• Smithsonian
    Institution
  • Travel
    With Us
  • Smithsonian
    Store
  • Smithsonian
    Channel
  • goSmithsonian
    Visitors Guide
  • Air & Space
    magazine

Smithsonian.com

  • Subscribe
  • History & Archaeology
  • Science
  • Ideas & Innovations
  • Arts & Culture
  • Travel & Food
  • At the Smithsonian
  • Photos
  • Videos
  • Games
  • Shop
  • Human Behavior
  • Mind & Body
  • Our Planet
  • Technology
  • Space
  • Wildlife
  • Art Meets Science
  • Science & Nature

Monumental Shift

Tackling an ages-old puzzle, a French architect offers a new theory on how the Egyptians built the Great Pyramid at Giza

| | | Reddit | Digg | Stumble | Email |
  • By Diana Parsell
  • Smithsonian.com, August 01, 2007, Subscribe
View More Photos »
How exactly was the Great Pyramid built
How exactly was the Great Pyramid built? Inside-out, thinks architect Jean-Pierre Houdin. (Courtesy of Virtools)

Photo Gallery (1/4)

Explore more photos from the story

More from Smithsonian.com

  • Decoding Ancient Egypt's Alphabet
  • Digging up Egypt's Treasures
  • Unearthing Egypt's Greatest Temple
  • Romancing the Stone
  • Symbolically Speaking
  • The Mystery of Bosnia's Ancient Pyramids

(Page 2 of 2)

External ramps figure in many previous theories of pyramid-building. One favors the use of a straight frontal ramp extending from the base to the summit; alternative approaches involve external ramps that zigzag up the triangular faces of a pyramid or spiral around the sides like a corkscrew. But all these theories have drawbacks, according to Bob Brier, an archaeologist at Long Island University who described Houdin's theory in the May/June issue of Archaeology.

A straight frontal ramp would require too much stone and labor if built to the full height of a pyramid, he explains. To maintain a manageable grade of 6 to 8 percent for the incline—the maximum slope of modern highways—such a ramp would have to extend a mile or more. Ramps surrounding a pyramid might block sight lines the builders needed to ensure their measurements were accurate, or be prone to collapsing.

Brier thinks Houdin has made a compelling case in his engineering analysis. "It's a radical idea, because of the ramp being internal, but it's possible, and it's worthy of being tested," Brier says. "It's not a perfect theory, but I think it's the most interesting archaeological theory we've had in a very long time."

Brier says he remains skeptical about whether internal passageways would have allowed the pyramid builders enough room to maneuver heavy stone blocks.

Craig B. Smith, an engineer who wrote How the Great Pyramid Was Built, also has some doubts about the new theory. "It adds an unnecessary degree of complexity, and I think of the ancient Egyptians as practical builders who reduced things to simple, practical approaches," says Smith. "Also, there is no evidence that internal ramps were used in any pyramid built before the Great Pyramid, or after."

Houdin is confident that internal passageways remain inside the Great Pyramid, obscured by outer layers of stones. He plans to test for their presence using non-invasive technologies such as infrared photography, radar, sonar and microgravimetry, which can detect hidden spaces in solid structures by measuring differences in density.

In partnership with archaeologists from around the world, Houdin applied for permission to do an on-site survey. He expects to get the go-ahead from Egyptian authorities in the next year or two.

Houdin has presented his theory to Zahi Hawass, secretary general of Egypt's Supreme Council on Antiquities. In the foreword to a recent book by Houdin, Khufu: The Secrets Behind the Building of the Great Pyramid, Zawass calls the work "an interesting, potentially promising, new line of investigation."

Diana Parsell is a writer and editor in Falls Church, Virginia.


In 1999, Henri Houdin, a retired French civil engineer, was watching a television documentary on the construction of Egypt's ancient pyramids. He had supervised many dam and bridge projects, and much of what he saw on the show struck him as impractical. "It was the usual pyramid-building theories, but he wasn't satisfied as an engineer," says his son, Jean-Pierre, an independent architect. "He had a sparkle in the brain. 'If I had to build one now, I would do it from the inside out.' "

Jean-Pierre Houdin realized he could test the feasibility of his father's idea through computer-based 3-D modeling. That's what he set out to do, taking for his model the Great Pyramid at Giza. His inquiry grew into a passionate quest to solve a puzzle that has baffled humankind for ages: how exactly was the Great Pyramid built? Houdin thinks he's figured it out, and that his father was onto something.

