• Smithsonian
    Institution
  • Travel
    With Us
  • Smithsonian
    Store
  • Smithsonian
    Channel
  • goSmithsonian
    Visitors Guide
  • Air & Space
    magazine

Smithsonian.com

  • Subscribe
  • History & Archaeology
  • Science
  • Ideas & Innovations
  • Arts & Culture
  • Travel & Food
  • At the Smithsonian
  • Photos
  • Videos
  • Games
  • Shop
  • Human Behavior
  • Mind & Body
  • Our Planet
  • Technology
  • Space
  • Wildlife
  • Art Meets Science
  • Science & Nature

Brave New World

Everything you wanted to know about stem cells, cloning and genetic engineering but were afraid to ask

| | | Reddit | Digg | Stumble | Email |
  • By James Trefil
  • Smithsonian magazine, December 2001, Subscribe
 

In the past 30 years, particularly in the past few, science has made enormous strides in the fields of molecular and cellular biology. Researchers have learned how to manipulate genes in plants and animals, and to a much lesser extent, in humans. In 2000, scientists from the public and private sectors co-announced that they'd sequenced the human genome, the arrangement of our DNA's fundamental components.

We've long been able to create life outside the womb, through in vitro fertilization (IVF); as a result, we can now screen embryos for many diseases. And in the past few years, scientists have managed to isolate from IVF embryos those "embryonic stem cells," so much in the news of late, that have the potential to develop into any cell in the body.

If that isn't enough, on the heels of decades of work in animal cloning—most notably the birth of Dolly, the first clone of a mammal from an adult cell, in 1996—three scientists announced this spring that they each, separately, intended to clone humans in their private labs.

None of these advances—or the suggestion of future advances—has come without controversy. Their promise, and peril, suggests author James Trefil, lie in their ability to let us get under the hood of living systems and change the way they operate. The debates that surround them raise questions "not only about changes in science and medicine but about such profound issues as the nature and value of human life." This article is a primer in the brave new world of biotech, a guide to the developments over the past few decades that have brought us to this point. As Trefil points out, "only by understanding the science involved can we begin to address the ethical conundrums coming our way."


In the past 30 years, particularly in the past few, science has made enormous strides in the fields of molecular and cellular biology. Researchers have learned how to manipulate genes in plants and animals, and to a much lesser extent, in humans. In 2000, scientists from the public and private sectors co-announced that they'd sequenced the human genome, the arrangement of our DNA's fundamental components.

We've long been able to create life outside the womb, through in vitro fertilization (IVF); as a result, we can now screen embryos for many diseases. And in the past few years, scientists have managed to isolate from IVF embryos those "embryonic stem cells," so much in the news of late, that have the potential to develop into any cell in the body.

If that isn't enough, on the heels of decades of work in animal cloning—most notably the birth of Dolly, the first clone of a mammal from an adult cell, in 1996—three scientists announced this spring that they each, separately, intended to clone humans in their private labs.

None of these advances—or the suggestion of future advances—has come without controversy. Their promise, and peril, suggests author James Trefil, lie in their ability to let us get under the hood of living systems and change the way they operate. The debates that surround them raise questions "not only about changes in science and medicine but about such profound issues as the nature and value of human life." This article is a primer in the brave new world of biotech, a guide to the developments over the past few decades that have brought us to this point. As Trefil points out, "only by understanding the science involved can we begin to address the ethical conundrums coming our way."

    Subscribe now for more of Smithsonian's coverage on history, science and nature.


| | | Reddit | Digg | Stumble | Email |
 

Add New Comment


Name: (required)

Email: (required)

Comment:

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until Smithsonian.com has approved them. Smithsonian reserves the right not to post any comments that are unlawful, threatening, offensive, defamatory, invasive of a person's privacy, inappropriate, confidential or proprietary, political messages, product endorsements, or other content that might otherwise violate any laws or policies.

Comments


Advertisement




View full archiveRecent Issues


  • Jun 2013


  • May 2013


  • Apr 2013

Newsletter

Sign up for regular email updates from Smithsonian magazine, including free newsletters, special offers and current news updates.

Subscribe Now

About Us

Smithsonian.com expands on Smithsonian magazine's in-depth coverage of history, science, nature, the arts, travel, world culture and technology. Join us regularly as we take a dynamic and interactive approach to exploring modern and historic perspectives on the arts, sciences, nature, world culture and travel, including videos, blogs and a reader forum.

Explore our Brands

  • goSmithsonian.com
  • Smithsonian Air & Space Museum
  • Smithsonian Student Travel
  • Smithsonian Catalogue
  • Smithsonian Journeys
  • Smithsonian Channel
  • About Smithsonian
  • Contact Us
  • Advertising
  • Subscribe
  • RSS
  • Topics
  • Member Services
  • Copyright
  • Site Map
  • Privacy Policy
  • Ad Choices

Smithsonian Institution