Who Can Identify the World's Rarest Butterfly
Two scientists are in a grim contest in the American Southeast to document some of the animal kingdom's most endangered species
- By Rob Dunn
- Smithsonian.com, October 07, 2011, Subscribe
Nick Haddad is a tall, quick-to-smile Minnesotan. But lest the easy grin fool you, he is also a man who likes to win. He wins in Scrabble. He tries to win in basketball. And he thinks he has won in the grim contest waged among biologists over which is the rarest butterfly in the world.
Haddad spends hundreds of hours a year studying the St. Francis Satyr, a small brown butterfly the size and weight of a folded postage stamp. The St. Francis Satyr lives at Fort Bragg, a military base near Fayetteville, North Carolina, and nowhere else. The St. Francis Satyr was once common but is now on the brink of extinction.
One part of the story of the St. Francis Satyr begins with beavers. If you’ve ever wondered just how whimsical evolution can be, consider beavers. They are the answer to that question and the punchline. They are giant rodents with ping-pong paddle tails. They live in houses they build of sticks. They dam rivers to make ponds and have teeth that will grow through their heads if not constantly worn down through use. Unfortunately, much of what makes beavers interesting also puts them at odds with humans. They impede the flow of rivers. They cut down trees. And they have thick, dense fur, perfect for a cape or coat. Consequently, the North American beaver, an animal that once may have numbered close to 90 million, is now rare in many regions and extinct in others. In much of the southeastern United States, including North Carolina, the beaver was gone by the turn of the last century.
The beaver’s story matters to butterflies because when beavers disappear, so do dams. Dams lead to ponds that eventually lead to meadows that sprout sweet young sedges, into which the St. Francis Satyr’s larvae sink their mouthparts one bite at a time.
When the beaver became rare, it appears the St. Francis Satyr did, too. Satyrs now number around 1,000 and are found in an area of less than 20 acres. The butterfly was discovered in 1983 by a collector named Thomas Kral. He named it in honor of St. Francis, the man who spoke to and, more importantly, listened to animals. Kral was convicted of conspiracy to violate the wildlife laws of the United States (though not the St. Francis Satyr, which was not yet listed as endangered or even known to exist when he collected 50 individuals). The Satyr persists both because of and in spite of the man who named it. It also persists because of war, or preparations for it.
In the United States, many plant and animal species, including the St. Francis Satyr, have benefited from military bases, where they tend to be relatively well protected from habitat loss. Despite the sounds of guns and bombs, the species are preserved. But the case of the St. Francis Satyr is a special one. The St. Francis Satyr may have survived because of bombs. At Fort Bragg, weapons—from big bombs to small bullets—are used nearly every day in soldiers’ training. The explosions start fires that burn the forests and allow sedges to grow on meadows, and with them, here and there, a few butterflies. Once the entire southeastern United States, from Florida to Raleigh, burned every few years naturally. Now Fort Bragg is one of the few places where the wilderness and its necessary flames remain.
So far bombs and the slow recovery of beavers, which are multiplying in the absence of hunting on the base, have saved the St. Francis Satyr at Fort Bragg, but just barely. Without more bombing (or other forms of burning) and beavers, meadows would grow over, bombed areas would grow back and the butterfly would have nowhere to go. Fortunately, this butterfly has advocates. St. Francis spoke on behalf of all animals. Nick Haddad speaks on behalf of just one, the St. Francis Satyr. He speaks on its behalf all the time, and when he does he tends to remind his audience that he is studying “the rarest butterfly in the world,” a statement that received little argument in the Southeast until Allison Leidner came to town and Haddad got competitive.
Allison Leidner is an unlikely character in the story of rare butterflies. Now a fellow at NASA in Washington, D.C., Leidner is a New Yorker with a fondness for city life who wanted to save species, to lift them up from the brink the way you might pick up a wounded bird. She came to North Carolina to study with Nick Haddad, and that was when the trouble started.
