VIDEO: Milky Way Moves Observe stars orbiting our galaxy's black hole
From the summit of Mauna Kea, nearly 14,000 feet above the Pacific Ocean, the Milky Way tilts luminously across the night sky, an edge-on view of our galaxy. Parts of the great disk are obscured by dust, and beyond one of those dusty blots, near the teapot of the constellation Sagittarius, lies the center of the Milky Way. Hidden there is a deeply mysterious structure around which more than 200 billion stars revolve.
Behind me atop the craggy rocks of this dormant volcano on the island of Hawaii are the twin domes of the W. M. Keck Observatory. Each dome houses a telescope with a giant mirror that is almost 33 feet wide and, like a fly's eye, is made of interlocking segments. The mirrors are among the world's largest for gathering starlight, and one of the telescopes has been equipped with a dazzling new tool that greatly increases its power. Fewer than 100 people have seen this technology in action. I gaze at the nearest of the Milky Way's graceful spiral arms as I wait for technicians to flip the switch.
Then, suddenly and with the faint click of a shutter sliding open, a golden-orange laser beam shoots into the sky from the open dome. The ray of light, 18 inches wide, appears to end inside one of the blackest spots in the Milky Way. It actually ends 55 miles above the surface of the earth. The signal it makes there allows the telescope to compensate for the blur of Earth's atmosphere. Instead of jittery pictures smeared by the constantly shifting rivers of air over our heads, the telescope produces images as clear as any obtained by satellites in space. Keck was one of the first observatories to be outfitted with a laser guide; now half a dozen others are beginning to use them. The technology provides astronomers with a sharp view of the galaxy's core, where stars are packed as tightly as a summer swarm of gnats and swirl around the darkest place of all: a giant black hole.
Without question, the Milky Way's black hole is the strangest thing in our galaxy—a three-dimensional cavity in space just ten times the physical size of our sun but with four million times the mass, a virtual bottomless pit from which nothing can escape. Every major galaxy, it turns out, has a black hole at its core. Now, for the first time, scientists have the chance to study the havoc these mind-boggling entities wreak. For the next decade, Keck astronomers will track thousands of stars caught in the gravity of the Milky Way's black hole. They will try to figure out how stars are born close to the black hole and how it distorts the fabric of space itself. "I find it amazing that we can see stars whipping around our galaxy's black hole," says Taft Armandroff, director of the Keck Observatory. "If you had told me as a graduate student that I'd see that during my career, I'd have said it was science fiction."
To be sure, the evidence for black holes is entirely indirect; astronomers have never actually seen one. Albert Einstein's general theory of relativity predicted that the gravity of an extremely dense body could bend a ray of light so severely that it could not escape. Something the mass of our sun, for instance, could trap light if it shrank into a ball just one and a half miles across. For Earth to become a black hole, its entire mass would have to fit into a sphere no bigger than a pea.
In 1939, J. Robert Oppenheimer and another physicist calculated that such drastic compression could happen to the biggest stars after they ran out of hydrogen and other fuel. Once the stars sputtered out, the scientists posited, the remaining gas would collapse under its own gravity into an infinitely dense point. Telescope observations backed up the theory in the 1960s and 1970s. Astronomers discovered quasars—extremely bright beacons billions of light-years away. A few researchers suggested the only possible power source for something so luminous would be a concentration of millions of suns in a small volume—pulled together by what scientists later dubbed a supermassive black hole. Astronomers then found stars that seemed to whip around invisible companions in our Milky Way, and they concluded that only the pull of gravity from small black holes could keep the stars in such tight orbits. Containing several times the mass of our sun, these are called stellar-mass black holes.
The Hubble Space Telescope added to the evidence for black holes in the 1990s by measuring how quickly the innermost parts of other galaxies rotate—up to 1.1 million miles per hour in big galaxies. The startling speeds pointed to cores containing up to a billion times the mass of the sun. The discovery that supermassive black holes are at the core of most, if not all, galaxies was one of Hubble's greatest achievements. "At the beginning of the Hubble survey, I would have said black holes are rare, maybe one galaxy in 10 or 100, and that something went wrong in the history of that galaxy," says Hubble scientist Douglas Richstone of the University of Michigan. "Now we've shown they are standard equipment. It's the most remarkable thing."


In this day of declining infrastructure, health care and education suffering lack of funds, water increasingly a matter for serious conflict between states and other problems we are evading, how can we continue the outrageous expense of the space programs. This article was generated -- at least partially -- from the island of Hawai`i where I live. I can assure you the lack of revenue from the space program tenants above Mauna Kea -- where this Keck telescope sits on state land -- is not providing anything like the revenue it should. Our children suffer one of the worst school systems in America. Our University of Hawai`i doesn't have enough money to provide adequate laboratory facilities for either teaching or research. Lots of money and attention for sports, however. This nation is in trouble and every article of this kind needs to include the COST of the beauty and science for which many see very little benefit. Or, if there are benefits beyond the satisfaction of "mine is bigger than yours" telescope enthusiasts, share them with the public.
