Who Can Identify the World's Rarest Butterfly
Two scientists are in a grim contest in the American Southeast to document some of the animal kingdom's most endangered species
- By Rob Dunn
- Smithsonian.com, October 07, 2011, Subscribe
(Page 2 of 2)
Anyone could see a Crystal Skipper if they wanted to. Many rare species live in hard-to-reach places, such as bombing ranges, but not the Crystal Skipper. It can be found in backyards on the islands. The tiny larvae of the Crystal Skipper crawl along grass leaves waiting to metamorphose, or on sand dunes or in a patch of grass behind the Food Lion. But wherever they are, the caterpillars often represent the entirety of their species. Most of the year no adults are flying through the air. No eggs wait to open. These larvae are it, the sum living total of what Leidner now thinks may be the rarest butterfly species in the world—or if not the rarest, the most precarious, perched as it is on the dunes between the rising sea and the encroaching city.
The good news about the Crystal Skipper is that it seems to do relatively well with urbanization. Like Leidner, the species is simultaneously urban and in love with a few dear and wild things, in its case a host plant, the little bluestem, a type of beach grass. The Crystal Skipper flies easily among the beach houses that rise up out of the sand in long, colorful rows. The houses themselves may be reconcilable with the conservation of the Skipper, as long as the little bluestem survives. The trouble is that houses do not arrive alone. With them come roads, grocery stores and lawns that tend to replace the wild, unkempt beach grass on which the Skipper depends. As far as anyone knows, the Crystal Skipper feeds on nothing else but little bluestem and lives nowhere else other than on the sandy patches of a few small islands. It is both rare and dependent, the last tenuous piece on a whirring mobile of coastal life.
Part of the rarity of the Crystal Skipper may be natural, a consequence of where it lives. Off and on over the past few millions years, the patches of dunes on the Outer Banks have been separated both from each other and from the mainland. Plants and animals that have persisted on or colonized the islands have become separate, too, and evolved into different species. This appears to be the case for the Crystal Skipper, whose closest likely relatives live in Florida, among the snowbirds. Because its story began with isolation on small islands, the Crystal Skipper was never common, but it is probably more rare than it has been for thousands of years. Leidner thinks, for example, that it used to live on the Shackleford Banks, where wild, hungry horses now roam and eat nearly everything, including the little bluestem, down to the ground. As they do, they also consume any chance for the Skipper to persist. On other islands, houses and civilization have replaced many acres of dunes and wild grass. What the Crystal Skipper has to work with now is just a small vestige of an already small wild past.
And so there are two rare butterflies in North Carolina, each with its own champion. Both Haddad and Leidner would be proud to be the one studying the world’s rarest butterfly, the rarer of these two. Haddad is still sure he has won. Leidner equivocates. “Depends on the year,” she says. But the bigger win would be to lose: The more rare either butterfly is, the more likely it will go extinct, whether because of the actions of humans, or now that humans have pushed these species to the edge, because of chance. And so they try, through talks about what needs to be done, through restoration projects and through whatever else they can do, to make the species they work on more common.
In the meantime, Haddad has not yet told Leidner, but he has begun working on what might be an even rarer species, the Miami Blue, which lives in the Florida Keys and numbers at most in the tens. Others may, in this case, agree that this butterfly is the rarest. The Miami Blue has recently been emergency listed as an endangered species, which will afford it some protection from additional threats posed by humans, out on the tiny islands in the enormous sea. Nick thinks it’s the winner, at least for now, though there are so many rare species flickering on the verge of extinction that it is impossible to know for sure.
Just outside San Francisco, the Lange’s Metalmark butterfly struggles to survive on a few old desert dunes. Another kind of butterfly, El Segundo Blue, lives only on the sand at the end of the runway at Los Angeles International Airport. Still another, the Uncompahgre Fritillary, is found only in small patches of habitat above 13,000 feet in Colorado’s San Juan Mountains. Then there are still others, outside the United States, although less data is available for them. Rare species persist, for now, in many places where someone has looked carefully. Some of those species have defenders like Haddad or Leidner. Most, particularly those in places like the tropics where fewer biologists are around to take stock, do not. They simply live and die, influenced by our actions but unnoticed as they rise up on the wind or fail to. Sometimes it is said that a butterfly flapping its wings in Japan can change the weather in Raleigh. Maybe. It seems more likely that a conservation biologist waving his or her hands can change the fate of a butterfly, or at least that is what we might hope: that in the battle over the rarest species, biologists all around the world begin to lose.
