Catching a Wave, Powering an Electrical Grid?
Electrical engineer Annette von Jouanne is pioneering an ingenious way to generate clean, renewable electricity from the sea
- By Elizabeth Rusch
- Smithsonian magazine, July 2009, Subscribe
She was in the water when the epiphany struck. Of course, Annette von Jouanne was always in the water, swimming in lakes and pools as she was growing up around Seattle, and swimming distance freestyle competitively in high-school and college meets. There's even an exercise pool in her basement, where she and her husband (a former Olympic swimmer for Portugal) and their three kids have spent a great deal of time...swimming.
But in December 1995 she was bodysurfing in Hawaii over the holidays. She'd just begun working as an assistant professor of electrical engineering at Oregon State University. She was 26 years old and eager to make a difference—to find or improve upon a useful source of energy, preferably one that wasn't scarce or fleeting or unpredictable or dirty. The sun was going down. The wind was dying. She was bobbing in the swells.
"As the sun set, it hit me: I could ride waves all day and all night, all year long," says von Jouanne. "Wave power is always there. It never stops. I began thinking that there's got to be a way to harness all the energy of an ocean swell, in a practical and efficient way, in a responsible way."
Today, von Jouanne is one of the driving forces in the fast-growing field of wave energy—as well as its leading proponent. She will explain to anyone who will listen that unlike wind and solar power, wave energy is always available. Even when the ocean seems calm, swells are moving water up and down sufficiently to generate electricity. And an apparatus to generate kilowatts of power from a wave can be much smaller than what's needed to harness kilowatts from wind or sunshine because water is dense and the energy it imparts is concentrated.
All that energy is also, of course, destructive, and for decades the challenge has been to build a device that can withstand monster waves and gale-force winds, not to mention corrosive saltwater, seaweed, floating debris and curious marine mammals. And the device must also be efficient and require little maintenance.
Still, the allure is irresistible. A machine that could harness an inexhaustible, nonpolluting source of energy and be deployed economically in sufficient numbers to generate significant amounts of electricity—that would be a feat for the ages.
Engineers have built dozens of the machines, called wave-energy converters, and tested some on a small scale. In the United States, waves could fuel about 6.5 percent of today's electricity needs, says Roger Bedard of the Electric Power Research Institute, an energy think tank in Palo Alto, California. That's the equivalent of the energy in 150 million barrels of oil—about the same amount of power that is produced by all U.S. hydroelectric dams combined—enough to power 23 million typical American homes. The most powerful waves occur on western coasts, because of strong west-to-east global winds, so Great Britain, Portugal and the West Coast of the United States are among the sites where wave energy is being developed.
Aside from swimming, von Jouanne's other passion as a youngster was learning how things work. It started with small appliances. An alarm clock broke. She unscrewed the back, fixed the mechanism and put it back together. She was about 8 years old. "That was so exciting for me," she says. She moved on to calculators and then to a computer she bought with money from her paper route. One day, she waited for her parents to leave the house so she could take apart the television and reassemble it before they returned. (Von Jouanne cautions kids not to do as she did: "there is a high-voltage component.")
When her brothers, older by eight and ten years, came home for college breaks, she pored over their engineering textbooks. (An older sister pursued a business degree.) "Reading them confirmed that, yup, this is what I want to do," she recalls.
Subscribe now for more of Smithsonian's coverage on history, science and nature.










Comments (19)
Some information for patent “Dynamic Engine” can be found on: Ocean energy: Wave energy | Climate TechWiki. Summary and drawing is on page 28. [PDF] BOPI no. 9/1994 – OSIM
Posted by cosma vasile on February 13,2013 | 04:50 AM
Yes, now we know to achieve most efficient technical solution of all time in the wave energy exploitation but is a problem, it should be funded with a minimum of 5000000 euro.
Vasile Cosma
Posted by cosma vasile on October 5,2011 | 01:01 PM
A similar device was posted on the internet YEARS ago. No one took the Professor (whose name I do not remember). This is not new news.
So what next? Build it!
Posted by Informed on October 2,2011 | 08:49 AM
Did you know that twenty years ago Romina technical solution has the performance of all time in the sea wave energy exploitation. " Patent 108893 as "dynamic engine for sea wave energy catching" a pioneering invention, which due to their high-tech could revolutionize the field of specialty. What this invention solve the problem?, Probema most difficult, the investment income, the problem was not solved until now. The level of performance "Dynamic Engine" was assessed by the examination of OSIM by three superlatives, BUILDING PERMITS INCREASE THIS quote: ADAPTABILITY ENGINE RELIABILITY AND PERFORMANCE OF THE PARAMETERS OF WAVES. More than that can not get any were proposed over a thousand years. It is estimated that "dynamic engine" has the ability to capture wave energy at a rate of over 80% while the other technical solutions known worldwide, are not able to capture wave energy with a higher percentage of about 10-15%. Imformatii For more, go to "offer wave engine. Contact address, e-mail cosma.vasile @ yahoo.com
Posted by cosma vasile on February 8,2011 | 03:19 AM
this is a very interesting article !!