The Great Pyramid rose 4,500 years ago on the Giza plateau, just outside Cairo, to house the tomb of the pharaoh Khufu (called Cheops by the Greeks). Covering 13 acres and originally 481 feet high, it survives as the last of the "seven wonders" of the ancient world. Its technical precision amazes modern architects and engineers, especially in light of the available resources. The pyramid's 2.3 million limestone blocks, most weighing more than two tons, were cut and hauled into place without the benefit of wheels, pulleys and iron tools.

After visiting Khufu's pyramid around 450 B.C., the Greek historian Herodotus surmised that 100,000 slaves spent 20 years building it. Many modern Egyptologists view that time frame as reasonable. But the notion that slaves did the work—long a myth of schoolbooks—has been discredited. Researchers now regard Egypt's pyramids as huge public works projects, to which all households in the kingdom provided workers, food and supplies.

Various studies have analyzed logistical movements, labor organization and the use of wooden sledges, ramps, levers and other devices to help explain pyramid construction. Some studies suggest that the work force may have been a fifth or a tenth of Herodotus' estimate. Yet the overall process by which the workers assembled the Great Pyramid remains a mystery.

To make his 3-D models of pyramid construction faithful to methods of the past and prevailing knowledge in the field, Houdin consulted with Egyptologists. Five years into the project, Dassault Systèmes, a French software company that makes 3-D models for cars and airplanes, stepped in to offer support. The company's software engineers spent 5,000 hours helping Houdin compile 3-D computer simulations to verify his ideas.

"The objective was to say, if we had to build the pyramid today using Jean-Paul's theories, would it be possible?" says Mehdi Tayoubi, a creative director at Dassault. "We found it would be."

Houdin announced the results of his study, which has not yet been published in a scientific journal, in March at a press conference in Paris. Members of the audience donned 3-D glasses to follow Houdin "inside" the Great Pyramid as he explained his view of how it was built. (His father, now 84, attended the event.)

As Houdin sees it, the process worked like this: First, workers used a conventional straight ramp to haul and assemble the large stone blocks for the pyramid's base layers, up to 141 feet; at that level, nearly three-fourths of the structure's total volume would be complete. That took about ten years. Next came construction of the interior King's Chamber—a separate engineering challenge because its ceiling incorporated granite beams weighing up to 60 tons each.

In the final stage, Houdin contends, the builders reached the steep upper layers of the pyramid by means of spiraling internal ramps, or tunnels. Stone blocks from the external ramp, he believes, were cut smaller to fill the top spaces. "At the end you have no waste," he says. "That's why we never found any remains at the site."

External ramps figure in many previous theories of pyramid-building. One favors the use of a straight frontal ramp extending from the base to the summit; alternative approaches involve external ramps that zigzag up the triangular faces of a pyramid or spiral around the sides like a corkscrew. But all these theories have drawbacks, according to Bob Brier, an archaeologist at Long Island University who described Houdin's theory in the May/June issue of Archaeology.

A straight frontal ramp would require too much stone and labor if built to the full height of a pyramid, he explains. To maintain a manageable grade of 6 to 8 percent for the incline—the maximum slope of modern highways—such a ramp would have to extend a mile or more. Ramps surrounding a pyramid might block sight lines the builders needed to ensure their measurements were accurate, or be prone to collapsing.

Brier thinks Houdin has made a compelling case in his engineering analysis. "It's a radical idea, because of the ramp being internal, but it's possible, and it's worthy of being tested," Brier says. "It's not a perfect theory, but I think it's the most interesting archaeological theory we've had in a very long time."

Brier says he remains skeptical about whether internal passageways would have allowed the pyramid builders enough room to maneuver heavy stone blocks.

Craig B. Smith, an engineer who wrote How the Great Pyramid Was Built, also has some doubts about the new theory. "It adds an unnecessary degree of complexity, and I think of the ancient Egyptians as practical builders who reduced things to simple, practical approaches," says Smith. "Also, there is no evidence that internal ramps were used in any pyramid built before the Great Pyramid, or after."

