House Proud
High design in a factory-made home? Michelle Kaufmann believes she holds the key
- By William Booth
- Smithsonian magazine, January 2007, Subscribe
(Page 2 of 2)
To hear her preach the prefab gospel, building a home from scratch, on-site—with what she calls "sticks"—makes little sense, while a factory committed to punching out Glidehouses provides nothing but advantages. There is quality control and little waste. Because the house moves down an assembly line, shuttled from station to station with overhead cranes and constructed on a grid with precision cuts, the joinery is plumb, the angles true.
"The factory reuses; the stick builder throws trash in the dumpster. With prefab, you build only what is needed," says Kaufmann. "The wood and other materials are not exposed to rain and the elements. There is also the human element: you know people are going to show up for work. There's no waiting for the subcontractor."
To prove the idea's benefits, Kaufmann performed an experiment in 2003 and 2004. While Cullen built the Glidehouse prototype from scratch on their Marin County lot, she worked with a manufacturer to complete an identical Glidehouse in a factory. The results: the site-built Glidehouse took 21 months to design, engineer and permit, and 14 months to build. The modular version was built in four months. (Kaufmann thinks she can shave this down to six weeks or less.) The site-built home cost $363,950 to build, or $233 per square foot, while the modular house cost $290,500, or $182 per square foot, including shipping. Both required additional spending for lots, foundations, landscaping, driveways, decks and garages.
After the experiment, Kaufmann dedicated her firm exclusively to prefab construction. "I was just young and naive enough not to know how hard this would be," she says.
Kaufmann soon learned that there were established companies already manufacturing modular structures for oil-field workers or temporary classrooms—decent boxes for temporary shelter, though hardly Glidehouses, with their lightweight paperstone kitchen countertops made of recycled paper, their roofs ready for clip-on solar panels and their clerestory windows. But her efforts to reach them were unavailing—she would discover that they wouldn't even call her back because they considered architects too difficult, and too time-consuming, to work with.
Undeterred, she says, "I basically became a stalker" and got through to a few manufacturers, enough to persuade them that "the future can be much more than what they had been doing." She contracted with them to make 11 Glidehouses and one Breezehouse, but she was still frustrated by the length of time the revolution was taking. So in 2006, she took the plunge and bought her own factory, 25,000 square feet east of Seattle, from a retiring modular house builder. She moved in this past October, with a goal of producing 10,000 prefabs over the next ten years. That's close to the number of post-and-beam houses—still considered jewels of mid-century modernism—that Joseph Eichler built in California between 1949 and 1974.
For Kaufmann, prefab offers something else worth celebrating: a truly green building. "We've already done all the homework to find the most sustainable materials," she says. A client may like a bathroom to be blue or green, but either way it will be lined with recycled glass tiles, finished with nontoxic paint, lit by energy-efficient fluorescent bulbs and equipped with low-flow faucets and a tankless water heater.
"I think about the house like I think about a hybrid car," says Kaufmann, who drives a Toyota Prius. "You can be more efficient, but you don't have to change your life. With the hybrid, you still go to the gas station and fill it up. With the prefab houses, you make it easier to go green."
Her most cherished insight? "You have to stop thinking like an architect and start thinking like a manufacturer," Kaufmann says. "When I started on this, I didn't realize that the way to do it was to do it all."
William Booth is a Los Angeles-based staff writer for the Washington Post who covers culture and the arts.
Subscribe now for more of Smithsonian's coverage on history, science and nature.









Comments (14)
Re-emergence or make-over of a good idea. Perhaps, she should consider opening a facility in the Southeast where the price of production should be lower and acceptance of prefab housing is high. (The number of mobile homes and double-wides; ie. prefab housing is evident throughout the area.) That means that the competition is high and her prices must be competitive or her concept something that appeals to a different group of people. If her houses have wide appeal she could ship them to other areas and still be competitive. Where she is positioned it looks like she may attract a market from the West Coast and perhaps a few major cities. To me, more important than building green is that people build so that they conserve energy and get energy from a green source. An aside: hybrid cars, at present, are just a rip-of from car companies (maybe in the future they will prove to be of value but I suspect that they are sapping energy and resources from developing realistic all-electric cars and transportation). I had a 1994 Ford Escord deisel when I lived in England and it had comparable fuel consumption. There are many, clean-air, deisel cars in Europe now that have comparable fuel consomption.
Posted by James Senn on March 9,2009 | 09:02 AM
Why are these houses always shown out in a rural setting, with trees and wide views? Isn't it a bit like ads that show the car zooming down a pretty mountain road all alone? Houses are built on city lots, and cars sit in traffic. Escapism doesn't help us to progress.