Posted by kendra on December 1,2009 | 02:53 PM
Its okay to take energy from waves becaus scientists can find a way to harness the gas and other bad particles and chemicals.The ocean is also over
Posted by on September 8,2009 | 09:53 PM
There is a vast amount of energy in the ocean, BUT, HUMANS ALSO RELY ON THE OCEAN BECAUSE IT IS A FOOD SOURCE, PROVIDES RECREATION, AND MOST IMPORTANT IT IS THE SOURCE OF LIFE. IF THE OCEAN DIES, HUMANS WILL FOLLOW. THE OCEAN AS A SOURCE OF POWER IS A GREAT IDEA, BUT HUMANS DON'T SEEM TO SEE THE FAR REACHING RESULTS OF THEIR TECHNOLOGY, THEY CUT OFF THEIR NOSE TO SPITE THEIR FACE. ISSUES LIKE ELECTROMAGNETIC ENERGY RELEASE IN THE WATER FROM THE SURROUNDING CABLES AND BUOYS. THE ELECTROMAGNETIC ENERGY RELEASED INTO THE WATER WARMS THE WATER, WHICH IS A BIG MISTAKE AND ANYONE STUDYING ENERGY SHOULD KNOW THAT MUCH. THE METHANE GAS ESCAPES. METHANE GAS IS A GREEN HOUSE GAS, AND HAS A SYNERGY EFFECT ON THE PROBLEM OF CARBON DIOXIDE. WARMING THE OCEAN ALSO BRINGS DEADLY BACTERIA TO FISH.
I COULD GO ON AND ON, BUT FOLKS INTO A SOURCE OF RENEWABLE ENERGY SHOULD LOOK AT THE LONG TERM EFFECTS OF THEIR IDEAS.
WE ALL KNOW ABOUT WIND AND SOLAR TYPES OF ENERGY. THEY ARE GIVEN TO US TO USE, BUT WE CANNOT EVERY SATISFIED UNLESS WE ARE DESTROYING NATURE TO GET THE ALMIGHTY DOLLAR. PROFIT AND GREED WILL BE HUMANS DOWNFALL. NOT ONLY vON JOUANNE, BUT ALL FOLKS INTO USING THE OCEAN SHOULD BE VERY FAMILIAR WITH THE PROBLEMS OF WAVE ENERGY AND ITS AFFECTS ON THE OCEAN. HUMAN GREED WILL BE THE DOWNFALL OF LIFE ON EARTH.
Posted by Barbara on July 28,2009 | 01:29 PM
The state of Calif. has an entire coastal area that could provide probably inland as well to a degree. Save mega bucks once constructed. Unfortunatly we have ding-dongs that can't complete a budget on time or extended time. Get rid of them next election & get people with some real drive to get things done. for a change !!
Posted by Robert T Samuel jr on July 17,2009 | 04:38 PM
good idea i have often watched the wave action and wondered vwhy someone don't make use of the obvious energy poteintually available all over the world stay with it i can see a lot of potential with this idea bill hainline ---frustrated erstwhile inventor
Posted by bill hainline on July 15,2009 | 10:44 PM
Can the plastic that is out in the ocean be mined and recycled? Can plastic be fashioned into machine parts? I am not an engineer or a scientist, just a curious person.
Posted by Martha Quigley on July 15,2009 | 08:39 PM
It is wonderful to read about Annette von Jouanne and her initiative and drive to perfect her device for generating electricity from the ocean waves ("Catching a Wave" by Elizabeth Rusch). I was the Project Manager for the successful demonstration of generating electricity from the tides using the "Gorlov Helical Turbine" (GHT). The project was supported by the Long Island Power Authority (LIPA), the New York State Energy R&D Authority (NYSERDA), GCK, Inc. (the owner of the patents on the GHT), and myself, and took place in the tidal channel between Shelter Island and North Haven Peninsula (near Sag Harbor) off Long island, New York in 2004. The two GHTs, submerged over the bow of a barge moored in the channel, immediately began generating electricity upon being lowered into place, producing an average power of about two kilowatts during the twenty hours per day of tidal flow. The GHTs are rugged, reliable and commercially available, in contrast to other systems such as the propeller type which recently failed in the East River of New York City. I should warn Ms. von Jouanne that after demonstrating the reliability of her "wave energy converter" in real ocean waves, not a trivial step, obtaining the funding for a commercial installation (millions of dollars to generate multi-megawatts) is the primary problem in making a significant impact. Whether the "American Clean Energy and Security Act" now before the Congress, if enacted, will provide funding for commercial scale "alternative energy systems" such as ocean waves and tidal flows is a real question.
