Tracking the Elusive Lynx
Rare and maddeningly elusive, the "ghost cat" tries to give scientists the slip high in the mountains of Montana
- By Abigail Tucker
- Photographs by Ted Wood
- Smithsonian magazine, February 2011, Subscribe
(Page 4 of 6)
To follow the cats into the folds of the Rockies, Squires employs a research team of former trappers and the hardiest grad students—men and women who don’t mind camping in snow, harvesting roadkill for bait, hauling supply sleds on cross-country skis and snowshoeing through valleys where the voices of wolves reverberate.
In the early days of the study, the scientists retrieved the data-packed GPS collars by treeing lynx with hounds; after a chase across hills and ravines, a luckless technician would don climbing spurs and safety ropes, scale a neighboring tree and shoot a sedation dart at the lynx, a firefighter’s net spread below in case the cat tumbled out. (There was no net for the researcher.) Now that the collars are programmed to fall off automatically every August, the most “aerobic” (Squires’ euphemism for backbreaking) aspect of the research is hunting for kittens in the spring. Thrillingly pretty, with eyes blue as the big Montana sky, the kittens are practically impossible to locate in the deep woods, even with the aid of tracking devices attached to their mothers. But the litters must be found, because they indicate the population’s overall health.
Squires’ research has shown time and again how particular lynx are. “Cats are picky and this cat’s pickier than most,” Squires said. They tend to stick to older stands of forest in the winter and venture to younger areas in the summer. In Montana, they almost exclusively colonize portions of woods dominated by Engelmann spruce, with its peeling, fish-scale bark, and sub-alpine fir. They avoid forest that has recently been logged or burned.
Such data are instrumental for forest managers, highway planners and everyone else obligated by the Endangered Species Act to protect lynx habitat. The findings have also helped inform the Nature Conservancy’s recent efforts to buy 310,000 acres of Montana mountains, including one of Squires’ longtime study areas, from a timber company, one of the biggest conservation deals in the country’s history. “I knew there were lynx but didn’t appreciate until I started working with John [Squires] the particular importance of these parcels of land for lynx,” says Maria Mantas, the Conservancy’s western Montana director of science.
Squires’ goal is to map the lynx’s entire range in the state, combining GPS data from collared cats in the remotest areas with aerial photography and satellite images to identify prime habitat. Using computer models of how climate change is progressing, Squires will predict how the lynx’s forest will change and identify the best management strategies to protect it.
The day after our run-in with M-120, the technicians and I drove west three hours across the shortgrass prairie, parallel to the front of the Rockies, to set traps in a rugged unstudied zone along the Teton River, in Lewis and Clark National Forest. The foothills were zigzagged with the trails of bighorn sheep, the high peaks plumed with blowing snow. Gray rock faces grimaced down at us. The vastness of the area and the cunning of our quarry made the task at hand seem suddenly impossible.
The grizzlies were “probably” still slumbering, we were assured at the ranger station, but there wasn’t much snow on the ground. We unhitched the snowmobiles from their trailers and eased the machines over melting roads toward a drafty cabin where we spent the night.
The next morning, Eggeman and Kosterman zoomed off on their snowmobiles to set the traps in hidden spots off the trail, twisting wire with chapped hands to secure the bait, dangling CDs and filing the trap doors so they fell smoothly. The surrounding snow was full of saucer-size lynx tracks.
Single Page « Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next »
Subscribe now for more of Smithsonian's coverage on history, science and nature.
