• Smithsonian
    Institution
  • Smithsonian
    Journeys
  • Smithsonian
    Store
  • Smithsonian
    Channel
  • goSmithsonian
    Visitors Guide
  • Air & Space
    magazine

Smithsonian.com

  • Subscribe
  • Home
  • History & Archaeology
  • People & Places
  • Science & Nature
  • Arts & Culture
  • Travel
  • Photos
  • Videos
  • Games & Puzzles
  • Blogs
  • Anthropology & Behavior
  • Dinosaurs
  • EcoCenter
  • Environment
  • Technology & Space
  • Wildlife
  • Science & Nature

Up in Smoke

Amazon research that has withstood thieves and arsonists now faces its greatest challenge

  • By Jess Blumberg
  • Smithsonian magazine, December 2007, Subscribe
View More Photos »
$Alt

Cheryl Carlin

 
Tweet

Article Tools

 
  • Comments
  • Font
  • Email
  • RSS
  • Print
  • Photo Gallery

    Laurance (at the Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute in Panama) says losing the Amazon research would be "tragic."

    Up in Smoke

    Explore more photos from the story

    Related Links

    Biological Dynamics of Forest Fragment Project (BDFFP)

    Biological Dynamics of Forest Fragment Project (BDFFP) archived information


    “Driving a wedge into the Amazon” by William F. Laurence and Regina C.C. Luisão, Nature, July 26, 2007


    Official Brazil Web site for the Manaus Free Trade Zone

    In Brazil, the Amazon rain forest extends across 1.3 million square miles—and yet patches of land measuring just 386 square miles might be the best hope for ensuring the survival of the vast ecosystem, one of the world's largest and most diverse.

    The site is home to the Biological Dynamics of Forest Fragments Project (BDFFP), operated jointly by the Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute (STRI) and Brazil's National Institute for Amazonian Research. For nearly 30 years, scientists and students at BDFFP have been gathering crucial data on the environmental impact of farming, logging and human settlements. Now, however, the study area is threatened by those very same activities. "It would be tragic to see a site that's given us so much information be lost so easily," says William Laurance, a STRI biologist who has been working on the project for 12 years. Originally slated to run until 1999, the project is still flourishing.

    At issue is the perennial conflict between natural conservation and economic development. The research site is located within the Agricultural District of the Manaus Free Trade Zone, which the Brazilian government established in 1967 to attract commerce to the region. The agency that manages the zone, SuperintendÍncia da Zona Franca de Manaus (SUFRAMA), recently announced plans for at least six colonization projects that would relocate 180 families in an area that encompasses the research site.

    It's an especially bitter turn of events for the scientists, whose research plots have already been subjected to raids, equipment theft and burning by colonists for the much desired commodity, charcoal.

    Laurance and his colleagues have focused their studies on what is known as "forest fragmentation." Rain forest clearing does not occur in one clean sweep; rather, it is a patchwork of encroachments that create oases of near pristine forest. The question is how large these forest fragments have to be in order to sustain their delicate ecosystems. Finding an answer could prove vital in planning development projects that would allow for human settlement without unnecessarily destroying swaths of forest.

    The researchers cleared the surrounding areas to create patches ranging from 2.5 to 250 acres. By comparing data from each plot before and after it was isolated, scientists have found that the larger the fragment, the better. If it's too small, the entire ecosystem unravels: drying winds penetrate the interior, killing trees. Animals suffer too. In a recently completed study of bird extinction patterns, the researchers found that fragments less than 250 acres lose half of the bird species in the forest's interior within 15 years. That loss is too rapid for bird populations to recover.

    Such findings argue against settling the area, environmental advocates say. Claude Gascon of Conservation International acknowledges that the Brazilian government is "within its mandate to use land for economic development" but believes it "should align [its] policies with what scientific results have shown." For its part, the Brazilian agency behind the settlement move, SUFRAMA, stresses that it conducted an environmental survey in 2004, and that it is "only the initial stage of a wide-ranging implementation process." SUFRAMA also contends that it "has striven to give its full support to the work of research institutions" in the area. Smithsonian's Laurance disagrees. He says the agency's proposed incursion into the research area ignores the findings of its own study.

