House Proud
High design in a factory-made home? Michelle Kaufmann believes she holds the key
- By William Booth
- Smithsonian magazine, January 2007, Subscribe
Like the robot maid and the flying car, the perfect prefab house seems like one of those futuristic promises that never quite come true. You know the house: a light and airy, clean and green 3 BR, 2 BA constructed of renewable, energy-efficient materials—delivered to your doorstep. A modern house you can buy the way you buy almost everything else, with a click of the mouse. A modular house that can be assembled in an afternoon and comes complete, right down to the towel racks in the bathroom. Just plug in the utilities.
This is the house that Michelle Kaufmann believes she has designed—a young architect's answer to the challenge of bringing good design to the masses. "We want to create sustainable homes, of high quality, for a reasonable price, for the middle classes," says Kaufmann, 38. And to do that, she says, "you need an assembly line."
Not too long ago, Kaufmann bumped into her old boss, architect and design maestro Frank O. Gehry. "You know," he said, "some pretty smart people have tried this and failed." Indeed, several masters of 20th-century architecture saw the promise of prefab—giants such as Walter Gropius, Charles and Ray Eames and Joseph Eichler—but they could not redeem it.
But where others have failed, Kaufmann sees a way. Gropius or the Eameses could have built the factories to make their prefabricated homes, she says, but they lacked a crucial piece of technology. "The Internet is the key," she says. "A house is not a toothbrush," meaning a one-size-fits-all, perishable good. "You need and want to interface with the customer," to get a sense of how your building might be tailored to individual needs.
But instead of taking a dozen meetings with an architect, pinning down a hundred details, a Kaufmann prefab buyer meets with her once and then communicates with her through a Web site and by e-mail, selecting from a limited menu of options. "If you had to take meetings, you could never have mass production," says Kaufmann, who grew up in Iowa and holds degrees in architecture from Iowa State and Princeton universities. "But with e-mail, we can make the changes, we can tweak in an instant. You can keep the process moving forward."
The prefab house is hot again, at least in the pages of shelter magazines, and Kaufmann's designs are some of the smartest around; she has "definitively answered the question, ‘Why prefab?'" wrote Allison Arieff when she was editor of dwell magazine. One of them is on view through June 3 at the National Building Museum in Washington, D.C., in an exhibit titled "The Green House: New Directions in Sustainable Architecture and Design." Another one, a demonstration project Kaufmann did with Sunset magazine in 2004, went up in a parking lot in Menlo Park, California, and was visited by some 25,000 people over two days. On her own she has designed a third, called mkSolaire, tailored more for urban than suburban lots. Kaufmann's firm's Web site (mkd-arc.com) has received some 15,000 inquiries for information on her modular homes.
How many prefabs has Kaufmann built? A dozen. Which hardly constitutes a revolution—high design, tailored prefab still remains more of an idea than a product line, but Kaufmann vows to change that.
She came to her "eureka" moment through personal experience. In 2002, she and her then-new husband, Kevin Cullen, a carpenter and contractor, began to look for a place to live in the San Francisco Bay Area; they quickly confronted the brutal realities of a real estate market gone bananas. Their choices were as frustrating as they are familiar: pay a gazillion dollars for a tear-down in close-in Oakland (and end up with no money to rebuild) or move to the far reaches of former farmland for a long commute from a soul-sucking tract of mini-mansions.
They looked for six months. "It was really depressing," Kaufmann recalls. "I seriously thought about what kinds of bad decisions had I made in my life to end up in a place where we could not afford a home. We actually went into therapy."
So they decided to build a house themselves. They found a narrow lot in suburban Marin County, and Cullen went to work on a Kaufmann design with a simple but beguiling floor plan of connected rectangles, just 1,560 square feet, with an easy flow from space to space—a curtain of glass doors under a shed roof covered with solar panels. They called it the Glidehouse. Friends took a look at the plans and said: Make us one too. "This is the thing," Kaufmann says. "They didn't want me to design them another house. They wanted our house, the exact same house. And that's when I thought, hmm, could we make this in mass production?"
Subscribe now for more of Smithsonian's coverage on history, science and nature.









Comments (14)
Re-emergence or make-over of a good idea. Perhaps, she should consider opening a facility in the Southeast where the price of production should be lower and acceptance of prefab housing is high. (The number of mobile homes and double-wides; ie. prefab housing is evident throughout the area.) That means that the competition is high and her prices must be competitive or her concept something that appeals to a different group of people. If her houses have wide appeal she could ship them to other areas and still be competitive. Where she is positioned it looks like she may attract a market from the West Coast and perhaps a few major cities. To me, more important than building green is that people build so that they conserve energy and get energy from a green source. An aside: hybrid cars, at present, are just a rip-of from car companies (maybe in the future they will prove to be of value but I suspect that they are sapping energy and resources from developing realistic all-electric cars and transportation). I had a 1994 Ford Escord deisel when I lived in England and it had comparable fuel consumption. There are many, clean-air, deisel cars in Europe now that have comparable fuel consomption.
