Charging Ahead With a New Electric Car
An entrepreneur hits the road with a new approach for an all-electric car that overcomes its biggest shortcoming
- By Joshua Hammer
- Photographs by Ahikam Seri
- Smithsonian magazine, July-August 2010, Subscribe
(Page 2 of 4)
Agassi was born in a Tel Aviv suburb—his father is an electrical engineer and his mother a fashion designer—and he began programming computers at age 7. He has already had one hugely successful career. In his early 20s he founded a software company, TopTier, that helped corporations organize data; at age 33, he sold it to the German software giant SAP for $400 million. He later became SAP’s chief of technology. Flush with cash and looking for a new challenge, he turned to global warming. At a gathering of young leaders at the World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland, in 2005, Agassi and other attendees were asked, “How do you make the world a better place?”
The challenge, he recalled to me, was “to do something more meaningful than create a new version of software. How do you run a country without oil, on today’s state-of-the-shelf technology?”
It took him a year to consider the options for propelling a vehicle—biofuels, hybrids, hydrogen—before settling on electricity. In the fall of 2006, in a talk he gave at Tel Aviv’s Saban Center for Middle East Policy about running a nation without oil, he mentioned his interest in electric car technology. A week later, Agassi says, he got a call from future Israeli President Shimon Peres, who expressed interest in the concept. Peres introduced Agassi to Prime Minister Ehud Olmert, and, at Davos in 2007, brought him together with Carlos Ghosn, the CEO of Renault. The partnership was formed “very quickly,” says Patrick Pélata, Renault’s chief operating officer. “We were already working on electric cars, and we realized you need three things—a cheap way of charging a battery at home or the office, a quick charge method and a quick drop for people who want their cars for a longer range. Agassi was the only one proposing that.” Agassi quit SAP and, in 2007, founded Better Place in Palo Alto, California. He attracted $200 million from investors, including the Israel Corporation, which owns oil refineries, and investment bank Morgan Stanley. This past January, Agassi announced another $350 million from backers led by the British bank HSBC, raising his investment total to $700 million.
Israel is a natural launching point for electric vehicles because of its small size, seldom-crossed borders and sensitivity to fossil-fuel dependency. The company plans to open its first switching station in Israel near Tel Aviv this year; the goal is to expand to 70 by the end of 2011. Agassi has installed thousands of “charge spots” in garages and parking lots, where drivers can plug in their Renaults for the standard four- to eight-hour, 220-volt recharge. Renault says it hopes to sell 100,000 electric vehicles in Israel and Denmark over the next five years—each equipped with a modified GPS system that will direct drivers to the nearest battery-swapping station or charge point. The vehicle, which can travel about 100 miles on a charge, will reportedly cost $25,000 to $30,000; Better Place hasn’t disclosed the cost of a battery-servicing contract.
Agassi also hopes to work with an Israeli utility company to purchase electricity from solar generators, to reduce his company’s carbon footprint. “The company is looking at the whole process, from the technology inside the car, to the infrastructure, to the charge spots and the connectivity that make all the pieces work together,” says Thilo Koslowski, an automotive analyst with Gartner Incorporated, a Stamford, Connecticut-based consulting firm specializing in high-technology industries. “Agassi has the lead on everybody else.”
Agassi is focusing his rollout on what he calls “transportation islands,” largely self-contained areas that are receptive to electric cars. In Denmark, the largest utility, Dong Energy, is investing $130 million to help provide charge spots and switching stations for Better Place vehicles, and will provide the facilities with wind-generated electricity. Also, the Danish government is temporarily offering citizens a reported $40,000 tax break to buy an electric car—plus free parking in downtown Copenhagen.
In April, Better Place began working with Japan’s largest taxi company to set up a battery-switching station in Tokyo and test four battery-powered cabs. Better Place has plans to operate in Canberra, Australia, and to run a pilot program in Oahu, Hawaii, by 2012.
Agassi is also aiming for the continental United States. He says he has spoken with San Francisco Mayor Gavin Newsom about building switching stations in the Bay Area. (In December, Newsom and other Bay Area community leaders announced a deal with Nissan—projected cost of the Nissan Leaf is $25,000, after tax credits—to install home-charging units for consumers.) Agassi says he dreams of the day when the big three U.S. automakers sign on to his plan and Better Place infrastructure blankets the country. “With about $3 billion to $5 billion, we can put switching stations across the five major U.S. corridors—West Coast, Northeast, Southeast, Midwest and South,” he says, his voice jumping an octave with enthusiasm. “We can’t fail,” he insists.