Posted by Bill Eger on March 26,2008 | 02:12PM
How Fantastic! Do they need observers going over data picked up by the pictures? Have they " watched" a star or other body actually enter the field of a black hole? do they have a picture of our galexy with the position of the black hole. I took a class on Black Holes, Quarks, and quasars in the 70's at UCSD. It was fasinating then and more so now. Science and space have come a long way! Carolyn
Posted by Carolyn Monteverde on March 26,2008 | 10:09PM
Hey i watched a movie today in science 21 about black holes and it has just made me so interested in them. It fasanates me how they are real and how our wonderful univers can create strange but interesting objects.
Posted by Danni Bright on March 27,2008 | 03:21AM
Does the laser help take the wiggle out of the image by compensating for distortions in the atmosphere or some more distant function? Charlie
Posted by Charles Smith on March 29,2008 | 01:18PM
Nice story. Maybe eventually everything will get sucked into the black holes? Coincidentally, I am almost done with reading the SF books Dragon's Egg and Starquake by Robert L. Forward. Fascinating books with a lot of science based fact intertwined about a hypothetical race of beings called the Cheela that live and build a civilization on a neutron star and can manipulate black holes.
Posted by Jojo on March 30,2008 | 03:25AM
Question for Robert Irion: If the universe is expanding, including the distance between galaxies, how can Andromeda and the Milky Way be on a collision course? Are they so close together already that the gravitational attraction is too strong to overcome? How do we know all this?
Posted by Tim Shank on March 30,2008 | 09:40AM
In response to Tim Shank's excellent question: The overall universe is expanding. Indeed, this expansion is now accelerating, one of the strangest discoveries in cosmology. This expansion takes place everywhere, but in some parts of the universe galaxies are close enough together so that their mutual gravitational pull toward each other is dominant. There are lots of major clusters of galaxies bound together in this way. Eventually, the largest galaxy at the center of each of these clusters will absorb the smaller galaxies around it. Astronomers see this galactic cannibalism happening everywhere they look. The Milky Way and Andromeda are part of a small cluster, called the Local Group -- it's our small neighborhood island of galaxies resisting the overall tide of universal expansion. Astronomers know this by examining the light emitted by stars in Andromeda. This light, as seen by our telescopes, is "blueshifted," or shifted toward the blue end of the spectrum of light's colors. That's because Andromeda is speeding toward us. In contrast, the light from galaxies moving away from us is "redshifted." (This is the starlight equivalent of the Doppler shift one hears when an ambulance siren or motorcycle approaches you, at a higher pitch, and then recedes from you, at a lower pitch.) Then, astronomers can extrapolate this speed to determine when the collision will happen. The galaxies will "fall" into each other gravitationally, at a quickening pace, with the first interaction about 2 billion years from now. I hope that makes sense! You basically answered your own question, Tim, with your insights. --RI
Posted by Robert Irion on March 30,2008 | 09:54PM
For Jojo: Our solar system and most of the galaxy's stars are safe from the central black hole, for the same reason planets don't spiral into the Sun: Their orbits have the momentum needed to keep them at a stable distance. The physical size of the black hole is actually incredibly small compared to the vast scale of the galaxy. If you shrank the Milky Way to the size of the Earth, the supermassive black hole at the center could fit onto the tip of your thumb. So it really can only "devour" the gas -- and occasional unfortunate stars -- that wander too close to it or get scattered into it after interacting with other stars nearby. Bottom line: We're staying put! (When Andromeda and the Milky Way crash, though, our solar system could get flung into intergalactic space by the turmoil.) By the way, Jojo, if you like black holes in science fiction, you should read "Eater" by Gregory Benford. It's about a rogue black hole that enters our solar system and is, well, capable of some dastardly thinking. I won't say more. But Benford is one of the best hard SF writers, with lots of physics wrapped into his plots. (He's a physicist at UC Irvine.) For Charles Smith: The laser provides a reference "point" of light high in the atmosphere, above most of Earth's blanket of air. When the telescope creates an image of this point, computers analyze the patterns of its "jiggles" created by moving currents of air overhead. Then, the computers send instructions to a flexible mirror to exactly counteract those jiggles. When the incoming light bounces off the flexible mirror, the images of real stars are restored to sharp points. It's true optical wizardry.
Posted by Robert Irion on March 30,2008 | 10:10PM
Your magazine says, on page 53, "Watch stars orbit our black hole at Smithsonian .com/blackhole" So here am am perusing everything on my screen, and I find nothing to watch. I have been misled.
