The Ten Most Disturbing Scientific Discoveries
Scientists have come to some surprising conclusions about the world and our place in it. Are some things just better left unknown?
- By Laura Helmuth
- Smithsonian.com, May 14, 2010, Subscribe
(Page 3 of 3)
It’s hard to tell fact from fiction when it comes to this particularly gruesome custom. Ritual sacrifice is described in the Bible, Greek mythology and the Norse sagas, and the Romans accused many of the people they conquered of engaging in ritual sacrifice, but the evidence was thin. A recent accumulation of archaeological findings from around the world shows that it was surprisingly common for people to ritually kill—and sometimes eat—other people.
9. We’ve already changed the climate for the rest of this century.
The mechanics of climate change aren’t that complex: we burn fossil fuels; a byproduct of that burning is carbon dioxide; it enters the atmosphere and traps heat, warming the surface of the planet. The consequences are already apparent: glaciers are melting faster than ever, flowers are blooming earlier (just ask Henry David Thoreau), and plants and animals are moving to more extreme latitudes and altitudes to keep cool.
Even more disturbing is the fact that carbon dioxide lingers in the atmosphere for hundreds of years. We have just begun to see the effects of human-induced climate change, and the predictions for what’s to come range from dire to catastrophic.
10. The universe is made of stuff we can barely begin to imagine.
Everything you probably think of when you think of the universe—planets, stars, galaxies, black holes, dust—makes up just 4 percent of whatever is out there. The rest comes in two flavors of “dark,” or unknown stuff: dark matter, at 23 percent of the universe, and dark energy, at a whopping 73 percent:
Scientists have some ideas about what dark matter might be—exotic and still hypothetical particles—but they have hardly a clue about dark energy. … University of Chicago cosmologist Michael S. Turner ranks dark energy as “the most profound mystery in all of science.”
The effort to solve it has mobilized a generation of astronomers in a rethinking of physics and cosmology to rival and perhaps surpass the revolution Galileo inaugurated on an autumn evening in Padua. … [Dark energy] has inspired us to ask, as if for the first time: What is this cosmos we call home?
But astronomers do know that, thanks to these dark parts, the universe is expanding. And not only expanding, but expanding faster and faster. Ultimately, everything in the universe will drift farther and farther apart until the universe is uniformly cold and desolate. The world will end in a whimper.
Subscribe now for more of Smithsonian's coverage on history, science and nature.









Comments (237)
+ View All Comments
Umm, there's clearly a correlation between CO2 levels and global temperature. The global (historical) sea-surface temperature curve indeed matches the historical CO2 curve (as measured in ice-cores). However, if CO2 were the cause of global temperature changes, the CO2 curve would preceded the sea-surface temperature curve. It does not (it follows it). Think about a soda. Warm up the soda and CO2 bubbles exit the drink. Cool down the soda and it absorbs CO2. This is what the ocean is doing - reacting to global temperature, which means Science hasn't proven that we've done anything to the climate for the next century ... which is why the claim "human caused climate change is unresovled" is true.
Posted by William T. on April 22,2013 | 03:38 PM
There is no record of 'sati,' the custom of burying a pharaoh's retainers and favorites alive with him, since the first few pharaohs of Egypt's First Dynasty, some 4,800 years ago. The practice, also discovered under the ruins of Ur in modern Iraq, didn't last there, either. Even absolute rulers couldn't enforce this level of obedience after their deaths. After all, the ones in the best positions to put these commands into effect would be the same ones who died in the process. And, as North Korea's Kim Jong On is now discovering, getting rid of all of your predecessor's top people isn't the best recipe for a long and successful rule.
Posted by allan on April 5,2013 | 09:36 PM
Alright, I like this article a lot. Especially number 4 - I've been sharing this tidbit with any friend willing to listen. However, one friend brought up the point that kept us... debating for awhile. He claims that this is, while interesting and plausible, total conjecture, and that one cannot actually prove that "human taste preferences evolved during times of scarcity." We have, so far, agreed to disagree, but I would like to follow up. What research or proof can support the above claim? I appreciate any input.
