What Makes a Planet?

Why our solar system just shrank.

  • By Robert Irion
  • Smithsonian magazine, October 2006, Subscribe
 

As just about everyone in the solar system knows by now, members of the International Astronomical Union, meeting in Prague, Czech Republic, in August, came up with a new definition of planets that leaves Pluto out in the cold.

The problem was that the term "planet" had no firm definition, just as in geology, "continent" remains a somewhat arbitrary concept. (Europe and Asia form a continuous landmass, yet they are separate continents.) Size alone doesn't bestow planethood. Moons of Jupiter and Saturn are wider than Mercury, and Pluto is smaller than Earth's moon. For years, astronomers tried to define a planet by shape, orbit around a star and its influence on other bodies. But they couldn't agree.

In 2000, an exhibit at the American Museum of Natural History in New York City downgraded Pluto to merely the largest object in the Kuiper Belt, a vast swarm of icy bodies beyond Neptune. The resulting uproar over the demotion made it clear that Earthlings loved our familiar family of nine planets. Some astronomers noted that the controversy would really take off if more sensitive telescopes started to spot objects larger than Pluto. What would we call them?

That very quandary presented itself late last year when a team led by Michael Brown of the California Institute of Technology in Pasadena examined an object in the Kuiper Belt called 2003 UB313, informally known as Xena. Analysis revealed that Xena—more than twice as far from the sun as Pluto—is about 1,500 miles in diameter, compared with Pluto's 1,430 miles. And solar system experts predict that surveys will reveal Xena's even bigger siblings in distant orbits. "It's absurd that dozens of Pluto-size objects should all be planets," said planet-hunter Geoff Marcy of the University of California at Berkeley. "It demotes them all by sheer numbers."

Many astronomers argued that a planet should have sufficient gravity to sweep up or expel the debris in its orbit, clearing its own path around its star. The eight main planets have largely done so, but not Pluto or Xena. Ultimately, that was the key factor in Prague. "It is scientifically the right thing to do," Brown said after the vote, gracefully giving up the right to call Xena—his team’s discovery—the tenth planet.

Still, some researchers think the orbit-clearing rule is too fuzzy. (For example, Neptune hasn't purged its orbit of large bodies—including Pluto, which crosses Neptune's path.) "It's a sloppy definition," says Alan Stern of the Southwest Research Institute in Boulder, Colorado, director of NASA's New Horizons mission. "It's bad science. It ain't over." He and others intend to fight for a new definition; they're organizing a conference to that end for this winter.

Pluto will always be special. We'll see it up close when the New Horizons spacecraft, launched in January, flies past it in 2015. But Pluto is almost certainly one of scores or even hundreds of impressively sized icy bodies in the Kuiper Belt. So, like Xena and Ceres, the largest asteroid in a band between Mars and Jupiter, it is now classified as a "dwarf planet." It’s cruel logic, perhaps, but it makes sense.


As just about everyone in the solar system knows by now, members of the International Astronomical Union, meeting in Prague, Czech Republic, in August, came up with a new definition of planets that leaves Pluto out in the cold.

The problem was that the term "planet" had no firm definition, just as in geology, "continent" remains a somewhat arbitrary concept. (Europe and Asia form a continuous landmass, yet they are separate continents.) Size alone doesn't bestow planethood. Moons of Jupiter and Saturn are wider than Mercury, and Pluto is smaller than Earth's moon. For years, astronomers tried to define a planet by shape, orbit around a star and its influence on other bodies. But they couldn't agree.

In 2000, an exhibit at the American Museum of Natural History in New York City downgraded Pluto to merely the largest object in the Kuiper Belt, a vast swarm of icy bodies beyond Neptune. The resulting uproar over the demotion made it clear that Earthlings loved our familiar family of nine planets. Some astronomers noted that the controversy would really take off if more sensitive telescopes started to spot objects larger than Pluto. What would we call them?

That very quandary presented itself late last year when a team led by Michael Brown of the California Institute of Technology in Pasadena examined an object in the Kuiper Belt called 2003 UB313, informally known as Xena. Analysis revealed that Xena—more than twice as far from the sun as Pluto—is about 1,500 miles in diameter, compared with Pluto's 1,430 miles. And solar system experts predict that surveys will reveal Xena's even bigger siblings in distant orbits. "It's absurd that dozens of Pluto-size objects should all be planets," said planet-hunter Geoff Marcy of the University of California at Berkeley. "It demotes them all by sheer numbers."

