Content ID:
Field:


  • About Smithsonian
  • Email Updates
  • Member Services
  • Shop
  • Archive
Smithsonian.com
  • Smithsonian Institution
  • Smithsonian Channel
  • goSmithsonian
  • Air & Space magazine
  • Home
  • History & Archaeology
  • People & Places
  • Science & Nature
  • Arts & Culture
  • Travel
  • Photos & Videos
  • Games & Puzzles
  • Subscribe
  • Anthropology & Behavior
  • Dinosaurs
  • Environment
  • Technology & Space
  • Wildlife
In a recent study, malaria-resistant mosquitoes —tipped off by their neon green eyes—faired better than typical wild insects after feeding on infected blood. In a recent study, malaria-resistant mosquitoes —tipped off by their neon green eyes—faired better than typical wild insects after feeding on infected blood.

Courtesy of Johns Hopkins University

  • Science & Nature

Can Mosquitoes Fight Malaria?

Scientists can build a mosquito that resists infection, but getting the insects to pass along the gene is a harder task

  • By Eric Jaffe
  • Smithsonian.com, June 01, 2007

Article Tools

  • Font
  • Share/Save/Bookmark Share
  • Email
  • Print
  • Digg Digg
  • Comments
  • StumbleUpon StumbleUpon
  • RSS
  • Reddit Reddit

    Related Topics

    Treatment

    More from Smithsonian.com
    • The Fatal Consequences of Counterfeit Drugs

    We may not have flying cars, and our shower curtains inevitably turn moldy after several months, but, to their credit, scientists can engineer a mosquito resistant to Plasmodium, the pathogen that causes malaria in people. Molecular biologists now can manufacture a gene that blocks the infection from fully forming, and inject it into a batch of mosquito eggs. To track the gene's success over generations, the researchers include a marker that, when active, gives each altered offspring a bulging pair of neon green eyes.

    The idea behind these tiny green lights was that they might help researchers control the disease that kills more than a million people a year—particularly in impoverished nations. This notion gained strength a few years ago, when a group of researchers found that mosquitoes carrying Plasmodium laid fewer eggs and lived shorter lives than those that buzzed about infection free. It stood to reason, then, that genetically altered insects—called "transgenic" mosquitoes—would, in the long-run, fair better than their wild cousins.

    Inside labs around the world, however, this logic did not always hold true. Scientists filled cages half with wild and half with transgenic mosquitoes. Several life cycles later, they censused the insect population and found that, at best, the cages remained half-filled with green eyes. More often, the wild eyes had it.

    Recently, a group of researchers at Johns Hopkins University tried again—with a twist. Instead of feeding the mosquitoes regular blood, as the previous experiments had, the Hopkins group fed the insects blood infected with Plasmodium. "Indeed, as generations passed, the proportion of transgenic mosquitoes increased," says Marcelo Jacobs-Lorena, a co-author of the study, which appeared in the Mar. 19 Proceedings of the National Academy of Science. After nine generations, some 70 percent of the population flashed those glowing greens. "Under these conditions," he says, "they were fitter."

    Among infectious disease researchers, such a finding would seem packed with promise. "The first reaction is, well, here you go," says Jacobs-Lorena. But the excitement is tempered by several reservations. The first is whether the work could translate to human blood (in the experiment, the mosquitoes fed on infected mice). Jacobs-Lorena believes it would, but even so, releasing genetically altered insects into the wild could also let loose a furious ethical debate.

    A more immediate problem exists, however. In wild populations, only 10 to 20 percent of mosquitoes transmit the disease, says parasitologist Hilary Hurd of Keele University, in England, who was not affiliated with the study. Sure, green eyes become the norm in populations that begin with an even roster of altered mosquitoes. But, when outnumbered greatly, could enough malaria-resistant mosquitoes pass on their genes to make a difference? "I am doubtful," says Hurd, a skepticism echoed by Jacobs-Lorena.

    It would help matters if some force could drive the desired gene through the population. "That's the biggest remaining burden," says Jacobs-Lorena, "to find this so-called 'drive mechanism.'" Relief for this burden could be getting closer—despite coming from a lab across the country studying not mosquitoes but fruit flies. A group of researchers in California has found a way to make certain genes spray through a population at a rate greater than chance.

    Put generally, the highly technical method "uses some trick to cause the death of a chromosome that doesn't carry the element"—in this case, the malaria-resistant gene—says Bruce A. Hay of the California Institute of Technology, who co-authored the study published in the Apr. 27 Science. The researchers call this trickster chromosome Medea, named for Euripides' tragic heroine who killed her own children to spite the husband who abandoned her. When Hay and his colleagues infused some fruit flies with Medea and put them in a cage with unaltered flies, every insect showed signs of the element within 10 or 11 generations. "The average fitness of wild type chromosomes goes down whenever Medea is in the population," he says.

