The Ten Most Disturbing Scientific Discoveries
Scientists have come to some surprising conclusions about the world and our place in it. Are some things just better left unknown?
- By Laura Helmuth
- Smithsonian.com, May 14, 2010, Subscribe
Science can be glorious; it can bring clarity to a chaotic world. But big scientific discoveries are by nature counterintuitive and sometimes shocking. Here are ten of the biggest threats to our peace of mind.
1. The Earth is not the center of the universe.
We’ve had more than 400 years to get used to the idea, but it’s still a little unsettling. Anyone can plainly see that the Sun and stars rise in the east, sweep across the sky and set in the west; the Earth feels stable and stationary. When Copernicus proposed that the Earth and other planets instead orbit the Sun,
… his contemporaries found his massive logical leap “patently absurd,” says Owen Gingerich of the Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics. “It would take several generations to sink in. Very few scholars saw it as a real description of the universe.”
Galileo got more grief for the idea than Copernicus did. He used a telescope to provide evidence for the heliocentric theory, and some of his contemporaries were so disturbed by what the new invention revealed—craters on a supposedly perfectly spherical moon, other moons circling Jupiter—that they refused to look through the device. More dangerous than defying common sense, though, was Galileo’s defiance of the Catholic Church. Scripture said that the Sun revolved around the Earth, and the Holy Office of the Inquisition found Galileo guilty of heresy for saying otherwise.
2. The microbes are gaining on us.
Antibiotics and vaccines have saved millions of lives; without these wonders of modern medicine, many of us would have died in childhood of polio, mumps or smallpox. But some microbes are evolving faster than we can find ways to fight them.
The influenza virus mutates so quickly that last year’s vaccination is usually ineffective against this year’s bug. Hospitals are infested with antibiotic-resistant Staphylococcus bacteria that can turn a small cut into a limb- or life-threatening infection. And new diseases keep jumping from animals to humans—ebola from apes, SARS from masked palm civets, hantavirus from rodents, bird flu from birds, swine flu from swine. Even tuberculosis, the disease that killed Frederic Chopin and Henry David Thoreau, is making a comeback, in part because some strains of the bacterium have developed multi-drug resistance. Even in the 21st century, it’s quite possible to die of consumption.
3. There have been mass extinctions in the past, and we’re probably in one now.
Paleontologists have identified five points in Earth’s history when, for whatever reason (asteroid impact, volcanic eruptions and atmospheric changes are the main suspects), mass extinctions eliminated many or most species.
The concept of extinction took a while to sink in. Thomas Jefferson saw mastodon bones from Kentucky, for example, and concluded that the giant animals must still be living somewhere in the interior of the continent. He asked Lewis and Clark to keep an eye out for them.
Today, according to many biologists, we’re in the midst of a sixth great extinction. Mastodons may have been some of the earliest victims. As humans moved from continent to continent, large animals that had thrived for millions of years began to disappear—mastodons in North America, giant kangaroos in Australia, dwarf elephants in Europe. Whatever the cause of this early wave of extinctions, humans are driving modern extinctions by hunting, destroying habitat, introducing invasive species and inadvertently spreading diseases.
Subscribe now for more of Smithsonian's coverage on history, science and nature.









Comments (229)
+ View All Comments
I'm no expert on the field of cosmology but I thought that according to Hubble's Law the universe was expanding uniformly such that everywhere was the centre of the universe. So if that is the case then the Earth is the centre of the universe....it's just it's not the only centre. Maybe someone who knows more on the subject could explain that better or tell me i'm wrong.
Posted by Alan Laing on February 8,2013 | 05:27 PM
Why do so many Christians who disagree with everything written here still read the articles and comment? I'm just curious. Posted by kiernan on January 29,2013 | 02:57 AM Kierman, Its because those who agree with certain aspects of this article are most likely NOT Christians. What about death? Is the E.T. dead too? Therefore, the answer to this question comes from the One who Fashioned us for this very purpose: 20 We are therefore Christ’s ambassadors, as though God were making his appeal through us. We implore you on Christ’s behalf: Be reconciled to God. 2 Corinthians 5 New International Version (NIV) Awaiting the New Body 5 For we know that if the earthly tent we live in is destroyed, we have a building from God, an eternal house in heaven, not built by human hands. 2 Meanwhile we groan, longing to be clothed instead with our heavenly dwelling, 3 because when we are clothed, we will not be found naked. 4 For while we are in this tent, we groan and are burdened, because we do not wish to be unclothed but to be clothed instead with our heavenly dwelling, so that what is mortal may be swallowed up by life.5 Now the one who has fashioned us for this very purpose is God, who has given us the Spirit as a deposit, guaranteeing what is to come.
Posted by Jeff on February 7,2013 | 08:38 PM
Darwin? Darwin did you say? Poppycock and feathers, I say. Be off with him already!
Posted by Thom McCan on February 7,2013 | 07:46 AM
E=mc² is from Poincaré
Posted by bud on February 7,2013 | 05:05 AM
I'd like to think that dark matter and dark energy will, somehow, become sufficiently understood that they can be a solution to some of our problems.
Posted by Nicholas on February 6,2013 | 09:18 PM
My Question: Will the melting of Arctic ice change the balance of the world? Will it wobble? Will it move? Will the changing of the seasons be gradually altered by this? Will Chinese, Thorium LFTR and Thorium fission technologies really "Alter The Gobal Energy Maps Forever"?
