Timothy Ferris on Voyagers' Never-Ending Journey
With the spacecraft poised to leave our solar system, the writer who helped compile the time capsules they carry reflects on our deepest foray into outer space
- By Timothy Ferris
- Smithsonian magazine, May 2012, Subscribe
(Page 2 of 3)
Their newfound alacrity flung the Voyagers from Jupiter to Saturn in less than three years. They found that Saturn has not just the few rings observed from Earth but thousands of them, rippled and twisted into kinks by the gravitational interactions of Saturn’s many moons.
There the two spacecraft parted company. Voyager One took a close look at Saturn’s mysterious, cloud-enshrouded satellite Titan—of intense scientific interest because it has a dense atmosphere thought to resemble that of the infant Earth. The maneuver enabled scientists to nail down Titan’s diameter (3,200 miles) and to improve their understanding of its surface, where ethane lakes are thought to glisten under an atmosphere 60 percent denser than Earth’s. But it also flung Voyager One out of the plane of the solar system, ending its planetary mission.
Voyager Two, however, continued on to Uranus in 1986 and Neptune in 1989. All the close-up photos we have of Uranus—a weird world knocked on its side, presumably by colliding with another massive body when the solar system was young and unruly—and of ice-blue Neptune, whose satellite Triton displayed nitrogen geysers blasting through a frozen-nitrogen surface sheath, were taken by Voyager Two.
Scientists like to say that a discovery’s significance can be measured by how many prior scientific papers it renders obsolete. Whole shelves full of books about the Sun’s planets were rendered obsolete by the Voyager mission and by those that followed the trails it blazed—missions like Galileo, which orbited Jupiter 34 times before being deliberately incinerated in the Jovian atmosphere in 2003 (to ensure that it would never crash into and contaminate Jupiter’s satellite Europa, which may harbor an ocean of liquid water beneath its surface ice), and Cassini, which has been orbiting Saturn since 2004. It’s not that the pre-Voyager books were foolishly erroneous, but as human knowledge grows, our perspectives improve, altering our sense of what matters.
Sagan perceived, more clearly than most, Voyager’s potential to improve human perspectives. At his instigation, Voyager One looked back on Valentine’s Day 1990 and took photos of all the Sun’s planets as seen from high above the plane. The Earth took up just one pixel, Carl’s famous Pale Blue Dot. “That’s home,” he wrote. “Think of the rivers of blood spilled by all those generals and emperors so that, in glory and triumph, they could become the momentary masters of a fraction of a dot.”
Voyager One is now 11 billion miles out—so far that its radio signals, traveling at the velocity of light, take 16 hours to reach Earth. If you perched on Voyager One and looked back toward home, you’d see the Sun as just a bright star, south of Rigel, with Earth lost in its glare. Voyager Two, on its quite different trajectory, is 13 light-hours out. Radio signals from the two probes, captured daily by the Deep Space Network’s big dish antennas, arrive at a strength of less than one femtowatt, a millionth of a billionth of a watt.
Once the Voyagers reach interstellar space, they will encounter an environment so different from Earth’s environs as to challenge our homespun notions of what it means to go someplace. The Sun and all the other stars we see in the sky are orbiting the center of the Milky Way galaxy. Their orbital velocity—out here in the suburbs, some 27,000 light-years from the galaxy’s center—is 220 kilometers per second. That’s 500,000 miles per hour, more than ten times the Voyagers’ speed of 40,000 mph relative to the Sun. So when we speak of the Voyagers’ velocities we’re talking about small increments, like that of a car entering a freeway and edging across lanes of speeding traffic.
People ask when one of the Voyagers will encounter another star. The answer, according to JPL’s navigators, is that Voyager Two, 40,000 years from now, will pass within 1.7 light-years of the red dwarf star Ross 248. But what that really means is that Ross 248, sweeping by Voyager Two like a distant ocean liner viewed from a lifeboat, will be seen from the perspective of Voyager Two to slowly brighten over the millennia, then get dimmer for many more.
Single Page « Previous 1 2 3 Next »
Subscribe now for more of Smithsonian's coverage on history, science and nature.









Comments (6)
Beautifully written and haunting--suggests that every space shot is really a kind of futile arrow against our own solitude and mortality. Loved it.
Posted by Ted Anton on August 17,2012 | 12:24 PM
The phrase in the second to last paragraph, "The technology, though outdated..." prompts me to request an education. I've thought about the Voyager recordings for many years (I have the commercial CD's of them), and have always thought analog was a good choice (even if nearly mandatory at the time). Compared to a digital alternative, that is. Isn't the fact that, e.g., ASCII character 65 being defined as a capital A, an Earth convention that computer-literate cultures have agreed to? If there truly were extraterestials, wouldn't the "primer" necessary to explain how we on Earth define the bits and bytes of our digital audio files be much larger than the relatively simple physics behind the analog production of sound waves on these golden records?
Posted by Dwight Klettke on May 18,2012 | 04:25 PM
Iwsh he would get his technical facts correct and sorted out rather than try to make them more dramatic that they are as opposed to technically impressive and reflecing creatrivity within the project team, both engineers and scientists as well as JPL project support spersonnel.
Posted by Norman F.Ness on May 6,2012 | 05:26 PM
What an absolutely incredible article. The author actually made me feel sad and jealous for these two incredible machines. Oh, but to see what these instruments will encounter. Fare thee well, Voyagers.
Posted by Dan on May 5,2012 | 01:44 PM
I love Timothy Ferris's writing. After listening to his "Seeing the Dark" numerous time, it was his voice I heard while reading this wonderful article.
Posted by Bill on April 24,2012 | 12:44 PM
A brilliant article, I enjoyed it immensely. Lots of good information in it.
Posted by Ron Knight on April 22,2012 | 10:10 PM