Charging Ahead With a New Electric Car
An entrepreneur hits the road with a new approach for an all-electric car that overcomes its biggest shortcoming
- By Joshua Hammer
- Photographs by Ahikam Seri
- Smithsonian magazine, July-August 2010, Subscribe
(Page 3 of 4)
But others say he can. The particular battery he has adopted in partnership with Renault may not be accepted by other car manufacturers. That would sharply limit the number of vehicles he could service, or it would force him to stockpile different batteries for different car models, substantially raising his costs. Moreover, lithium-ion battery technology is improving so quickly that Agassi’s switching stations, which cost nearly $1 million apiece, may quickly become as obsolete as eight-track tapes. “If we have a breakthrough, with 300 to 600 miles per charge, the whole thing could be derailed,” says analyst Koslowski.
Better Place also faces difficulties breaking into markets. Without considerable tax incentives, customer rebates and government subsidies for electric car and battery makers, weaning Americans off gasoline will be a challenge. “The U.S. imports more oil than any other country and [gas] prices are the lowest in the West,” Agassi says. Even in Europe, where gasoline costs up to three times as much as it does in the United States, progress has been slower than expected. In Denmark, Agassi promised to have 100,000 charging spots and several thousand cars on the road by 2010, but so far he’s got just 55 spots and no cars. Better Place spokesman Joe Paluska says the company scaled back “while it worked out better design and implementation processes ahead of full-scale commercial launch in 2011.”
Terry Tamminen, an adviser on energy policy to California Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger and author of Lives Per Gallon: The True Cost of Our Oil Addiction, says Agassi’s faith in battery-powered vehicles is excessive. The technology’s drawbacks, Tamminen says, include the potential drain on the electrical grid and the vast new infrastructure needed—such as tens of thousands of charging spots for the Bay Area alone—and the mileage limitations of even the best batteries. Tamminen, who also served as the head of the California Environmental Protection Agency, believes hydrogen-powered cars will play a role (he drives one himself). They use hydrogen fuel derived mainly from natural gas or other fossil fuels to generate electricity and power the engine; but Tamminen points out that hydrogen fuel can also be derived from water, and dishwasher-size machines that extract hydrogen from water will be available to consumers in 2013. Under the Hydrogen Highway Network, California has installed 30 hydrogen-fueling stations. “Yesterday I drove 150 miles to Palm Springs from Los Angeles in my hydrogen-powered electric car. I refueled in seven minutes and was ready to return that afternoon,” he told me.
But hydrogen fuel faces obstacles, too. U.S. Energy Secretary Steven Chu last year tried to eliminate federal funding for research into hydrogen cars; he cited the high cost and questionable durability of fuel cells, the expense of building a refueling infrastructure and the reliance of most hydrogen-generating processes on fossil fuels. (Congress, however, restored some funding.)
Agassi told me hydrogen power is an “idiotic idea” because the infrastructure to support it would have to be created from scratch; in contrast, electric batteries rely on the existing power grid.
By 2020, Agassi predicts, half of all cars bought in the United States and Europe will be electric. Others say Agassi’s estimate is overblown. Renault’s Pélata says a better guess might be 10 percent. Rod Lache, an analyst with Deutsche Bank Equity Research, says Better Place could be a financial success even if it occupies a small niche. “It could get 10 percent of the market in Israel and still be hugely profitable. Beyond that, it’s hard to say.”
I caught up with Agassi at Better Place’s new R & D facility, in an industrial park east of Tel Aviv. Agassi, dressed as usual in black, was sitting in a windowless office with unadorned white walls. Carpenters hammered and drilled in the next room. “In Palo Alto I have a cubicle,” he said. “I don’t travel with an entourage. It’s all strictly bare bones.” He had flown from the United States for the final countdown to what his company calls the Alpha Project—the opening of the first switching station and a visitor center, near Tel Aviv. Some 8,000 people have dropped by the center this year to test-drive a Renault EV. Down the hall, in a glass-walled conference room, a score of Better Place employees were working out logistics, such as whether to locate the switching stations underground or at street level.
