premises of the secular democratic state that Turkey wants to institutionalize," says Metin Heper, a political scientist at Bilkent University in Ankara. Although Erdogan has not publicly repudiated his stance on reopening Hagia Sophia to Muslim prayer, he has scrupulously enforced existing law against it.


Comments
This is a matter that should interest all who care about the human heritage. Is there one organization that one could support in an effort to help? UNESCO, perhaps?
Posted by Joan Campion on November 28,2008 | 09:44AM
This is a magnificent essay on the current state of this outstanding church. It is sad that this structure is referred to as a "basilica" since its construction is a domed building with four pendantives and does not have a hip roof and an apse at one end. That structure was characteristic of the emperor's building where he held court and many Christrian churches are constructed in that pattern and architecturally are designated as basilicas. However the popes had seen fit to apply that name to certain domed churches as an honorific one. The popes never had control of this church except when the warriors of the fourth crusade, through the wiles of the Venetians, overcame Constantinople and held it for 60 years. This has never been termed a basilica by the citizens of that city. It wss always referred to as "the Great Church of the Holy Wisdom of God." By the same token they and their empire were never identified as "Byzantines" or the "Byzantine Empire." These titles were introduced by a western scholar of the sixteenth century and were unknown in the 1000 year existence of that empire.
Posted by John P. Nasou, M.D. on November 28,2008 | 12:32PM
I enjoyed the article on HAGIA SOPHIA, but there is no mention of the BLUE MOSQUE with its six minarets (the only one with six in the world) and a change by Attaturk from religion to secular and its being restored. Am I missing something? It impressed me greatly when I visited. GP
Posted by George Pittman - COL.USAF, RET'D on November 29,2008 | 10:32AM
WOW!!! My wife and I just returned from a 5 weeks vacation in Turkey with the last 18 days in Istanbul. We spent an entire day wondering around the Hagia Sophia....the 360 degree tour blows my mind away!!!!! Dale
Posted by dalerudd on November 29,2008 | 06:23PM
I have visited the Agia Sophia. It is an architectural and cultural landmark of the highest order. I hope and pray that all of the responsible parties will come together to preserve it for future generations.
Posted by Rabbi Gilbert Kollin on November 30,2008 | 07:49PM
I am only 17 but I hve been a committed Byzantinist for several years now. I think the Byzantine Empire is the most fascinating and significant empire to western civilization and I am glad you actually di a story bringing them and their greatness back into the light again. The western world needs to gain an appreciation of this great culture that preserved civilization during the dark ages. I think it goes without saying that I think that the Hagia Sophia should be restored to a church once more.
Posted by Ethan Williamson on December 1,2008 | 03:09PM
My recent visit to the Hagia Sophia was the fulfillment of a lifetime dream! It breaks my heart to think of how glorious it was in its heyday and how much damage has been done by time, weather and the history of empires. I will never forget the awesome beauty of that ancient and Holy place. May G-d preserve it for all generations to come, and grant us all a measure of His Holy Wisdom...
Posted by Ann-Marie on December 2,2008 | 11:38AM
I have visited Hagia Sophia many times and it is one of my favorite places in Europe. The 360 tour is wonderful - fantastic views. Made me miss my visits all the more. I hope all parties decide to preserve this wonderful landmark and historical icon so many, many generations can enjoy it's beauty. I love Istanbul and it's rich history. I can not imagine it without Hagia Sophia.
Posted by Felecia Davenport on December 3,2008 | 12:49PM
Thank you for a this article which introduces this masterpiece to your readers. I read your article carefully and I must say I sensed some Christian bias against the Turkey and Turks in it. As you know, Anatolia is a cradale of the civization whose history goes back for over ten thousand years. Turkey has so much to restore that, unless the entire World's restoration efforts are devoted to it, the Turkish Government's resources are not adquate. As for converting Saint Sophia to a Church. The morality in 1453, when Ottoman's took it, was very different than today's. Many Mosques taken by Christians, including the Mosques in Kordoba, Sevilla, and Granada were converted to and are still being used as churches. I have also traveled all around the Greek islands and cities, including the island of Crete and observed that all churches there were destroyed and not a single mention of the Ottomans is made in any of their museums. A similar situation exists in other old Ottoman lands such as the Bulgaria, Serbia, and Armenia. Turks did not destroy a single Church. They either converted it to a mosque or allowed these to be used as churches by their Christian population. Turks did the most humane thing to Saint Sophia by converting it to a museum. For 500 years it was used as a Mosque and converting it to a Church will hurt the sensibilities of many Turks who are 98% Moslem.
