Jellyfish: The Next King of the Sea
As the world's oceans are degraded, will they be dominated by jellyfish?
- By Abigail Tucker
- Photographs by John Lee
- Smithsonian magazine, July-August 2010, Subscribe
(Page 2 of 6)
A breeding jellyfish can spit out unfertilized eggs at a prodigious rate: one female sea nettle may spew as many as 45,000 per day. To maximize the chances of sperm meeting egg, millions of moon jellies of both sexes assemble in one place for a gamete-swapping orgy.
Chad Widmer is one of the world’s most accomplished jellyfish cultivators. At the Monterey Bay Aquarium in California, he is lord of the “Drifters” exhibit, a slow-motion realm of soft edges, rippling flute music and sapphire light. His left ankle is crowded with tattoos, including Neptune’s trident and a crystal jellyfish. A senior aquarist, Widmer labors to figure out how jellyfish thrive in captivity—a job that involves untangling tentacles and plucking gonads until his arm is swollen with venom.
Widmer has bred dozens of jellyfish species, including moon jellies, which resemble animated shower caps. His signature jelly is the Northeast Pacific sea nettle, displayed by the score in a 2,250-gallon exhibit tank. They are orange and incandescent, like dollops of lava, and when they swim against the current they look like glowing meteors streaming to Earth.
The waters of Monterey Bay have not been spared from the gelatinous woes said to be sweeping the oceans. “It used to be that everything had a season,” Widmer says. Spring was the time for lobed comb jellies and crystal jellies to arrive. But for the past five years or so, those species seem to be materializing almost at random. The orange spotted comb jelly, which Widmer nicknamed the “Christmas jelly,” no longer peaks in December; it haunts the shoreline practically year-round. Black sea nettles, once seen mostly in Mexican waters, have started appearing off Monterey. Last August, millions of Northeast Pacific sea nettles bloomed in Monterey Bay and clogged the aquarium’s seawater intake screen. The nettles typically retreat by early winter. “Well,” Widmer informs me gravely on my February visit, “they’re still out there.”
It’s hard to tell what may be causing jellyfish to proliferate. The fishing industry has depleted populations of big predators such as red tuna, swordfish and sea turtles that feed on jellyfish. And when small, plankton-eating fish such as anchovies are overharvested, jellies flourish, gorging on plankton and reproducing to their hearts’ content (if they had hearts, that is).
In 1982, when the Black Sea ecosystem was already weakened by anchovy overfishing, the warty comb jelly (Mnemiopsis leidyi) arrived; a species native to the East Coast of the United States, it was most likely carried across the Atlantic in a ship’s ballast water. By 1990, there were some 900 million tons of them in the Black Sea.
Pollution, too, may be fueling the jelly frenzy. Jellyfish succeed in all sorts of fouled conditions, including “dead zones,” where rivers have pumped fertilizer runoff and other materials into the ocean. The fertilizer fuels phytoplankton blooms; after the phytoplankton die, bacteria decompose them, hogging oxygen; the oxygen-depleted water then kills or forces out other marine creatures. The number of coastal dead zones has doubled every decade since the 1960s; there are now roughly 500. (Oil can kill jellyfish, but no one knows how jellyfish populations in the Gulf of Mexico will fare in the long run after the BP oil spill.)
Carbon-based air pollution may be another factor. Since the Industrial Revolution, the amount of carbon in the atmosphere from burning fossil fuels and wood as well as from other enterprises has risen by some 36 percent. That contributes to global warming, which, some researchers speculate, may benefit jellyfish at the expense of other marine animals. Moreover, carbon dioxide dissolves in seawater to form carbonic acid—a major threat to marine life. As the seas become more acidic, scientists say, ocean water will begin to dissolve animal shells, stunt coral reefs and disorient larval fish by skewing their sense of smell. Jellies, meanwhile, may not even be inconvenienced, according to recent studies by Jennifer Purcell of Western Washington University.
Single Page « Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next »
Subscribe now for more of Smithsonian's coverage on history, science and nature.










Comments (12)
Does anyone know what the niche of a sea nettle is? They don't seem to have any "role" in the environment.
Posted by SamIAm on February 5,2013 | 06:28 PM
no story about jellyfish is compleate with out saying a nylon or licra panty hose suit and pantyhose is helpful in protecting yourself from many jelly fish stings .
