After the first atomic bomb explosion (seen here from 10,000 yards away, in a time series from .006 seconds to .081 seconds after detonation), Oppenheimer recalled, "a few people laughed, a few people cried. Most people were silent." After the first atomic bomb explosion (seen here from 10,000 yards away, in a time series from .006 seconds to .081 seconds after detonation), Oppenheimer recalled, "a few people laughed, a few people cried. Most people were silent."

Los Alamos National Laboratory

Building the Bomb

A new book about atomic scientist J. Robert Oppenheimer charts the secret debate over deployment of the first A-bomb and the anxiety that suffused its first live test

  • By Kai Bird and Martin J. Sherwin
  • Smithsonian magazine, August 2005

Article Tools

  • Font
    		•  Share/Save/Bookmark Share
  • Email
    		•
  • Print
    		•  Digg Digg
  • Comments
    		•  StumbleUpon StumbleUpon
  • RSS
    		•  Reddit Reddit

    Photo Gallery

    After the first atomic bomb explosion (seen here from 10,000 yards away, in a time series from .006 seconds to .081 seconds after detonation), Oppenheimer recalled, "a few people laughed, a few people cried. Most people were silent."

    Building the Bomb

    Explore more photos from the story

    The top-secret laboratory in Los Alamos, New Mexico, opened in April 1943 with J. Robert Oppenheimer as its scientific director. Just 27 months later, Oppenheimer and his colleagues were ready to test an atomic weapon. Everyone at Los Alamos in a position to have an informed opinion agreed that without Oppenheimer's extraordinary leadership, atomic bombs would not have been completed in time to be used during the war. That was both a matter of pride and a heavy burden for "the father of the atomic bomb."

    Another Los Alamos scientist recalled that Oppenheimer "was present in the laboratory or in the seminar rooms when a new effect was measured, when a new idea was conceived . . . . His continuous and intense presence . . . produced a sense of direct participation in all of us."

    Oppenheimer was also present when fellow scientists discussed potential uses of the bomb. By the end of 1944, it was clear that the war in Europe would soon be over. A number of the scientists at Los Alamos began to voice their growing ethical qualms about the continued development of the "gadget."

    Oppenheimer argued that the war should not end without the world knowing about this primordial new weapon. If the gadget remained a military secret, then the next war would almost certainly be fought with atomic weapons, and they would be used in a surprise attack. The scientists had to forge ahead, he explained, to the point where it could at least be tested.

    The top-secret laboratory in Los Alamos, New Mexico, opened in April 1943 with J. Robert Oppenheimer as its scientific director. Just 27 months later, Oppenheimer and his colleagues were ready to test an atomic weapon. Everyone at Los Alamos in a position to have an informed opinion agreed that without Oppenheimer's extraordinary leadership, atomic bombs would not have been completed in time to be used during the war. That was both a matter of pride and a heavy burden for "the father of the atomic bomb."

    Another Los Alamos scientist recalled that Oppenheimer "was present in the laboratory or in the seminar rooms when a new effect was measured, when a new idea was conceived . . . . His continuous and intense presence . . . produced a sense of direct participation in all of us."

    Oppenheimer was also present when fellow scientists discussed potential uses of the bomb. By the end of 1944, it was clear that the war in Europe would soon be over. A number of the scientists at Los Alamos began to voice their growing ethical qualms about the continued development of the "gadget."

    Oppenheimer argued that the war should not end without the world knowing about this primordial new weapon. If the gadget remained a military secret, then the next war would almost certainly be fought with atomic weapons, and they would be used in a surprise attack. The scientists had to forge ahead, he explained, to the point where it could at least be tested.


     
    Comments

    Post a Comment


    Name: (required)

    Email: (required)

    Comment:



    Advertisement


    - - - Advertisements - - -


    Join Us

    Facebook

    Facebook

    Become a fan of Smithsonian magazine's official Facebook page!

    Twitter

    Follow Smithsonian magazine on Twitter

    Smithsonian magazine presents

    6th Annual Smithsonian Photo Contest Winners

    Out of more than 17,000 entries, Smithsonian and its readers select the year's best