Jellyfish: The Next King of the Sea
As the world's oceans are degraded, will they be dominated by jellyfish?
- By Abigail Tucker
- Photographs by John Lee
- Smithsonian magazine, July-August 2010, Subscribe
(Page 4 of 6)
When ocean conditions become ideal, however, the polyp starts to “strobilate,” or bud off new jellyfish, a process Widmer shows me under a microscope. One polyp looks as if it is balancing a stack of Frisbees on its head. The tower of tiny discs pulses slightly. Eventually, Widmer explains, the top one will fly off, like a clay pigeon at a shooting range, then the next one, and the next. Sometimes dozens of discs launch, each disc a baby jellyfish.
To test the impact of warming oceans on polyp productivity, Widmer assembled a series of incubators and seawater baths. If he heated each a few degrees warmer than the last, what would the jellyfish do? At 39 degrees Fahrenheit, the polyps generated, on average, about 20 teeny jellyfish. At 46 degrees, roughly 40. The polyps in 54-degree seawater birthed some 50 jellies each, and one made 69. “A new record,” Widmer says, awed.
To be sure, Widmer has also found that some polyps can’t produce young at all if placed in waters significantly warmer than their native range. But his experiments, which confirm research on other jellies done by Purcell, also lend some credence to anxieties that global warming may induce jelly extravaganzas.
Two events ultimately stalled the Mnemiopsis invasion in the Black Sea. One was the fall of the Soviet Union: in the ensuing chaos, some farmers ceased fertilizing their fields and water quality improved. The other was the accidental introduction of a second exotic jellyfish that happened to have a taste for Mnemiopsis.
In lieu of dismantling superpowers or importing invasive species, countries have adopted jelly-proofing strategies. South Korea recently released 280,000 native, jelly-eating filefish along the coast of Busan. Spain dispatched indigenous loggerhead sea turtles off Cabo de Gata. Japanese fishermen hack at the giant Nomura’s with barbed poles. Mediterranean beaches have organized jellyfish hot lines, spotter boat armadas and airplane flyovers; the slimy troublemakers are sometimes sucked up by garbage scows, carted off by backhoes or used for fertilizer. Bathers in the worst areas are advised to wear full-body Lycra “stinger suits” or pantyhose or to smear themselves with petroleum jelly. Most sting-treatment products feature vinegar, the best remedy for jelly venom.
When, nearly two decades ago, Daniel Pauly, a fisheries biologist at the University of British Columbia, started warning of the dangers of overfishing, he liked to alarm people and say we would end up eating jellyfish. “It’s not a metaphor anymore,” he says today, pointing out that not only China and Japan but also the U.S. state of Georgia have commercial jellyfish operations, and there’s talk of one starting in Newfoundland, among other places. Pauly himself has been known to nibble jellyfish sushi.
About a dozen jellyfish varieties with firm bells are considered desirable food. Stripped of tentacles and scraped of mucous membranes, jellyfish are typically soaked in brine for several days and then dried. In Japan, they are served in strips with soy sauce and (ironically) vinegar. The Chinese have eaten jellies for 1,000 years (jellyfish salad is a wedding banquet favorite). Lately, in an apparent effort to make lemons into lemonade, the Japanese government has encouraged the development of haute jellyfish cuisine—jellyfish caramels, ice cream and cocktails—and adventuresome European chefs are following suit. Some enthusiasts compare the taste of jellyfish to fresh squid. Pauly says he’s reminded of cucumbers. Others think of salty rubber bands.
The main edible variety in U.S. waters, cannonball jellies, are found on the Atlantic Coast from North Carolina to Florida and in the Gulf of Mexico. They scored quite high on a “hedonic scale” of color and texture in a study led by Auburn University. Another scientific paper hailed jellyfish flesh—which is 95 percent water, a few grams of protein, the barest hint of sugar, and, once dried, only 18 calories per 100-gram serving—as “the ultimate modern diet food.”
Single Page « Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next »
Subscribe now for more of Smithsonian's coverage on history, science and nature.










Comments (12)
Does anyone know what the niche of a sea nettle is? They don't seem to have any "role" in the environment.
Posted by SamIAm on February 5,2013 | 06:28 PM
no story about jellyfish is compleate with out saying a nylon or licra panty hose suit and pantyhose is helpful in protecting yourself from many jelly fish stings .