Single Page « Previous 1 2 3 4 Next »
Subscribe now for more of Smithsonian's coverage on history, science and nature.










Comments (20)
+ View All Comments
Why should you charge an electric car after 100 miles or so, the cars we have now uses an alternator to charge the battery. An electric car has so many moving parts that can be used to generate electricity to charge the batteries. This will be a much better system, cleaner air no pollution on a bigger scale no need for the power companies to expand If not I bet that in a couple of years to charge your car will cost as much as a tank of gas now, because somebody needs to make money.
Posted by Nico on May 3,2012 | 09:51 PM
Why use batteries and all that why can't we use cars that run on any thing that u put in the gas tank, just put it in and the car will shred it. Put anything u like!
Posted by Mohammed on January 25,2012 | 09:46 PM
Replacing gasoline with electricity means you now have a coal or natural gas or nuclear car. Until you solve the electric power problem you only have a battery and have traded automobile pollution for power plant pollution. "Renewables" of biofuel, solar, and wind, don't provide good energy and actually cause environmental harm. We know about the coal, gas, oil, and hydrocarbon problems. Nuclear plants are unstable thus prone to accidents and produce long lived nuclear waste.
The LFTR (Liquid Fluoride Thorium Reactor), a Thorium fueled Molten Salt Reactor, is an excellent canditate for clean energy that provides a new type of nuclear with inherent safety, lack of waste problems, and low costs.
Posted by Jim D on August 16,2011 | 07:17 PM
still have a way to go on this
http://angellabsllc.com/
http://pesn.com/2009/11/18/9501588_MYT_engine_SAE_guest/
Posted by BRIAN on August 16,2011 | 05:57 PM
Agassi is a slippy con man. ere is why.
what he is doing is replicating the architecture of the mobile phone industry where you essentially rent the phone and pay small monthly payments.
Ultimately the merchandise sellers are in a much better position to rent you something rather that sell it to you.
Here is the proof too. In Europe with 3 phase 400 volt to most homes, you can now charge most EV car batteries to 80% in 10 minutes using lithium Ion.
He knows this, but still hopes to sucker governments into the "Pay as you go" model and so have a monopolistic stake i n the ability to get fuel for you car.
Posted by gedw99 on December 29,2010 | 04:55 PM
I applaud Mr. Agassi. I think it's great that there are people out there who are creative enough to come up with ideas like his. Sadly, I fear that his current technology will only be a brief stepping stone to something better, and that his critics are right. Too much resistance to what's new in a universe that's constantly changing (how ironic), and competing factions will make it a long, hard road.
Posted by Glenn McGrew on November 1,2010 | 01:53 AM
The business about natural gas being clean has some dubious aspects for me. the combustion products are still CO2 and H2O. Other, more noxious species are lower than from hydrocarbon fuels, it does not appear that the overall greenhouse footprint is that much lower than that of gasoline. In addition the extraction of natural gas can have strong adverse impacts on the environment [http://www.nytimes.com/2010/07/24/business/energy-environment/24gas.html]
The notion that gasoline substitutes made from renewable resources have lower carbon footprints than hydrocarbons is also a matter of public debate [http://earth2tech.com/2010/02/03/epa-sets-rules-for-sizing-up-ethanols-carbon-footprint-controversy-rages-on/].
To me the bottom line seems to be that there is no way to save the planet without REAL changes in human habits. There is no free lunch.
Posted by John Barnes on August 5,2010 | 09:14 PM
Letters;
In the "Charging Ahead" story you mistakingly refer to the upcoming General Motors Volt as an 'electric plug-in/gas hybrid'. That is a misnomer that continues to be made by many media sources. The Volt is and all electric car. It is powered by an electric motor ONLY. Its difference to all other electric cars is that it has a small gasoline engine that powers an on board generator that recharges the on-board battery. (not unlike the gas powered generators that you see at construction sites, or in some back yards in case of power failure) The concept is simple, the engineering is ingenius.