Not long after Leidner arrived in North Carolina, she heard about another rare butterfly, rumored to live on just a few islands of the Outer Banks. Allison decided to look for it and found it: it was lovely and rare, very rare. It did not yet have a scientific name. It still doesn’t. It is called, simply, “Atrytonopsis new species 1” or, as she dubbed it, the Crystal Skipper, an unnoted gem skipping among the dunes.
Subscribe now for more of Smithsonian's coverage on history, science and nature.









Comments (11)
Hello Thomas, I am actually writing a graduate thesis on the concept of butterfly collection/butterfly poaching and would be very interested in hearing your thoughts on this issue. I am unsure of how to contact you, but you can find my email address in the current student roster on the MIT Science Writing website.
Posted by Sarah Yu on November 7,2012 | 10:22 PM
Thomas Kral has repeatedly demonstrated that he refuses to hold himself accountable for the behavior that he was convicted for and that he will continue to omit and obsfuscate about his activities, or he will resort to online retorts and the need to get in the last word. From an article published in Outside Magazine, January 1996: "Kral's collection alone contained 1,637 illegal butterflies. As one incredulous Fish & Wildlife officer said, it was "one of the finest collections I've ever seen, even counting in a museum." Mr. Kral may have the right to his own opinion about the crime for which he was prosecuted, but not his own facts. Yours in relevancy (but not distortion of the facts), J.W.
Posted by J. Willbley on August 8,2012 | 06:43 PM
Regarding the comment posted by Peter Laufer on November 16 - please don't confuse a few instances from the 1980's of someone caught looking for otherwise non-protected butterflies in a National Park or Wildlife Refuge with the false accusations made by Nick Haddad and others. I find it far more bizarre that Mr. Peter Laufer never bothered to try and even contact me regarding my input into what he claims was his "well researched" Chapter 7 of his book The Dangerous World of Butterflies, which is typical of the one-sided tabloid journalism available in libraries and supermarket newsstands across the country. By the way, where was the Smithsonian moderator when Mr. Laufer's blatant product endorsement of his book was posted in clear violation of comments that are supposed to be moderated?
Posted by Thomas Kral on December 5,2011 | 11:08 PM
Fascinating article by Rob Dunn, along with bizarre commentary from Thomas Kral. Took me back to the research I did for my book The Dangerous World of Butterflies. I studied the Kral case, looking through much of the original evidence still held by the government in the National Archives Pacific Region depository. Here's an intriguing quote from a letter Kral wrote to one of his colleagues: "I myself got caught collecting in Florida's Everglades National Park and twice in Loxahatchee National Wildlife Reserve, but got away with it each time, simply claiming ignorance of the laws." My detailed account of the case is in Chapter Seven of the book, available at libraries throughout the country, if readers are interested . . .
Posted by Peter Laufer on November 16,2011 | 10:43 PM
Dear Editor,
Please correct another major error in your article - I never collected any of the 50 individuals of the St. Francis Satyrs to sell, these were never for sale. Also, I had never collected any butterfly or other insect once a given taxa was listed under the Endangered Species Act, nor have I sold ANY endangered insects. I was never convicted of poaching Endangered butterflies as you continue to state in your article. The seized butterflies in question were mostly from Mexico and not protected under the ESA. Please study case CR-93-20137-JW more carefully.
I have been formally acknowledged as an expert on North American Lepidoptera (Butterflies and Moths) by the US Fish & Wildlife Service, and I can professionally state that most of the other comments and observations made in this article regarding the Saint Francis Satyr are either false or greatly exaggerated, which makes me question the supposed research conducted by Nick Haddad; since 1984 when I last collected this subspecies, research by others has shown that the butterfly is much more widespread than indicated and certainly has never been in any danger of extinction.