Posted by Theresa Enroth on March 30,2008 | 10:49PM
I am so fascinated by the universe in general and especially intrigued by blackholes. Thank you for the great article and the great reading tips from other readers. I can't get enough of this subject!
Posted by Sue Wuolukka on April 1,2008 | 08:57PM
will we live beside the moon and the sun ?!!!! its very exiting what will we use to travel ?!!!
Posted by hani haleem on April 3,2008 | 03:44AM
This was a fantastic article to read! Here are some additional links if you want to see some pictures of the data that gets taken and web-movies of the stars orbiting the black hole: UCLA Galactic Center Group: http://www.astro.ucla.edu/~ghezgroup/gc/ Check out the Pictures section for good animations and the Education/Outreach section for even more links. Max Planck Institute for Extraterrestrial Physics Galactic Center Group http://www.mpe.mpg.de/ir/GC/index.php
Posted by jlu on April 4,2008 | 01:24PM
This article is awesome, I was so excited as I read it. I wrote my first book, 16 short sci-fi stories and the first story is about collapsing galaxies - as in black holes. Oh I am so very excited. The research confirms much of what I had come to through study and reading over the years. What confirmation you provide with your articles, not even realizing that you touched my galaxy of life, and imploded the heavy darkness in the black holes of experiences. Thank you, and thanks to all the researchers. . .I'm with you and I feel you!!!
Posted by DrSew on April 8,2008 | 04:34PM
For Theresa: You can access the animation touted on page 53 by clicking the link in the text after the article's byline at the top of the page. (link embedded in this text: VIDEO: Milky Way Moves Observe stars orbiting our galaxy's black hole)
Posted by Jess on April 10,2008 | 06:56AM
Reply to Bill Eger, When we study and learn how we fit in among wonders of the cosmos we nurture and feed the human spirit which treasures learning and shows itself as a sparkle in the eyes of of a healthy and curious human being, a sparkle as powerful and expansive as what we externalize and call the big bang. Collapsing infrastructure and environment should be associated with huge negatives like continuous war, gargantuan subsidies to polluting technologies and centralization of land ownership to corporations which are at war with nature in their area of ownership. Research into the wonders of creation is not the place where money is wantonly burned. Think about how many energy saving light bulbs it takes counteract one take-off and bombing run in the continuous war. There is a long list of negative culprits which absorb and misuse human effort, understanding how human consciousness blossoms with the cosmos is a positive scientific study, it is not on that dark list of negatives which deprive humanity and destroy nature.
Posted by Garrett Connelly on April 14,2008 | 05:14PM
Thanks, Garett. I can't contain myself when I see the same old whazzitgoodfo' line.
Posted by Dihydrogen Monoxide on April 15,2008 | 07:46AM
I share your concern Bill Eger. As much as I am interested in and find this information so exciting, I cannot help but think that the resources here on earth could and should be better spent on programs that are effective in relieving human persecution, starvation, suffering and inhuman treatment on this planet. From my observatory of life I see this program as well as the decadent NASA program as figurative "black holes" for resources that could/should be more intelligently spent on genuinely real issues here on earth. However, the perceived mis-spending of resources is not caused by the resources themselves or the programs upon which they are spent. Rather, it reflects a deficiency in overall leadership to act upon the important priorities of our time. It is somewhat of a folly that we can point powerful and expensive telescopes at the center of our galaxy while turning a blind eye to fellow members of our species on this planet. As to the reference to the bombing missions made by Mr. Connelly, my little girl oft reminds me that two wrongs do not make a right. And expanding human consciousness cannot fill a stomach or cure the sick. I know this hard since if I had my druthers, I wish we had unlimited resources so that we could do it all...
Posted by Frank Porta on April 15,2008 | 05:30PM
NASA Gripes me too. What they do is important in a research perspective; however, i cannot help but think like many in that so many of our tax dollars go down a huge sinking black hole. Like so much government, it ends up just adding to fraud, waste and abuse. Let's explore our ocean floors; now there we go, it's even on our planet. LM
Posted by Mac on May 2,2008 | 11:46AM
Comments by Bill Eger regarding Mauna Kea are ironically short-sighted. I am a regular visitor to Hawaii and was on the peak of Mauna Kea when this article was distributed to readers. Multiple countries (non American public monies) have invested millions of dollars creating the most remarkable observatory peak in the world, the Keck observatories were funded by a private foundation, and the 13,000+ foot mountain peak of Mauna Kea could not serve any other practical purpose for the people of Hawaii. As to the issue of Hawaiian education, the culture in Hawaii affords historically little priority to education, and that cultural problem pre-existed any observatory on the Big Island. Astronomy and our space program inspires many to seek answers to the universe ... and that has been far more successful in providing perspective in the universe than the multitude of religious philosophies that have competing explanations for how the universe formed. The key to public funding priorities is to balance the absolute needs of society with our inherit desire to learn, understand and improve ourselves. Let's not return to the dark ages of mental stagnation ... a human mind is a terrible thing to waste.
