Listening to Bacteria
By studying microbial communications, Bonnie Bassler has come up with new ways to treat disease
- By Natalie Angier
- Smithsonian magazine, July-August 2010, Subscribe
Bonnie Bassler, her shoes kicked off, knees up and socked feet pressed against the rim of the conference room table, watches with an air of droll expectation as a researcher in her world-renowned microbiology laboratory at Princeton University stands up to present his latest experimental results to the other members of her team. Yunzhou Wei is known for his campy presentations, and he does not disappoint. Slides of the cast members of his favorite television crime series flash on the screen and he launches a brief, sportive discussion of the lessons the scientists might extract from the shows: Trust your instincts! But look for evidence, too! Then a far more pressing question arises: which TV character would Bassler want to play? The genius behavioral analyst? No, no, not the “nerdy guy,” Bassler grumbles. Well, how about the prim and pretty forensic anthropologist? No, the celebrated scientist’s mind is made up. “I want to be her,” Bassler says, pointing at Special Agent Jennifer “JJ” Jareau, the Nordic bombshell on the CBS program “Criminal Minds.” Case closed, Bassler says. “Let’s get back to molecules now.”
The character of Jareau suits Bassler remarkably well. Jareau is the communications point person of her group, the media liaison between the FBI and the outside world. Bassler, 48, has been fabulously successful in her career, winning laurels like a MacArthur Foundation “genius” award, membership in the National Academy of Sciences, a coveted position with the Howard Hughes Medical Institute and the presidency of the American Society for Microbiology. And all that can be traced to her deep appreciation for the power of communication. Messaging is the medium in which Bassler shines.
Bassler is at the forefront of the fast-growing field of “quorum sensing,” the study of how microbes communicate with each other as they go about building the vast interlocking infrastructure of life on which we macrobes depend. In recent years she and other microbiologists have discovered that bacteria are not the dull solipsists of long-standing reputation, content to merely suck in food, double in size, divide down the middle and repeat ad infinitum, attending to nothing but their obtuse, unicellular selves. Instead, bacteria turn out to be the original newshounds, glued to their cellphones and Internet chat lines. They converse in a complex chemical language, using molecules to alert one another to who’s out there, in what numbers and how best to behave given the present company. Bacteria survey their ranks, they count heads, and if the throng is sufficiently large and like-minded—if there is a quorum—they act. Through chemical signaling, tiny bacterial cells can band together and perform the work of giants. They can compost an elephant, fertilize an oak forest or light up the oceans in the eerie teal glow of bioluminescence. Some bacterial collusions are far less charming and do real harm. Molecular communication allows 600 different species of bacteria to organize themselves into the slimy dental plaque that leads to tooth decay, for example, and it likely enables the nasty pathogens that cause streptococcal pneumonia or bubonic plague to time the release of their toxins for maximum impact on their human hosts.
In deciphering the nuances of bacterial communication, biologists have learned that the lexicons come in two distinct styles: private and public. Every bacterial species has its own dialect, a molecular signature that can be understood only by others of its kind. Bassler made her fame discovering that bacteria also traffic in the second, more universally recognized set of signals that seems to serve as bacterial Esperanto. “Bacteria can talk to each other,” she says. “Not only can they talk, but they are multilingual.”
“Bonnie is the champion of bacterial conversations,” says Richard Losick, a microbiologist at Harvard University. “This is a field that goes back to the 1970s, but she has re-energized it in a remarkable way.”
“Her work is groundbreaking,” says Jo Handelsman, a microbiologist at Yale University. “We used to think of bacterial communication as something species specific, but she’s really opened up the possibility that interspecies communication is a big part of the quorum-sensing story.”
Amusingly enough, the scientist who helped divulge that bacteria are polyglot is herself...not. “What do you expect?” she mutters. “I’m an American! I speak English!”
Bassler’s foray into microbial idioms is of more than academic interest. The work may well have an impact on what the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention calls one of the “most pressing public health problems” in the world today: antibiotic resistance. In recent years, the overuse of drugs like penicillin to treat childhood earaches, or to inoculate livestock crowded together on factory farms, has spawned the appearance of “superbugs,” bacterial strains able to shrug off virtually any of the conventional antibiotics lobbed at them.
Subscribe now for more of Smithsonian's coverage on history, science and nature.










Comments (9)
Incredible! I've imagined a lot of stuff that eventually was proven or came true (like the fall of the USSR), some of it incredibly obvious stuff, but I NEVER in my wildest dreams considered bacterial communication! Amazing! Just be certain that they don't add your name to their language ("Attack Bonnie!") or you'll have a whole new problem on your hands. Seriously though, I think you've hit on something that will make antibiotics look so primitive and, hopefully, something they won't be able to overcome!