The Smithsonian Maqgazine is not setting any good examples by cutting people down and making gross exaggerations to glorify paid researchers like Nick Haddad - indeed there are some who are profitting from my discovery of the St. Francis Satyr.
Sincerely,
Thomas Kral
Posted by Thomas Kral on November 10,2011 | 09:11 PM
We've corrected the error and posted the following correction: Editor's Note, November 9, 2011: We apologize for an error in the original version of this story. Thomas Kral was sentenced to community service, fined and placed on probation, but he was not jailed for butterfly poaching.
Posted by Brian Wolly on November 9,2011 | 05:05 PM
Dear Editor, With regard to the article published in the Smithsonian Magazine on October 7, 2011, Who Can Identify the World’s Rarest Butterfly, I must address the sheer libelous and slanderous aspects of this article after it was called to my attention by several shocked readers. First, I was never jailed for butterfly poaching. In federal court proceedings back in 1995 (Case No. CR-93-20137-JW), the judge recognized that I had “shown extraordinary acceptance of responsibility and that the law was confusing” in giving me a probationary sentence in recognition that most violations that were illegal insect collecting under the Lacey Act and other obscure laws were in fact infractions made by myself and a host of other “un-indicted” collectors that included many university and museum researchers and even an employee of the US Fish & Wildlife Service, as is fully proven and documented in these court proceedings. I discovered Neonympha mitchelli francisci purely by accident when I was a soldier stationed at Fort Bragg. There was never any intent or action whatsoever to collect specimens to sell, instead many were donated to museums, including the holotype that I had donated to of all places, the Smithsonian Museum. I never made a single cent from my discovery of this subspecies, but this is how the Smithsonian Magazine decides to repay the services of a veteran! Do you even use fact-checkers? These false and slanderous comments could easily be dismissed if they were from the Tabloids or other journalistic rags, but this is the Smithsonian! People expect truth, honesty and accuracy from a magazine that is directly identified with the United States of America. Thus, I will also contact members of the US Congress and Senate to fully investigate this matter in order for Congress, government agencies, and legal councils to determine appropriate apologies, disciplinary, and terminations for the comments made by Nick Haddad, Rob Dunn and all perpetrators.
Posted by Thomas W. Kral on November 6,2011 | 02:18 PM
There appear to be several other colonies of something that appears to be this butterfly. These are scattered from N Alabama to Central Texas in inadequately studied wetlands. Future DNA analysis may make it possible to unravel relationships in this group if the colonies survive habitat destruction from peat extraction, pasture improvement and regional drought. These insects are easily confused with two very similar species that are more widespread.
Posted by C. J. Durden on October 17,2011 | 10:17 AM
The article is flawed in that this entire discussion revolves around one very-weakly differentiated colony of Mitchell's Satyr on Fort Bragg, N.C. The butterfly occurs in several sites on Fort Bragg and has even been reported outside the base, though the details are a closely-held secret among local biologists. Note that two counties are listed for the butterfly's North Carolina distribution on the Butterflies and Moths of North America maps, reflective of known distribution around Fort Bragg. Neonympha mitchelli has now been reported from many sites in northern Alabama and northeastern Mississippi, where it can be widespread and numerous in the region's wooded wetlands. All reports indicate that these populations resemble the North Carolina population, so the range of the St. Francis Satyr extends well beyond the borders of Fort Bragg.
Second point: Tom Kral was never jailed for his poaching conviction. Kral was sentenced to a relatively small fine and community service.
Posted by Harry Pavulaan on October 16,2011 | 03:56 PM
No doubt that one of the rarest of the rare is the Palos Verde Blue. The species only know locality is on a small portion of a military fuel dump near San Diego. The population is being augmented through a captive breeding program managed through Moorpark College.
Posted by Mitch Magdich on October 12,2011 | 08:53 AM
The St. Francis Satyr used to come to east Texas to dine on Lantana Flowers in the 1960's. :D
Posted by Sondra Anderson on October 7,2011 | 04:45 PM