Posted by Demir Karsan on December 3,2008 | 02:27PM
Has Smithsonian organized any tour groups to visit Hagia Sophia?
Posted by Jen Martin on December 4,2008 | 06:25AM
Thanks for the exceptionally well done article and the wonderful and stunning 360 degree tour! One can only hope that reason and a respect for world heritage will prevail over human fanaticism of all stripes.
Posted by Gordon N. Fleming on December 4,2008 | 09:24AM
Thanks for such a great article. Very objective coverage. I have visited Aghia Sophia on 3 diffeent trips to Turkey. Each time I entered the building, I had to stop for about 20 minutes to fully absorb the meaning of what I had just walked into. It's awesome. Worldwide, there are certainly enough people that would give support to a rehabilitation of the structure. Too bad there is so much difficulty getting started.
Posted by Charles Antonacos on December 4,2008 | 06:01PM
The article on 'Ayasofya' leaves me befuddled. Is it an article exposing the needs of this museum, or is it directed at listing the history of the wars between Byzantium and the Ottomans? If it was the former, it was covered, with great mediocrity, in 4-6 paragraphs. If the latter, then it did succeed, flowered with push button words and a definite anti-Ottoman (should I say anti-Islamic) slant. Very disappointed. E. Esat Atikkan, Ph.D.
Posted by E. Esat Atikkan on December 7,2008 | 02:23PM
As usual nothing about the music in the H.S. - Neil Moran - see the article in Plainsong and Medieval Music (2002), 11:2:99-112 Cambridge University Press: http://journals.cambridge.org/action/displayIssue?jid=PMM&volumeId=11&issueId=02&iid=137178# Byzantine castrati by Neil Moran Abstract The employment of castrati in the Byzantine Church can be traced back to the choirmaster Brison in the fourth century. Brison was called upon by John Chrysostom to organize the antiphonal hymn-singing in the patriarchal church. Since eunuchs were generally considered to be remnants of a pagan past, castrati are seldom mentioned in early Byzantine sources, but beginning in the tenth century references to eunuchs or castrati became more and more frequent. By the twelfth century all the professional singers in the Hagia Sophia were castrati. The repertory of the castrati is discussed and the question is raised whether the introduction of castrati to the Sistine Chapel was influenced by the employment of castrati in Italo-Greek cloisters.
Posted by Neil Moran on December 8,2008 | 09:05AM
As a former student of the late Fr. John Meyendorff, Dean of St. Vladimir's Seminary and world-renowned expert on Byzantium, this article is a good introduction. I would recommend books by John Meyendorff to understand the Byzantine History and Theology of the Orthodox Church. The major unrepairable occurrence between the Roman Catholic Church and the Orthodox Church took place with the Fourth Crusade when the Italian West invaded Constantinople destroying and looting the city. Dumbarton Oaks outside Washington, D.C. has devoted itself to the history and understanding of Byzantium.
Posted by Nick Kobbs on December 15,2008 | 07:04AM
Since many people still seem to want to worship at the Hagia Sophia, why not allow limited religious services to any interested denomination? Keep the interior as it is now, non-denominational, allow a Christian service on Sunday and maybe one Moslem service per day on the other days. This way the building would be fulfilling its originally intended function, in a way that serves the needs of Istanbul's current population. And a resolution of the religious issues, in a way that is seen as fair and impartial, would be a big step towards preservation.
Posted by Mark Brissenden on December 15,2008 | 11:00AM
I visited Hagia Sophia in 1999. I amazed for beatiful building. Turks were very friendly. I recommend everybody.
Posted by Kagan Keskin on December 17,2008 | 11:06PM
This is Ethan again, the young byzantinist, I was wondering if anyone knows of a good college that has Byzantine Studies around Kansas City, Missouri. If somebody could post it here I would be very appreciative, My search has been fruitless and I would rather not travel all the way to Dumbarton Oaks for college just yet.