Houdin is confident that internal passageways remain inside the Great Pyramid, obscured by outer layers of stones. He plans to test for their presence using non-invasive technologies such as infrared photography, radar, sonar and microgravimetry, which can detect hidden spaces in solid structures by measuring differences in density.

In partnership with archaeologists from around the world, Houdin applied for permission to do an on-site survey. He expects to get the go-ahead from Egyptian authorities in the next year or two.

Houdin has presented his theory to Zahi Hawass, secretary general of Egypt's Supreme Council on Antiquities. In the foreword to a recent book by Houdin, Khufu: The Secrets Behind the Building of the Great Pyramid, Zawass calls the work "an interesting, potentially promising, new line of investigation."

Diana Parsell is a writer and editor in Falls Church, Virginia.


Single Page « Previous 1 2

    Subscribe now for more of Smithsonian's coverage on history, science and nature.


Related topics: Architecture Old Kingdom Historic and Cultural Monuments


| | | Reddit | Digg | Stumble | Email |
 

Add New Comment


Name: (required)

Email: (required)

Comment:

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until Smithsonian.com has approved them. Smithsonian reserves the right not to post any comments that are unlawful, threatening, offensive, defamatory, invasive of a person's privacy, inappropriate, confidential or proprietary, political messages, product endorsements, or other content that might otherwise violate any laws or policies.

Comments (15)

Diana, I have a great admiration for mr. Houdin, but his system is very sophisticated. There is another and more simple investigation, very interesting to know. See next link: http://www.scribd.com/doc/101327184/The-Great-Pyramid-built-with-Rolling-Stones Kind regards, Henk Koens

Posted by Henk Koens on March 12,2013 | 05:18 PM

So weren't the workers provided by the households slaves of the households? Just because the wealthy families were forced by the pharaohs to contribute with slaves for the building of their pyramids, doesn't mean they weren't constructed by slaves.

Posted by livinginstone on October 19,2012 | 01:56 AM

interesting, take. should be totally provable or disprovable, with ground (pyramid) piercing radar :-) the math behind being spiraling around an almost square ramp, should be way beyond a civilization that didn't even have curved arches. it would show that the egyptians were far more advanced in their mathematics of the time, then we thought.

Posted by charles kafka on April 4,2012 | 08:40 PM

Anyone interested in the subject at hand would do themselves a great favor by examination of the books "Secrets of the Great Pyramid" , "The Magic of Obelisks" , and "Mysteries of the Mexican Pyramids" by Peter Tompkins. I mention two ideas of note: 1) whatever was originally intended, a project needing years or generations to complete can have its purposes and goals augmented or even revised, possibly just to keep everyone working, and 2) that historian, Herodotus, who first named the object was a Greek. Translation from Greek for "pyre" "amid" is "fire" "in the center of" .

Posted by John Aikman on March 23,2012 | 04:34 AM

I believe that Ezekiel's "wheels within wheels" and his vision refers to the real event circa 2500 BC of Giza Pyramid building using ancient Egyptian four-lobed pinion-pulleys to raise the Pyramid blocks.
Fully explained at www.haitheory.com
or Google four-lobed pinion-pulley.

Posted by Paul Hai on December 18,2011 | 08:32 AM

The great pyramids could not have been built 4500years back. It must have been built 12500 years back , to pass on message to future humans by the then existing advanced civilisation. That was when temperature rose by 16degrees in 50 years and all technical civilisations were wiped out by the repeated tsunamic inundashons. As it is due to lingering ice age developed settlements were near the sea shores. The tunnel in the north face was exactly pointing at Vega , which was the pole star at that time. The egyptians only repaired the pyramids. Even that would be a herculian task for them.

Posted by PRADEEP GOSWAMI on October 7,2010 | 10:31 AM

How about this as a solution. Construction of the pyramid started on the peak of a hill. The first block was put in place first. Then, earth or rock underneath the first block was dug out to make a cavity underneath each end of the block but with enough earth/rock left in the middle underneath the block to suppport it. Two further blocks were then inserted in these cavities and the earth/rock that had been left in the middle to support the first block was removed as the first block was now supported by the two blocks inserted under each end of it. The principle was then continued until the pyramid was completed. Hence the VALLEY of the kings; "valley" because they built the pyramids downwards and not upwards. Any good?