Editor's Note, November 9, 2011: We apologize for an error in the original version of this story. Thomas Kral was convicted of violating the wildlife laws of the United States and sentenced to community service, fined and placed on probation, but not jailed.
| The very rarest butterflies | |
| Lotis blue | Lycaeides argyrognomon lotis |
| Miami blue butterfly | Cyclargus thomasi bethunebakeri |
| Saint Francis' satyr | Neonympha mitchellii francisci |
| Schaus swallowtail | Heraclides aristodemus ponceanus |
| Lange's metalmark | Apodemia mormo langei |
| Palos Verdes blue | Glaucopsyche lygdamus palosverdesensis |
| Leona’s little blue butterfly | Philotiella leona |
| Island Marble | Euchloe ausonides insulanus |
| Also very, very rare | |
| Mt. Charleston blue | Icariacia shasta charlestonensis |
| El Segundo blue | Euphilotes battoides allyni |
| Crystal skipper | Atrytonopsis new Sp.1 |
| Mitchell's satyr | Neonympha mitchellii mitchellii |
| Laguna Mountains | Pyrgus ruralis lagunae |
| Behren's silverspot | Speyeria zerene behrensii |
| Also rare | |
| Fender's blue | Icaricia icarioides fenderi |
| Carson wandering | Pseudocopaeodes eunus obscurus |
| Callippe silverspot | Speyeria callippe callippe |
| Mission blue | Icaricia icarioides missionensis |
| San Bruno elfin | allophrys mossii bayensis |
| Myrtle's silverspot | Speyeria zerene myrtleae |
| Quino checkerspot | Euphydryas editha quino (=E. e. wrighti) |
| Smith's blue | Euphilotes enoptes smithi |
| Uncompahgre fritillary | Boloria acrocnema |
| Karner blue | Lycaeides melissa samuelis |
Rob Dunn is a writer and biologist at North Carolina State University. His latest book is The Wild Life of Our Bodies. He has written about the deadliest animals in humans’ evolutionary past, singing mice, rudeness, the discovery of the hamster, and many other subjects for Smithsonian.
Subscribe now for more of Smithsonian's coverage on history, science and nature.









Comments (11)
Hello Thomas, I am actually writing a graduate thesis on the concept of butterfly collection/butterfly poaching and would be very interested in hearing your thoughts on this issue. I am unsure of how to contact you, but you can find my email address in the current student roster on the MIT Science Writing website.
Posted by Sarah Yu on November 7,2012 | 10:22 PM
Thomas Kral has repeatedly demonstrated that he refuses to hold himself accountable for the behavior that he was convicted for and that he will continue to omit and obsfuscate about his activities, or he will resort to online retorts and the need to get in the last word. From an article published in Outside Magazine, January 1996: "Kral's collection alone contained 1,637 illegal butterflies. As one incredulous Fish & Wildlife officer said, it was "one of the finest collections I've ever seen, even counting in a museum." Mr. Kral may have the right to his own opinion about the crime for which he was prosecuted, but not his own facts. Yours in relevancy (but not distortion of the facts), J.W.
Posted by J. Willbley on August 8,2012 | 06:43 PM
Regarding the comment posted by Peter Laufer on November 16 - please don't confuse a few instances from the 1980's of someone caught looking for otherwise non-protected butterflies in a National Park or Wildlife Refuge with the false accusations made by Nick Haddad and others. I find it far more bizarre that Mr. Peter Laufer never bothered to try and even contact me regarding my input into what he claims was his "well researched" Chapter 7 of his book The Dangerous World of Butterflies, which is typical of the one-sided tabloid journalism available in libraries and supermarket newsstands across the country. By the way, where was the Smithsonian moderator when Mr. Laufer's blatant product endorsement of his book was posted in clear violation of comments that are supposed to be moderated?
Posted by Thomas Kral on December 5,2011 | 11:08 PM
Fascinating article by Rob Dunn, along with bizarre commentary from Thomas Kral. Took me back to the research I did for my book The Dangerous World of Butterflies. I studied the Kral case, looking through much of the original evidence still held by the government in the National Archives Pacific Region depository. Here's an intriguing quote from a letter Kral wrote to one of his colleagues: "I myself got caught collecting in Florida's Everglades National Park and twice in Loxahatchee National Wildlife Reserve, but got away with it each time, simply claiming ignorance of the laws." My detailed account of the case is in Chapter Seven of the book, available at libraries throughout the country, if readers are interested . . .
Posted by Peter Laufer on November 16,2011 | 10:43 PM
Dear Editor,
Please correct another major error in your article - I never collected any of the 50 individuals of the St. Francis Satyrs to sell, these were never for sale. Also, I had never collected any butterfly or other insect once a given taxa was listed under the Endangered Species Act, nor have I sold ANY endangered insects. I was never convicted of poaching Endangered butterflies as you continue to state in your article. The seized butterflies in question were mostly from Mexico and not protected under the ESA. Please study case CR-93-20137-JW more carefully.
