A Wildlife Mystery in Vietnam
The discovery of the saola alerted scientists to the strange diversity of Southeast Asia's threatened forests
- By Richard Stone
- Smithsonian magazine, August 2008, Subscribe
A landslide has blocked the cliff-hugging road into the Pu Mat National Park in northwestern Vietnam. To go farther, we must abandon our car and wade across a shallow river. My wife, Mutsumi, a photojournalist, and I roll up our jeans to the knee and look uncertainly at our two young boys. Do Tuoc, a 63-year-old forest ecologist, reads our minds. "I'll take the bigger boy," he says, hoisting our 6-year-old onto his shoulders.
Before I can come to my senses and protest, Tuoc plunges into the current, sure-footed, and reaches the opposite bank safely. I wade out with our 3-year-old clinging to my neck. I stumble like a newborn giraffe on the slippery rocks of the riverbed. My jeans are soaked. My son, asphyxiating me, crows with joy. Both boys want to do it again.
I shouldn't have been surprised by Tuoc's nimbleness: he knows this primeval wilderness better, perhaps, than any other scientist. It was near here in 1992 that Tuoc discovered the first large mammal new to science in more than half a century, a curious cousin of cattle called the saola. The sensational debut showed that our planet can still keep a fairly big secret, and it offered a reprieve from the barrage of bad news about the state of the environment.
If only humans had reciprocated and offered the saola a reprieve. A decade after coming to light, the unusual ungulate is skidding toward extinction. Its habitat in Vietnam and Laos is disappearing as human settlements eat into the forest, and it is inadvertently being killed by hunters. Saola appear to be particularly vulnerable to wire snares, introduced in the mid-1990s to snag Asiatic black bears and Malayan sun bears, whose gallbladders are used in traditional Chinese medicine. For the saola, "the situation is desperate," says Barney Long, a World Wildlife Fund conservation biologist, who is working with local scientists to protect forests in central Vietnam inhabited by saola. The Vietnamese government created Pu Mat and nearby Vu Quang national parks in response to the saola discovery, and this past fall designated two more nature reserves in the saola's dwindling range and banned all hunting in critical saola habitat. Neighboring Laos, the only other country in which the saola has been spotted, has pledged similar action. But no one knows whether these eleventh-hour efforts will succeed.
That's because the saola is so rare that not even Tuoc has spied one in the wild. Estimates of their numbers are based on interviews with villagers who have glimpsed the animal, and on trophies. Tuoc, who works for the Forest Inventory and Planning Institute in Hanoi, first beheld a partial saola skull mounted in a hunter's home in Vu Quang. He knew he was seeing something extraordinary. DNA tests confirmed that the saola was a previously unknown species, the first large mammal discovered since the kouprey, a Southeast Asian forest ox identified in 1937. The saola's horns, one to two feet in length and slightly diverging, inspired its name, which means "spinning wheel posts."
Tuoc calls himself "very lucky" to have discovered the saola—and to be alive. Forty years ago, his older brother volunteered in the Vietnam People's Navy, which ran supplies to forces in the south on a sea version of the Ho Chi Minh Trail. His brother's service exempted Tuoc from the military and allowed him to focus on science. With his keen powers of observation, he has discovered two other species in addition to the saola.
The best guess is that a couple of hundred saolas are left in Vietnam, Long says. "Very little is known about the saola. We don't know exactly where it occurs, or how many there are. There's a big question mark surrounding it," says Laos-based William Robichaud, who is leading a working group of the International Union for Conservation of Nature that met in June to draft a strategy for protecting saola. "The last incontrovertible evidence we have—a photograph from a camera trap—was in 1999," says Robichaud.
Since February, Robichaud and his staff have placed about 20 camera traps in Laos' Nakai-Nam Theun National Protected Area—historical saola habitat, according to hunters' sightings. But neither the cameras nor interviews with locals have yielded evidence of saola activity. "Villagers seem unsure if it's still hanging on or not," he says.
Subscribe now for more of Smithsonian's coverage on history, science and nature.









Comments (8)
great!!
Posted by erin on May 25,2011 | 03:45 PM
I know I'm commenting over a year after this article was written but I haven't read it before. First, I have to comment on the people talking about who originally discovered the saola. Although I do think it is very important to give credit where credit is due, everyone seems to be focusing on the not so important part of the article. I feel the main point of the article is to let people know why it is imperative to save the rainforests of Southeast Asia. If this animal remained undiscovered for all these years, what other plant and animal species could be hiding in these forests? How many have gone and will go extinct before we ever learn of them? The deforestation of this area is a huge crisis and this article helps people understand why it's so important that we save it.
Posted by Cristalle Olson on December 8,2009 | 03:28 AM
Well you may not have found this mammal till 1969 and 1970.
Posted by Dale Gilliam on October 4,2008 | 07:54 PM
Dale, well put. And the hubris often comes from the foreigner "white" person wanting to claim credit for discovery, when it should be for documentation. These natives appear not to care about documentation in the same way other cultures do, neither is wrong or right. However, it is wrong to claim credit for discovery just b/c you were the first to document something. Indeed, if John MacKinnon was the first to document this species with a scientific name, perhaps he should have found out who the first villager was that knew of the saola, and give that person credit. This, being an almost impossible task, leads us back to the question of who gets credit. In this light, perhaps the onus of this dilemma is on the choice of words used by the reporter of such news. "First to document", may have been a better choice of words in this case. Also mentioning that the villagers, whom have lived with this species for quite some time, are the true "discoverers". This would be an appropriately humble addition for those who are not reading between the lines.
Posted by MG on August 26,2008 | 04:05 PM
There is a one-hundred percent probability the saola was not discovered by those merited in this article. Ten's if not hundred's of thousands of local inhabitants have seen, observed, hunted and known of the saola for just as many years. How does one discover a species that is already known? It's called scientific hubris.
Posted by Dale Remund on August 22,2008 | 04:14 PM
I believe the discovery of the saola is generally credited with John MacKinnon of the WWF, who gave it its scientific name. Touring the area near the border with Laos soon after Vietnam began opening to the West, it was he who spotted a pair of antlers in a villager's home and recognized them as being unknown to science.
Posted by Jeff Wise on August 21,2008 | 05:25 PM
Sherri, The most comprehensive observations of captive saola have been published by William Robichaud (Physical and behavioral description of a captive saola, Pseudoryx nghetinhensis; Journal-of-Mammalogy 1998; 79(2): 394-405). Other published reports rather focused on chromosomal studies in the saola. I am not sure that infectious disease were tested on the captive animal. In any case, it would be really difficult to draw conclusions from a so small number of samples. Thank you for your interest. Pierre Comizzoli
Posted by Pierre Comizzoli on August 13,2008 | 09:41 AM
Hello, My name is Sherri Rosenthal and I had a few questions on the article about the Saola. First I was wanting to know if when the Saola were brought back to where they were being kept in captivity were they able to test for infections? Also what kind of testing were they able to do on the deceased Saola? Could they keep any long enough in captivity to test on a live specimen? Like what kind of diseases or infections is it prone to and if the transportation was too strenuous for it physically as well as mentally? Also is their more scientific data being contemplated as well as being carried out? I just want to let you know I thoroughly enjoyed your article and I look to hearing more about this most intriguing animal and it's life. Please also let me know if you or anyone related to this article can answer any of my questions. Thank You so much for reading this. Sincerely, Sherri Rosenthal
Posted by Sherri Rosenthal on August 5,2008 | 07:09 PM