Posted by Mike O'Brien on August 26,2008 | 11:26 PM
this reminds me of the "icharus project" on the georgia tech campus. a fully "green house" that i think was modular. great idea! i hope it takes off
Posted by frank blackston on August 25,2008 | 12:23 AM
I agree with an earlier comment that $182 per square foot might seem a bargain in the Bay Area, but is just very unrealistic in the vast majority of areas of the U.S. Perhaps with "quantity", though, the price could be driven down. Also: would like to see the concept utilized on some more traditional style homes rather than modern-type "glidehouse" which would not be a style I would choose. An Arts and Crafts look would be most welcomed!
Posted by Suzanne on August 25,2008 | 10:09 AM
I just read the article in the Web-magazine of the Smithonian magazine. This woould solve a lot of problems in ND state for those who can not find apartments or houses to rent or buy. We are in the midst of an oil boom. Housing is limited. I could see this type of home being used in WA state where we winter & our kids live. It sounds like it would be a pleasant starter home for young people newly married & starting a new family. I am interested in this.
Posted by CarolAnn Sanderson on August 22,2008 | 11:59 PM
I like this idea coming back, and I hope it really takes hold. My question is: What makes this different than the prefab Sears houses of many years ago, and also the 'build in one day' homes from the '50s & early '60s. I remember a long time ago now watching a actual house go up in one day. I too would like to see some floor plans, even though the price quoted in the article is still not in my price range.
Posted by Susan Adix on August 22,2008 | 09:29 AM
My late husband and I have wondered for years why in the world we are still stuck in the "stick-built-house" mode. It has to be the most costly, not to mention frustrating, way to aquire a home. We were told years ago that in Japan there are factory built modular units available, whose parts could be "mixed and matched", but we never followed up on it.(That was in the dark ages before the Internet). Good Luck getting this idea finally off the drawing board. On our island TRULY affordable QUALITY housing is badly needed.
Posted by Irmgard Conley on August 21,2008 | 11:07 PM
The heart of the article is in the following quote: "The site-built home cost $363,950 to build, or $233 per square foot, while the modular house cost $290,500, or $182 per square foot, including shipping. Both required additional spending for lots, foundations, landscaping, driveways, decks and garages." What planet is she on and what planet are her buyers from? In my neighborhood, at those prices one could build a virtual Taj Mahal from "sticks" and have money left over for ice cream and cake! Sorry, nice idea but it won't sell in my neighborhood. Maybe that's why smarter and more experienced architects couldn't make it work.
Posted by Andy Kenagy on August 21,2008 | 08:17 PM
I lived in a pre-fab house in 1952 in Fairless Hills PA. It worked very well. There was not much choice of materials, but it was interesting how each resident made changes to make theri own. I think this is a very sensible way to go. I never though about it before, but now in retirement I am living in a mobile home that is not mobile. Pre-fabs have been around for a long time. Go Green!
Posted by Joyce Wilder-Jones on August 21,2008 | 06:45 PM
The answer to a prayer! I am about to clear out a 1910 house to simplify my life, and I have specific needs caused by a disability that prevents my working full time. The "greenness" and the economic considerations are worth pursuing. I genuinely hope I will be able to contact you soon--before I land in the "too much stuff" and "like GOOD architecture (product of Cornell U.)" looney bin! What a great answer!
Posted by Hamilton Media on August 21,2008 | 05:08 PM
I would also like to see some floor plans or at least a snapshot of one or more of your prefabs. We are trying to encourage a brother(brother-in-law) to go with a prefab on his lot. What is the best way to introduce him to you for the purpose of luring him into a serious consideration of your concept? Keep up this great endever!
Posted by Geoff Phillips on August 21,2008 | 01:56 PM
In the past manufactured homes, i.e. mobile homes, have been treated as second class solutions by the banks and local government zoning laws. Is this concept of green pre-fab housing going to be received differently by the financial institutions and local government zoning personnel? Gary Celustka Oregon
Posted by Gary Celustka on August 19,2008 | 08:57 PM
In your construgtion of homes do you use any pressure treated lumber as we live in a high Termite area. Do you do any thing special for areas where high winds and tropical storms come arround yearly. Are nails or screws used in your design. Thank you Si
Posted by Si Lambert on August 19,2008 | 08:29 PM
I enjoyed reading this article and was thrilled with the concept. I feel that the prefab home will become even more popular as the younger citizens decide to build. I find it hard to enjoy seeing a "MacMansion" being built, because too often lovely trees and shrubs are sacrificed so the house goes from lot line to lot line or as close as possible. I would have enjoyed seeing pictures of the house designs. That is the only negative comment I have for this article.
Posted by Patbooks on August 18,2008 | 10:43 AM