Posted by Glenn McGrew on November 2,2010 | 07:59 AM
God made man in his own image and likeness. Deolal Mahabir
Five years ago (August 2005), after meditation one morning a thought became clear to me. Five seconds of thought takes a long time to write down, especially if it was a developing thought that just crested at that moment.
I reflected on the thought or idea from somewhere in the bible it was… “God made man in his own likeness, and gave him dominion over all.” At that moment an immediate reaction was, yeah! Tell that to the bacteria in you belly.
As the thought unraveled even further, I kept thinking that there are good bacteria and bad bacteria. Parallel to this thought was another thought that we are the carrier of all possible pathogen at any one given moment in time. For sure if the ‘bad’ bacteria should gain control over their host it would only be because the immune system was compromised and the ‘bad’ bacteria was not kept in check.
Meanwhile in another part of the world, the microbial world, the ‘good’ bacteria and the ‘bad’ bacteria were a having a discussion. The ‘good’ bacteria was telling the ‘bad’ bacteria is you continue to dominate our host, then there will at some point come down from up above- acid rains (here acid rains is meant to be antibiotics) and that will destroy you, if that does not happen you will certainly cause global warming (fevers to the host) on our planet (the body). If they go to war, and if the bad bacteria should defeat the good bacteria that would lead to malefic effects or even destroy the planet (the body). We should all try to live in harmony with each on in a friendly eco system.
I told one of my teachers, Dr. Sharma and he laughed speechlessly since he had not imagined a thought as far fetched as this, but it made so much sense and ponder for a long while and then said…beautiful, beautiful. This all came from my meditation practice.
Posted by Deolal Mahabir on September 15,2010 | 05:46 PM
Bonnie Bassler's article has vindicated me after almost 60 years. Way back in 1946-7 I took a rudimentary course in Virus's and Bacteriology. The field was just getting attention after penicillan and etc. we were still concerned with how to fight what were then common health problems such as trichinosis and polio. Then as now I was interested in everything,and had sought a job as a health inspector.I recall studying the tobacco mosaic virus I think because it was large and prolific enough to give us an idea of how things worked.
Our main tools were a microscope, petri dishes, an oven and patience. In a short paper on my observations I noted that the viruses seemed to have basic communication skills, to me they seemed to sense danger, were able to adapt and change in order to survive as did other living things. They also seemed to be able to communicate, like ants, when the pickings were good suddenly thay all knew etc. Others said I was nuts, but I continued to believe after all these years the Bonnie Bassler story lends some credibility to my theory. Thanks Bonnie B.
Posted by Charles Welcome on August 18,2010 | 12:42 PM
I recall reading about the ability of hyenas to eat things that were at a state of decomposition that defied belief. I have often wondered how they could do so without becoming sick. Could it be that they can turn off the bacterial communications in a way to render them harmless?
Posted by Kenneth Davis on August 16,2010 | 09:44 PM
Anything to combat bacterial resistance is good news.I have heard of work on bacteriophages to deal with resistance.
Posted by Lyle Gaulding on July 19,2010 | 07:59 PM
Nataslie Angier wrote an excellent article with just the right mix of personal/scientific info, just like her subject, Bonnie Bassler is all that. A fascinating and inspiring read.
Posted by Lee Fairbanks on July 15,2010 | 12:29 PM
I read this article in the Smithsonian Magazine and I have to say this research is awesome. I've often wondered if there was a more natural way to fight disease, like inhibiting something withing the bacteria/virus itself; without bad drug side affects. This gives me hope. I also liked the way the article was written. I have no science degree, but the writer made it very easy to understand the scientific processes and terminology. Thanks for this. Please keep articles like this coming!
Posted by Esther Ditterline Riddell on July 15,2010 | 07:44 AM
I can only hope Bonnie Bessler's work leads to the drug that will block the "pseudomonal calls to mayhem" and is developed in time to help my lovely 17-year-old grandniece fight off her cystic fibrosis.
Posted by Marilyn McMorris Gottwald on July 8,2010 | 10:05 PM
I was excited to learn about bacterial linguistics, as I soaked in a hot bath trying to get over a cold. I wonder, can temperature (fever) play a role in messages the bacteria send and receive? When fever plays a helpful role in overcoming illness, perhaps it deters the production of "let's go" molecular signals. Other bacteria could have adapted to high fever, which triggers their signals. Conversely, common lore is that when the body gets chilled, it is more vulnerable to illness. Could a lowered body temperature trigger signals for some bacteria to multiply?
There is so much to learn, and Smithsonian does a great job of expanding the world of its readers. Thank you.
Posted by Barbara Rosenthal on July 7,2010 | 02:47 PM