Next door a pair of software engineers showed me a computer program designed to regulate the electricity flow into the company’s charge spots. A recent simulation by Israel’s main utility indicated that the nation might have to spend about $1 billion on new power plants if every car was electric by 2020. But Better Place says “smart grid management,” or generating electricity only when it’s needed and sending it only where it’s needed, could reduce the number of new plants. Company designer Barak Hershkovitz demonstrated the company’s role in making the grid smarter: five electric cars hooked up at a charge post in the company garage used 20 percent less power than they would have consumed without smart-grid management. Likewise, he told me, to avoid straining the grid, a central computer could keep track of every car being charged in Israel and regulate the juice flow.
Single Page « Previous 1 2 3 4 Next »
Subscribe now for more of Smithsonian's coverage on history, science and nature.










Comments (20)
+ View All Comments
Why should you charge an electric car after 100 miles or so, the cars we have now uses an alternator to charge the battery. An electric car has so many moving parts that can be used to generate electricity to charge the batteries. This will be a much better system, cleaner air no pollution on a bigger scale no need for the power companies to expand If not I bet that in a couple of years to charge your car will cost as much as a tank of gas now, because somebody needs to make money.
Posted by Nico on May 3,2012 | 09:51 PM
Why use batteries and all that why can't we use cars that run on any thing that u put in the gas tank, just put it in and the car will shred it. Put anything u like!
Posted by Mohammed on January 25,2012 | 09:46 PM
Replacing gasoline with electricity means you now have a coal or natural gas or nuclear car. Until you solve the electric power problem you only have a battery and have traded automobile pollution for power plant pollution. "Renewables" of biofuel, solar, and wind, don't provide good energy and actually cause environmental harm. We know about the coal, gas, oil, and hydrocarbon problems. Nuclear plants are unstable thus prone to accidents and produce long lived nuclear waste.
The LFTR (Liquid Fluoride Thorium Reactor), a Thorium fueled Molten Salt Reactor, is an excellent canditate for clean energy that provides a new type of nuclear with inherent safety, lack of waste problems, and low costs.
Posted by Jim D on August 16,2011 | 07:17 PM
still have a way to go on this
http://angellabsllc.com/
http://pesn.com/2009/11/18/9501588_MYT_engine_SAE_guest/
Posted by BRIAN on August 16,2011 | 05:57 PM
Agassi is a slippy con man. ere is why.
what he is doing is replicating the architecture of the mobile phone industry where you essentially rent the phone and pay small monthly payments.
Ultimately the merchandise sellers are in a much better position to rent you something rather that sell it to you.
Here is the proof too. In Europe with 3 phase 400 volt to most homes, you can now charge most EV car batteries to 80% in 10 minutes using lithium Ion.
He knows this, but still hopes to sucker governments into the "Pay as you go" model and so have a monopolistic stake i n the ability to get fuel for you car.
Posted by gedw99 on December 29,2010 | 04:55 PM
I applaud Mr. Agassi. I think it's great that there are people out there who are creative enough to come up with ideas like his. Sadly, I fear that his current technology will only be a brief stepping stone to something better, and that his critics are right. Too much resistance to what's new in a universe that's constantly changing (how ironic), and competing factions will make it a long, hard road.
Posted by Glenn McGrew on November 1,2010 | 01:53 AM
The business about natural gas being clean has some dubious aspects for me. the combustion products are still CO2 and H2O. Other, more noxious species are lower than from hydrocarbon fuels, it does not appear that the overall greenhouse footprint is that much lower than that of gasoline. In addition the extraction of natural gas can have strong adverse impacts on the environment [http://www.nytimes.com/2010/07/24/business/energy-environment/24gas.html]
The notion that gasoline substitutes made from renewable resources have lower carbon footprints than hydrocarbons is also a matter of public debate [http://earth2tech.com/2010/02/03/epa-sets-rules-for-sizing-up-ethanols-carbon-footprint-controversy-rages-on/].
To me the bottom line seems to be that there is no way to save the planet without REAL changes in human habits. There is no free lunch.
Posted by John Barnes on August 5,2010 | 09:14 PM
Letters;
In the "Charging Ahead" story you mistakingly refer to the upcoming General Motors Volt as an 'electric plug-in/gas hybrid'. That is a misnomer that continues to be made by many media sources. The Volt is and all electric car. It is powered by an electric motor ONLY. Its difference to all other electric cars is that it has a small gasoline engine that powers an on board generator that recharges the on-board battery. (not unlike the gas powered generators that you see at construction sites, or in some back yards in case of power failure) The concept is simple, the engineering is ingenius.