Posted by James Senn on March 9,2009 | 09:02 AM
Why are these houses always shown out in a rural setting, with trees and wide views? Isn't it a bit like ads that show the car zooming down a pretty mountain road all alone? Houses are built on city lots, and cars sit in traffic. Escapism doesn't help us to progress.
Posted by Mike O'Brien on August 26,2008 | 11:26 PM
this reminds me of the "icharus project" on the georgia tech campus. a fully "green house" that i think was modular. great idea! i hope it takes off
Posted by frank blackston on August 25,2008 | 12:23 AM
I agree with an earlier comment that $182 per square foot might seem a bargain in the Bay Area, but is just very unrealistic in the vast majority of areas of the U.S. Perhaps with "quantity", though, the price could be driven down. Also: would like to see the concept utilized on some more traditional style homes rather than modern-type "glidehouse" which would not be a style I would choose. An Arts and Crafts look would be most welcomed!
Posted by Suzanne on August 25,2008 | 10:09 AM
I just read the article in the Web-magazine of the Smithonian magazine. This woould solve a lot of problems in ND state for those who can not find apartments or houses to rent or buy. We are in the midst of an oil boom. Housing is limited. I could see this type of home being used in WA state where we winter & our kids live. It sounds like it would be a pleasant starter home for young people newly married & starting a new family. I am interested in this.
Posted by CarolAnn Sanderson on August 22,2008 | 11:59 PM
I like this idea coming back, and I hope it really takes hold. My question is: What makes this different than the prefab Sears houses of many years ago, and also the 'build in one day' homes from the '50s & early '60s. I remember a long time ago now watching a actual house go up in one day. I too would like to see some floor plans, even though the price quoted in the article is still not in my price range.
Posted by Susan Adix on August 22,2008 | 09:29 AM
My late husband and I have wondered for years why in the world we are still stuck in the "stick-built-house" mode. It has to be the most costly, not to mention frustrating, way to aquire a home. We were told years ago that in Japan there are factory built modular units available, whose parts could be "mixed and matched", but we never followed up on it.(That was in the dark ages before the Internet). Good Luck getting this idea finally off the drawing board. On our island TRULY affordable QUALITY housing is badly needed.
Posted by Irmgard Conley on August 21,2008 | 11:07 PM
The heart of the article is in the following quote: "The site-built home cost $363,950 to build, or $233 per square foot, while the modular house cost $290,500, or $182 per square foot, including shipping. Both required additional spending for lots, foundations, landscaping, driveways, decks and garages." What planet is she on and what planet are her buyers from? In my neighborhood, at those prices one could build a virtual Taj Mahal from "sticks" and have money left over for ice cream and cake! Sorry, nice idea but it won't sell in my neighborhood. Maybe that's why smarter and more experienced architects couldn't make it work.
Posted by Andy Kenagy on August 21,2008 | 08:17 PM
I lived in a pre-fab house in 1952 in Fairless Hills PA. It worked very well. There was not much choice of materials, but it was interesting how each resident made changes to make theri own. I think this is a very sensible way to go. I never though about it before, but now in retirement I am living in a mobile home that is not mobile. Pre-fabs have been around for a long time. Go Green!
Posted by Joyce Wilder-Jones on August 21,2008 | 06:45 PM
The answer to a prayer! I am about to clear out a 1910 house to simplify my life, and I have specific needs caused by a disability that prevents my working full time. The "greenness" and the economic considerations are worth pursuing. I genuinely hope I will be able to contact you soon--before I land in the "too much stuff" and "like GOOD architecture (product of Cornell U.)" looney bin! What a great answer!
Posted by Hamilton Media on August 21,2008 | 05:08 PM
I would also like to see some floor plans or at least a snapshot of one or more of your prefabs. We are trying to encourage a brother(brother-in-law) to go with a prefab on his lot. What is the best way to introduce him to you for the purpose of luring him into a serious consideration of your concept? Keep up this great endever!
Posted by Geoff Phillips on August 21,2008 | 01:56 PM
In the past manufactured homes, i.e. mobile homes, have been treated as second class solutions by the banks and local government zoning laws. Is this concept of green pre-fab housing going to be received differently by the financial institutions and local government zoning personnel? Gary Celustka Oregon
Posted by Gary Celustka on August 19,2008 | 08:57 PM
In your construgtion of homes do you use any pressure treated lumber as we live in a high Termite area. Do you do any thing special for areas where high winds and tropical storms come arround yearly. Are nails or screws used in your design. Thank you Si
Posted by Si Lambert on August 19,2008 | 08:29 PM
I enjoyed reading this article and was thrilled with the concept. I feel that the prefab home will become even more popular as the younger citizens decide to build. I find it hard to enjoy seeing a "MacMansion" being built, because too often lovely trees and shrubs are sacrificed so the house goes from lot line to lot line or as close as possible. I would have enjoyed seeing pictures of the house designs. That is the only negative comment I have for this article.
Posted by Patbooks on August 18,2008 | 10:43 AM