The Ten Most Disturbing Scientific Discoveries
Scientists have come to some surprising conclusions about the world and our place in it. Are some things just better left unknown?
- By Laura Helmuth
- Smithsonian.com, May 14, 2010, Subscribe
(Page 3 of 3)
It’s hard to tell fact from fiction when it comes to this particularly gruesome custom. Ritual sacrifice is described in the Bible, Greek mythology and the Norse sagas, and the Romans accused many of the people they conquered of engaging in ritual sacrifice, but the evidence was thin. A recent accumulation of archaeological findings from around the world shows that it was surprisingly common for people to ritually kill—and sometimes eat—other people.
9. We’ve already changed the climate for the rest of this century.
The mechanics of climate change aren’t that complex: we burn fossil fuels; a byproduct of that burning is carbon dioxide; it enters the atmosphere and traps heat, warming the surface of the planet. The consequences are already apparent: glaciers are melting faster than ever, flowers are blooming earlier (just ask Henry David Thoreau), and plants and animals are moving to more extreme latitudes and altitudes to keep cool.
Even more disturbing is the fact that carbon dioxide lingers in the atmosphere for hundreds of years. We have just begun to see the effects of human-induced climate change, and the predictions for what’s to come range from dire to catastrophic.
10. The universe is made of stuff we can barely begin to imagine.
Everything you probably think of when you think of the universe—planets, stars, galaxies, black holes, dust—makes up just 4 percent of whatever is out there. The rest comes in two flavors of “dark,” or unknown stuff: dark matter, at 23 percent of the universe, and dark energy, at a whopping 73 percent:
Scientists have some ideas about what dark matter might be—exotic and still hypothetical particles—but they have hardly a clue about dark energy. … University of Chicago cosmologist Michael S. Turner ranks dark energy as “the most profound mystery in all of science.”
The effort to solve it has mobilized a generation of astronomers in a rethinking of physics and cosmology to rival and perhaps surpass the revolution Galileo inaugurated on an autumn evening in Padua. … [Dark energy] has inspired us to ask, as if for the first time: What is this cosmos we call home?
But astronomers do know that, thanks to these dark parts, the universe is expanding. And not only expanding, but expanding faster and faster. Ultimately, everything in the universe will drift farther and farther apart until the universe is uniformly cold and desolate. The world will end in a whimper.
Subscribe now for more of Smithsonian's coverage on history, science and nature.









Comments (228)
+ View All Comments
Why do so many Christians who disagree with everything written here still read the articles and comment? I'm just curious. Posted by kiernan on January 29,2013 | 02:57 AM Kierman, Its because those who agree with certain aspects of this article are most likely NOT Christians. What about death? Is the E.T. dead too? Therefore, the answer to this question comes from the One who Fashioned us for this very purpose: 20 We are therefore Christ’s ambassadors, as though God were making his appeal through us. We implore you on Christ’s behalf: Be reconciled to God. 2 Corinthians 5 New International Version (NIV) Awaiting the New Body 5 For we know that if the earthly tent we live in is destroyed, we have a building from God, an eternal house in heaven, not built by human hands. 2 Meanwhile we groan, longing to be clothed instead with our heavenly dwelling, 3 because when we are clothed, we will not be found naked. 4 For while we are in this tent, we groan and are burdened, because we do not wish to be unclothed but to be clothed instead with our heavenly dwelling, so that what is mortal may be swallowed up by life.5 Now the one who has fashioned us for this very purpose is God, who has given us the Spirit as a deposit, guaranteeing what is to come.
Posted by Jeff on February 7,2013 | 08:38 PM
Darwin? Darwin did you say? Poppycock and feathers, I say. Be off with him already!
Posted by Thom McCan on February 7,2013 | 07:46 AM
E=mc² is from Poincaré
Posted by bud on February 7,2013 | 05:05 AM
I'd like to think that dark matter and dark energy will, somehow, become sufficiently understood that they can be a solution to some of our problems.
Posted by Nicholas on February 6,2013 | 09:18 PM
My Question: Will the melting of Arctic ice change the balance of the world? Will it wobble? Will it move? Will the changing of the seasons be gradually altered by this? Will Chinese, Thorium LFTR and Thorium fission technologies really "Alter The Gobal Energy Maps Forever"?
Posted by Uncle B on February 6,2013 | 09:12 PM
Very interesting piece! However, I must point out that #7 regarding Darwin's evolution theory has yet to be proven as fact and there is much evidence to support the theory that modern humankind was created through genetic manipulation of an earth hominid/ape like creature by advanced extra terrestrial visitors using their own DNA. Ancient records, worldwide creation stories, out of place artifacts and our own unique DNA and chromosomal structures lend credence to this theory. We will never find that missing evolutionary link - there never was one. Also, dire climate change being created by humans (#9)is likely not true either. Ancient historical records, pre- historical stories handed down orally by peoples all over the world and actual geophysical evidence on the Earth point to repeating and regular earth cataclysms every 3,600 years caused by what many believe is either a comet or a planet orbiting our sun's brown dwarf twin that passes close enough to earth for geomagnetic and electrical plasma reactions to occur between them. Keep your minds open and do your own research. I think you'll be amazed.
