A Spanish Breakthrough in Harnessing Solar Power
Solar technologies being pioneered in Spain show even greater promise for the United States
- By Richard Covington
- Smithsonian magazine, July-August 2010, Subscribe
Amid the green wheat fields, oak groves and ancient olive trees of Andalusia, a giant solar energy farm shimmers like a silver sea. Even under cloudy skies, the arrays of mirrors and massive towers sprawling over three square miles are an arresting sight.
Twenty miles west of Seville, the Solúcar solar farm, built by the company Abengoa, is part of Spain’s push to produce more energy from renewable sources. The nation currently produces up to 3.65 gigawatts of power from the sun, second in the world after Germany. Those gigawatts make up about 3 percent of the country’s power, the highest percentage in the world. (The United States generates less than 1 percent of its energy from the sun.) Spain’s solar output is expected to rise in the next three years to seven gigawatts, enough to supply about ten million people—the combined population of Madrid and Barcelona—with electricity during the day.
The Solúcar farm is pioneering technologies that are being replicated in the United States, including concentrated solar power, or CSP. While traditional solar panels use photovoltaic cells to convert the sun’s rays directly into electricity, CSP deploys huge banks of mirrors to focus solar radiation; the intense heat drives steam turbines, producing electricity in a process similar to the one used in coal-or oil-fired plants, but without the greenhouse gas emissions.
At the Solúcar site, two concrete towers—one about 50 stories tall, the other 35—collect light reflected by 1,879 enormous glass mirrors, each one 33 feet high and 40 feet wide. The mirrors, called heliostats, cover some 345 acres. They face south and are turned to follow the sun as it crosses the sky.
The smaller CSP tower began providing power in 2007, the larger one in May 2009. Together, they produce 31 megawatts. By 2013, when Solúcar is finished adding another tower plant and other installations, Abengoa expects the CSP facility to generate 300 megawatts, enough energy to power 220,000 households, or all of metropolitan Seville.
“These commercial tower plants are unique in the world,” Valerio Fernández, Solúcar’s operations manager, told me in his office overlooking the mirrored fields. (He was not counting a small, five-megawatt power tower operated in Lancaster, California, by the American company eSolar, or a demonstration tower the Spanish government runs in Almería.) “Today, however, they’re on vacation,” he added, with a shrug.
When it’s raining or overcast—like the cool gray March day I visited—the solar installation shuts down. But photographs of the CSP site at its best are otherworldly: towers glowing with shafts of light, an effect caused by reflected sunlight passing through water vapor and dust in the air. Though you might think the south of Spain is an ideal solar energy site, Fernández said the company expects bad weather to reduce or halt energy production around 80 days a year, generally between November and March.
“If we are seeking to make solar power more efficient, there are better places than Seville,” Fernández told me. He gestured to a wall map of the world with shaded bands representing solar energy potential: Andalusia was tan, the Mojave Desert of California and Nevada brown, and the Sahara darker still.
Subscribe now for more of Smithsonian's coverage on history, science and nature.










Comments (12)
In fact I am surprise because of these huge projects in Spain .
I am interesting in this field of generating electricity from clean and green environment to protect our earth from warming which produced from burning oil and coal.
I Am engineer in electricity and would like to try to make a very small project like this in my country (about 100 KW ) so I want to help me if it is possible in this project like calculating the length of the tower and number of mirrors and its area each.
also the mirrors how can I get them from etc.
I want to thank every body of you , I hope you all succeed in your future projects.
Best Regards.
Posted by Majed Moammar on July 17,2011 | 10:12 PM
Spuffler asks why not let mirrors be made from photovoltaic (PV) panels? Elegant idea, but there actually are a few reasons why optimized mirrors work better in this application. Most solar cells have a textured front surface to bend the incoming light to achieve a longer transit path for the light through the solar cell, increasing its opportunity to be absorbed. The texturing also affects the reflected light - it reflects out at various angles, so only a tiny fraction of that reflected light would reach the tower. Another factor is that most of the light that the solar cell doesn't convert to electricity is absorbed and converted to heat, not reflected.
For the record, most solar cells do not need to track the sun. Only concentrator solar cell modules need to be mounted on trackers.
The mirrors used in this project are probably far less expensive in terms of area than PV panels. The cost difference is made up by the cost of the tower, fluid handling equipment, and the turbine. In the end, the cost of this method of generating electricity is approximately on par with the cost of an equivalent field of PV panels.
When the environmental costs of traditional methods of electricity generation are taken into account (they rarely appear as a component in the electricity price), terrestrial conversion of power generated by remote nuclear fusion is very cost-effective. This is why Thermal CSP such as the one in this article and fields of PV panels are both being built all over the world.