    We may not have flying cars, and our shower curtains inevitably turn moldy after several months, but, to their credit, scientists can engineer a mosquito resistant to Plasmodium, the pathogen that causes malaria in people. Molecular biologists now can manufacture a gene that blocks the infection from fully forming, and inject it into a batch of mosquito eggs. To track the gene's success over generations, the researchers include a marker that, when active, gives each altered offspring a bulging pair of neon green eyes.

    The idea behind these tiny green lights was that they might help researchers control the disease that kills more than a million people a year—particularly in impoverished nations. This notion gained strength a few years ago, when a group of researchers found that mosquitoes carrying Plasmodium laid fewer eggs and lived shorter lives than those that buzzed about infection free. It stood to reason, then, that genetically altered insects—called "transgenic" mosquitoes—would, in the long-run, fair better than their wild cousins.

    Inside labs around the world, however, this logic did not always hold true. Scientists filled cages half with wild and half with transgenic mosquitoes. Several life cycles later, they censused the insect population and found that, at best, the cages remained half-filled with green eyes. More often, the wild eyes had it.

    Recently, a group of researchers at Johns Hopkins University tried again—with a twist. Instead of feeding the mosquitoes regular blood, as the previous experiments had, the Hopkins group fed the insects blood infected with Plasmodium. "Indeed, as generations passed, the proportion of transgenic mosquitoes increased," says Marcelo Jacobs-Lorena, a co-author of the study, which appeared in the Mar. 19 Proceedings of the National Academy of Science. After nine generations, some 70 percent of the population flashed those glowing greens. "Under these conditions," he says, "they were fitter."

    Among infectious disease researchers, such a finding would seem packed with promise. "The first reaction is, well, here you go," says Jacobs-Lorena. But the excitement is tempered by several reservations. The first is whether the work could translate to human blood (in the experiment, the mosquitoes fed on infected mice). Jacobs-Lorena believes it would, but even so, releasing genetically altered insects into the wild could also let loose a furious ethical debate.

    A more immediate problem exists, however. In wild populations, only 10 to 20 percent of mosquitoes transmit the disease, says parasitologist Hilary Hurd of Keele University, in England, who was not affiliated with the study. Sure, green eyes become the norm in populations that begin with an even roster of altered mosquitoes. But, when outnumbered greatly, could enough malaria-resistant mosquitoes pass on their genes to make a difference? "I am doubtful," says Hurd, a skepticism echoed by Jacobs-Lorena.

    It would help matters if some force could drive the desired gene through the population. "That's the biggest remaining burden," says Jacobs-Lorena, "to find this so-called 'drive mechanism.'" Relief for this burden could be getting closer—despite coming from a lab across the country studying not mosquitoes but fruit flies. A group of researchers in California has found a way to make certain genes spray through a population at a rate greater than chance.

    Put generally, the highly technical method "uses some trick to cause the death of a chromosome that doesn't carry the element"—in this case, the malaria-resistant gene—says Bruce A. Hay of the California Institute of Technology, who co-authored the study published in the Apr. 27 Science. The researchers call this trickster chromosome Medea, named for Euripides' tragic heroine who killed her own children to spite the husband who abandoned her. When Hay and his colleagues infused some fruit flies with Medea and put them in a cage with unaltered flies, every insect showed signs of the element within 10 or 11 generations. "The average fitness of wild type chromosomes goes down whenever Medea is in the population," he says.

    The two studies already have struck a romance: "I think this is quite promising," says Jacobs-Lorena. "If one can transfer this technology to mosquitoes, that could be quite powerful." Researchers would have to create a tight lock between Medea, the driver, and the transgene, the passenger carrying the critical briefcase. "If one could do this in an area relatively quickly, with the driver helping to move [the transgene] rapidly, you have an opportunity to break the cycle of infection," says Hay. "Once Plasmodium has nowhere to replicate, then it's gone."

    Those are two big "ifs," and the researchers say they have several generations of studies to go through before removing any doubt. But in time—perhaps in as few as five years, says Hay—the two might even have themselves a swarm of bugs with beautiful green eyes. A healthy swarm.