Posted by Rose on February 4,2013 | 10:02 PM
@Don I wonder why whenever we drill down into ice, to see what the air was like when it was trapped in the falling snow, we always see the CO2 levels have spiked dramatically in the last 200 years. http://zipcodezoo.com/Trends/Trends%20in%20Atmospheric%20Carbon%20Dioxide.asp When you consider that we create about 26 400 000 000 000 kg of CO2 per year that must be a rather large volcano that you are thinking about. Unfortunately for your theory Olympus Mons is on Mars and so probably does not affect our atmosphere. http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn11638-climate-myths-human-co2-emissions-are-too-tiny-to-matter.html While the human contribution to the total CO2 produced per year is not that large when compared with all biological processes. Our little nudge has pushed a stable system 30% further from its balance point than it has been in a half million years. So the question becomes what if we push the system to far and it topples into a new balance point. The problem is that no one really knows the answer. Which is why it is probably a good idea to do some research so we can make a better guess of how much trouble we are in. My best guess is that in the 1st world it will probably only mean a tightening of the belts (both proverbially and figuratively). In the 3rd world where people are living closer to the edge it probably means that lots of people will starve.
Posted by James on February 4,2013 | 01:24 PM
I like the article, but I was hoping an organization as vernerable as the Smithsonian wouldn't be ignorant enough to blame climate change on Man. I mean, ONE vulcano eruption releases more Co2 into the atmosphere than man has since he walked upright. At the VERY least, global warming, or manmade climate change, or whatever you call it now to make the facts fit your theory, is unquestionably unproven. It should no tbe presented as fact. WEAK.
Posted by Don McCoy on February 4,2013 | 11:21 AM
I can't help but be amused by the disturbing "fact" that we can see only 4% of the Universe. This may not be the case. Mathematician Donald Saari has derived a model that treats galaxies as though they are composed of rigid bodies (aka stars and planets) rather than as "star soup". This model doesn't account for all the matter we see--but it's likely that we see 90% of the universe, rather than 4%. Of course, this new model is rather controvertial: mathematicians and physicists tend to think it's reasonable, but astrophysicists tend to dislike it.
Posted by Alpheus on February 2,2013 | 01:05 AM
Why do so many Christians who disagree with everything written here still read the articles and comment? I'm just curious.
Posted by kiernan on January 29,2013 | 02:57 AM
According to the scientist in Programming Of Life by the scientist Johnson, Miano and Ortenzi evolution is operationally impossible. "Scientist generally consider anything with a probability of 1 in 10 to the 70 power operationally impossible." "The probability that life, a single cell, evolving by undirected natural processes is 1 in 10 to the 340,000,000 power." That's just one cell, think about it.
Posted by terrence on January 27,2013 | 09:37 PM
#10 is a bit odd, since we can see so little of the cosmos, of course we can't see most of it. If it dosen't glow radiation then it's invisible. I"d suggest replacing it with Hubbles' discovery that they Universe is expanding and the Discovery that it is doing so at an increading rate of speed. Not jsut big discoveries but, they also prove that Einstein's Relativity Theory is wrong, since Big Bangs violate it, and the expanding cosmose provs a Big Bang happend. Also, #9. Henry David Thoreau, was born and grew up during the Little Ice Age. You may hav heard of it, it lasted from approxiamately 1352 to 1855 AD. The COLDEST period of the Little Ice age was its last 60 years [1795 to 1855]. This period is known as the Mauder Minimum. It saw the coldest temperatures in Europe and Nothern America ever recorded by mankind. So yes girls, during the Little Ice Age's coldest period, spring did come later. However, never fear, the Little Ice Age ended, and the earth has gotten back to warming up as our planet gets nearer to the Sun do it it's wobbly orbit. A gift from that asteroid that smacked into the earth 65 milliion years ago and killed off the last of the surface dynosaurse.
Posted by Bill Masters on January 27,2013 | 01:11 PM
There are many eminent scientists alive today who will not and could not subscribe to Darwin's still unproven theories. These are taught in schools as facts. I can tell you why: We have rebelled against our Creator and will do/say/believe anything rather than have Him rule over us. In Six Days is a book I have heard about, love to read it soon, unfortunately haven't got it yet so content myself with the greatest Book of all
Posted by Maureen Leigh on January 23,2013 | 10:01 AM
Up until 8 some of the facts seemed credible, and plausible and although some of these facts are true, once a problem is found the rest of the hypothesis crumbles down regardless of whether the rest is true or not. " 8. Cultures throughout history and around the world have engaged in ritual human sacrifice. ... after sacred Mayan ballgames, the losing team was sometimes sacrificed." Check your facts here, I was born in Mexico, I was born in a family that travelled a lot in Mexico before traveling outside of it. I have probably gone to 90% of the most common ruins for Aztecs and Mayan cultures, as well as a great amount of non common ones. Ball players in Latin America I.e. Mayans, Aztecs, sacrificed the winners of the ball games. Not the losers. It was a great honor to win and be sacrificed. Your article may have started very nicely redacted with credible facts and to ignorant people it may all be good sport. But this kind of misinformation is what will keep us from ever knowing what is true and what is fiction/lies.
Posted by Latin Lover on January 17,2013 | 12:40 AM
+ View All Comments