Posted by Ally on March 19,2013 | 08:13 PM
#10 If as you state we are expanding faster and faster then in time we will be moving fast enough to be going back in time. Now tell me how this is possible. It can not be both ways at the same time. At a point of that time we will be at a resonate point where we will say oh I am getting younger no older no younger, but at that point in time we will be going back in time so we will have no clue that we were there before.If we are expanding faster and faster in regards to what. Yes our population in whole are getting bigger bellies. Are you saying our universe is expanding. If that is true how long will it be before the sun is so far from us that we can not see it. Maybe you are saying that no the sun is moving with us as we expand. Maybe it is time that is expanding or is it someones head.
Posted by tom on March 14,2013 | 01:21 PM
"Our ape ancestry conflicts with every culture’s creation myth and isn’t particularly intuitive, but everything we’ve learned since then—in biology, geology, genetics, paleontology, even chemistry and physics—supports his great insight." The above statement from the article is a bold-faced lie. Many, many discoveries contradict the evolutionary model, and require twisting of the facts, speculation, special pleading, etc to make it fit into the evolution paradigm. I guess the writer of this article is, like most people, unaware of the mountain of evidence that contradicts evolutionism, and should take the time to read the "Evolution cruncher" book or its companion website http://www.evolutionfacts.com/ where you will read of this evidence, as well as hundreds of quotes by evolutionary scientists themselves expressing dismay and confusion dissatisfaction about their own evolutionary theories. The debate between creationism and evolutionism may rage on for a while yet, but the alleged conclusiveness of evolutionism is far from true but merely wishful thinking on the part of those who just cannot accept the alternative.
Posted by Henry Velthuizen on March 12,2013 | 05:32 PM
I really like knowin about the Science discoveries. The ten most disturbin discoveries, I've found them really informative. I already knew some of them but had been wantin to know rest of them as well.. Thanks loads!
Posted by Ayesha Qureshi on March 5,2013 | 08:38 AM
This article was rather poorly written and researched. For one, climate change is a VERY complex interrelationship of influences(see #10 for a clue if you want one). The article also makes specific presumptions about the readership, which I resent - and I'm not even a scientist. I expected better from Smithsonian.
Posted by Jon Snow on February 24,2013 | 04:54 PM
Umm... we are not apes. We (and apes) evolved from a common ape-like ancestor. Now give me my bannana.
Posted by Brian on February 21,2013 | 12:51 AM
I'm no expert on the field of cosmology but I thought that according to Hubble's Law the universe was expanding uniformly such that everywhere was the centre of the universe. So if that is the case then the Earth is the centre of the universe....it's just it's not the only centre. Maybe someone who knows more on the subject could explain that better or tell me i'm wrong.
Posted by Alan Laing on February 8,2013 | 05:27 PM
Why do so many Christians who disagree with everything written here still read the articles and comment? I'm just curious. Posted by kiernan on January 29,2013 | 02:57 AM Kierman, Its because those who agree with certain aspects of this article are most likely NOT Christians. What about death? Is the E.T. dead too? Therefore, the answer to this question comes from the One who Fashioned us for this very purpose: 20 We are therefore Christ’s ambassadors, as though God were making his appeal through us. We implore you on Christ’s behalf: Be reconciled to God. 2 Corinthians 5 New International Version (NIV) Awaiting the New Body 5 For we know that if the earthly tent we live in is destroyed, we have a building from God, an eternal house in heaven, not built by human hands. 2 Meanwhile we groan, longing to be clothed instead with our heavenly dwelling, 3 because when we are clothed, we will not be found naked. 4 For while we are in this tent, we groan and are burdened, because we do not wish to be unclothed but to be clothed instead with our heavenly dwelling, so that what is mortal may be swallowed up by life.5 Now the one who has fashioned us for this very purpose is God, who has given us the Spirit as a deposit, guaranteeing what is to come.
Posted by Jeff on February 7,2013 | 08:38 PM
Darwin? Darwin did you say? Poppycock and feathers, I say. Be off with him already!
Posted by Thom McCan on February 7,2013 | 07:46 AM
E=mc² is from Poincaré
Posted by bud on February 7,2013 | 05:05 AM
I'd like to think that dark matter and dark energy will, somehow, become sufficiently understood that they can be a solution to some of our problems.
Posted by Nicholas on February 6,2013 | 09:18 PM
My Question: Will the melting of Arctic ice change the balance of the world? Will it wobble? Will it move? Will the changing of the seasons be gradually altered by this? Will Chinese, Thorium LFTR and Thorium fission technologies really "Alter The Gobal Energy Maps Forever"?
Posted by Uncle B on February 6,2013 | 09:12 PM
+ View All Comments