Richard S. Greeley
St. Davids, PA
Posted by Richard S. Greeley on July 8,2009 | 11:29 AM
Nice story - good practical application of physics as well, but there's already a simple device under patent process which operates on fresh or sea water, and looks to have the capability of pumping (per square meter of pump area) 333,000 gallons of liquid an hour to a 150 foot head for no "manufactured" energy in. Combining both technologies could provide an optimum process. Hydraulics certainly can be an efficient energy source. The devices could be incorporated each to the other and be fully synergistic.
Posted by Bill on July 7,2009 | 04:01 PM
I would think that the greater ocean depth is necessary to counter the water depth changes due to tides. The amount of slack in the anchor line with a 10 foot tide is not as noticeable in 140ft of water then say 40ft. (angle of the buoy line at low tide accounting for drift) It would seem important to keep the fixed coil as vertical as possible.
Otherwise, a very simple design, that would be relatively inexpensive to produce, and maintain. Kudos to Von Jouanne
Posted by Larry on July 4,2009 | 12:05 PM
I suspect that equally important to developing a wave energy converter would be to develop a wave energy enhancer. In other words, the power developed by Ms. von Jouanne's buoys is limited to the vagaries of the type wave it harnesses.
Both the strength and direction of waves can be manipulated by the depth of the ocean bottom. As ocean waves approach the shallow depth of a beach they are bent and the wave height increases. More than 50-years ago, Doc Walters, demonstrated this with a wave generator. He changed the tank's water depth by placing wide blocks of metal of various thickness (and shape) in the water. When a lens-shaped block was placed in the water as an artificial "ocean" bottom, the waves were bent and came to a focal point the same as light through a lens. The waves can be tightly managed. Where the waves cross, there are nodes and height-on-height super-waves; they are like controlled 'rogue waves'. The energy surges.
Instead of taking a buoy out 1-1/2 miles to an ocean depth of 140' as Ms. von Jouanne did, it may be better to consider shallow depths. By constructing an off-shore reef of specific shape and depth, the restructured cookie-cutter waves will allow a different shape buoy to optimize the harvest of massive power from each predictable wave rather than from a sole point on the wave. Better: harness controlled rogue waves.
Posted by Andy Olsen on July 2,2009 | 10:07 PM
Meaning no offense to the people in the article but I cannot believe there is no mention of Steven Salter and the "Salter Duck".
We had this technology in 1974 and if it weren't for Parliament mistakenly/foolishly (your choice) killing the project, we could have been refining his work ever since. Also, his device was definitely not one to which "The gadgets all had one problem in common: they were too complicated." applies.
Posted by Ben on July 2,2009 | 09:25 PM
The up-down motion could be converted simply to rotating motion of a manetized rotor of an electric generator. With this rotor in a quasi horizontal position perpendicular to the vertical motion of the wave action the gyroscopic condition of the system would help to stabilize the buoy mounting against more aggressive wave action. I was thinking of the "yankee" screwdriver as a means of coverting vertical motion to rotating motion as a simple technic.
Posted by Robert Meek on June 29,2009 | 07:45 PM
The Devil is in the details. The voltage generated by the coil is N ∂φ/∂t where N is the number of turns in the coil,φ is the magnetic flux and t is the time it takes to make the magnet move through the coil. ∂φ/∂t is the rate of change of magnetic flux. Thus the magnet must be large to generate an adequate magnetic flux and larger the magnet, the greater its inertia (t becomes greater) and thus the lower the voltage generated.
Posted by Moderate Redoy on June 29,2009 | 01:39 PM
"Complex machines like [Pelamis] are riddled with valves, filters, tubes, hoses, couplings, bearings, switches, gauges, meters and sensors. The intermediate stages reduce efficiency, and if one component breaks, the whole device goes kaput."
Rather like aeroplanes, automobiles and wind turbines?
A Penny Farthing is simpler than a derailleur gear road bicycle with all its complicated linkages but it's not more efficient.
Similarly a single engine failure on a 747 doesn't cause it to go kaput and the same applies to a properly engineered Wave Energy Converter.
Posted by Max CC on June 25,2009 | 05:57 PM
This is a great story, portraying the human side to an emerging technology and industry. We often think technology evolves from big budgets and armies of engineers, but this story reminds us that it can happen from the efforts of a dedicated few who treat it as a labor of love. The work can take place as much in a family bathtub or community swimming pool, as in a high tech laboratory.
John Lavrakas
Newport, OR
Posted by John Lavrakas on June 25,2009 | 12:33 PM