The Top Ten Daily Consequences of Having Evolved
From hiccups to wisdom teeth, the evolution of homo sapiens has left behind some glaring, yet innately human, imperfections
- By Rob Dunn
- Smithsonian.com, November 19, 2010, Subscribe
(Page 2 of 2)
6. We're awfully cold in winter
Fur is a warm hug on a cold day, useful and nearly ubiquitous among mammals. But we and a few other species, such as naked mole rats, lost it when we lived in tropical environments. Debate remains as to why this happened, but the most plausible explanation is that when modern humans began to live in larger groups, our hair filled with more and more ticks and lice. Individuals with less hair were perhaps less likely to get parasite-borne diseases. Being hairless in Africa was not so bad, but once we moved into Arctic lands, it had real drawbacks. Evolution has no foresight, no sense of where its work will go.
7. Goosebumps don't really help
When our ancestors were covered in fur, muscles in their skin called “arrector pili” contracted when they were upset or cold, making their fur stand on end. When an angry or frightened dog barks at you, these are the muscles that raise its bristling hair. The same muscles puff up the feathers of birds and the fur of mammals on cold days to help keep them warm. Although we no longer have fur, we still have fur muscles just beneath our skin. They flex each time we are scared by a bristling dog or chilled by a wind, and in doing so give us goose bumps that make our thin hair stand uselessly on end.
8. Our brains squeeze our teeth
A genetic mutation in our recent ancestors caused their descendants to have roomy skulls that accommodated larger brains. This may seem like pure success—brilliance, or its antecedent anyway. But the gene that made way for a larger brain did so by diverting bone away from our jaws, which caused them to become thinner and smaller. With smaller jaws, we could not eat tough food as easily as our thicker-jawed ancestors, but we could think our way out of that problem with the use of fire and stone tools. Yet because our teeth are roughly the same size as they have long been, our shrinking jaws don’t leave enough room for them in our mouths. Our wisdom teeth need to be pulled because our brains are too big.
9. Obesity
Many of the ways in which our bodies fail have to do with very recent changes, changes in how we use our bodies and structure our societies. Hunger evolved as a trigger to drive us to search out food. Our taste buds evolved to encourage us to choose foods that benefited our bodies (such as sugar, salt and fat) and avoid those that might be poisonous. In much of the modern world, we have more food than we require, but our hunger and cravings continue. They are a bodily GPS unit that insists on taking us where we no longer need to go. Our taste buds ask for more sugar, salt and fat, and we obey.
10 to 100. The list goes on.
I have not even mentioned male nipples. I have said nothing of the blind spot in our eyes. Nor of the muscles some of use to wiggle our ears. We are full of the accumulated baggage of our idiosyncratic histories. The body is built on an old form, out of parts that once did very different things. So take a moment to pause and sit on your coccyx, the bone that was once a tail. Roll your ankles, each of which once connected a hind leg to a paw. Revel not in who you are but who you were. It is, after all, amazing what evolution has made out of bits and pieces. Nor are we in any way alone or unique. Each plant, animal and fungus carries its own consequences of life's improvisational genius. So, long live the chimeras. In the meantime, if you will excuse me, I am going to rest my back.
Editor's note: A previous version of this article stated that your ankles once connected a foreleg to a paw. This version has been corrected to say hind leg.
Subscribe now for more of Smithsonian's coverage on history, science and nature.









Comments (220)
+ View All Comments
For the people who don't understand (such as Dawn) and those who will nod along to her questions: There is one simple misunderstanding. Evolution isn't a conscious force moving us towards being perfect beings. Evolution works when unadaptive traits start to weed out those among the species that have them. Why do we still have skin cancer (or any diseases, for that matter)? Well, there are multiple reasons, but there are two important ones. First, viruses and cancers are all forms of life themselves, and they evolve to survive like we have. It's like asking why are there still tigers and lions and other animals that can kill us. Evolution doesn't favor humans, it favors any life that can survive. Secondly, evolution doesn't eliminate every 'negative' trait, only those that are maladaptive to procreation. Hence why are bodies shutdown in old age. There is no process that will weed out the common symptoms of old age because by that point most in the species will have already reproduced, thus ensuring the continuation of those particular genetic symptoms. We lost our fur because it led to disease that killed our young. Skin cancer, however, generally doesn't affect people until later in life, so we never evolved an adaptation that would eliminate it (or, rather, someone might have been born with such a mutation, but because it wasn't any more beneficial for procreation, it didn't overwhelm the status quo of our genetics). These are simplifications and a lot more detail could be given, but this should at least answer Dawn's (and the like-minded) questions.