Posted by davida on November 10,2012 | 10:44 AM
In the Atlantic, the growth of jellyfish numbers happened in tandem with the overfishing of cod. If we stopped overfishing and let the fish eat the jellyfish, the problem would be solved - and we could have a reliable source of fish, with its abundant harvest properly regulated.
Posted by on November 8,2012 | 02:51 AM
Sir, solar energy is not a reliable source in some places and nuclear energy exceeds in reliability and efficiency and just as dave said "Nuclear energy is clean too." Understand your topic before commenting and making a fool out of yourself. I may be young but even I know that.
Posted by A 6th grader on November 18,2010 | 09:34 PM
I literally laughed when I read about the damage jellyfish are inadvertently inflicting in their role as "mother nature's avengers" against mankind's general unwillingness to try to live in harmony with nature due to greed. It seemed like such poetic justice.
I was (and continually am) disappointed by the continued insistence of the Smithsonian and other media on fingering carbon dioxide as the main culprit in global warming when there are other factors much more powerful, such as the Milankovitch cycle (an entirely natural cycle responsible for the global temperature cycle, among other things, that anthropogenic factors only modify to a degree), water vapor (aka steam) and methane, along with a laundry list of stupid actions performed by humans.
The article was very educational and I learned some new things about jellyfish. The photography was stunning and I loved the "Marine Advisory" sidebar - I just hope people read it! The estimates were slightly conservative for the Arctic and coral reefs, but that's the norm - better to be cautious than embarrassed.
Posted by Glenn McGrew on November 1,2010 | 01:44 AM
I'd like to read more about these creatures.
Posted by Lilly on July 14,2010 | 08:11 PM
After reading about the rise of jellyfish throughout the world's seas and oceans (July/August 2010 40th anniversary issue), I'll be looking forward to buying my jellyfish t-shirt at the Smithsonian gift shop. On the back it will read: Do you not have what it takes? On the front it will read: No Bones, No Blood, No Brain. It will be black with bold images of Stomolophus meleagris and other members of the jellyfish family.
Posted by Joe Shocket on July 14,2010 | 04:19 PM
What extraordinary creatures. They evolved 500 million years ago, and they may be here 500 million years after humankind is gone. Jellyfish should be celebrated as one of our planet’s ultimate survivalists. This article helps illustrate the wonderful complexity of all life on Earth and shows how quickly one group of creatures can step in to fill a void in any ecological niche or niches.
Posted by John Sorrells on July 13,2010 | 07:07 PM
I learned of this article after showing my aunt photos of an unusual sea jelly my daughter and I found washed up on the sands of Hermosa bch, Ca., one morning in mid April of this year. No one I know has ever seen one before. Very fascinating article.
Posted by melissa safady on July 6,2010 | 09:09 PM
"They are still using COAL..."
That's funny, Jim. Oh, you were serious? Did you know that coal is still the primary fuel source almost everywhere - including the US? It still accounts for over 50% of the power production here and 25% world-wide, behind only China at 35%. Wind, solar, and geo-thermal are not worldwide, viable solutions at this point. The only real alternative to coal is nuclear power but I'm assuming you disagree with that too even though it is a clean fuel source ,eh?
Posted by dave on July 6,2010 | 03:58 PM
They wrote: It was wrought by JELLY FISH, Some 50 dump trucks worth has been sucked in the cooling pipes of a COAL FIRED power plant. Here we are at the dawn of a new Millenium,in the age of cyberspace, and we are at the mercy of jellyfish =end quote
What an ironic statement. They are still using COAL to heat precious water to make electricity. This makes tons of pollution ,causes global warmiong and is less than 30% efficient.
In the 21th Centruy I use clean renewable Solar PV power. It uses no water, makes zero pollution and makes the most during the day when we use and need it and shuts off at night. The Phillipines should step up to the New Millenium with Wind, Solar and Geo-Thermal power and leave the Jelly fish and nature alone.
Posted by jim stACk on July 4,2010 | 10:23 AM
http://news.travel.aol.com/2010/06/11/bp-oil-spill-disturbing-images-of-a-disaster/?ncid=AOLCOMMtravsharartl0001&sms_ss=facebook
Posted by Stephen Cecrle on July 3,2010 | 12:17 PM