I have been formally acknowledged as an expert on North American Lepidoptera (Butterflies and Moths) by the US Fish & Wildlife Service, and I can professionally state that most of the other comments and observations made in this article regarding the Saint Francis Satyr are either false or greatly exaggerated, which makes me question the supposed research conducted by Nick Haddad; since 1984 when I last collected this subspecies, research by others has shown that the butterfly is much more widespread than indicated and certainly has never been in any danger of extinction.
The Smithsonian Maqgazine is not setting any good examples by cutting people down and making gross exaggerations to glorify paid researchers like Nick Haddad - indeed there are some who are profitting from my discovery of the St. Francis Satyr.
Sincerely,
Thomas Kral
Posted by Thomas Kral on November 10,2011 | 09:11 PM
We've corrected the error and posted the following correction: Editor's Note, November 9, 2011: We apologize for an error in the original version of this story. Thomas Kral was sentenced to community service, fined and placed on probation, but he was not jailed for butterfly poaching.
Posted by Brian Wolly on November 9,2011 | 05:05 PM
Dear Editor, With regard to the article published in the Smithsonian Magazine on October 7, 2011, Who Can Identify the World’s Rarest Butterfly, I must address the sheer libelous and slanderous aspects of this article after it was called to my attention by several shocked readers. First, I was never jailed for butterfly poaching. In federal court proceedings back in 1995 (Case No. CR-93-20137-JW), the judge recognized that I had “shown extraordinary acceptance of responsibility and that the law was confusing” in giving me a probationary sentence in recognition that most violations that were illegal insect collecting under the Lacey Act and other obscure laws were in fact infractions made by myself and a host of other “un-indicted” collectors that included many university and museum researchers and even an employee of the US Fish & Wildlife Service, as is fully proven and documented in these court proceedings. I discovered Neonympha mitchelli francisci purely by accident when I was a soldier stationed at Fort Bragg. There was never any intent or action whatsoever to collect specimens to sell, instead many were donated to museums, including the holotype that I had donated to of all places, the Smithsonian Museum. I never made a single cent from my discovery of this subspecies, but this is how the Smithsonian Magazine decides to repay the services of a veteran! Do you even use fact-checkers? These false and slanderous comments could easily be dismissed if they were from the Tabloids or other journalistic rags, but this is the Smithsonian! People expect truth, honesty and accuracy from a magazine that is directly identified with the United States of America. Thus, I will also contact members of the US Congress and Senate to fully investigate this matter in order for Congress, government agencies, and legal councils to determine appropriate apologies, disciplinary, and terminations for the comments made by Nick Haddad, Rob Dunn and all perpetrators.
Posted by Thomas W. Kral on November 6,2011 | 02:18 PM
There appear to be several other colonies of something that appears to be this butterfly. These are scattered from N Alabama to Central Texas in inadequately studied wetlands. Future DNA analysis may make it possible to unravel relationships in this group if the colonies survive habitat destruction from peat extraction, pasture improvement and regional drought. These insects are easily confused with two very similar species that are more widespread.
Posted by C. J. Durden on October 17,2011 | 10:17 AM
The article is flawed in that this entire discussion revolves around one very-weakly differentiated colony of Mitchell's Satyr on Fort Bragg, N.C. The butterfly occurs in several sites on Fort Bragg and has even been reported outside the base, though the details are a closely-held secret among local biologists. Note that two counties are listed for the butterfly's North Carolina distribution on the Butterflies and Moths of North America maps, reflective of known distribution around Fort Bragg. Neonympha mitchelli has now been reported from many sites in northern Alabama and northeastern Mississippi, where it can be widespread and numerous in the region's wooded wetlands. All reports indicate that these populations resemble the North Carolina population, so the range of the St. Francis Satyr extends well beyond the borders of Fort Bragg.
Second point: Tom Kral was never jailed for his poaching conviction. Kral was sentenced to a relatively small fine and community service.
Posted by Harry Pavulaan on October 16,2011 | 03:56 PM
No doubt that one of the rarest of the rare is the Palos Verde Blue. The species only know locality is on a small portion of a military fuel dump near San Diego. The population is being augmented through a captive breeding program managed through Moorpark College.
Posted by Mitch Magdich on October 12,2011 | 08:53 AM
The St. Francis Satyr used to come to east Texas to dine on Lantana Flowers in the 1960's. :D
Posted by Sondra Anderson on October 7,2011 | 04:45 PM