Posted by ken bastin on May 2,2008 | 04:51PM
It has been impossible to find a discussion on black hole collisions. I'm told that all scientists accept the big bang theory. I should think that black hole collisions should get more attention because deriving an entire universe from a singularity seems too far out and I have not seen a plasible explanation for it.
Posted by Don W Baird on May 2,2008 | 09:50PM
i think this so called "black hole" is very interesting and i think that we need to do some more research on it because some people don't believe in it. We need more information on the "black hole" because i don't know if it even exists.
Posted by Jenny on May 3,2008 | 07:26AM
For Don Baird: Quite a few astrophysicists do study black hole collisions. Some of them use supercomputer simulations to explore what happens when black holes spiral into each other and crash. Those are incredibly violent events, and they literally rattle the universe by sending out "gravitational waves" that distort the fabric of space-time -- just like the ripples you create in a smooth pond by hurling a rock into it. Physicists have built detectors that probably are within a few years of finding and measuring these waves for the first time. Ultimately the detectors will spot most of the collisions of giant black holes throughout the universe. We won't "see" them in the traditional sense because most of the crashes will be inside galaxies much too far away for telescopes to resolve. However, telescopes on the ground and in space have shown astronomers many examples of galaxies in the long process of merging with each other, as our Milky Way and the nearby Andromeda galaxy will do billions of years from now. For instance, the Chandra X-ray Observatory orbiting around Earth has seen evidence of pairs of giant black holes very close to each other inside these "interacting pairs" of galaxies. To my knowledge, no researcher claims that such collisions would create new universes, though. The Big Bang is indeed really difficult to grasp, but it doesn't appear a black hole bangup was involved. --RI
Posted by Robert Irion on May 9,2008 | 11:33AM
I have no idea if this comment will be censored, but the concept of black holes or more properly, a singularity, was not accepted by Einstein, and the Schwartzchild interpretation is in error. Warped space-time, a black hole in every galactic core are not required in plasma cosmology. Here's link to the original paper in English: http://www.sjcrothers.plasmaresources.com/schwarzschild.pdf Dr. Jeremy Dunning-Davies is a Senior Lecturer in Theoretical Physics in the Department of Physics at the University of Hull, England. He writes: 'One further point needs stressing, I think. I was initially trained as a mathematician, although my degree did involve two years of subsidiary physics. Over the years, I have come to realise more and more the power of mathematics but also the fact that that power can be misused. Mathematics is a beautiful subject and can be studied, in its own right, as a highly worthwhile intellectual pursuit. However, mathematics has a second role as the language of physics and, in that rôle, it is simply a tool which must always remain subservient to the physics. If the mathematics throws up a result which does not accord with physical reality, it should be studied carefully but not accepted immediately unless a genuine physical interpretation can be found; the physics must never ever be made to fit the mathematics!' http://www.thunderbolts.info/thunderblogs/guest2.htm
Posted by James Parker on May 10,2008 | 07:04AM
The use of the term 'hot gas' throughout this article indicates the 'experts' are entirely ignorant of plasma; you are dealing with plasma, not hot gas. Black holes are a mathematical construct that have become an industry; Einstein thought they were improbably, and his writing is ignored; black holes have become a 'faux' industry. If I am not censored, here are links for interested taxpayers to check out. ' http://plasmascience.net/tpu/TheUniverse.html http://www.thunderbolts.info/thunderblogs/guest2.htm As Dr. Dunning-Davies writes: 'As Stephen Crothers has recently pointed out, this final topic should really be a non-starter, based as it is on an incorrect statement of Schwartzschild’s solution of the Einstein field equations. However, again as Stephen has pointed out, even the incorrectly quoted ‘solution’ is included in, and protected by, conventional wisdom. One further surprising aspect of much of conventional wisdom is that the originators of much of this body of knowledge would have welcomed discussion and even criticism, provided that criticism was constructive. In this day and age, however, people who disagree with conventional wisdom do not face discussion and constructive criticism; rather they are either quietly ignored or destroyed. The first of these is possibly the more destructive action occurring in modern science because if something is quietly ignored, it gains no publicity and so remains unknown, except to the favoured few.' If there are 'truth seekers' here, please make up your own mind. The galactic center is a Torus, not a black hole, the focus of intergalactic Birkeland currents. No space time has to be twisted to provide an answer to observations. Electrical forces are at work and plasma physics, demonstrated on laboratories on earth. Cheer!
Posted by J. Parker on May 10,2008 | 09:34AM
how long would it take for the sun to explode? what would it look like?
Posted by sam canne on May 10,2008 | 10:42AM