    The scientists are now enlisting the help of sympathetic agencies such as the Brazilian Institute of Environment and Renewable Natural Resources. Laurance emphasizes there is little to be gained by colonization, as the Amazon's low-quality soil makes for poor agriculture. "The social and economic benefits are paltry relative to the scientific and conservation benefits," he says.


    In Brazil, the Amazon rain forest extends across 1.3 million square miles—and yet patches of land measuring just 386 square miles might be the best hope for ensuring the survival of the vast ecosystem, one of the world's largest and most diverse.

    The site is home to the Biological Dynamics of Forest Fragments Project (BDFFP), operated jointly by the Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute (STRI) and Brazil's National Institute for Amazonian Research. For nearly 30 years, scientists and students at BDFFP have been gathering crucial data on the environmental impact of farming, logging and human settlements. Now, however, the study area is threatened by those very same activities. "It would be tragic to see a site that's given us so much information be lost so easily," says William Laurance, a STRI biologist who has been working on the project for 12 years. Originally slated to run until 1999, the project is still flourishing.

    At issue is the perennial conflict between natural conservation and economic development. The research site is located within the Agricultural District of the Manaus Free Trade Zone, which the Brazilian government established in 1967 to attract commerce to the region. The agency that manages the zone, SuperintendÍncia da Zona Franca de Manaus (SUFRAMA), recently announced plans for at least six colonization projects that would relocate 180 families in an area that encompasses the research site.

    It's an especially bitter turn of events for the scientists, whose research plots have already been subjected to raids, equipment theft and burning by colonists for the much desired commodity, charcoal.

    Laurance and his colleagues have focused their studies on what is known as "forest fragmentation." Rain forest clearing does not occur in one clean sweep; rather, it is a patchwork of encroachments that create oases of near pristine forest. The question is how large these forest fragments have to be in order to sustain their delicate ecosystems. Finding an answer could prove vital in planning development projects that would allow for human settlement without unnecessarily destroying swaths of forest.

    The researchers cleared the surrounding areas to create patches ranging from 2.5 to 250 acres. By comparing data from each plot before and after it was isolated, scientists have found that the larger the fragment, the better. If it's too small, the entire ecosystem unravels: drying winds penetrate the interior, killing trees. Animals suffer too. In a recently completed study of bird extinction patterns, the researchers found that fragments less than 250 acres lose half of the bird species in the forest's interior within 15 years. That loss is too rapid for bird populations to recover.

    Such findings argue against settling the area, environmental advocates say. Claude Gascon of Conservation International acknowledges that the Brazilian government is "within its mandate to use land for economic development" but believes it "should align [its] policies with what scientific results have shown." For its part, the Brazilian agency behind the settlement move, SUFRAMA, stresses that it conducted an environmental survey in 2004, and that it is "only the initial stage of a wide-ranging implementation process." SUFRAMA also contends that it "has striven to give its full support to the work of research institutions" in the area. Smithsonian's Laurance disagrees. He says the agency's proposed incursion into the research area ignores the findings of its own study.

    The scientists are now enlisting the help of sympathetic agencies such as the Brazilian Institute of Environment and Renewable Natural Resources. Laurance emphasizes there is little to be gained by colonization, as the Amazon's low-quality soil makes for poor agriculture. "The social and economic benefits are paltry relative to the scientific and conservation benefits," he says.

        Subscribe now for more of Smithsonian's coverage on history, science and nature.


    Tweet Digg
     
    Comments

    On the same day as this article appeared on my computer our local newspapper Honolulu Star-Bulletin/Monday,December 17, 2007 an article "UH creates'high-tech' charcoal. University of Hawaii researcher Micheal J. Antal Jr has developed a flash carbonization turning green waste into fuel and fertilizer. There are two related articles 'Scientists use effort to treat soil in Africa' and Oahu factory takes Antal's idea to market. All the articles are written by Helen Altonn at haltonn@starbulletin.com. Hope these articles offer some help. Aloha, Katie Schell

    Posted by Katie Schell on December 29,2007 | 02:46 PM

    Post a Comment


    Name: (required)

    Email: (required)

    Comment:

    Comments are moderated, and will not appear until Smithsonian.com has approved them. Smithsonian reserves the right not to post any comments that are unlawful, threatening, offensive, defamatory, invasive of a person's privacy, inappropriate, confidential or proprietary, political messages, product endorsements, or other content that might otherwise violate any laws or policies.