Posted by Ethan Williamson on December 18,2008 | 01:42PM
Thank for the issue that highlighted the significance of Hagia Sophia, not only as a structure and architectural masterpiece but also, and more importantly, as a symbol of preserving cultural heritage in all over the world. I wish the same understanding could prevail much earlier in the Balkans, for example. Please allow me to point out that, there are thousands of such pieces inherited in Turkey from many historic civilizations, including Seljuk and Ottoman eras, which deserve and wait for upgrading, restoration and rehabilitation. Please keep in mind that if the Turks had not saved, upgraded, and preserved the structure, today you would not see a piece of Hagia Sophia. It is regretful and disappointing that the author keeps implying clash of "fundamentalists" and "secularists" in Turkey on a monumental architectural museum. (You might have noticed some Christian fundamentalist readers above desiring conversion of the museum back to a church!)It is merely a matter of budget and time to rehabilitate defects in the roof insulation and interior plaster and painting. I would be pleased if you could consider Hagia Sophia as the monument of the tolerance and peace dominated by the Turkish Ottoman civilization in our region for centuries. Thank you, and kind regards.
Posted by Vecihi Acun on December 31,2008 | 01:21AM
The restoration of the Hagia Sophia would serve us all. Would it be possible to organize and engage in a truly GRASSROOTS effort with volunteers from all over the civilized world contributing the labor? Such an effort would not only restore the building, but raise the awareness among all of us of our kinship. Perhaps it could be done through the colleges and universities, with all of the disciplines involved.
Posted by Megan McClard on December 31,2008 | 05:31AM
To the young Byzantinist: I don't know specifically whether there are any good places for Byzantine studies near you, but as an art historian, I can recommend some resources. The College Art Association has just published a guide to art history programs in the United States and will list the specialties of faculty members. You can probably get it through your local library. If there is the work of a scholar you particularly admire, you could contact him or her - email addresses are often findable on the web - to ask for advice. Best wishes.
Posted by Natasha S. on January 4,2009 | 06:26AM
To the Byzantinist: Please remember that Byzantine Empire is a term invented by the French Historian Montesqueu in 18th Century. The Ionian Megeran Byzas established the first settlement and the polis in 6th century BCE and Montesqueu adapted the name from that. The city was named Constantinopolis after the Roman Emperor Constantine made it the Roma Capital in 313CE and built the first Saint Sophia Church. The Emperors and the population of Constantinopolis identified themselves as Romans. There is no written or archeological record of them ever calling themselves as the Byzantine Empire, Byzantines, Hellen, or Greek. Quite the contary, being a multi deity culture, many Hellens strongly reacted to the Roman State imposed Christianity and there were several returns to Hellinic Gods (Such as the Emperor Julian the Apostate period when the Christian religion olmost perished).
Posted by Demir Karsan on January 8,2009 | 04:18PM
The Agia Sophia is a place of worship. I traveled to Istanbul and I saw the present state of the building and this is sad. Why should a building of this magnitude and history be falling apart. Shame on you Turkey for neglecting this site and leaving the hundreds of other Byzantine sites to simply fall apart. The European Union should take action and the world alike to bring and end to Byzantine history which is being threatened because of neglect and stupidity. LETS DO SOMETHING ABOUT IT!
Posted by John Dedes on May 18,2009 | 11:11AM
"Force of Arms" is a completely legitimate way of transferring ownership of territory,treasure and artifacts etc, even when good guys lose. Just ask the Americans they are experts on "Force of Arms". The Hagia Sophia belongs rightfully to the Turkish Government and therefore they are under no moral obligations.
Posted by Williams on May 28,2009 | 07:27PM
Force of Arms”, in latin referred to as “Vi et Armis” or “Armorum VI”, in which ownership has always been established by force; originally by the "Force of Arms and latterly by the force of law. We are all descendants and have become the successors in title to the goods taken from our ancestors by "Force of Arms". As stated, the Hagia Sophia belongs rightfully to the Turkish Government and therefore they are under no moral obligations.
Posted by Williams on May 29,2009 | 08:46PM