I can't help but feel if this truly revolutionary car was forthcoming from some foreign company, it would be heralded for the remarkable achievement that it represents instead to be grouped with less practical, rehashed concept cars from other companies.
Posted by Michael J. Genzale on July 27,2010 | 12:54 PM
Forget batteries, hydrogen, and biofuels, what we need is beamed energy. People will buy a car and have a contract for the beamed energy. This will make the weight of a car much less and consequently use less power.
The beamed energy could be obtained from solar, geothermal, wind, and water power.
Posted by Cy Berat on July 16,2010 | 02:51 PM
They've been doing low-tech versions of the battery switcharoo in electric pedicabs in Asia, for years.
Posted by Jon Orff on July 9,2010 | 04:47 PM
I am staggered by the level of mis-information on this forum.
Isreal is not 100% fossil powered! In fact, Israel has the largest network of Concentrated Solar power plants in the world! Israel has made great strides in this arena- just in the same way that Germany has in Solar Thermal, and Germany and Denmark has in off-shore wind. Too much rhetoric, plenty of readers and participants, but not enough INFORMED participants on this site. Don't believe the lies- EVs, Wind, and Solar are here to stay, and as the fossil resources get used up, the economics will be staring us in the face- Wind, Solar, and EV's will be the obvious and economic choice. You wait- I can promise you this much- give it time. "Instant karma's gonna get you, gonna look you right in the face!" -John Lennon
Posted by Matt on July 7,2010 | 09:00 AM
Someone further up said an electric car powered by a coal plant is dirtier than a gasoline car- I couldn't disagree more. The figures are that an EV powered from electricity made from a coal plant is still only 1/3 as 'dirty' as a gasoline powered car. Several reasons for this- first the electric drivetrain is inherently more efficient- so there's less wasted energy. Second- A car's small ICE cannot be made as efficient as a large electric power plant- because it's just too cumbersome to add on all the efficiencies onto a mobile platform. Furthermore- if most of our day in and day out transportation needs were met by EV's, then all that is left is to switch the electric grid over to renewables, so the equation for 'greening' would become simpler- less tasks to tackle. Here in the USA, I am still scratching my head why we don't make better use of wind power- we have an abundance of wind and in most places they are finding it is about on par for cost as it is to build a new Natural Gas or new Coal fired plant. A drive through rural Wyoming is evidence as to just how elegant windmills are. A wind farm 'obstructs' the view yes, but not in an unpleasant way, whereas the several coal plants you see don't 'obstruct' the view per se (even though they are in plain view) but are much more unsightly! Windmills are advanced, elegant, cost effective, and the US has abundant wind, the necessary space, and the workforce ready and eager to be put to work installing them! We should be harnessing this source of power more than we currently are. T Boone Pickens has a great idea in switching natural gas over from electricity generation over to powering 18 wheelers- while using EV's for personal transportation... wind, solar, and nuclear for electricity and we're virtually coal and oil free!
Posted by Matt on July 7,2010 | 08:55 AM
The article wants us to think that powering electric cars with a fast-change battery will somehow reduce fossile fuel use in Israel. Electrical power in Israel is generated by burning 76% coal, and 24% oil and natural gas, or 100% fossile fuel.
The battery is only a very narrow conduit for storing and delivering energy. This must be generated elsewhere by coal, oil, nuclear, hydro, bio-fuels, wind, geo-thermal, solar-electric in order of decreasing contribution.These are the sources of energy, not a battery.
Posted by G Ronald Dalton on July 3,2010 | 04:13 PM
What matters is that the world is fast running out of oil, and its rising price will again be back up over the point where businesses close, unemployment rises, and terrorists become more wealthy. Never mind that our sloppy consumption of fossil fuels are heating up the only planet we've got and poisoning our land, rivers, oceans, air, animals, fish, birds, and us!
Every time an oppressively loud motorcycle or old car goes by I think "trade that noisy, filthy, greasy, engine in for a quiet electric motor with only 1 moving part. Instead of fighting with it, enjoy it.
The size and cost of batteries are already coming down and with gov. support, things will get better, even faster.
Posted by greg on July 1,2010 | 01:59 AM
+ View All Comments