Posted by Sean McLaughlin on February 27,2010 | 05:10 AM

Rampless Egyptian Pyramid construction has a definite AUSTRALIAN connection.

Captain Matthew Flinders navigated and mapped Australia’s coastline. His grandson became Professor Sir William Matthew Flinders Petrie who excavated ancient Egyptian artifacts. In 1895 as an employee of the Egypt Exploration Fund (now Society) of London he was excavating artifacts at Deir el-Bahari and found a cache of ancient building equipment buried for preservation in a hewn out rock pit during Pharaonic times.

One of the wooden items is stated as being of “unidentified use” and has been named the “Petrie rocker” by Egyptologists.

Petrie considered the “rocker” was used to raise Pyramid blocks with a “rocking” motion and in 2006 he has been proven partly correct on the matter of raising Pyramid blocks using “rockers”.

The “rocker” is a component of an ancient Egyptian pulley which operates with a mechanical advantage of 2.8 and with CLASS 2 lever principle as a wheelbarrow does. (CLASS 2 lever: Pivot – Load – Effort).

The technical term for the “Petrie rocker” is “pinion-pulley lobe quadrant”. Four of these surround a Pyramid block and then the pulley is hoisted causing rotation and positive engagements of pulley lobes with Pyramid steps.

Consider the Pyramid as four RACKS of stone teeth on to which the PINION pulley lobes engage and here is the earliest form of RACK & PINION mechanics that we know of.

This is the ancient method of Pyramid construction as used on at least four large Pyramids: Sneferu’s RED Pyramid and those at Giza of Khufu, Khafre and Menkaure.

This ancient method of construction DOES NOT REQUIRE RAMPS and uses the Pyramid under construction (using all four sides simultaneously) to complete the Pyramid, thus using a Pyramid to build a Pyramid.

Petrie died in Jerusalem in 1942 unknowing that “Petrie rockers” are components of an ancient pulley, unlike any pulley in the modern world, and his most important excavation.

Posted by Paul Hai on December 26,2009 | 06:18 AM

A Google search for "Egyptian pyramid construction" and "Egyptian pyramid ramps" displays my web page as number one on page one. It is the only web page that describes the use of movable wooden ramps. My web page also points out the absurdity of the mud rubble ramp theory postulated in almost all the other web pages. Perhaps you can tell my why it is totally ignored by your page and all the others when it is so widely viewed.

Posted by Frank Steiger on October 9,2009 | 01:38 AM

The Cheops pyramid was designed by skilled architects, and the construction was supervised by very skilled Engineers. The very moment that the Cheops pyramid was completed, with all its fittings and precision surfaces in place, was the only time that this Instrument was ready for use, for the purpose to which it was designed. The outer casings were precision ground to optical tolerances. The so called “ventilation shafts” measured 8.2 inches square, the same dimensions as the wave length Of galactic Hydrogen ( 1,420 MHz), There was no metal used in their construction because a more efficient method was used ,. Namely a UHF plasma beam. Using one side of the pyramid, fitted with a small hyperbolic reflector, would convert this paraboloid surface Into a very high gain UHF antenna. Few people are interested in the original purpose of this instrument. The outer casings are seldom referred to. Of course the shafts ( wave guides) were closed up, which is the most intelligent thing one can do, when not using the shafts, particularly if you want to avoid filling the interior of the pyramid with water from the rain . All we have left now is a huge pile of stones, it is no longer a purpose built pyramid. B .Sallur

Posted by Brian Sallur on January 19,2009 | 07:49 AM

Canto's Pyramid Sides As Ramps Theory of Construction... Henry Houdin was partially correct. The internal ramp was used to haul up sand and small stones as well as equipment by workers. My theory contends that the Egyptians used the SIDES OF THE PYRAMID AS RAMPS from launch points on a base ramp. The building stones were placed on sleds that were pulled straight up the side of the pyramid using vessels as counter weights on the opposite that were filled with sand and small stone. Winches were used at the top to guide ropes and tracks in core stones guided the sleds. Once the building stones reached the top, the sand and stone were emptied out the bottom of the vessels. This method was duplicated all along the side of the pyramid which accounts for the speed of construction. The outer casing stones were cut and polished in the quarry and put in place first and then the core stones were put into place as needed and cut to size on the spot to fit. My theory does not require massive construction of external ramps, complicated pulleys/lever mechanisms, nor extra terrestrials. It uses simplicity and the resources of the time. I can email a pdf diagram for further illustration. canto_lee@hotmail.com