Posted by davida on November 10,2012 | 10:44 AM
In the Atlantic, the growth of jellyfish numbers happened in tandem with the overfishing of cod. If we stopped overfishing and let the fish eat the jellyfish, the problem would be solved - and we could have a reliable source of fish, with its abundant harvest properly regulated.
Posted by on November 8,2012 | 02:51 AM
Sir, solar energy is not a reliable source in some places and nuclear energy exceeds in reliability and efficiency and just as dave said "Nuclear energy is clean too." Understand your topic before commenting and making a fool out of yourself. I may be young but even I know that.
Posted by A 6th grader on November 18,2010 | 09:34 PM
I literally laughed when I read about the damage jellyfish are inadvertently inflicting in their role as "mother nature's avengers" against mankind's general unwillingness to try to live in harmony with nature due to greed. It seemed like such poetic justice.
I was (and continually am) disappointed by the continued insistence of the Smithsonian and other media on fingering carbon dioxide as the main culprit in global warming when there are other factors much more powerful, such as the Milankovitch cycle (an entirely natural cycle responsible for the global temperature cycle, among other things, that anthropogenic factors only modify to a degree), water vapor (aka steam) and methane, along with a laundry list of stupid actions performed by humans.
The article was very educational and I learned some new things about jellyfish. The photography was stunning and I loved the "Marine Advisory" sidebar - I just hope people read it! The estimates were slightly conservative for the Arctic and coral reefs, but that's the norm - better to be cautious than embarrassed.
Posted by Glenn McGrew on November 1,2010 | 01:44 AM
I'd like to read more about these creatures.
Posted by Lilly on July 14,2010 | 08:11 PM
After reading about the rise of jellyfish throughout the world's seas and oceans (July/August 2010 40th anniversary issue), I'll be looking forward to buying my jellyfish t-shirt at the Smithsonian gift shop. On the back it will read: Do you not have what it takes? On the front it will read: No Bones, No Blood, No Brain. It will be black with bold images of Stomolophus meleagris and other members of the jellyfish family.
Posted by Joe Shocket on July 14,2010 | 04:19 PM
What extraordinary creatures. They evolved 500 million years ago, and they may be here 500 million years after humankind is gone. Jellyfish should be celebrated as one of our planet’s ultimate survivalists. This article helps illustrate the wonderful complexity of all life on Earth and shows how quickly one group of creatures can step in to fill a void in any ecological niche or niches.
Posted by John Sorrells on July 13,2010 | 07:07 PM
I learned of this article after showing my aunt photos of an unusual sea jelly my daughter and I found washed up on the sands of Hermosa bch, Ca., one morning in mid April of this year. No one I know has ever seen one before. Very fascinating article.
Posted by melissa safady on July 6,2010 | 09:09 PM
"They are still using COAL..."
That's funny, Jim. Oh, you were serious? Did you know that coal is still the primary fuel source almost everywhere - including the US? It still accounts for over 50% of the power production here and 25% world-wide, behind only China at 35%. Wind, solar, and geo-thermal are not worldwide, viable solutions at this point. The only real alternative to coal is nuclear power but I'm assuming you disagree with that too even though it is a clean fuel source ,eh?
Posted by dave on July 6,2010 | 03:58 PM
They wrote: It was wrought by JELLY FISH, Some 50 dump trucks worth has been sucked in the cooling pipes of a COAL FIRED power plant. Here we are at the dawn of a new Millenium,in the age of cyberspace, and we are at the mercy of jellyfish =end quote
What an ironic statement. They are still using COAL to heat precious water to make electricity. This makes tons of pollution ,causes global warmiong and is less than 30% efficient.
In the 21th Centruy I use clean renewable Solar PV power. It uses no water, makes zero pollution and makes the most during the day when we use and need it and shuts off at night. The Phillipines should step up to the New Millenium with Wind, Solar and Geo-Thermal power and leave the Jelly fish and nature alone.
Posted by jim stACk on July 4,2010 | 10:23 AM
http://news.travel.aol.com/2010/06/11/bp-oil-spill-disturbing-images-of-a-disaster/?ncid=AOLCOMMtravsharartl0001&sms_ss=facebook
Posted by Stephen Cecrle on July 3,2010 | 12:17 PM