    1 2


    Related topics: Treatment

     
    Comments

    Post a Comment


    Name: (required)

    Email: (required)

    Comment:



    Advertisement


    Most Popular Video

    • Newest
    • Most Viewed
    Coral Reef Spawn

    How Coral Reefs Spawn

    Watch coral reefs reproduce in a flurry of carefully-timed action

    Flipping Out Over Pinball

    David Silverman has collected more than 800 pinball machines to preserve their history

    Sing Along to the Messiah

    Sing Along to the Messiah

    The story within Handel's famous piece is what drives its enduring popularity

    A Rare Look at Tucker Cars

    Collector David Cammack owns three of the 43 remaining cars in existence designed by Preston Tucker

    The Residents of Arlington Cemetery

    While President Kennedy may be one of the best known gravesites in Arlington, there are many other notable Americans buried there

    The Ju/'Hoansi Tribe in Action

    Over the course of 50 years, John Marshall filmed the African tribe, tracking how their nomadic culture slowly died out

    Watch the Gecko's Tail Flip

    Leopard geckos can shed their tail to distract predators, and the tails can leap up to 3 cm in one jump

    A Final Takeoff

    Watch one of Amelia Earhart's final takeoffs

    Most Popular

    • Viewed
    • Emailed
    • Commented
    1. Ten Notable Apocalypses That (Obviously) Didn’t Happen
    2. Tattoos
    3. Wildlife Trafficking
    4. The Secrets Within Cosmic Dust
    5. A Brief History of the Salem Witch Trials
    6. Crawling Around with Baltimore Street Rats
    7. Ethiopia's Exotic Monkeys
    8. How Arlington National Cemetery Came to Be
    9. 28 Places to See Before You Die—the Taj Mahal, Grand Canyon and More
    10. Family Ties
    1. Ten Notable Apocalypses That (Obviously) Didn’t Happen
    2. Crawling Around with Baltimore Street Rats
    3. The Glorious History of Handel's Messiah
    4. Ethiopia's Exotic Monkeys
    5. The Waldseemüller Map: Charting the New World
    6. UBI in the Knife and Gun Club
    7. Invasion of the Longhorn Beetles
    8. Teaching Cops to See
    9. Shopping Maul
    10. Wildlife Trafficking
    1. Ten Notable Apocalypses That (Obviously) Didn’t Happen
    2. Crawling Around with Baltimore Street Rats
    3. From Brooklyn to Worthington, Minnesota
    4. A Brief History of the Salem Witch Trials
    5. Ethiopia's Exotic Monkeys
    6. Looking for Leonardo
    7. For Smithsonian, Mangione Memorabilia 'Feels So Good'
    8. Dinosaur Shocker
    9. Underwater Photo of the Human Body
    10. Wildlife Trafficking

    - - - Advertisements - - -


    Join Us

    Facebook

    Facebook

    Become a fan of Smithsonian magazine's official Facebook page!

    Twitter

    Follow Smithsonian magazine on Twitter

    In The Magazine

    December 2009 Issue Cover

    December 2009

    • Wildlife Trafficking
    • Hallelujah
    • The Pyramid Man
    • Glee Mail
    • Savoring Puebla

    View Table of Contents »

    Enter Now!

    Smithsonian magazine 7th Annual Photo Contest

    Smithsonian magazine 7th Annual Photo Contest

    So, what makes a photograph a Smithsonian winner? Enter the contest to see if you have what it takes

    • Smithsonian Store
    • Smithsonian Journeys
    Smithsonian magazine 7th Annual Photo Contest

    Kokeshi Dolls

    Item No. 85070

    Smithsonian magazine 7th Annual Photo Contest

    Antarctica: Aboard National Geographic Explorer

    Journey to Antarctica to experience this otherworldly and unparalleled wilderness up close. (Jan 7 - 21, 2010)



    View full archiveRecent Issues

    • December 2009 Issue Cover
      Dec 2009

    • November 2009 Issue
      Nov 2009

    • October 2009 Issue Cover
      Oct 2009

    Newsletter

    Sign up for regular email updates from Smithsonian magazine, including free newsletters, special offers and current news updates.

    Subscribe Now

    About Us

    Smithsonian.com expands on Smithsonian magazine's in-depth coverage of history, science, nature, the arts, travel, world culture and technology. Join us regularly as we take a dynamic and interactive approach to exploring modern and historic perspectives on the arts, sciences, nature, world culture and travel, including videos, blogs and a reader forum.

    Explore our Brands

    • goSmithsonian.com
    • Smithsonian Air & Space Museum
    • Smithsonian Institution
    • Smithsonian Catalogue
    • Smithsonian Journeys
    • Smithsonian Channel
    • Site Map
    • Privacy Policy
    • Copyright
    • About Smithsonian
    • Contact Us
    • Advertising
    • Reader Panel
    • Subscribe
    • RSS
    • Topics

    Smithsonian Institution

    Produced by Clickability