Posted by Uncle B on February 6,2013 | 09:12 PM
Very interesting piece! However, I must point out that #7 regarding Darwin's evolution theory has yet to be proven as fact and there is much evidence to support the theory that modern humankind was created through genetic manipulation of an earth hominid/ape like creature by advanced extra terrestrial visitors using their own DNA. Ancient records, worldwide creation stories, out of place artifacts and our own unique DNA and chromosomal structures lend credence to this theory. We will never find that missing evolutionary link - there never was one. Also, dire climate change being created by humans (#9)is likely not true either. Ancient historical records, pre- historical stories handed down orally by peoples all over the world and actual geophysical evidence on the Earth point to repeating and regular earth cataclysms every 3,600 years caused by what many believe is either a comet or a planet orbiting our sun's brown dwarf twin that passes close enough to earth for geomagnetic and electrical plasma reactions to occur between them. Keep your minds open and do your own research. I think you'll be amazed.
Posted by Rose on February 4,2013 | 10:02 PM
@Don I wonder why whenever we drill down into ice, to see what the air was like when it was trapped in the falling snow, we always see the CO2 levels have spiked dramatically in the last 200 years. http://zipcodezoo.com/Trends/Trends%20in%20Atmospheric%20Carbon%20Dioxide.asp When you consider that we create about 26 400 000 000 000 kg of CO2 per year that must be a rather large volcano that you are thinking about. Unfortunately for your theory Olympus Mons is on Mars and so probably does not affect our atmosphere. http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn11638-climate-myths-human-co2-emissions-are-too-tiny-to-matter.html While the human contribution to the total CO2 produced per year is not that large when compared with all biological processes. Our little nudge has pushed a stable system 30% further from its balance point than it has been in a half million years. So the question becomes what if we push the system to far and it topples into a new balance point. The problem is that no one really knows the answer. Which is why it is probably a good idea to do some research so we can make a better guess of how much trouble we are in. My best guess is that in the 1st world it will probably only mean a tightening of the belts (both proverbially and figuratively). In the 3rd world where people are living closer to the edge it probably means that lots of people will starve.
Posted by James on February 4,2013 | 01:24 PM
I like the article, but I was hoping an organization as vernerable as the Smithsonian wouldn't be ignorant enough to blame climate change on Man. I mean, ONE vulcano eruption releases more Co2 into the atmosphere than man has since he walked upright. At the VERY least, global warming, or manmade climate change, or whatever you call it now to make the facts fit your theory, is unquestionably unproven. It should no tbe presented as fact. WEAK.
Posted by Don McCoy on February 4,2013 | 11:21 AM
I can't help but be amused by the disturbing "fact" that we can see only 4% of the Universe. This may not be the case. Mathematician Donald Saari has derived a model that treats galaxies as though they are composed of rigid bodies (aka stars and planets) rather than as "star soup". This model doesn't account for all the matter we see--but it's likely that we see 90% of the universe, rather than 4%. Of course, this new model is rather controvertial: mathematicians and physicists tend to think it's reasonable, but astrophysicists tend to dislike it.
Posted by Alpheus on February 2,2013 | 01:05 AM
Why do so many Christians who disagree with everything written here still read the articles and comment? I'm just curious.
Posted by kiernan on January 29,2013 | 02:57 AM
According to the scientist in Programming Of Life by the scientist Johnson, Miano and Ortenzi evolution is operationally impossible. "Scientist generally consider anything with a probability of 1 in 10 to the 70 power operationally impossible." "The probability that life, a single cell, evolving by undirected natural processes is 1 in 10 to the 340,000,000 power." That's just one cell, think about it.
Posted by terrence on January 27,2013 | 09:37 PM
#10 is a bit odd, since we can see so little of the cosmos, of course we can't see most of it. If it dosen't glow radiation then it's invisible. I"d suggest replacing it with Hubbles' discovery that they Universe is expanding and the Discovery that it is doing so at an increading rate of speed. Not jsut big discoveries but, they also prove that Einstein's Relativity Theory is wrong, since Big Bangs violate it, and the expanding cosmose provs a Big Bang happend. Also, #9. Henry David Thoreau, was born and grew up during the Little Ice Age. You may hav heard of it, it lasted from approxiamately 1352 to 1855 AD. The COLDEST period of the Little Ice age was its last 60 years [1795 to 1855]. This period is known as the Mauder Minimum. It saw the coldest temperatures in Europe and Nothern America ever recorded by mankind. So yes girls, during the Little Ice Age's coldest period, spring did come later. However, never fear, the Little Ice Age ended, and the earth has gotten back to warming up as our planet gets nearer to the Sun do it it's wobbly orbit. A gift from that asteroid that smacked into the earth 65 milliion years ago and killed off the last of the surface dynosaurse.
Posted by Bill Masters on January 27,2013 | 01:11 PM
There are many eminent scientists alive today who will not and could not subscribe to Darwin's still unproven theories. These are taught in schools as facts. I can tell you why: We have rebelled against our Creator and will do/say/believe anything rather than have Him rule over us. In Six Days is a book I have heard about, love to read it soon, unfortunately haven't got it yet so content myself with the greatest Book of all
Posted by Maureen Leigh on January 23,2013 | 10:01 AM
+ View All Comments