What's Next in Space?
Probes and landers sent into the final frontier will bring us closer to answering cosmic mysteries
- By Mark Strauss
- Smithsonian magazine, July-August 2010, Subscribe
(Page 2 of 2)
Meanwhile, the earlier NASA-ESA Cassini-Huygens mission—launched in 1997 to explore Saturn and its moons—might be extended to 2017, enabling scientists to collect data on weather changes as the ringed planet enters its summer solstice.
Launched in 2004, ESA’s Rosetta probe will rendezvous with comet 67/P Churyumov-Gerasimenko in 2014. A lander will study the surface, and an orbiter will follow the comet another two years.
The Cosmos
NASA’s NuSTAR (launch date: 2012) will rely on high-energy X-rays to study the cosmos. Among its missions will be gazing at supernovas, or exploded stars, for clues explaining how and why they self-destruct.
Designed to penetrate dust clouds, NASA’s CALISTO orbiting observatory (launch: 2015) will search interstellar space for traces of organic molecules, the building blocks of life.
The James Webb Space Telescope (launch: 2014) will collect infrared radiation with a mirror 21 feet in diameter. The goal is to study signals generated when stars and galaxies formed in the aftermath of the Big Bang 12 billion to 14 billion years ago. NASA’s Weiler says the telescope “will have the ability to look back at the birth of matter itself.”
Mark Strauss is a senior editor.
Subscribe now for more of Smithsonian's coverage on history, science and nature.










Comments (6)
I happen to be eager to know what's up there in the whole wide universe since my childhood. Thanks to you people I have begun reading about the secrets of the universe though not fully. I always pray not to die before the existence or non existence of some kind of life somewhere else other than our earth. I am an old pensioned teacher in the horn of Africa-Ethiopia to be precise.
Posted by Tesfaye Gebremariam on February 18,2011 | 09:12 AM
Good point, Lynn.
If we discover life on Titan, it's likely to be very different from life here on earth, made of different materials and designed to thrive in a different range of temperature.
I think, given all the potential energy sources on Titan, and the fact that there's a weather system here (weather being an integral part of the biosystem on earth), there's likely life of some sort on Titan.
Best prospect though would be Mars, in the form of some "immortal" bacterial spores sleeping for millions of years in await of the Martian "summer."
Posted by chello on October 25,2010 | 07:25 PM
In support of my comment above, see Seti astronomer Seth Shostak's argument in Acta Astronautica, or at
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-11041449
Posted by Lynn Austin on August 23,2010 | 09:04 AM
We need to start Terra-forming MARS
Posted by David Acuna on August 17,2010 | 11:23 AM
Pardon my naiveté. I have often heard that it is arrogant for us humans to insist that the only life is on Earth, opening the possibility of life elsewhere in the universe. However, in this article it was preceded by a statement that gave the restricted formula for “life” anywhere as being constituted of water, energy, and organic material. Isn’t it arrogant to insist that “life” is limited to what we consider “life”? Couldn’t there be other forms of entities that reproduce, grow, and die (another Earthling’s definition of life) but are constituted of other material?
Posted by Lynn Austin on August 13,2010 | 02:40 PM
Given the way NASA is going, what's next in space is most likely a Chinese space station and moon base, while the US watches with sadness at what could have been them but was squandered away on useless bureacracy and feel-good "environmental" and "outreach" projects well outside the stated mission of NASA or indeed the US government.
Posted by J.T. Wenting on July 22,2010 | 01:19 PM