Related topics: Carnivores Hunting Montana Mountains
Additional Sources
"Ghost Cat: a historic land deal will protect forests for the rare Canada lynx—if researchers can find it," Scott McMillion, Nature Conservancy Magazine, Winter 2009
"Movements of a Male Canada Lynx Crossing the Greater Yellowstone Area, Including Highways," John R. Squires and Robert Oakleaf, Northwest Science Notes, 2005
"Winter Prey Selection of Canada Lynx in Northwestern Montana," John R. Squires and Leonard F. Ruggiero, Journal of Wildlife Management, April 2007
"Characteristics of an unharvested lynx population during a snowshoe hare decline," Kim G. Poole, Journal of Wildlife Management, October 1994









Comments (7)
Tina, While not a researcher I know much data can be learned from observation, viewing, photography, scat analysis, interviewing locals and hunters, autopsies, and if adventurous enough with software modeling. The idea that two thirds of the animals being tracked died should in itself tell an ethical person to stop. How many of these deaths were the result of a drugged animal with a noose around it's neck running into traffic, or too disoriented and distracted to find food. If "a dedicated researcher without traps and radio collars would be lucky to see one lynx in ten years," and I've seen fifty without trying, can I get paid for my insight? To me this approach is akin to thinking people die from hypothermia, let's throw some in the ice water and collect the data as they suffer and die, then we'll know what to do. These animals do not require rocket science, if you want to help them help the local rabbits, if you want to help the rabbits, plant some grass. Common sense is lacking here. Alan Strech
Posted by Alan Strech on November 5,2012 | 06:46 PM
Alan Strech, you have no idea what you're talking about. "A multitude of other ways to get the data"? Name three. Name one. A dedicated researcher without traps and radio collars would be lucky to see one lynx in ten years. This animal can range over hundreds of square miles of rugged mountains, and leaves tracks only in snow, often deep snow. Want to try tracking one without a collar? You first! "Of the animals that died while Squires was tracking them, about a third perished from human-related causes, such as poaching or vehicle collisions; another third were killed by other animals (mostly mountain lions); and the rest starved." Now tell me how to get information like that without radio collars-- which are not "permanent nooses" but are sized so the animal can follow its normal routine and are generally designed to fall off after a certain time. The trapping is done with as little disruption to the animals as possible. The information gained is often critical to their conservation and survival, as is stated clearly in this article. If you have any better ideas, your nearest university department of wildlife conservation would like to hear them.
Posted by Tina Rhea on March 22,2012 | 06:04 PM
"Snow Phantom" was an interesting read. In our neighborhood we have 3 or 4 of their brethren, bobcats (Lynx rufus), which we welcome. What we don't do is pursue them with snowmobiles, bait them, trap them, drug them and tie transmitters to their necks. One can only imagine the horror of a wild animal waking up in and from a drugged state with a permanent noose around their neck. Where I'm from we shun people who torture animals, not revere them. There are a multitude of other ways to get the data that is neither lazy nor cruel. Shame on them.
Posted by Alan Strech on February 22,2011 | 10:05 PM
well, im gonna have a nice discussion tomorrow about this.I could understand this text well...
Posted by luiz on February 21,2011 | 06:10 PM
Dear Ms. Tucker,
This is a wonderful story and I loved the photographs of the lynx. I just have one criticism; I saw the same photographs (and read essentially the same story, with only a slightly different text) a few months ago while waiting in the dentist's office in Nature Conservancy Magazine.
I would have preferred, if you're publishing the same story twice, to have some different pictures to go with the slightly different text.
all the best,
Grayson Hugh
Posted by Grayson Hugh on February 2,2011 | 07:34 PM
Hi
Interesting article on the linx. It was mentioned that the lynx can bare young at a very early age, one year I believe.
Could it be that the diet of the lynx, which is exclusively rabbits may have something to do with this early onset of the ability to become pregnant? I believe that rabbits are able to not only pregnant at less than a year, but that they also can have overlapping pregnancies.
I feel that the lynx ingesting so many rabbits in its lifetime over countless generations have become linked to the hormonal balances and influences of the rabbit and have inadvertently become physically adapted to the hormonal cycles of the rabbit.
Posted by Amphibian. on January 28,2011 | 07:58 PM
Ms. Tucker: While you followed the team on the track of the lynx, you carried us along--not only through the anecdotal asides, but with sentences so deftly written they operated like hidden cameras. You kept us in the world with your words. If that piece does not win honors--such as republication in America's Best Essays--the judges should hang their heads like the guy who found nothing in those cages. Well done.
Posted by Mike Robinson on January 22,2011 | 10:16 AM