Posted by Halden on January 9,2011 | 03:37 PM
I think this is a fabulous idea,and can't see why the United States doesn't have this system of collecting energy already in place today. If we have these 'mirrors' in our country we could be saving so much coal and oil. It would be amazing to see these 'mirrors' installed and watch them save our fossil fuel resources from being over used.
Posted by Maria Watson on January 6,2011 | 08:54 PM
Seems obvious to me, but why not design the 'mirrors' to use solar panels (solar cells also need to track the sun), and then aim the remaining reflected spectra which reflects off the solar cells onto a suitably designed tower. Yes, the solar cells aren't as good at the task of reflecting, but the best mirror isn't producing any energy output where the solar cell reflector is. Yes, the reflected energy hitting the tower isn't as potent as from a mirror, but is it not better to use the reflected energy (from a common solar cell panel) than to ignore it as solar cell panels presently do?
Just a thought
Posted by Spuffler on August 19,2010 | 10:00 AM
First, a terminology issue: This article refers to one of two common CSP techniques. CSP also commonly refers to concentration of solar power onto very-efficient small solar cells via mirrors or fresnel lenses, not just the thermal-turbine conversion cycle described in this article.
Second, a technology point: Contrary to Gerald Hogan's comment, nuclear fission is not carbon-neutral; vast amounts of fossil fuel is used to mine, refine, process, and transport the nuclear fuel.
Third, a technology comparison: Billions of dollars later, terrestrial nuclear fusion power is still dangerous and far from practical. *Remote* nuclear fusion power is the only source that has already been proven to be sustainable for billions of years. With far less subsidy and research investment than terrestrial nuclear fusion, remote nuclear fusion has already made tremendous progress and displaced high-emission generation, as evidenced by the project described in this article and many others around the world.
Posted by Halden Field on July 28,2010 | 11:17 PM
solar and wind power will save oil through the electric motor.
And don't worry about the long dictant,
power grid company can solve the problem.
Posted by jh on July 23,2010 | 09:12 AM
Whether oil is currently used to generate power or not is besides the point. The future is Nuclear, fission then fusion as the energy requirements of the human race rise exponentially. Think of the power we will need for de-salinisation as well as the future technologies that will help feed the ower populated planet. Renewables will have their place, solar will be used for things that need their own power source perhaps, or installations in remote and sunny places, and perhaps renewables could satisfy the demands of humanity..eventually..but it wont happen fast enough. We need to pour more money into fusion research, in the grand scale of things we really are not spending much on it at all at the moment...
Posted by A Patz on July 19,2010 | 08:33 AM
Gerald Hogan's comment claims that no electricity is generated from oil. Oil is used to generate electricity in the US (http://www.eia.doe.gov/cneaf/electricity/epa/epates.html) and other locations around the world.
Posted by Bruce Lites on July 14,2010 | 10:44 PM
reply to Gerald Hogan. Your comment about it not saving oil is beside the point. Reducing the use of fossil fuels is the point. Coal, the dirtiest, is mostly what will be saved.
Regarding the govt. subsidies, that is only for construction, not for operation. Under Bush and now under Obama, the U.S. is supporting the nuclear industry, but they are moving slowly because nuclear plants are very, very expensive. Fusion reactors have been a dream for the past 60 years, with billions spent it is still a dream.
Wind, fotovoltaic, thermal solar, and nuclear combined will eliminate our dependence on fossil fuels and some folks who hate us.
Posted by Fred Schwartz on July 14,2010 | 07:42 PM
It appears that the prime 'breakthrough' on this project is getting the area to install all of the solar devices. This is not easy to do in the U.S.
Posted by John Tomassoni on July 14,2010 | 12:53 PM
Richard Covington-Spanish Solar
So how often do the mirrors get cleaned or replaced? How often does their focal point get adjusted? On a purely commercial basis how long does it take to get payback on the investment assuming power gets sold on a competitive basis?
Article is mostly like frosting on the cake and lacks operational details. Where's the beef so to speak.
Paul Tyksinski, Kailua, Hawaii
Posted by Paul Tyksinski on July 11,2010 | 05:47 PM
Two points slipped by in this article: One - solar power, and wind power, cannot exist on their own. They require "hefty" subsidation. Spain has now backed off on their very expensive solar power. Two - the sun doesn't always shine, where it shines the most is very far from where the power is needed. Another point - oil is not used to generate electricity. Solar and wind power will not save a drop of oil. In the near term nuclear power generation is the most efficient, carbon neutral, method. Long term, hydrogen or fusion are where future power generation exists.
Posted by Gerald Hogan on July 4,2010 | 12:50 PM