The Return of the Phage
As deadly bacteria increasingly resist antibiotics, researchers try to improve a World War I era weapon
- By Julie Wakefield
- Smithsonian magazine, October 2000, Subscribe
(Page 2 of 3)
Early on, phages held much promise in conquering many of the world’s scourges. D’Herelle went on to set up an institute with microbiologist George Eliava in Tbilisi, the capital of Georgia. There, they harvested phages from the nearby Kura River for culturing. Though D’Herelle left during the Stalinist era and Eliava was executed, the Eliava Institute of Bacteriophage, Microbiology, and Virology flourished. In the late 1930s, it churned out phages by the ton. Patients threw back their heads and swallowed a solution of the phages. Several major U.S. pharmaceutical companies — Eli Lilly, for one — entered the field.
But the advent of sulfa drugs and antibiotics in the 1940s relegated phages to the backseat — at least in Western countries. While phages frequently and inexplicably failed, antibiotics, it seemed, were fail-safe. Physicians preferred the new class of drugs because they were relatively easy to use, killed a broad spectrum of bacterial infections and didn’t pose the risk living organisms do.
Later on, because of their structural and genetic simplicity and ease of growth in the lab, Western researchers tapped bacteriophages as model systems to study the molecular basis of genetics, spawning the science of molecular biology. The lab techniques that made the revolution possible were largely advanced through research on phages and their bacterial hosts.
“If you look at the early Nobel Prizes in molecular biology, half of the awards went to researchers using phages,” NIMH’s Merril says. The work also helped researchers understand the shortcomings of phage therapy of the past. Some of the preparations were contaminated. On top of that, early researchers didn’t realize that each phage type is highly specific for a given bacteria species, more finicky than Morris the cat.
Back in the Baltimore lab, Chighladze painstakingly isolates phages from harbor water by culturing them with sundry strains of bacteria. Modern technology can decipher which type of phage kills which type of bacteria. For a broad spectrum assault, purified phages can then be combined in cocktails.
Over time, bacteria naturally develop resistance to phages, as they do to antibiotic drugs. Drug resistance, however, has been accelerated by global misuse of antibiotics. Phages, in contrast, can adapt to keep up with the bacteria, matching their prey mutation for mutation. “It’s a biological arms race,” explains Sulakvelidze, a former Georgian lab director who worked extensively with the Eliava Institute. Back in Tbilisi, phages never fell out of fashion. They’ve been in use in humans for 70 years with claims of miraculous results. Phages offer other advantages over antibiotics. For starters, they don’t harm benevolent bacteria living in symbiosis with human hosts. But even with such positive traits, phages do have their downside.
Rather than kill bacteria, some phages make them even more lethal. This happens, for example, with the bacterium that causes cholera.
In the mid-1980s interest in the West was renewed when British and Polish researchers studied phage success against microbes in animals. But burgeoning cases of antibiotic-resistant bacterial infections really prompted the surge in Western research.
Single Page « Previous 1 2 3 Next »
Subscribe now for more of Smithsonian's coverage on history, science and nature.









Comments (1)
Many thanks for including the article about bacteriophages. As someone with extensive allergic reactions to every antibiotic ever prescribed, I can look to this as a "possibly someday solution" to my problem.
Posted by Lynne Reynolds on July 20,2008 | 04:28 PM