Jellyfish: The Next King of the Sea
As the world's oceans are degraded, will they be dominated by jellyfish?
- By Abigail Tucker
- Photographs by John Lee
- Smithsonian magazine, July-August 2010, Subscribe
(Page 5 of 6)
The research vessel Point Lobos heaves in the swells of Monterey Bay. After a two-hour ride from shore, the engine idles as a crane lowers the Ventana, an unmanned submarine stocked with a dozen glass collecting jars, into the water. As the submarine begins its descent into the canyon, its cameras feed footage to computer monitors in the boat’s dark control room. Widmer and other scientists watch from a semicircle of armchairs. Widmer is allotted only a few trips on the MBARI submarine each year for his research; his eyes are shining with anticipation.
On the screens we see the bright green surface water darken by degrees to deep purple, then black. White flecks of detritus called marine snow rush past, like a star field in warp speed. The submarine drops 1,000, 1,500, 5,000 feet. We are en route to what Widmer has modestly named the Widmer Site, a jellyfish mecca on the lip of an undersea cliff.
Our spotlight illuminates a Gonatus squid, which clenches itself into an anxious red fist. Giant gray-green Humboldt squid sail by, like the ghosts of spent torpedoes. Glimmering beings appear. They seem to be constructed of spider webs, fishing line and silk, soap bubbles, glow sticks, strands of Christmas lights and pearls. Some are siphonophores and gelatinous organisms I’ve never seen before. Others are tiny jellyfish.
Every now and then, Widmer squints at an iridescent speck, and—if it isn’t too delicate, and the gonads look ripe—asks the pilot of the remote-controlled sub to give chase. “I don’t know what it is, but it looks promising,” he says. We bear down on jellyfish the size of jingle bells and gumdrops, slurping them up with a suction device.
“Down the tube!” Widmer cries in triumph.
“In the bucket!” the pilot agrees.
The whole boat crew pauses to stare at the screen and marvel at a piece of kelp studded with fuzzy pink anemones. We snatch a jelly here, a jelly there, including a mysterious one with a strawberry-colored center, always keeping a sharp eye out for polyps.
The submersible sails over the wreck of a blue whale, a gigantic rockfish curled up like a cat beside the great skull. We pass a frilly albino sea cucumber and a Budweiser can. We see squat lobsters and spot prawns, bleached sea stars, black owl fish, bouncy coils of eggs, a pale pink orb with tarantula-like legs, lemon-yellow mermaid’s purses, English sole, starry flounders and the purple bullet shapes of sharks. The California sunshine seems dismal in comparison.
Single Page « Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next »
Subscribe now for more of Smithsonian's coverage on history, science and nature.










Comments (12)
Does anyone know what the niche of a sea nettle is? They don't seem to have any "role" in the environment.
Posted by SamIAm on February 5,2013 | 06:28 PM
no story about jellyfish is compleate with out saying a nylon or licra panty hose suit and pantyhose is helpful in protecting yourself from many jelly fish stings .
Posted by davida on November 10,2012 | 10:44 AM
In the Atlantic, the growth of jellyfish numbers happened in tandem with the overfishing of cod. If we stopped overfishing and let the fish eat the jellyfish, the problem would be solved - and we could have a reliable source of fish, with its abundant harvest properly regulated.
Posted by on November 8,2012 | 02:51 AM
Sir, solar energy is not a reliable source in some places and nuclear energy exceeds in reliability and efficiency and just as dave said "Nuclear energy is clean too." Understand your topic before commenting and making a fool out of yourself. I may be young but even I know that.
Posted by A 6th grader on November 18,2010 | 09:34 PM
I literally laughed when I read about the damage jellyfish are inadvertently inflicting in their role as "mother nature's avengers" against mankind's general unwillingness to try to live in harmony with nature due to greed. It seemed like such poetic justice.
I was (and continually am) disappointed by the continued insistence of the Smithsonian and other media on fingering carbon dioxide as the main culprit in global warming when there are other factors much more powerful, such as the Milankovitch cycle (an entirely natural cycle responsible for the global temperature cycle, among other things, that anthropogenic factors only modify to a degree), water vapor (aka steam) and methane, along with a laundry list of stupid actions performed by humans.
The article was very educational and I learned some new things about jellyfish. The photography was stunning and I loved the "Marine Advisory" sidebar - I just hope people read it! The estimates were slightly conservative for the Arctic and coral reefs, but that's the norm - better to be cautious than embarrassed.
Posted by Glenn McGrew on November 1,2010 | 01:44 AM
I'd like to read more about these creatures.
Posted by Lilly on July 14,2010 | 08:11 PM
After reading about the rise of jellyfish throughout the world's seas and oceans (July/August 2010 40th anniversary issue), I'll be looking forward to buying my jellyfish t-shirt at the Smithsonian gift shop. On the back it will read: Do you not have what it takes? On the front it will read: No Bones, No Blood, No Brain. It will be black with bold images of Stomolophus meleagris and other members of the jellyfish family.
Posted by Joe Shocket on July 14,2010 | 04:19 PM
What extraordinary creatures. They evolved 500 million years ago, and they may be here 500 million years after humankind is gone. Jellyfish should be celebrated as one of our planet’s ultimate survivalists. This article helps illustrate the wonderful complexity of all life on Earth and shows how quickly one group of creatures can step in to fill a void in any ecological niche or niches.
Posted by John Sorrells on July 13,2010 | 07:07 PM
I learned of this article after showing my aunt photos of an unusual sea jelly my daughter and I found washed up on the sands of Hermosa bch, Ca., one morning in mid April of this year. No one I know has ever seen one before. Very fascinating article.
Posted by melissa safady on July 6,2010 | 09:09 PM
"They are still using COAL..."
That's funny, Jim. Oh, you were serious? Did you know that coal is still the primary fuel source almost everywhere - including the US? It still accounts for over 50% of the power production here and 25% world-wide, behind only China at 35%. Wind, solar, and geo-thermal are not worldwide, viable solutions at this point. The only real alternative to coal is nuclear power but I'm assuming you disagree with that too even though it is a clean fuel source ,eh?
Posted by dave on July 6,2010 | 03:58 PM
They wrote: It was wrought by JELLY FISH, Some 50 dump trucks worth has been sucked in the cooling pipes of a COAL FIRED power plant. Here we are at the dawn of a new Millenium,in the age of cyberspace, and we are at the mercy of jellyfish =end quote
What an ironic statement. They are still using COAL to heat precious water to make electricity. This makes tons of pollution ,causes global warmiong and is less than 30% efficient.
In the 21th Centruy I use clean renewable Solar PV power. It uses no water, makes zero pollution and makes the most during the day when we use and need it and shuts off at night. The Phillipines should step up to the New Millenium with Wind, Solar and Geo-Thermal power and leave the Jelly fish and nature alone.
Posted by jim stACk on July 4,2010 | 10:23 AM
http://news.travel.aol.com/2010/06/11/bp-oil-spill-disturbing-images-of-a-disaster/?ncid=AOLCOMMtravsharartl0001&sms_ss=facebook
Posted by Stephen Cecrle on July 3,2010 | 12:17 PM