The Venus Flytrap's Lethal Allure
Native only to the Carolinas, the carnivorous plant that draws unwitting insects to its spiky maw now faces dangers of its own
- By Abigail Tucker
- Photographs by Lynda Richardson
- Smithsonian magazine, February 2010, Subscribe
(Page 2 of 4)
Instead of absorbing nitrogen and other nutrients through their roots, as most plants do, the 630 or so species of carnivorous plants consume insects and, in the case of certain Southeast Asian pitcher plants of toilet-bowl-like proportions, bigger animals such as frogs, lizards and “the very, very occasional rodent,” says Barry Rice, a carnivorous plant researcher affiliated with the University of California at Davis. The carnivores are particularly abundant in Malaysia and Australia, but they’ve also colonized every state in this country: the Pine Barrens of coastal New Jersey are a hot spot, along with several pockets in the Southeast. Most varieties catch their prey with primitive devices like pitfalls and sticky surfaces. Only two—the Venus flytrap and the European waterwheel, Aldrovanda vesiculosa—have snap traps with hinged leaves that snag insects. They evolved from simpler carnivorous plants about 65 million years ago; the snap mechanism enables them to catch larger prey relative to their body size. The fossil record suggests their ancestors were much more widespread, especially in Europe.
Flytraps are improbably elaborate. Each yawning maw is a single curved leaf; the hinge in the middle is a thick vein, a modification of the vein that runs up the center of a standard leaf. Several tiny trigger hairs stand on the leaf’s surface. Lured by the plants’ sweet-smelling nectar glands, insects touch the trigger hairs and trip the trap. (A hair must be touched at least twice in rapid succession; thus the plant distinguishes between the brush of a scrambling beetle and the plop of a raindrop.) The force that closes the trap comes from an abrupt release of pressure in certain leaf cells, prompted by the hair trigger; that causes the leaf, which had curved outward, to flip inward, like an inside-out soft contact lens snapping back into its rightful shape. The whole process takes about a tenth of a second, faster than the blink of an eye. After capturing its prey, a flytrap excretes digestive enzymes not unlike our own and absorbs the liquefying meal. The leaf may reopen for a second or even a third helping before withering and falling off.
The plant, a perennial, may live 20 years or maybe even longer, Luken speculates, though nobody knows for sure. New plants can grow directly from an underground shoot called a rhizome or from seeds, which typically fall just inches away from the parent: flytraps are found in clumps of dozens. Ironically, the traps rely on insects for pollination. In late May or early June, they sprout delicate white flowers, like flags of truce waved at bees, flies and wasps.
The first written record of the Venus flytrap is a 1763 letter from Arthur Dobbs, governor of North Carolina, who declared it “the great wonder of the vegetable world.” He compared the plant to “an iron spring fox trap” but somehow failed to grasp the ultimate fate of the creatures caught between the leaves—carnivorous plants were still an alien concept. The flytraps were more common then: in 1793, the naturalist William Bartram wrote that such “sportive vegetables” lined the edges of some streams. (He applauded the flytraps and had little pity for their victims, the “incautious deluded insects.”)
Live plants were first exported to England in 1768, where people referred to them as “tipitiwitchets.” A British naturalist, John Ellis, gave the plant its scientific name: Dionaea is a reference to Dione, mother of love goddess Venus (some believe this was a bawdy anatomical pun about the plant’s half-closed leaves and red insides), and muscipula means “mousetrap.”
Ellis also guessed the plant’s dark secret. He sent a letter detailing his suspicions, along with some dried flytrap specimens and a copperplate engraving of a flytrap seizing an earwig, to the great Swedish botanist and father of modern taxonomy, Carl Linnaeus, who apparently didn’t believe him. A carnivorous plant, Linnaeus declared, was “against the order of nature as willed by God.”
A hundred years later, Charles Darwin was quite taken with the notion of flesh-eating foliage. He experimented with sundews he found growing on the heaths of Sussex, feeding them egg whites and cheese, and was particularly charmed by the flytraps that friends shipped from the Carolinas. He called them “one of the most wonderful [plants] in the world.” His little-known treatise, Insectivorous Plants, detailed their adventuresome diet.
Darwin argued that one feature of the snap trap’s structure—the gaps between the toothy hairs that fringe the trap’s edges—evolved to allow “small and useless fry” to wiggle free so the plants could focus their energies on meatier bugs. But Luken and his colleague, aquatic ecologist John Hutchens, recently spent a year inspecting exoskeletons pried from snapped traps before ultimately siding against Darwin: flytraps, they found, ingest insects of all sizes. They also noticed that flytraps don’t often trap flies. Ants, millipedes, beetles and other crawling creatures are much more likely to wander into jaws opened wide on the forest floor.