Posted by Lyttleton on January 25,2013 | 12:43 PM
Well, since the comments are going down this road...Evolution just makes more sense than creationism. Scientific evidence > 2000 year old book.
Posted by Kevin on March 29,2012 | 01:51 PM
Dawn, why are we not evolving to protect against skin cancer, etc.? I don't think you understand how long these changes take.
Look for instance at the example about losing our hair. People did not in a few generations decide--it's hot. We'll have less hair when we are born now. Somehow our bodies will know and make the children this way. Instead, over thousands of years, people will less hair lived longer because it was less likely they would get diseases from fleas and ticks. Those people had more children because they lived longer. Eventually, the hair characteristic was bred out.
We are evolving--some kids are being born without useless little toes,and Tibetans have developed slightly more dilate blood vessels to combat the cold over 3,000 years and that's pretty fast for this stuff. It takes so long to get to a significant difference you will not see it.
Posted by Paula on March 14,2012 | 06:11 PM
Dawn, evolution is not process of hundreds years, but a process of hundreds of thousands of years.
Posted by IE on February 25,2012 | 11:10 AM
Dawn's comments are very revealing. Maybe we are closer to a species divergence than we realize. The last time this happened was 200,000 years ago with the emergence of homo sapiens. It cannot be a coincidence that this was also a time of huge climate change. May I suggest homo scientiens and homo superstitiens?
Posted by Upright N. Grateful on January 30,2012 | 08:49 AM
I think Dawn's comment is very revealing. Perhaps we are closer to a species divergence than we realize. The last time this happened was 200,000 years ago, again accompanied by a major climate change. I don't think we can ignore the coincidence. Can I suggest homo scientifiens and homo superstitiens?
Posted by Upright N. Grateful on January 29,2012 | 11:41 AM
You guys are fighting for nothing i believe God made us! I think that the theory of evolutions is fasinating!BUT Get this God made us i am with John Gilbert
Posted by Selena on January 24,2012 | 10:45 PM
Oh brother! What an unscientific load of rubbish.
Posted by Cass on November 28,2011 | 02:54 AM
The last part of #2 is false. I routinely suppress hiccups by thought alone. It has become almost automatic; by the time I notice I have hiccups, I have usually suppressed them already.
Posted by Andrew on November 25,2011 | 07:26 PM
I think this article is a joke for real! it is a stretched to believe any of this. My question when I see the picture along with the article is, what is the next step? Why are we not evolving? of course you would say that our enviroment is inhibiting us, but really if we were evolving to our bodies would be crippled, from a bridge shaped spine as the article suggested to a S and then it would continue on to a C, is that not correct?? and what happens to our skin after we have lost our hairy exterior??? I guess you would say elemental damage like sunburn or cancer. Why would our body not evolve with another protective layer? Just a thought
Posted by Dawn on November 24,2011 | 01:01 PM
I am fond of the theory that we have descended from aquatic apes who lived near and utilized streams, lakes, and seas. Why do we stand on two legs? To see a greater distance in a savanna means such primates could also be seen by predators from greater distances. Moving about in water on two legs to keep their heads above water sounds possible to me.
Articles on the "Aquatic Ape Hypothesis" can be found by searching...
Posted by G. Dempsey on November 20,2011 | 04:08 AM
To Coert,
To what Darwinian stereotype that evolution promotes racism are you speaking of. This idea is an aspect of social darwinism and had nothing to do with Darwin or human evolution.
Most scientist in this field would agree that the differences between different races are so minute that they are almost irrelevant to any real discussion beyond identifying migration patterns.
p.s. If this picture represents a timescale then only the last figure would be a member of our species. The others would not even be subject to the term race.
Posted by Seth on November 17,2011 | 07:15 PM
I really enjoyed reading this article. Lovely, humourously told science, is a pleasure to read.
Interesting point about the 1930s nutritional research that a reader mentioned in relation to wisdom teeth. That was the one I hadn't heard before in the article, which leads me down the garden path of further enquiry to confirm or deny... Maybe I should've been a scientist. Maybe I still can be. Maybe we all are. Big brains are wonderful.
Posted by Lyn-K Saunders on August 24,2011 | 07:35 PM
Hrmm I have to say that I'm a little skeptical of #8. I thought that there are archaelogical finds of recent ancestor skulls full of healthy, straight teeth, without occlusion. I perceive today's epidemic of malocclusion as having modern malnutrition as the cause, not evolution. Shrug.
Posted by Ed on August 22,2011 | 10:48 PM
+ View All Comments