Many astronomers argued that a planet should have sufficient gravity to sweep up or expel the debris in its orbit, clearing its own path around its star. The eight main planets have largely done so, but not Pluto or Xena. Ultimately, that was the key factor in Prague. "It is scientifically the right thing to do," Brown said after the vote, gracefully giving up the right to call Xena—his team’s discovery—the tenth planet.

Still, some researchers think the orbit-clearing rule is too fuzzy. (For example, Neptune hasn't purged its orbit of large bodies—including Pluto, which crosses Neptune's path.) "It's a sloppy definition," says Alan Stern of the Southwest Research Institute in Boulder, Colorado, director of NASA's New Horizons mission. "It's bad science. It ain't over." He and others intend to fight for a new definition; they're organizing a conference to that end for this winter.

Pluto will always be special. We'll see it up close when the New Horizons spacecraft, launched in January, flies past it in 2015. But Pluto is almost certainly one of scores or even hundreds of impressively sized icy bodies in the Kuiper Belt. So, like Xena and Ceres, the largest asteroid in a band between Mars and Jupiter, it is now classified as a "dwarf planet." It’s cruel logic, perhaps, but it makes sense.

    Subscribe now for more of Smithsonian's coverage on history, science and nature.



 

Add New Comment


Name: (required)

Email: (required)

Comment:

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until Smithsonian.com has approved them. Smithsonian reserves the right not to post any comments that are unlawful, threatening, offensive, defamatory, invasive of a person's privacy, inappropriate, confidential or proprietary, political messages, product endorsements, or other content that might otherwise violate any laws or policies.

Comments (16)

+ View All Comments

pretty cool

Posted by amani on April 25,2013 | 11:59 AM

i liked what i learned

Posted by on February 25,2013 | 10:18 AM

i love what i learned on hear now i can learn mre about sience

Posted by katelyn on April 30,2012 | 07:11 PM

Thank you very much this clears a lot up. I'm currently working on a science report on weather Pluto is considered a planet or not. Thank yo so much, this has really helped.

Posted by Katelyn Olsen on March 25,2011 | 05:21 PM

I think that it's interesting that they say that Pluto isn't a planet now even though they could have said it a LONG time ago. But is sort of makes since that it is a dwarf planet because I read that it's smaller then the moon!!!!!!!!!!!!! I mean if that qualifies then the Earth made a small minature planet that won't leave us alone! :)But this is a good arcticle because I'm doing a science prodject on what makes a planet a planet and I really do wonder if it really wasn't a planet at all then how come it took them this LONG to figure that out???????? But did you hear that they found two new planets??????? I wonder if they'll call them dwarf planets too!!!! But I heard that one is made INTIRALY of DIAMONDS!!!! And the other one is REALLY HOT!!!!!!!!!!!

Posted by H!$ on January 18,2011 | 06:30 PM

Very Helpful. Thank you. (: I'm currently working on a science project and still not understanding, if Pluto is out of the line for crossing paths why is Neptune still a planet? It crosses paths with Pluto.

Posted by Cassie on November 5,2010 | 09:12 AM

it was very helpful and i learned alot

Posted by Cyle Smith on May 17,2010 | 01:39 PM

I just wrote an essay on this article comparing it to a letter written by a planetarium. I must say I like this article more, though I wish it would have been longer. A+. :)

Posted by Dustyn on April 7,2010 | 06:50 PM

I like to believe that, no matter who tries to prove it wrong, Pluto is a planet! and it qualifies!

Posted by Kate on March 18,2010 | 03:55 PM

so what are the criterias that scientist use to determine if it is a planet?

Posted by Kaylie on December 4,2009 | 04:00 PM

can u please name what makes a planet a planet? like how it has to be in space to be a planet and it has to have a moon and things like that.

Posted by Spacey on November 9,2009 | 07:49 PM

this web site was extreamly helpful for a scienc paper i had to do for my high school science class it gave me a better knowing on my topic thanks :-)

Posted by kaylee binion on April 22,2009 | 03:14 PM

If it's half the size or mass of our moon, it should qualify! I don't care if Pluto and the objects past it are planets or dwarf planets, just don't change it that so Ceres is considered a planet. We'd have to renumber the planets past 4!

Posted by Mike Redcock on March 6,2009 | 11:19 PM

And Mercury should be the limiting standard for how small a planet can be before being classified as a dwarf.

Posted by Max on February 16,2009 | 11:02 AM



Advertisement


Advertisement

Follow Us





First Name
Last Name
Address 1
Address 2
City
State   Zip
Email


Travel with Smithsonian




Smithsonian Store