Jellyfish: The Next King of the Sea
As the world's oceans are degraded, will they be dominated by jellyfish?
- By Abigail Tucker
- Photographs by John Lee
- Smithsonian magazine, July-August 2010, Subscribe
(Page 3 of 6)
Purcell and a graduate student, Amanda Winans, decided to breed moon jellyfish in water with the staggering acid levels that some scientists say will prevail in the years 2100 and 2300. “We took it to very severe acid, using the worst predictions,” Purcell says. The jellyfish reproduced with abandon. She has also conducted experiments that lead her to suspect that many jellies reproduce better in warmer water.
With the world’s human population expected to increase 32 percent by 2050, to 9.1 billion, a number of environmental conditions that favor jellyfish are predicted to become more common. Jellyfish reproduce and move into new niches so rapidly that even within 40 years, some experts predict “regime shifts” in which jellyfish assume dominance in one marine ecosystem after another. Such shifts may have already occurred, including off Namibia, where, after years of overharvesting, the once fecund waters of the Benguela current now contain more jellyfish than fish.
Steven Haddock, a zooplankton scientist at the Monterey Bay Aquarium Research Institute (MBARI), is concerned that researchers and the news media may be overreacting to a few isolated jelly outbreaks. Not enough is known about historical jelly abundances to distinguish between natural fluctuation and long-term change, he says. Are there really more of the creatures, or are people simply more prone to notice and report them? Are the jellyfish changing, or is our perspective? A self-described “jelly hugger,” Haddock worries that jellyfish are taking the blame for messing up the seas when we’re the ones causing the damage. “I just wish that people had the perception that jellyfish are not the enemy here,” Haddock says.
Purcell, who sports jellyfish earrings the day I meet her in Monterey, says she is disgusted by what she sees as humanity’s efforts to exploit the ocean, filling it with fish farms and oil wells and fertilizer. Compared with fish, jellies are “better feeders, better growers, more tolerant of all kinds of things,” she told me, adding of the marine environment: “I think it’s entirely possible we’ve made things better for jellyfish.” Part of her likes the idea of unruly jellies causing a commotion and foiling our plans. She’s cheering for them, almost.
Widmer’s lab at the Monterey Aquarium is dominated by bubbling lime-green columns of algae, which he feeds to brine shrimp, which he then feeds to jellyfish. The algae come in six other “flavors,” but he says he prefers the green type for its mad scientist aesthetic. The room is full of jellyfish tanks ranging in size from salad bowls to wading pools. The containers rotate slowly, creating a current. “Let’s feed!” Widmer cries. He scrambles up and down stepladders, squirting a turkey baster of pink krill into this tank and that.
Toward the back of the lab, haggard orange sea nettles stumble along the bottom of their tank, their bells brownish and transparent, their tentacles torn. These, Widmer says, have been taken out of the public display and retired. “Retired” is Widmer’s euphemism for “about to be snipped up with fabric scissors and fed to other jellies.”
He calls his prize specimens “golden children.” He speaks to them in cooing tones usually reserved for kittens. One tank holds the petite but striking purple-lipped cross jellies, which Widmer retrieved from Monterey Bay. The species has never been bred in captivity before. “Oh, aren’t you cute!” he trills. The other golden child is a small brown smudge on a pane of glass. This, he explains, dabbing artistically at the smudge’s edges with a paintbrush, is a colony of lion’s mane jellyfish polyps.
When jellyfish sperm and egg meet, the fertilized egg forms a free-swimming larva, what Widmer describes as “a fuzzy ciliated tic tac.” It whizzes around before landing on a sponge or other seafloor fixture. There it morphs into a weedy little polyp, an intermediate form that can reproduce asexually. And then—well, sometimes nothing happens for a good long while. A jellyfish polyp can sit dormant for a decade or more, biding its time.
Single Page « Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next »
Subscribe now for more of Smithsonian's coverage on history, science and nature.










Comments (12)
Does anyone know what the niche of a sea nettle is? They don't seem to have any "role" in the environment.
Posted by SamIAm on February 5,2013 | 06:28 PM
no story about jellyfish is compleate with out saying a nylon or licra panty hose suit and pantyhose is helpful in protecting yourself from many jelly fish stings .