Single Page « Previous 1 2 3 4 Next »
Subscribe now for more of Smithsonian's coverage on history, science and nature.
Related topics: Plants Conservation Botany Environmental Preservation North Carolina South Carolina
Additional Sources
“How the Venus flytrap snaps,” Yoël Forterre et al., Nature, January 27, 2005.
“Habitats of Dionaea muscipula (Venus’ Fly Trap), Droseraceae, Associated with Carolina Bays,” James O. Luken, Southeastern Naturalist, 2005.
“Prey capture in the Venus flytrap: collection or selection?” John J. Hutchens and James O. Luken, Botany, October 1, 2009.









Comments (13)
not enough information maybe a little more info will do the trick.
Posted by azalea on October 15,2012 | 09:33 PM
wow! so lame!
Posted by sam on April 28,2012 | 04:36 PM
I grew up a few miles from Wilmington, North Carolina, the heart of Venus Fly-Trap country. My mother was a self-educated expert on wild plants and occasionally gave lectures on Venus Fly-Traps to Ladies' Clubs in Eastern North Carolina. We had transplanted Venus Fly-Traps from the wild to our backyard and she would dig up a plant and pot it to illustrate her lectures. This was in the early 1920's, when I was in grammar school; plants were not protected and were abundant. I'm afraid that I myself helped her dig up at least a hundred plants to transplant or to give to friends. When transplanted out of their native bog they usually did not live more than a year or two.
Posted by Morris Cox on April 20,2010 | 10:21 AM
Only the Carolinas? perhaps that's a particular strain of venus flytrap?
In woods west of Pensacola Florida, there were dense fields of flytrap, choking out most other plants. I haven't been there since 1980, perhaps they're buried under houses now. I remember walking through these areas (your feet were in water), the atmosphere felt very odd, menacing. They were mostly full to the top with ex-bugs, to use in a bouquet, you had to arduously clean the insides.
Posted by Mary on April 13,2010 | 10:58 AM
what page numbers did this article appear on in the Smithsonian magazine??
Posted by Molly on March 4,2010 | 12:37 AM
Ms. Tucker has expertly captured the quintessence of the vanishing Venus'Flytrap in its lair in the Carolinas, as studied by the dedicated ecologist-conservationist James Luken. Readers who are concerned with the sad fate of this unique carnivorous plant might wish to join proposed efforts to save the Venus' Flytrap through a voluntary premium placed on the sale of ethical and legal plants and thereby generating badly needed funds for its habitat management and protection (see http://botit.botany.wisc.edu/flytrap.
Posted by Thomas C. Gibson on March 2,2010 | 11:24 AM
Fantastic article.
Posted by CatfishSC on March 2,2010 | 03:16 AM
COOOOOOOOOL!!!!
Posted by paul on February 28,2010 | 01:50 PM
Sweet article!
Posted by sarah springer on February 23,2010 | 10:26 AM
Abigail Tucker is one of the best magazine writers in the business. The Smithsonian is lucky to have her. Keep up the amazing work!
Posted by Joseph on January 26,2010 | 01:36 PM
Wonderful article! You all might be interested to know that there is at least one more genus of active trappers - Utricularia have small bladder traps with a vacuum-sealed front door. Prey touch tiny trigger hairs that release the door, which opens inward, sucking in the prey to their doom. In the Southeastern US, most of these are floating aquatics - one species, Utricularia inflata, floats to the surface every spring to bloom, decorating our ponds like golden stars across the sky. So lovely.
Posted by Jean Everett on January 26,2010 | 05:55 AM
INTERESTING !!
Posted by ESTEBAN AGOSTO REID on January 23,2010 | 06:11 AM
Very well written and extremely informative. I had no idea of where the Venus Flytrap came from. I've known about them since I was probably 8 yr. old some 54 yr. ago. For some unknown reason I always thought of them coming up to the stores from the Amazon Rain Forrest or a jungle in Africa. That was probably from watching Tarzan movies and TV shows.
It's sad this topic isn't taught in grammar school. That's when children are most curious about these kinds of oddities of nature and impressionable. They would then take the information home to parents, who probably aren't aware of it either.
The information has got to get out to the public through articles like this, but in the mainstream news, not a publication most people cannot afford and some cannot understand.
Stronger protection of their natural habitat needs to be a priority. Addresses of Congressmen on Conservationist Committees need to accompany articles like these, as well as, the responsible people in the Carolinas.
Thanks for the education.
Posted by Charles Smyth on January 21,2010 | 07:00 PM