I can't help but feel if this truly revolutionary car was forthcoming from some foreign company, it would be heralded for the remarkable achievement that it represents instead to be grouped with less practical, rehashed concept cars from other companies.
Posted by Michael J. Genzale on July 27,2010 | 12:54 PM
Forget batteries, hydrogen, and biofuels, what we need is beamed energy. People will buy a car and have a contract for the beamed energy. This will make the weight of a car much less and consequently use less power.
The beamed energy could be obtained from solar, geothermal, wind, and water power.
Posted by Cy Berat on July 16,2010 | 02:51 PM
They've been doing low-tech versions of the battery switcharoo in electric pedicabs in Asia, for years.
Posted by Jon Orff on July 9,2010 | 04:47 PM
I am staggered by the level of mis-information on this forum.
Isreal is not 100% fossil powered! In fact, Israel has the largest network of Concentrated Solar power plants in the world! Israel has made great strides in this arena- just in the same way that Germany has in Solar Thermal, and Germany and Denmark has in off-shore wind. Too much rhetoric, plenty of readers and participants, but not enough INFORMED participants on this site. Don't believe the lies- EVs, Wind, and Solar are here to stay, and as the fossil resources get used up, the economics will be staring us in the face- Wind, Solar, and EV's will be the obvious and economic choice. You wait- I can promise you this much- give it time. "Instant karma's gonna get you, gonna look you right in the face!" -John Lennon
Posted by Matt on July 7,2010 | 09:00 AM
Someone further up said an electric car powered by a coal plant is dirtier than a gasoline car- I couldn't disagree more. The figures are that an EV powered from electricity made from a coal plant is still only 1/3 as 'dirty' as a gasoline powered car. Several reasons for this- first the electric drivetrain is inherently more efficient- so there's less wasted energy. Second- A car's small ICE cannot be made as efficient as a large electric power plant- because it's just too cumbersome to add on all the efficiencies onto a mobile platform. Furthermore- if most of our day in and day out transportation needs were met by EV's, then all that is left is to switch the electric grid over to renewables, so the equation for 'greening' would become simpler- less tasks to tackle. Here in the USA, I am still scratching my head why we don't make better use of wind power- we have an abundance of wind and in most places they are finding it is about on par for cost as it is to build a new Natural Gas or new Coal fired plant. A drive through rural Wyoming is evidence as to just how elegant windmills are. A wind farm 'obstructs' the view yes, but not in an unpleasant way, whereas the several coal plants you see don't 'obstruct' the view per se (even though they are in plain view) but are much more unsightly! Windmills are advanced, elegant, cost effective, and the US has abundant wind, the necessary space, and the workforce ready and eager to be put to work installing them! We should be harnessing this source of power more than we currently are. T Boone Pickens has a great idea in switching natural gas over from electricity generation over to powering 18 wheelers- while using EV's for personal transportation... wind, solar, and nuclear for electricity and we're virtually coal and oil free!
Posted by Matt on July 7,2010 | 08:55 AM
The article wants us to think that powering electric cars with a fast-change battery will somehow reduce fossile fuel use in Israel. Electrical power in Israel is generated by burning 76% coal, and 24% oil and natural gas, or 100% fossile fuel.
The battery is only a very narrow conduit for storing and delivering energy. This must be generated elsewhere by coal, oil, nuclear, hydro, bio-fuels, wind, geo-thermal, solar-electric in order of decreasing contribution.These are the sources of energy, not a battery.
Posted by G Ronald Dalton on July 3,2010 | 04:13 PM
What matters is that the world is fast running out of oil, and its rising price will again be back up over the point where businesses close, unemployment rises, and terrorists become more wealthy. Never mind that our sloppy consumption of fossil fuels are heating up the only planet we've got and poisoning our land, rivers, oceans, air, animals, fish, birds, and us!
Every time an oppressively loud motorcycle or old car goes by I think "trade that noisy, filthy, greasy, engine in for a quiet electric motor with only 1 moving part. Instead of fighting with it, enjoy it.
The size and cost of batteries are already coming down and with gov. support, things will get better, even faster.
Posted by greg on July 1,2010 | 01:59 AM
+ View All Comments