    Advertisement


    Popular Videos

    • Newest
    • Most Viewed

    Behind the Scenes of the Smithsonian App

    (01:28)

    Behind the Scenes at the World Orchid Convention

    (3:15)

    Playing the Unplayable Records

    (3:39)

    Introducing Ask Smithsonian

    (1:15)

    View All Newest Videos »

    Behind the Scenes at the World Orchid Convention

    (3:15)

    Playing the Unplayable Records

    (3:39)

    A Brief History of Chocolate

    (01:22)

    Mammoth vs. Mastodon

    View All Videos »

    Most Popular

    • Viewed
    • Emailed
    • Commented
    • Topics
    1. What You See When You Turn a Fish Inside Out
    2. The Orchid Olympics
    3. Henrietta Lacks’ ‘Immortal’ Cells
    4. Eric Klinenberg on Going Solo
    5. Meet Lucy Jones, "the Earthquake Lady"
    6. The Ten Most Disturbing Scientific Discoveries
    7. An Astronomer’s Solution to Global Warming
    8. Nine Ways to Lure a Lover, Orchid-Style
    9. The Top Ten Daily Consequences of Having Evolved
    10. North America’s Most Endangered Animals
    1. The Orchid Olympics
    2. Eric Klinenberg on Going Solo
    3. Henrietta Lacks’ ‘Immortal’ Cells
    4. The 'Secret Jews' of San Luis Valley
    5. Meet Lucy Jones, "the Earthquake Lady"
    6. An Astronomer’s Solution to Global Warming
    7. The Science of Sarcasm? Yeah, Right
    8. The Sperm Whale's Deadly Call
    9. Wild Things: Piranhas, Nazca Boobies, Glowing Millipedes
    10. The Ten Most Disturbing Scientific Discoveries
    1. An Astronomer’s Solution to Global Warming
    2. The Dinosaur Fossil Wars
    3. The Orchid Olympics
    4. Portraits in the Wild
    5. Eric Klinenberg on Going Solo
    6. Henrietta Lacks’ ‘Immortal’ Cells
    7. Sleepless in Hawaii
    8. Nine Ways to Lure a Lover, Orchid-Style
    9. Defending the Rhino
    10. Feeding the Animals at the National Zoo

    View All Most Popular »

    Advertisement

    Follow Us

    Smithsonian Magazine
    @SmithsonianMag
    Follow Smithsonian Magazine on Twitter

    Sign up for regular email updates from Smithsonian.com, including daily newsletters and special offers.


    In The Magazine

    February 2012

    • Gold Fever
    • Mystique of the Mother Road
    • The Orchid Olympics
    • Mad for Dickens
    • Dickens' Secret Affair

    View Table of Contents »






    First Name
    Last Name
    Address 1
    Address 2
    City
    State   Zip
    Email

    Smithsonian Store

    Jefferson Bible
    Smithsonian Edition

    Get your own copy of this recently conserved treasure.

    Smithsonian Journeys

    Private Jet Tours

    Explore some of the most treasured and legendary places on Earth, aboard our private aircrafts.



    View full archiveRecent Issues


    • Feb 2012


    • Jan 2012


    • Dec 2011

    Newsletter

    Sign up for regular email updates from Smithsonian magazine, including free newsletters, special offers and current news updates.

    Subscribe Now

    About Us

    Smithsonian.com expands on Smithsonian magazine's in-depth coverage of history, science, nature, the arts, travel, world culture and technology. Join us regularly as we take a dynamic and interactive approach to exploring modern and historic perspectives on the arts, sciences, nature, world culture and travel, including videos, blogs and a reader forum.

    Explore our Brands

    • goSmithsonian.com
    • Smithsonian Air & Space Museum
    • Smithsonian Student Travel
    • Smithsonian Catalogue
    • Smithsonian Journeys
    • Smithsonian Channel
    • Site Map
    • Privacy Policy
    • Copyright
    • Member Services
    • About Smithsonian
    • Contact Us
    • Advertising
    • Subscribe
    • RSS
    • Topics

    Smithsonian Institution

    Produced by Clickability