A Wildlife Mystery in Vietnam
The discovery of the saola alerted scientists to the strange diversity of Southeast Asia's threatened forests
- By Richard Stone
- Smithsonian magazine, August 2008, Subscribe
(Page 3 of 3)
At Pu Mat, the late morning sun is burning off the mist. With the spry Tuoc leading the way, we clamber up a slick path until we reach Kem Waterfall. Tuoc grabs a handful of broad, dark-green leaves near the entrancing falls. "Saola like to eat these," he says. "At least, we have seen bite marks." These Araceae leaves, I realize with a pang, may be as close as I ever get to a saola. Tuoc, too, has no delusions. "Maybe I'll never see one in the wild," he says.
Richard Stone is the Asia editor for Science magazine. He lives in Beijing.
Subscribe now for more of Smithsonian's coverage on history, science and nature.









Comments (8)
great!!
Posted by erin on May 25,2011 | 03:45 PM
I know I'm commenting over a year after this article was written but I haven't read it before. First, I have to comment on the people talking about who originally discovered the saola. Although I do think it is very important to give credit where credit is due, everyone seems to be focusing on the not so important part of the article. I feel the main point of the article is to let people know why it is imperative to save the rainforests of Southeast Asia. If this animal remained undiscovered for all these years, what other plant and animal species could be hiding in these forests? How many have gone and will go extinct before we ever learn of them? The deforestation of this area is a huge crisis and this article helps people understand why it's so important that we save it.
Posted by Cristalle Olson on December 8,2009 | 03:28 AM
Well you may not have found this mammal till 1969 and 1970.
Posted by Dale Gilliam on October 4,2008 | 07:54 PM
Dale, well put. And the hubris often comes from the foreigner "white" person wanting to claim credit for discovery, when it should be for documentation. These natives appear not to care about documentation in the same way other cultures do, neither is wrong or right. However, it is wrong to claim credit for discovery just b/c you were the first to document something. Indeed, if John MacKinnon was the first to document this species with a scientific name, perhaps he should have found out who the first villager was that knew of the saola, and give that person credit. This, being an almost impossible task, leads us back to the question of who gets credit. In this light, perhaps the onus of this dilemma is on the choice of words used by the reporter of such news. "First to document", may have been a better choice of words in this case. Also mentioning that the villagers, whom have lived with this species for quite some time, are the true "discoverers". This would be an appropriately humble addition for those who are not reading between the lines.
Posted by MG on August 26,2008 | 04:05 PM
There is a one-hundred percent probability the saola was not discovered by those merited in this article. Ten's if not hundred's of thousands of local inhabitants have seen, observed, hunted and known of the saola for just as many years. How does one discover a species that is already known? It's called scientific hubris.
Posted by Dale Remund on August 22,2008 | 04:14 PM
I believe the discovery of the saola is generally credited with John MacKinnon of the WWF, who gave it its scientific name. Touring the area near the border with Laos soon after Vietnam began opening to the West, it was he who spotted a pair of antlers in a villager's home and recognized them as being unknown to science.
Posted by Jeff Wise on August 21,2008 | 05:25 PM
Sherri, The most comprehensive observations of captive saola have been published by William Robichaud (Physical and behavioral description of a captive saola, Pseudoryx nghetinhensis; Journal-of-Mammalogy 1998; 79(2): 394-405). Other published reports rather focused on chromosomal studies in the saola. I am not sure that infectious disease were tested on the captive animal. In any case, it would be really difficult to draw conclusions from a so small number of samples. Thank you for your interest. Pierre Comizzoli
Posted by Pierre Comizzoli on August 13,2008 | 09:41 AM
Hello, My name is Sherri Rosenthal and I had a few questions on the article about the Saola. First I was wanting to know if when the Saola were brought back to where they were being kept in captivity were they able to test for infections? Also what kind of testing were they able to do on the deceased Saola? Could they keep any long enough in captivity to test on a live specimen? Like what kind of diseases or infections is it prone to and if the transportation was too strenuous for it physically as well as mentally? Also is their more scientific data being contemplated as well as being carried out? I just want to let you know I thoroughly enjoyed your article and I look to hearing more about this most intriguing animal and it's life. Please also let me know if you or anyone related to this article can answer any of my questions. Thank You so much for reading this. Sincerely, Sherri Rosenthal
Posted by Sherri Rosenthal on August 5,2008 | 07:09 PM