Posted by davida on November 10,2012 | 10:44 AM
In the Atlantic, the growth of jellyfish numbers happened in tandem with the overfishing of cod. If we stopped overfishing and let the fish eat the jellyfish, the problem would be solved - and we could have a reliable source of fish, with its abundant harvest properly regulated.
Posted by on November 8,2012 | 02:51 AM
Sir, solar energy is not a reliable source in some places and nuclear energy exceeds in reliability and efficiency and just as dave said "Nuclear energy is clean too." Understand your topic before commenting and making a fool out of yourself. I may be young but even I know that.
Posted by A 6th grader on November 18,2010 | 09:34 PM
I literally laughed when I read about the damage jellyfish are inadvertently inflicting in their role as "mother nature's avengers" against mankind's general unwillingness to try to live in harmony with nature due to greed. It seemed like such poetic justice.
I was (and continually am) disappointed by the continued insistence of the Smithsonian and other media on fingering carbon dioxide as the main culprit in global warming when there are other factors much more powerful, such as the Milankovitch cycle (an entirely natural cycle responsible for the global temperature cycle, among other things, that anthropogenic factors only modify to a degree), water vapor (aka steam) and methane, along with a laundry list of stupid actions performed by humans.
The article was very educational and I learned some new things about jellyfish. The photography was stunning and I loved the "Marine Advisory" sidebar - I just hope people read it! The estimates were slightly conservative for the Arctic and coral reefs, but that's the norm - better to be cautious than embarrassed.
Posted by Glenn McGrew on November 1,2010 | 01:44 AM
I'd like to read more about these creatures.
Posted by Lilly on July 14,2010 | 08:11 PM
After reading about the rise of jellyfish throughout the world's seas and oceans (July/August 2010 40th anniversary issue), I'll be looking forward to buying my jellyfish t-shirt at the Smithsonian gift shop. On the back it will read: Do you not have what it takes? On the front it will read: No Bones, No Blood, No Brain. It will be black with bold images of Stomolophus meleagris and other members of the jellyfish family.
Posted by Joe Shocket on July 14,2010 | 04:19 PM
What extraordinary creatures. They evolved 500 million years ago, and they may be here 500 million years after humankind is gone. Jellyfish should be celebrated as one of our planet’s ultimate survivalists. This article helps illustrate the wonderful complexity of all life on Earth and shows how quickly one group of creatures can step in to fill a void in any ecological niche or niches.
Posted by John Sorrells on July 13,2010 | 07:07 PM
I learned of this article after showing my aunt photos of an unusual sea jelly my daughter and I found washed up on the sands of Hermosa bch, Ca., one morning in mid April of this year. No one I know has ever seen one before. Very fascinating article.
Posted by melissa safady on July 6,2010 | 09:09 PM
"They are still using COAL..."
That's funny, Jim. Oh, you were serious? Did you know that coal is still the primary fuel source almost everywhere - including the US? It still accounts for over 50% of the power production here and 25% world-wide, behind only China at 35%. Wind, solar, and geo-thermal are not worldwide, viable solutions at this point. The only real alternative to coal is nuclear power but I'm assuming you disagree with that too even though it is a clean fuel source ,eh?
Posted by dave on July 6,2010 | 03:58 PM
They wrote: It was wrought by JELLY FISH, Some 50 dump trucks worth has been sucked in the cooling pipes of a COAL FIRED power plant. Here we are at the dawn of a new Millenium,in the age of cyberspace, and we are at the mercy of jellyfish =end quote
What an ironic statement. They are still using COAL to heat precious water to make electricity. This makes tons of pollution ,causes global warmiong and is less than 30% efficient.
In the 21th Centruy I use clean renewable Solar PV power. It uses no water, makes zero pollution and makes the most during the day when we use and need it and shuts off at night. The Phillipines should step up to the New Millenium with Wind, Solar and Geo-Thermal power and leave the Jelly fish and nature alone.
Posted by jim stACk on July 4,2010 | 10:23 AM
http://news.travel.aol.com/2010/06/11/bp-oil-spill-disturbing-images-of-a-disaster/?ncid=AOLCOMMtravsharartl0001&sms_ss=facebook
Posted by Stephen Cecrle on July 3,2010 | 12:17 PM