Posted by Canto Lee on December 2,2008 | 06:03 PM

The Pyramids were made by Telekinesis by the Sirians from Sirius, you will find the answers you seek in The Pleiadian Agenda. Peace. Love and Light. B

Posted by Brett Berg on June 10,2008 | 01:56 PM

May I request that the Smithsonian update their websites concerning ancient Egyptian Pyramid construction theories by including the new discovery and Australian rampless theory of 27 August 2006. The new work is carried within a 121 page book. http://nla.gov.au/anbd.bib-an41968130 The National Libraries Australia link.

Posted by Paul Hai on June 10,2008 | 03:45 AM

Thank you for allowing me to comment on the new theory of internal ramps. I was very surprised when Archaeology magazine seemed to come out in favor of Houdin's theory lot stock and barrel. How do the experts at the Smithsonian feel about it. To me, it is the most fascinating thing I've heard about in years. I've e-mailed Houdin, but is there anyone else who has an opinion on the matter who I might contact? Fascinated but still skeptical James Webster Auburn, Ala.

Posted by James Webster on June 9,2008 | 04:27 PM



Advertisement


Most Popular

  • Viewed
  • Emailed
  • Commented
  1. The Scariest Monsters of the Deep Sea
  2. 16 Photographs That Capture the Best and Worst of 1970s America
  3. The Ten Most Disturbing Scientific Discoveries
  4. Microbes: The Trillions of Creatures Governing Your Health

  5. Ten Inventions Inspired by Science Fiction
  6. Jack Andraka, the Teen Prodigy of Pancreatic Cancer
  7. What is Causing Iran’s Spike in MS Cases?

  8. How Titanoboa, the 40-Foot-Long Snake, Was Found
  9. The Pros to Being a Psychopath
  10. Photos of the World’s Oldest Living Things
  1. Why Procrastination is Good for You
  2. Microbes: The Trillions of Creatures Governing Your Health

  1. Life on Mars?
  2. What the Discovery of Hundreds of New Planets Means for Astronomy—and Philosophy
  3. Barrow, Alaska: Ground Zero for Climate Change
  4. The Fight to Save the Tiger
  5. Gem Gawking
  6. The Great Midwest Earthquake of 1811
  7. On the Case
  8. Why Procrastination is Good for You
  9. The Ten Most Disturbing Scientific Discoveries
  10. Fantastic Photos of our Solar System

View All Most Popular »

Advertisement

Follow Us

Smithsonian Magazine
@SmithsonianMag
Follow Smithsonian Magazine on Twitter

Sign up for regular email updates from Smithsonian.com, including daily newsletters and special offers.

In The Magazine

May 2013

  • Patriot Games
  • The Next Revolution
  • Blowing Up The Art World
  • The Body Eclectic
  • Microbe Hunters

View Table of Contents »






First Name
Last Name
Address 1
Address 2
City
State   Zip
Email


Travel with Smithsonian




Smithsonian Store

Stars and Stripes Throw

Our exclusive Stars and Stripes Throw is a three-layer adaption of the 1861 “Stars and Stripes” quilt... $65



View full archiveRecent Issues


  • May 2013


  • Apr 2013


  • Mar 2013

Newsletter

Sign up for regular email updates from Smithsonian magazine, including free newsletters, special offers and current news updates.

Subscribe Now

About Us

Smithsonian.com expands on Smithsonian magazine's in-depth coverage of history, science, nature, the arts, travel, world culture and technology. Join us regularly as we take a dynamic and interactive approach to exploring modern and historic perspectives on the arts, sciences, nature, world culture and travel, including videos, blogs and a reader forum.

Explore our Brands

  • goSmithsonian.com
  • Smithsonian Air & Space Museum
  • Smithsonian Student Travel
  • Smithsonian Catalogue
  • Smithsonian Journeys
  • Smithsonian Channel
  • About Smithsonian
  • Contact Us
  • Advertising
  • Subscribe
  • RSS
  • Topics
  • Member Services
  • Copyright
  • Site Map
  • Privacy Policy
  • Ad Choices

Smithsonian Institution